Welcome!

Hello, JORJKIE.AV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 16:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop capitalizing things. They are supposed to be lowercase per wikipedia guidelines. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I too have to suggest that you read WP:MOS before you continue making edits as you have been doing. Randomly capitalizing things and changing & times; and ;&dash goes against MOS and is disrupting editing. Greekboy (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you PLEASE stop separating the opening paragraph and randomly bold-ing it? There is no need from that, and the random bold-ing does not follow WP:MOS. Greekboy (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Greekboy (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Anna Vissi. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you.Greekboy (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anna Vissi. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Orderinchaos 22:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the warning above, and after reviewing continuing edits, I have blocked you for 24 hours for edit warring. Orderinchaos 15:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty obvious that you are the same person who was behind the dynamic IPs which caused enough disruption at Anna Vissi related articles to have them all semi-protected. While creating an account to get around semi-protection is not in itself a violation of policy, continuing these WP:MOS violating editing sprees will not be tolerated. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for resumption of edit warring on Template:Anna Vissi, Anna Vissi and other related pages. You have repeatedly ignored warnings about violating the WP:MOS and have refused to engage in discussion. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will make clear now that after this block expires it is last chance saloon. If you resume edit warring and other disruptive behaviour after the block has expired, you will re-blocked indefinitely. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You still seem to be behaving in the same way - silently edit warring with no attempt to discuss: example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4, and example 5. If this behaviour continues, I will carry out the indefinite block. Camaron · Christopher · talk 18:07, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to silently edit war on Anna Vissi related pages despite many warnings and two blocks. Clearly temporary blocks and warnings are not going to work. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Camaron · Christopher · talk 12:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would be willing to immediately unblock you if you agree on this talk page (you can still edit it while blocked) to (a) seize edit warring on Anna Vissi related pages, (b) be willing to discuss your proposed changes on the appropriate article talk page such as Talk:Anna Vissi, and (c) accept the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and other polices and guidelines and try to follow them while editing articles. Camaron · Christopher · talk 12:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]