Archives

Archive 1

Hi, @EytanMelech, thanks for creating Akademia Nasionala del Ladino. You created the article on 6 July. Any interest in submitting the article for WP:DYK before 13 July? Longhornsg (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would love the article to be submitted, but I have no idea what fact I would do for it. EytanMelech (talk) 14:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something like this:

• ... that the Akademia Nasionala del Ladino in Israel is dedicated to preserving the Judaeo-Spanish language, which has an estimated 130,000 speakers worldwide? [1] [2]

Sounds great! I'll submit it! EytanMelech (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help improvements. Thanks you. 2402:800:6344:6610:E9CA:3119:3C88:9387 (talk) 03:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Có vẻ như bài viết đã rất rõ ràng. Tại sao bạn lại đến gặp một nhóm người ở đây và yêu cầu họ đồng loạt chỉnh sửa cho bạn? EytanMelech (talk) 03:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The IP spammed messages like this to a couple of dozen user talk pages. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaim Tzvi Schneerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Mordechai of Liakhovichi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Greetings! I trust you're having a wonderful day. I wanted to express my gratitude for your valuable contribution to Wikipedia through your article. I'm delighted to inform you that your article has successfully met Wikipedia's guidelines, and as a result, I have reviewed and marked it accordingly. Wishing you and your family a fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! EytanMelech (talk) 02:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Levantine Synagogue. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thank you creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 17:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! EytanMelech (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ask based on your work on Nicole Gelinas. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today might not be a great day to work on it, but i'll see what I can do, thanks! EytanMelech (talk) 02:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No rush. It's been sitting in draft space for years. BD2412 T 03:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Akademia Nasionala del Ladino, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Akademia Nasionala del Ladino in Israel is dedicated to preserving the Judaeo-Spanish language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Akademia Nasionala del Ladino. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Akademia Nasionala del Ladino), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sacerio. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lightoil (talk) 08:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Fails the requirements of WP:DISAMBIG only relates to a single Wikipedia article. Noting Geneanet is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacerio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EytanMelech. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think our edits are bit clashing, I mistakenly reversed your edits while saving other edits Mindthem (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I merged our edits together. Sorry for the clash, I didn't realize somebody else was editing at the moment. EytanMelech (talk) 16:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay noted Mindthem (talk) 16:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged this as G7 (author request), although you haven't even edited the page before. Did you mean to use a different CSD? Cheers, Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, the page was blanked by the actual author of the contents of the article, V.B.Speranza, following a deletion discussion. You can check his comment in the edit history of the page. EytanMelech (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought they didn't create the redirect. But it has been deleted, so I can't check the page history anymore. Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech,

Thank you for creating Rocco Reed.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Looking at the references on the page and a quick search online, I do not believe this is going to be notable. While references exist, they are mainly him talking about his life.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand that most of my sources are his talking about his life. I haven't been comfortable going through pornographic sources because I don't want that in my search history. Today I might try to go through his pages on the Italian, Turkish, Russian, and Spanish wiki pages and look for already used sources that I can use regarding his field of work. I don't think he has an article in 7 other languages for no reason. EytanMelech (talk) 10:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EytanMelech:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article of lists doesn't demonstrate notability. A collection of museum identifiers also fits into What Wikipedia is not at WP:NOTDATABASE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Ugaritic texts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 19:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever received any emails directing you to a discussion on Wikipedia asking you to participate? nableezy - 14:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EytanMelech. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has anybody emailed you asking you to make an edit or vote in a AFD or RFC? nableezy - 15:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nableezy! No, I have not been astroturfed or persuaded by anybody to vote a specific way on any AfD or RfC. Thanks for checking in! Keep up the good work. EytanMelech (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Jihad Shehadeh. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Fouad Abu Butihan. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Bițu Fălticineanu. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you have a chance, it might be a good idea for you to sign and date the comment you left in the RfC. I had to put an "unsigned" template on it. IIf you have the opportunity to do, please be sure to put the date and time you left the comment originally. Cheers, Coretheapple (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! I don't know how I forgot. Sorrry! EytanMelech (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Easy to forget to sign. Coretheapple (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your excellent work on Romanian Sephardim. I've been interested in improving content related to Central and Eastern European Sephardim for some time now. I've created cats and sub-cats for German, Swiss, Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian Sephardim. Hopefully we can one day see cats for Sephardi culture in Russia and Ukraine and sub-cats for Czech, Slovak, and Hungarian Sephardim. I haven't looked very closely into the Sephardi history of Lithuania / the Baltic region, Belarus, Moldova, or Slovenia. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 13:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I was happy to make those articles. EytanMelech (talk) 14:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't much yet, but I've begun the article for Sephardic Jews in Hungary. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 04:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pearl Berg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Berg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Interstellarity (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Francis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Francis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Interstellarity (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brady Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quentin Newcomer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Newcomer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KoiKoi Nelligan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KoiKoi Nelligan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casilda Benegas Gallego and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 20:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Yitzhak Avigdor Orenstein. ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. Happy new year!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EytanMelech,

There are currently motions at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions § Motions: PIA Canvassing regarding an ongoing effort by one or more banned editors to canvass discussions within the Israel-Palestine topic area and asking for proxy edits to promote a pro-Israel point of view.

One of the motions proposes indefinitely banning you from the English Wikipedia for participation in the effort. Statements and evidence submissions are welcome at the above link, or by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org if information cannot be posted publicly.

For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:EytanMelech, I'll message you here since it is really inconvenient to message you on the arbitration page due to the restrictions there. I want to help you, as I feel bad about what seems to be a very annoying situation. I think it's really unfortunate and unfair that, for an unclear reason, ARBCOM refusing to provide information on which specific edits they consider problematic. For the life of me, I cannot understand how this could be considered a fair procedure. However, I think you can narrow down the list of candidates to the articles mentioned in the 'General facts' section and cross-reference those with the messages you received from Fagerbakke, if you kept all of them. Marokwitz (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how many I kept, but I have a ready list of 13 different email chains that I have where I didn't make any edits by either making excuses or not replying to the email. I offered to send them to ToBeFree, but he has already made up his mind and has declined to see my evidence. This is devestating to me. I have nearly 6k edits and Wikipedia has been one of my happy places since my Mom's death in October (brain cancer). I am hoping so much that when the other ArbCom members vote, they may see reason, but in the case that they do not, I am going to make rounds with other Wikipedians I am friendly with and say goodbye on their talk pages in case I am permanently banned for stuff that I haven't been shown evidence for. EytanMelech (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that. I believe you. It's possible that someone might be trying to frame you with fake emails, but I guess we'll never be able to prove it due to the so-called "privacy issues." Since ArbCom's task is not to punish but to prevent, perhaps you could negotiate a plea bargain with them in return for a reduced sentence, as humiliating as it may be to plead guilty. Marokwitz (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a feeling since I have already denied allegations and, as Wikipediocracy put it, kept my stance when tobefree played "Good Cop", there's no plea bargain. There isn't even a place for negotiation, it's support, oppose, and abstain. EytanMelech (talk) 12:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Highway 333 (Israel). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I forgot to put the template in. Will do so next time. EytanMelech (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Shmuel Slavin. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Struś coat of arms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zenepe Pirani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Sugar Zaza. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EytanMelech, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sugar Zaza, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Zaza.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding PIA Canvassing

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding PIA Canvassing

Thanks for your contributions to Lämel School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and Ref 1, 6, 8 are the only valid references. The rest are non-rs. Needs updated to rereference the article.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 13:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sacerio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a heads up that I merged this article to List of Brazilian supercentenarians#Biographies per WP:N. As I said in my edit summary I am all for more articles for supercentenarians, but in her case information is sparse. You may want to userfy the page to work on it some more? Maybe you can find additional information? I'm just not seeing how it passes our notability guideline at this point. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was:

Recent afd indicated that this person is not clearing the notability criteria, which was in 2018. And no new sources after 2018 are being presented in the article, which I think is enough to decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Misao Okawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

zoglophie^•talk• 08:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak)) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak)) until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Ugaritic texts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Yakubovskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Yakubovskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Killing of Yuval Castleman. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, North8000,

I guess you didn't notice that this editor is indefinitely banned. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: No I didn't....was just commenting on the article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on Abraham Adgeh. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:YouTubers of Jewish descent has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Casilda Benegas Gallego, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jerusalem Archaeological Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lämel School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EytanMelech. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jerusalem Archaeological Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Broome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Broome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 19:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish businesspeople has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked your account as your ban has been lifted following your appeal to ArbCom. Welcome back, and feel free to ask me if you need anything to help you return to the community. An announcement will be posted to WP:ACN shortly. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee unbans EytanMelech following a successful appeal of his site ban. His topic ban from the Arab–Israeli conflict remains in force.

Support: Aoidh, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree

Oppose:

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § EytanMelech unbanned

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Misao Okawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lämel School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ada Verdun Howell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear @EytanMelech. I want you to know that I'm so glad you're back (I just found out). You’re very welcome. And thank you for creating some of the articles I requested. Askhaiz (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Glad to be back. EytanMelech (talk) 15:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Welcome back. Andre🚐 06:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks! EytanMelech (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you recently created the page Yitzhak Shamir Road by translating the Hebrew Wikipedia's version of the article. You added the transplated page template to the talk, but under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license, you need to provide attribution in your edit summaries on the article, not its talk page. Please read the instructions at WP:TFOLWP and follow them going forward. I've fixed the attribution for you on Yitzhak Shamir Road. Thanks! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1808 establishments in Poland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz

Someone removed Przedmieście Oławskie from the category, but I don't fully understand their reasoning from the edit description. Is it okay for me to add it back?

EytanMelech (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If text lacks RS support, it is OR. It is incumbent on the person adding the text to add such support, not on others. If it is deleted, it is incumbent on them to add it with inline RS citations, per wp:burden. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Elizabeth Francis, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 06:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]