Hello Infoman99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up on my page about NCSY. But I do not want a three times revert fight. This is one of the cases where I need another person to help and to also bring in an administator. I originaly added lots of stuff, some pro and some con and some neutral but nothing stays. I put see also USY and NIFTY but that keeps getting removed. I also added the very pro "famous people associated with NCSY" Aryeh Kaplan, Pinhas Stopler et al The anon IP (each time a similar number) is only intersted in the "fun stuff" Now what??--Jayrav 03:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): That block is probably an appropriate and necessary one, but since you have an established track record with no trouble, I'm going to grant you IP block exemption, which means you will be able to edit even though the IP is blocked. Request handled by: Mangojuicetalk 14:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Infoman99 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have forwarded your request to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Unblock. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoman99, I'm puzzled by this request, since you already have the IP Block Exempt permission. The block on the proxy is very old; it was placed in February 2006. Please try to edit User:Infoman99/Sandbox and hit the 'Save page' button. If you get an error message when you try this, please copy the entire text of the error message here. You won't be able to edit with the above IP address, only with your registered account Infoman99. (So when you try this, be sure you are logged in). EdJohnston (talk) 13:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're able to edit fine now. I've removed the unblock request since no action was taken. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 16:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you two. Looks like I had somehow logged out before trying my initial edits. Infoman99 (talk) 16:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Schmooz-a-Palooza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your hang-on tag. I followed the redirect, which did not relate to the article redirected too. Hence the deletion. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-R3}} (misnomer) would have done if you feel A3 is inappropriate, although in my view the cooment in WP:CSD relating to A3 is not meant to cover redirects which are intrinsically sense-free. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article and removed the tags. It took quite a lot of time for both of us; please be careful to ensure that redirects make sense. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In {{Organized Jewish life in the United States}}, you list Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Alpha Mu, Zeta Beta Tau, Alpha Epsilon Phi, and Sigma Delta Tau as college organizations. In fact only two of those five (AEPi and AEPhi) are still Jewish organization according to their websites and other sources. The others are only historically Jewish. I'd like to remove ZBT, SAM, and SDT but I wanted to check with you first. Let me know your thoughts on this. Thank you. --Mblumber (talk) 05:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mblumber, thanks for the heads-up on what you were thinking. I went back and forth on this myself. As you noted, there are several fraternities/sororities that are historically Jewish but currently are not officially so. However, they tend to occupy a treasured place in the mind of the American Jewish community. For an example of this as it relates to Zeta Beta Tau, browse through this Google Books listing. Also, significant portions of the membership of their chapters tend to be Jewish and the organizations are involved in a number of Jewishly-natured activities. (See, for example, this university chapter FAQ page at the "What is the Jewish aspect of ZBT?" question discussing membership and programming, ZBT's own national page on Jewish programming, and a campus Chabad page discussing joint activities with ZBT. There is also this fraternity national official's quote in a college newspaper article: "We remain a largely Jewish organization today, and will always be one."). My feeling is that the presence of significant Jewish membership/involvement, historical official links to the American Jewish community, and a strong fondness in the Jewish community for these organizations' roots are sufficient to place them within the perceived organized American Jewish community. (Although I would definitely welcome more discussion on this.) Thank you again for bringing this up. I also have to say that your note was one of the more polite ones I've encountered on Wikipedia. -- Infoman99 (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Way too many discussions end up in argements on here, and it's no fun. So, to your point, I would argue that there are many fraternities that can claim to have historically been focused on Christianity, most notably LXA and AXP which have chosen to open up to everyone. These days few would consider them "christian fraternities". The same applies to SAM and ZBT. Although they do have significant Jewish membership, their current national mission is not a Jewish one. They're fraternities with Jews, not Jewish fraternities. They don't have active partnerships with Chabad and Hillel like AEPi and AEPhi do. We should focus on the current state of affairs, and as such there is only one Jewish fraternity and one Jewish sorority. --Mblumber (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1) What would your feelings be on distinguishing the "currently Jewish" fraternities/sororities from the historical?

For example, the row could read:

College Organizations

Hillel · KOACH · KESHER · KEDMA · Alpha Epsilon Pi · (Historically Jewish: Sigma Alpha Mu · Zeta Beta Tau · Alpha Epsilon Phi · Sigma Delta Tau)

I think that would relieve the concerns you raised, while also taking into consideration some of the thoughts I mentioned. Or maybe you can think of similar wording that would help clarify the difference?

I have a whole bunch of other, more complex thoughts about this, but I don't even think I need to bring it up, since this compromise or something similar could resolve it.

2) Google searches of both the AEPhi and SDT websites lead to pages noting the Jewish origins of their founders, their support for Jewish philanthropies, and the Jewish community leadership roles of their alumnae. The only difference seems to be AEPhi's mission statement, which mentions in a roundabout way "the vision of [their] Jewish founders." I'm not sure that's enough to distinguish the two. Newspaper articles about their local chapters also vary greatly in this regard. So I think the fate of AEPhi's listing should be the same for SDT. -- Infoman99 (talk) 22:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Made the change. Great doing business with you. --Mblumber (talk) 22:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. Thanks for the great attitude.--Infoman99 (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but oy!, what a massacre. I had to go back to 17:11, 2 May 2005 for a version that I could be certain didn't include vast blocks of history taken from history sections on the BBG website. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're welcome. I only revert vandalism because it is the right thing ti do. If you want you should make a user page. Thanks for appriciating my work. --Nascar1996 20:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you de-alphabetized the newspapers in the template. Can you put them back in order. Or let me know why you changed the order?

Also, I don't know that I will get to them anytime soon, but some other Jewish papers that may be worthy of a wiki article are:[1][2]

• The Jewish News in Michigan
• B'nai Brith Messenger and Sentinel in Chicago
• Hadassah Magazine
• B'nai Brith's National Jewish Monthly
• Midstream (magazine)
• Judaism (magazine)
• Tradition (magazine)
• Jewish Spectator
• The Jewish Bulletin of Northern California

Hi Epeefleche -

First, thanks for your additions of Jewish Sports Review and New Jersey Jewish News to the media category on the template (and the other newspapers added recently).

Here's the long explanation for why the template isn't in a simple alphabetical order. Overall, I designed the template as an aid to those seeking to understand the spectrum of major Jewish entities in the United States and the ways they are interconnected. As an interpretive guide, the template is not merely a rote listing, but offers nuance and an inherent sense of relative status among the entitites. For example:

• the religious denominational bodies are listed in terms of popularly perceived observance level/halachic strictness
• the youth groups are listed in both terms of length of history, membership numbers, and long-term connections to the community (BBYO first, Young Judaea last) but also observance levels of their parent bodies (NCSY, then USY/Kadima, then NFTY)
• the policy organizations/Federal liaisons are in a mixed list that emphasizes their official standing (Conference of Presidents is the official umbrella political body for Federal purposes and is listed first), roots (JCPA oversees the JCRCs and they are grouped together), purposes (NJDC and RJC grouped together because of same mission of reaching out to Jews on behalf of the political parties -- and near the end of the list because of their recent origins), and connection in popular thought (the two AJCs are frequently confused and are subject of regular merger talks but are grouped near the beginning because of their long histories).

In other words, ask a typical, somewhat-active member of the American Jewish community to name X number of organizations that do Z task, and this list should roughly mirror the real-life answer you'll get and the ways that people mentally group together these entities.

Until about 20 years ago, newspapers were strongly tied to particular geographic areas. The geography greatly affected their readership numbers (e.g., Philadelphia having a greater overall/Jewish population than, say, Memphis). It also factored into their competitiveness with any other papers in their cities and the positions they staked out. This should be reflected in the category. Likewise, the relative importance, standing, readership, and history of newspapers within a geographic area should be reflected.

The New York area papers have enjoyed the greatest readership, impact, and length of history of the Jewish papers. (Clearly due to the Jewish population in the area, its density, and its centrality in US Jewish life and trends.) Within the NY papers, I would guess that the official voice of the UJA-Federation, the Jewish Week, has a greater readership than the Forward -- although the Forward has arguably had a greater political role/impact in its lifespan. The relative newcomer, the NY Jewish Press, apparently has a fairly large subscriber base because of its focus on NY Haredi issues.

In general, an east-to-west listing of the major city Jewish newspapers (with Boston after NY) seems to naturally take into account a mix of age/historical readership totals/size of current Jewish population in city. Hard subscriber numbers are difficult to find for many of these publications, so these rough estimates would seem to be good stand-bys.

The two non-city-specific papers, Hamodia and Yated Ne'eman, are grouped together last because of their unique non-geographic focus.

I welcome your input, especially in terms of relative status of the papers in the cities and if you know of hard numbers on current/historical total readership for the papers, or other (scholarly or not) analyses that rank the papers in terms of importance.

Again, I appreciate your additions and any thoughts you might have.

Infoman99 (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. Nice work on the template. You can respond here, btw, without need for a talkback -- I will watch you page till we have finished our conversation.

I will limit my conversation mainly to the media, though I expect some of my comments could apply as well to the others.

First, as this is an encyclopedia, I believe any listing should have a NPOV rationale that -- if one accepts the rationale -- all agree on, and that is (to use a wiki word) " verifiable". To stray outside those bounds on any list on wikipedia introduces the possibility that the editor's point of view (a no-no as a guiding force on wiki) may direct the order in the list. And that the editor's list may rely on "original research" -- another no-no.

Alpha order would appear to me to be the most NPOV. It was also appear to be the most logical. Other lists commonly follow that format. Another editor looking at the list can easily determine how it is ordered. A subsequent editor can easily determine where a new insert would slide in. There is zero ambiguity.

Your listing method, in contrast, lacks many of these characteristics. It does not suggest to the new editor coming upon it what order it follows. The specific order is open to debate -- some New Yorkers would put the Forward way ahead of the Jewish Press, while others would do the opposite without question. It requires one to wade through the entire list to see if a paper you are looking for is there.

There are -- if one could find them, other indicia that would be non-ambiguous as well as alpha order. The year of first publication (though readers would not know that was the criteria, unless you listed it, and I think it less helpful than alpha order). The readership numbers (same).

As to wiki standards in this regard, please see this guideline. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your 3rd opinion at talk:Western Betrayal, it was very thorough and obviously you spent time on it. Your time and work are appreciated. Leidseplein (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the third opinion.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 12:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings informan99 user, seeing the current situation of the article is necessary structural change but I think I was misunderstood. Explain what happened to constructive ideas for adding new participants and also to follow the WP: SUMARY:

1 Origin of the denomination

2 History

The origin of the Diablada is a matter of dispute between the countries of Peru and Bolivia.^[1] Three main locations exist for the possible origin of the dance. These places are:

• Juli, Peru: The Diablada would have been introduced in 1576 to the native Lupakas people of Juli, located near Lake Titicaca in the Altiplano of present-day Puno, Peru; and from there it allegedly spread to other parts of the Spanish domain in the Americas.^[2]
• Oruro, Bolivia: The 2001 proclamation of the Carnaval de Oruro as one of the Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity by the UNESCO suggested that this dance had roots in the ancient dance of the Llama llama in worship of the Uru god Tiw. This used to take place in the ancient location where the modern Oruro, Bolivia is nowadays, which was a sacred place for the Urus.^[3]
• Potosí, Bolivia: The dance could have had its beginnings in another city of modern-day Bolivia, such as in the city of Potosí, back then a miner's settlement during the Spanish conquest, from where it later spread to Oruro and other parts of the Altiplano.^[4]

During the evangelism of the natives, the missionaries instilled the Christian paradigm of good and evil by teaching them their theatrical dance which was a representation of the seven deadly sins that concluded with the victory of the angels over the demons (which is how the costumes of angels and demons became associated with the dance). Ultimately, the result was a fusion between Spanish and Andean culture in the Altiplano as the original dance taught by the Jesuit missionaries adopted Andean elements.

The Diablada' represents a mixture between Christianity and Andean religions that goes as far back as 1538, where in the mines of Aullagas (in northern Potosí) the natives adopted Christian religious figures and adapted them to their indigenous religious visions.^[4] The dance eventually became part of a series of Christian religious festivities, most prominently during the celebrations to the Virgin of Candelaria (also known as the Virgin of Socavón).^[4] These Christian rituals replaced the old Andean beliefs and mythology, and the festivities changed from honouring what were considered "pagan" gods to that of honouring Christian saints and God. Over the years, the Diablada has developed uniquely in various regions of South America, which has led to variations such as the Diablada Puneña and the Diablada of Oruro.

3 Dance

4 Choreography

5 Music

6 Regional variations

7 Reinvindication movements

8 See also

Would move more data history subtitle to the article "History of the Diablada" and so the data only leave the dance for better reading.--Nair (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother again, I wanted to ask for an opinion about this picture:

I know it is forbidden according to the Wikipedia a primary source because this is based on sources to create their articles, this image was made according to the current wording of Article diablada marshall user does not exist in any verifiable source by any historian, researcher , anthropologist, government, institution, etc. showing this picture and would be a work of such user's own research, which wikipedia does not allow. I wanted to know your opinion about this. Thanks --Nair (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image is sourced. I already explained this to you in more than one (good) way. Creating a historical map for Wikipedia is like contributing in the written portion of the article. All of the parts that need sources (the origin locations) are sourced. The Altiplano region does not need source, neither do the country borders/shapes, because that is common knowledge. Also, please focus on using talk pages for notifications; if your complaint is relevant to the article, it would be nice if you posted it on the talk page of the article. Best regards.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 23:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Manticore 21:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infoman99. You have new messages at Talk:Fleet Admiral (United_States)#Revision removing information about rank insignia and relative ranks vis-a-vis General of the Army.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Manticore 16:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at 96.232.126.111's talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Face mask (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pregaming, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Last call and Century Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommy Thompson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philip Morris and The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spiro Agnew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommy Thompson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White House Jewish Liaison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JTA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Education in the Crown dependencies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <ref name=Gundara>World Yearbook of Education 1997: Intercultural Education. Jagdish Gundara, ed. ("They are Crown Dependencies[...]. Their powers over education are limited in effect because of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matzo Ball may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Dreidel, Christmas Eve Heebonism and Jewjitsu in Palm Springs'', LA Weekly, December 28, 2009]]</ref> In Denver, the local Heebonism event had its origin as a private [[pregaming|pre-party]] for

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the purposes of whether an article is "categorized" or not, no, they're not. "Stub" categories aren't really meant for user browsing purposes, but rather group articles by a maintenance state — and the template is meant to eventually be removed from an article. Even if it has 10,000 stub templates on it which are all transcluding stub categories, it's still uncategorized if it doesn't have at least one real "end user" content category declared directly on it in the [[Category:Blah blah]] format. Bearcat (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matzo Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernini (fashion), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MGM Grand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cohens v. Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Lottery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moscow–Washington hotline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eyes Only. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matzo Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottsdale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Matzo Ball page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mad Dogs (U.S. TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thriller and Chris Cole. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there; if you going to create a dab page, could you go ahead and do it and deal with any incoming links? There's not much point having the "better" title redirect to a disambiguated one. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infoman99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPhone 8. Since you had some involvement with the IPhone 8 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping us fill in vital gaps on Wikipedia by writing articles like Children_of_Time_(novel).

Sadads (talk) 03:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infoman99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Hill

White House Jewish Liaison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infoman99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matzo Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assimilation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Soviet nationality law.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 15:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Street box - Stormtrooper with a remembrance poppy - stencil (2016).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TN status, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Codification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Croatian nationality law. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iberosphere. Since you had some involvement with the Iberosphere redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TV app. Since you had some involvement with the TV app redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on DVD player; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I've noted at Talk:DVD player# Clean up and modernization of article, your posting above to my personal talk page violates the guidance of the WP:EDITWAR policy: "Avoid posting a generic warning template if you are actively involved in the edit war yourself". Infoman99 (talk) 21:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Infoman99 reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: ). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page WP:THREADs follow WP:LISTGAP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IPad (2020), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zoom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. This is not a criticism of any of your edits SMP0328. (talk) 03:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple TV+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Immigration Act 1971, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hostile environment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Roku OS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

<blockquote>{{db-afc-move|1=Draft:Roku_OS}}</blockquote>

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qcne (talk) 20:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Top-shelf liquor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15 § Top-shelf liquor until a consensus is reached. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hebrew Home for the Aged has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § Hebrew Home for the Aged until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]