The Original Barnstar
	Kurdistan Region-PKK conflict is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First ever barnstar, thank you!!! Xaneqînî (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Rawandiz massacre is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are huge mistakes about topics in Turkists of Izmit and Gebze.

In reference there is nothing about "protest in Ankara" but you keep writing it.

"Kemalism" and "Anti-Islamism" is not related with these groups.

You also removed "Pan-Turanist" organisations.

Leader of these groups are NOT Member Parliament. They were MP candidate for Victory Party on 2023 election.

It seems you can't translate Turkish. I will keep editing. Nasadakimasa (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In reference there is nothing about "protest in Ankara" but you keep writing it.

• Yeah, upon reading it I confused Sabri Yalım parkı with Ankara which was mentioned in it.

"Kemalism" and "Anti-Islamism" is not related with these groups.

• They admire ataturk and believe in all the 6 principles, also yes they are Anti-Islamist (anti-islamism is NOT anti-islam, its just anti political islam), in the source they literally spoke about how they forgot about turkmens and uyghurs by “playing a muhajireen and ansar role”

You also removed "Pan-Turanist" organisations.

• Mistake, it happens while reverting

Leader of these groups are NOT Member Parliament. They were MP candidate for Victory Party on 2023 election.

• Yeah you’re right

Xaneqînî (talk) 23:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah right. "Islamism" = "Political Islam" so "Anti Islamism" is accurate.

Kemalism is not about just accepting 6 principles of ATATURK. So it means they are not related with "Kemalism"

"Hodri Meydan" is not a university name. It is fan group of Kocaelispor. So I'm going to edit as "High school&university members of Hodri Meydan(linked to Kocaelispor)"

"Syrians" are not "immigrants" or "refugees" in Türkiye. The law defines them as "asylum seekers"

Thanks for correctings. Nasadakimasa (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Turkey and the Fire of Racism. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Saraya al-Salam. Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 18:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Turkists of Gebze. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Victims of Kurdish Hezbollah indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Gjs238 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Grey Wolves training camps. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hatay Province into Hatay dispute. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Xaneqînî, could you make a page about the rest of hezbollah leaders

Edip Gümüş

Cemal Tutar

İsa Altsoy

? 213.142.97.51 (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been trying to make pages about them for so long, all I need is enough reliable sources which I’m currently looking for. Thanks. Xaneqînî (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Islam and nationalism. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you like it! Took me alot of work so I definitely appreciate hearing that. Xaneqînî (talk) 23:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Republican People's Party, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Atsızism. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Afghan Tatars. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Müsavat Dervişoğlu. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Iraqi mafia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Kurdish mafia. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of İbrahim Oktugan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of İbrahim Oktugan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Xaneqînî, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Serkan Ramanlı, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serkan Ramanlı.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Yakyn Inkar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 13:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaneqînî. Thank you for your work on Inter-Ba'athist conflict. Another editor, Chaotic Enby, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Found a few more references that might be interesting! [1] [2]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does your user page mean? The hidden link to from Deportation of Americans from the United States to Deportation of Uyghurs from Turkey? MWQs (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, I had misclicked the "Deportation of Americans from the United States" link when I was trying to type deportation of uyghurs so that i could create the page. Ilamxan (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Persecution of Uyghurs in Turkey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have restored the same unreferenced content twice now (most recently in this edit). It is Wikipedia policy that All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Unless you provide a direct citation, you are violating Wikipedia policy. — MarkH₂₁^talk 16:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One point here is that the statement is making three claims: that 1) the MHP supported Erdoğa beginning in 2015, 2) the MHP was vocal about Uyghur issues before 2015, and 3) the MHP has not vocal about Uyghur issues after 2015. The currently cited reference only says that they have not been vocal about Uyghur issues. The statement needs additional sources for the other claims, otherwise it is unreferenced and/or synthesis. I.e. it is not enough to have separate sources saying that 1) MHP started supporting Erdoğan in 2015, and 2) the MHP has not been vocal recently. Thanks. — MarkH₂₁^talk 17:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll get on it now. Ilamxan (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Gazi University protests, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Gazi University protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Beyoğlu protests, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Beyoğlu protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, instead of arguing with me through back and worth edit summaries, please reply to me on the article talk page which I have pinged you at. Your edit does not make much sense, and I would like to explain why, this cannot be explained through edit summaries by edit warring back and forth. Ecrusized (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not edit warring, if anything I’ve swallowed my pride to prevent that. I just reinstated the parts I felt were unfairly removed. Ilamxan (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ecrusized (talk) 11:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained why your edits were reverted. Not only have you not replied on the talk page, but are now reinstated those said edits. As I've said on the talk page, the material which you are adding is already included in the article. Ecrusized (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't added them back. As I said before, I swallowed my pride because I don’t feel like going back and forth. I don’t know why you removed the parts about the Takbir and ripping flags, or the one about Tahrir alSham increasing security. The SNA is with Turkey according to their official statement, so no need to put pro-turkey as the whole organisation is pro-turkey. The Anti-turkey faction is just a few dissidents, “factions” is more than enough. Ilamxan (talk) 11:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don’t accuse me of edit warring, if you saw then you would know I merged my “2024 Syria riots” with your “Northern aleppo clashes” article to show I didn’t care who made them I just wanted a really good article. Your article about the riots in Turkey were exclusive to Kayseri while I’d argue that mines was more detailed, when you merged mines with yours instead of making a redirect and edit war I just updated yours to make it better. Ilamxan (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Islamokemalism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No such term exists outside some fringe opinion articles written in Turkish. The term "Islamokemalism" is highly questionable and debatable, if non-existent - there are no scholarly references available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Mohammad Hossain~ 12:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newroz clashes (2023), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newroz clashes (2023) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ilamxan. Thank you for your work on İzzettin Yıldırım. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goyche-Zangezur Republic, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goyche-Zangezur Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ilamxan. Thank you for your work on Kaplanism. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ilamxan. Thank you for your work on Abdullah Beğik. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Republican People's Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Republican People's Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 03:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Red.png#/media/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Red.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Green.png#/media/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Green.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Green%26Yellow.png#/media/File:Kurdish_Hezbollah_Flag_Green&Yellow.png

I hope it will be useful for you. Yasaroz (talk) 09:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilamxan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Velioğlu (tribe), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurdish mafia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish mafia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(t · c) buidhe 17:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilamxan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Velioğlu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hearth Party, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearth Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ilamxan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gerila for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilamxan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoctorWhoFan91, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gerila, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ilamxan. Thank you for your work on Second Soran Unit. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect IMK-Peshmerga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 24 § IMK-Peshmerga until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]