This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 17:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is to notify you that I requested arbitration enforcement in regards to your editing [1]. --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As an uninvolved administrator, I would like to give you some advice. One of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia is that it is not a battleground. If you treat it that way, as in the edits you made at Talk:Nezami Ganjavi, you are not going to be able to contribute here. In particular, you need to be very careful about accusing editors of doing things because of their nationality. Ordinarily edits of the sort you made would lead to a block on your account, but because you are not very experienced, I would like to give you a chance to take a different approach rather than blocking immediately. Looie496 (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 where articles related to Armenia/Azerbaijan have stricter sanctions as well as Wikipedia guidelines WP:SOAPBOX, WP:FORUM, WP:OR, WP:RS(note Teriatary sources), WP:synthesis, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:BEP, WP:Vandalism. So it is good to familarize with discretionary sanctions under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. You cannot generalize the edits of the users by their background, or attack their nationality/background as this can result into a block or permanent ban. As per biographies, look at Newton, Divinchi, and Einstein and etc. Just like Persian poet is not put in the first line (per britannica's title)[2] (top left hand corner) or the much more reliable Encyclopaedia of Islam, which introduces Nezami as: "Chelkowski, P. "Nizami Gandjawi, jamal al-Din Abu Muhammad Ilyas b. Yusuf b. Zaki Muayyad . Encyclopaedia of Islam. Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill, 2008. Brill Online. "Nizami Gandjawi, Djamal al-Din Abu Muhammad Ilyas b. Yusuf b. Zaki Muʾayyad, one of the greatest Persian poets and thinkers."". Thats only based on concensus or else, if admins get involved and look at the majority of sources, then the first thing likely to occur is to put this sort of introudction. Also removing sources is not acceptable and Nezami is considered Persian literature (whatever his DNA might have been 900 years ago). He himself calls his work "Persian poetry"(Nazm-e-Dari).. not "poetry that is in Persian". His heritage is shared by Persian countries (Britannica specifically only mentions Persian lands) and Azerbaijan, this is mentioned. Also 7-8 quotes as a result of good will were removed that showed the USSR nation-building. The introduction has been worked out through a long concensus. Else I would prefer the description) form this book:[3] (which is written by Western scholars, and these have much more weight in Wikipedia than teriatary sources (like Britannica)). . --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous comment at Talk:Nezami Ganjavi‎ was not deleted. I moved it to the bottom of the page. If you continue to post your comments at the top, people are unlikely to see them. EdJohnston (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

Your declaration that Iran is a backward country, and that their president is a clown, is enough to put us on our guard about your editing intentions here. If you would like to clarify your thinking for us, you may respond at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Iksus2009. There is a section provided for your own comments, called 'Statement by Iksus2009'. It would help if you can clarify if your statement (below) from June 2009 still reflects your attitude to editing Wikipedia articles in the AA region:

If anything, don’t look at the past, look at what Iran is right now: one of the most backward countries on Earth, living according to a dark-age ideology, abusing women’s rights, and electing a total clown as your president.

Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned here as a party [4] --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 11:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]