You undid one of my edits, why? Jimmy John Pringle (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've left a message in your talk page. You added unreferenced information to Monterey, California, that also did not seem to be written in a neutral point-of-view. If you believe the information to be correct, you can talk about it in Talk: Monterey, California and include your sources. i2n2z 02:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed false information and do not see how that is not constructive. I did not add anything or change any pictures-if that appeared to be the case then it was in error and I apologize as I have not edited before. Tzuffit (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to source how that information is false. The best place to do that would be in the talk page. i2n2z 04:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As in the talk page of the article.

i2n2z 04:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but it is not possible to prove a negative. The person making the claim (i.e. that Israel tried to change the bird's name) needs to provide legitimate evidence/source that it is true. Tzuffit (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The claim has four seperate sources showing otherwise. i2n2z 04:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't. If you actually read the articles, Haaretz and NBC do not make that claim at all and only mention that it lost the vote to become Israel's national bird (which is true, and I did not try to remove that from the entry). The aa.com.tr source cited simply states that the bird has been adopted as Palestine's national bird (this is also true) and that it is being used as a logo for exported Palestinian products. The Gulf News article cites one person claiming there was a "major Israeli campaign" that had "reached all the world institutions and bodies.” They do not specify which "world bodies" the campaign reached or who exactly from Israel's side was responsible (government, nature society, etc.). There are no sources available that do provide this information, which would be odd if it was such a major public campaign. All other internet sources simply cite the Gulf News article do not provide any further evidence. Tzuffit (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted two edits of mine at Walter Mischel. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.189.193.10 for my explanation of why I believe you were incorrect. 24.189.193.10 (talk) 07:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake. I must have gotten confused with a different article. I will undo my revert, my apologies. i2n2z 07:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fix! 24.189.193.10 (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1204687558

2409:4061:8E42:8DD3:8B78:7B09:69ED:ABB2 223.233.65.21 (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]