A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200 Fun and interesting pages Userpage guidelines Userbox directory Most visited articles Join a WikiProject Are you a Wikipediholic? The top editors The motto of the day Some really bad ideas... The department of fun! Wikisongs! Some new article ideas Some very odd articles... List of the newest users Barnstars! List of user rewards List of most vandalized pages Very frequently asked questions The founder of Wikipedia... The reward board (earn awards!) Get suggestions for articles to edit from SuggestBot Find out exactly how many edits you have made! Visit a totally random page! Meet a random user! Hello, Huligan0, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am ChildofMidnight and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Fun stuff...   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Keep cool   Ask an experienced editor to adopt you   Policy on neutral point of view And here are several pages on things to avoid: How not to spam How to avoid copyright infringement What Wikipedia is not How not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this! The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) - if you click on the button it will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, please consider joining the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here. Feel free to delete this template if you don't want it. Again, welcome!  You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.) Fix spelling and grammar None More... • Learn how Fix wikilinks Adrenal crisis Max Fishman Worthington Steel Hugo Markl Stellenbosch University More... • Learn how Update with new information Global Village Telecom Breema Trams in Stockholm IV liiga Euerdorf More... • Learn how Expand short articles Ariake, Kagoshima Kōriyama, Kagoshima Minamimorokata District, Kagoshima Kashima, Kagoshima Kasari, Kagoshima More... • Learn how Check and add references ZTE Raymond A. Litke List of ethnic groups in China Homalopoma Rastriya Swatantra Party More... • Learn how Fix original research issues Oldsmobile Cutlass Chuckmuck Citizen Smith Insurgency Johann Fust More... • Learn how Improve lead sections József Szájer Alexis Dubus 332d Expeditionary Operations Group TwinGo! Galician–Asturian More... • Learn how Add an image National Centre for Australian Children's Literature Miami University Hamilton National Library of Namibia Mount Coffee Hydropower Project National Digital Research Centre More... • Learn how Translate and clean up The civil war of the Keitai and Kinmei dynasties Shuhrat Battle of Ciucea Julia Wieniawa Otto Adolf Weismann von Weißenstein More... • Learn how Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality. Click to reply to this message.

ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

work

A tag has been placed on Elektra Birseck Münchenstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MLauba (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elektra Birseck Münchenstein, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No independent sources except for other language wikipedia projects or quotations thereof to support a neutral article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MLauba (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also sections are for relevant links only with no extra text. Links should not already be in the article.--Charles (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Charles, okay, I have put the text above the section, best wishes --Huligan0 (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Great Globe, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mulberrycottages.com/things-to-do/dorset. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(???) okay this is a note --Huligan0 (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Great Globe has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should you wish to reinsert the material, keep in mind that it must be sufficiently altered so as to avoid a close paraphrase. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Great Globe has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please stop. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear VernoWhitney, you have repeatedly distroyed this artikel. www.isleofpurbeck.com/durlston.html states:

The Globe was constructed from Portland stone in Mowlem's Yard in Greenwich in 1887, for George Burt. Burt was Mowlems nephew and one-time partner. It is popular belief that the construction was in London/Greenwich because there were not sufficiently skillful craftsmen locally. It measures 10 feet in diameter, weighs 40 tons, and is of 15 sections.

I write:

The Globe was constructed from Portland stone in Mowlem's Yard in Greenwich in 1887 and was brought to Swanage by sea. It was erected by W.M. Hardy in the park upon a platform cut into the solid rock during the same year. It measures 10 feet in diameter, weighs 40 tons, and is made up of 15 sections of stone and joined together with granite dowels. Its position on the cliff is 136 feet above sea level.

The Globe was constructed of Portland stone. It was made in Mowlem's Yard in Greenwich in 1887. It was brought to Swanage by sea and was erected by W.M. Hardy upon a platform chopped into the solid rock of the hill in the course of the same year. The Great Globe measures 10 feet in diameter, weighs 40 tons and is accomplished out of 15 segments of stone, connected by granite dowels. Its position upon the cliff is 136 feet above sea level.

The Great Globe is made of Portland stone. It was constructed in Mowlem's Yard in Greenwich during 1887 and was brought to Swanage by sea. The Globe was erected by W.M. Hardy upon a platform choped into the solid rock of the hill in the course of the same year. The Great Globe measures 10 feet in diameter, it weighs 40 tons and is accomplished out of 15 segments of stone, connected by granite dowels. Its position upon the cliff is 136 feet above sea level.

Please do not get on my nerves. Thanks --Huligan0 (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I changed the categories on some of the pictures. I replaced the Dorset culture category on them. Dorset culture is a pre-Inuit culture that lived in the Arctic rather than anything about the culture of Dorset in England. The name comes from Cape Dorset, Nunavut. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 23:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Tyneham has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. How many times do you have to be warned about copyright violation? Consider this a last and final warning. Simple Bob (talk) 09:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...oooh, sorry, I seem to have annoyed you. Okay, so a couple of the sentences were unaltered (however from a non-copyright MoD leaflet). You ask How many times...?, but please read the above carefully, because none were copyright violations (!!!) Therefore, there is no need to threaten me.

However, after writing and translating well over 100 Articles on the Jurassic Coast and the Isle of Purbeck and after reading so much about the Lulworth Military Range, I think that the warning notice is imperative. But to avoid you any future annoyance, I will add the warning to the discussion pages. Regards --Huligan0 (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was no threat from me and I'm sorry if you took any of my comments that way. Why do you think a warning is appropriate on either the article or talk page? Wikipedia isn't a travel guide it is an encyclopaedia. Also, why do you think an MOD leaflet is copyright free? Is there a clear statement on it saying that? --Simple Bob (talk) 14:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First: ...last and final warning + blocked from editing (!!!) Apolgy accepted.
Second: a caution warning is imperative because any unexploded ordnance could be dangerous. Encyclopaedia or travel guide is not the question, because all geologists and fossil hunters will be visiting the area after they've read my articles *smile*, (if I ever get finished). Leaflet states: please copy and distribute.
Further, infact I didn't want to write the Lulworth Military Range, but now I have and now I've even added some refs, please remove the unref sign. Happy Christmas, best wishes, kindest regards --Huligan0 (talk) 16:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up that I am removing ukfossils.co.uk and jurassiccoastline.com as neither are reliable sources. Please try to find more suitable references. --Simple Bob (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay remove. There are so many difference between Wiki- english, french and german, I get confused. Article names for example, commas or brackets: Swyre Head, Lulworth comma in english, Swyre Head (Lulworth) with brackets in german. Then such things as: references go after punctuation, not before, other way round in german. Happy Christmas anyway --Huligan0 (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are only for discussing improvements to their corresponding articles. Could you please stop adding warnings about Lulworth Military Range and unexploded shells to these pages? Thanks. Barret (talk) 23:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SimpleBob, you threatened me with statements like: block from editing and stating: last and final warning, I didn’t threat you. I accepted your apology, you didn’t accept mine. I accepted your critics, you didn’t accept mine. I answered your questions, you didn’t answer mine. I asked you politely to remove the unref sign, you didn’t. I sent you kindest Christmas wishes, you ignored me. You said the refs were unreliable, I agreed. I stated my Interwiki problems, you ignored me again. Now you set BarretBonden against me... I’m glad you are a friend and not an enemy. Please don’t apologise to me, because it would be embarrassing to have to accept again. Happy Christmas anyway --Huligan0 (talk) 00:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(I posted this at Talk:Mupe Bay, but am reposting it hear in case you don't see it) - I am very sorry to hear about your brother and now understand why you are so motivated to add the warnings. However, such advocacy could be considered to be soapboxing and should be avoided. You could achieve something similar by using a simple factual statement such as "Warnings about unexploded shells posted at Mupe Bay by the Ministry of Defence and visitors are advised to keep to official footpaths, because it is part of the Lulworth Military Range." Then give the MOD's PDF file as a reference. --Simple Bob (talk) 10:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on your FCB stuff! Keep up the good work . . . Dribblingscribe 06:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. Grüsse aus der Schweiz --Huligan0 (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Patrick Rahmen. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hava added reference and external link. Best wishes --Huligan0 (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know — there's some sort of formatting error toward the bottom of the article that's making everything (including the references) appear only on the right side of the screen. I'd fix it, but I don't know what's causing it. Nyttend (talk) 19:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nyttend, thanks, I've fixed it now. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 19:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was ugly. Only a few things were overhauled. Elimination of redundancies and a return to original form for the article. It's proper structure of thisk kind of article. Kingjeff (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also forgot to mention it was disorganized and some unsourced statements. Kingjeff (talk) 23:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Huligan0, I think it was you who added the information about the Jurassic Coast. This note is to alert you to the fact that UNESCO says that the Jurassic Coast is 155km in length and not 153km. See http://whc.unesco.org/pg.cfm?cid=31&id_site=1029 I have corrected umpteen references, but In case I have missed some, please change them yourself. Michael Glass (talk) 02:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Michael Glass, thanks, I had a different source (and unesco still have one with 153km) but your source seems a lot better. Greetings, happy Christmas, happy New Year --Huligan0 (talk) 12:36, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huligan0. Thanks for your good wishes! Have a happy New Year. Finding good information has many traps. Let's hope that UNESCO got it right. Michael Glass (talk) 07:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Huligan0; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jörg Stohler, Huligan0!

Wikipedia editor Uncletomwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

its a good article!!!!!!!!!

To reply, leave a comment on Uncletomwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Information in the articles should be verifiable, if not it could be challenged per Wikipedia:Verifiability. I think that refimprove templates are better option than trimming all tables. Editors will see what's the problem and maybe soon someone will add suitable references to cover and verify also friendly matches.--Oleola (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mohamed Salah. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Oleola (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor-War. Thanks. --Huligan0 (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Salah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 23:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mohamed Salah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Oleola (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Oleola, It's YOU who is making the edit-war, not me --Huligan0 (talk) 23:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Oleola, you are continuing a personal edit-war against me.
You write: <actually you provided some wrong and unsourced info>: But the infos are indeed all sourced. However your sole source is wrong: with your ref^[1] one game and the goal from that game is missing in this source. Please read Egyptian FA official site for infos about the U-20 team.
Please also read Egypt national under-23 football team; here the dates, the games and goals for the U-23 are sourced, in fact, in addition all the goals are all sourced on the page Mohamed Salah itself (goals dated from 29 July 2010 to 1 August 2012).
Please study the German version of this page which contains further refs. Further infos can be found under:

* 2012 Africa Cup of Nations qualification#Group G

* Football at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament – Group C

* 2013 Africa Cup of Nations qualification#Egypt v Central African Republic and

* 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round#Group G.

Please read these sources and please stop your continued edit-war against me. --Huligan0 (talk) 21:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Gastón Sauro, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:GiantSnowmanSnowman, thanks for posting this very funny "warning" on my talk page. Pease note that I wrote: Swiss Cup runner up: 2012–13 (four words and one season) in which two links were included and within both links one can read that FC Basel lost the final in a penalty shoot-out. If one does not win a final, one is a runner-up. I will now revert your revert to my original edit and will add this ref^[2] and this ref^[3] and thus I hope that this will help you not to repeat your embarassing mistake a second time. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd strongly advise you to get rid of your crummy attitude and take some friendly advice. Your team being a runner up in a tournament does not mean the individual is a runner-up. You have to actually be awarded a medal, as confirmed in reliable sources. GiantSnowman 07:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Giant, crummy attitude (???) (Perhaps your appearance is crummy as well and...) I consider your attitude as quite aggressive (!!!) If you had added "citation needed" to my edit and had written an explanation on my talk page then this would have been "friendly", but to delete the edit and to post a "warning" on my talk page, yes this can easily be understood as aggressive. Okay, so you started this article, but during my edits I also referenced it (three times). In Switzerland (Swiss Cup) everybody in the team receives the silver medal for the runner up, player, substitute, reserve player, trainer, assistant trainer (etc.), but which journalist or homepage would mention the names of each of the runners up just so that someone can reference this in Wiki (???) I have made thousands of edits about FC Basel (in English and German) and as long as FC Basel is part of me, as long as I am part of FC Basel (season ticket holder, club member, shareholder and sponsor), I will edit FC Basel, the seasons of FC Basel, its history and its players, to the best of my knowledge. Yes, I will add references when possible. But in such a case as "loser of a cup final" I consider this as "unnecessary". Further, despite the fact that my edit has been deleted again by ‎User:Beerest355 I will reinstall it. Let's work together and not against one another. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You spammed my talkpage again so I reply you last time. You didn't provide any sources for info you added in Mohamed Salah. You didn't provide a source for 13 goals in Al Mokawloon Al Arab, despite two sources say 11. You didn't provide a source for alleged a match in U20 in 2009 and you didn't provide a source for caps in U23. So please stop lying that you supplied something. Other unreferenced articles from Wikipedia are not sources, as Wikipedia is not a "reliable source": WP:WPNOTRS.--Oleola (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stop trolling? I've got full rights to remove comments from my talkpage per WP:OWNTALK.--Oleola (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Salah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 13:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Oleola (talk) 02:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. You have new messages at JMHamo's talk page.
Message added 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JMHamo (talk) 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you have added a number of new sources surely shows that the information was not previously referenced? GiantSnowman 16:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Samuel Inkoom. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 09:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GiantSnowman, don't threaten me with the Wikipedia:Blocking policy because it's you who is acting against this policy. Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia and this is exactly what you are doing (!!!) The difference between good manners and bad manners is: if someone challenges the information that's good manners, but if someone just deletes it then that's bad manners. You did NOT challenge the information (which can also be found within the links) you just DELETED the texts and the links and the Web-Link. What have you got against Samuel Inkoom's website: www.inkoom.pro? This is a correct weblink. Ghana won the silver medal at the Africa Cup of Nations see: 2010. Basel won the Swiss Championship, see the league table in: 2010. Basel won the Swiss Cup, see the Final in: 2010. And so on and so forth. I have reinstalled your pointless deletion, but at the same time I have double linked the Swiss Championship and the Swiss Cup. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're re-addition of WP:BLP-violating material (i.e. unsourced information about a BLP) is vandalism and would merit blocking if you continue. This is a very important policy, you need to familiarize yourself with it before editing these articles again. GiantSnowman 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GiantSnowman, I reverted yet another of your pointless deletions in this article because the refs already appear in the text. You need to familiarize yourself with the facts before you edit and delete things in any article again. Hoping that you will better yourself, I send friendly greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Inkoom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GiantSnowman 16:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the sources are so readily available then please introduce them and directly cite the information. GiantSnowman 16:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again GiantSnowman, don't threaten me again, because I even double and treble referenced the information. --Huligan0 (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...but you didn't. GiantSnowman 16:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...yes I did: refs with numbers 2, 6, 7, 10+15 and 11+16. I am now going to the Joggeli stadium to watch the FC Basel match and when I come back I will continue with edits to the present Basel team. I will try to keep of your way, because altho' you're funny, you're not very funny and this is becoming a waste of time. Have a nice evening --Huligan0 (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...no, you did not. Look at your version:

where is the RS which verifies the claim that "He was not nominated for the tournament squad. After that competition, Inkoom aided Ghana in winning the 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup by holding Brazil to a 0–0 score over 120 minutes, and then, when the game went to a penalty shootout, took the second spot-kick for Ghana and scored, giving Ghana the victory. Inkoom made his World Cup debut on 26 June 2010, starting on the right wing against the United States in a Last-16 knockout game, which Ghana won 2–1 in extra time."?

where is the RS which verifies the 'International goals' template?

where is the RS which confirms the honour of "Africa Cup of Nations Silver Medal: 2010"

That is all unreferenced information which you have added and re-added to this article in violation of WP:BLP, despite numerous warnings. Do it again and you will be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 18:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

At Naser Aliji's page, it says that he played since FC Basel's under 21 side since 2000. That seems to be an error to me, would you please revise that? Guess it's 2010 you mean? Cheers! Eden10Hazard (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mirko Salvi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikifolks.org/wiki/index.php/Mirko_Salvi.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mirko Salvi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huligan, I appreciate your effort to create and edit pages for FC Basel players. In the future please do not title the "Honours" section as "Honours and titles" or "Titles and honours" and you don't need to include the word champions. I've just gone through and tried to edit every one but I may have missed some so if you can help that would be great. Cheers. Rupert1904 (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also please include all years the competition took place, not just the year the title was won. For instance, 2007-08 and not just 2008, and some editors are divided about whether youth championships should be included in "Honours" sections. I don't really care either way so I just moved them to underneath the senior league and cup titles, so in the future just do the same as well. Thanks again. Rupert1904 (talk) 23:23, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rupert1904, thanks for your messages, thanks for the compliment. I've noted your mention about the title "Honours and titles", altho' I'm not quite the same opinion, but I will continue as you suggest. In future I will also include all years the competition took place, I understand your opinion here. Whenever I included youth championships I always reference them, but have noticed that (even tho' you wrote you don't really care) you have deleted some of them despite the inclusion of the refs. Greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I may have cut it and forgot to paste it underneath the senior honours they have won with Basel. My apologies, I can replace them. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gastón Sauro. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 12:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Hallo Giant ;-) Your mistaken again... --Huligan0 (talk) 21:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gastón Sauro. GiantSnowman 10:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Yoichiro Kakitani page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw your revert at Taulant Xhaka. I must informe you that this isn't correct mode of the player infobox footballgraphy: 1.The club should appeared in simply way, should removed for example FC, CF, etc., in concret example FC Basel, his currect club should appeared just as Basel. 2.Years which player has been part of the club should appeared from where he "signed" with it, to where he left the club definitively. Agree? Eni.Sukthi.Durres (talk) 20:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eni.Sukthi.Durres, okay have amended clubs names as you wish, because I do agree. But the dates are the dates of playing and not the dates of contract. Therefore Basel/GC/Basel(now) and not Basel(including now)/GC. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You know who is Andrea Pirlo, the "maestro" of football, watch his wikipedia, at infobox, and let's talk again! Eni.Sukthi.Durres (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bad example, see Italian version (!!!) See German version of Xhaka (!!!) Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you mean, can u be more clear, give me a link of those versions.Eni.Sukthi.Durres (talk) 11:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Armenian Wikipedia. Can I create articles in English on the wiki?--1221nor (talk) 13:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 1221nor, yes, but only if that, what you, create is correct and referenced. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 22:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks Jaellee, I know but I forgot :-( Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Walter Samuel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again GiantSnowman, you are back on my talk page are you (???) I think that you are vandalizing and destroying perfectly good articles by deleting perfectly good information from them. I again reverted yet another of your pointless deletions in this article because the refs already appear in the text. You need to familiarize yourself with the facts before you edit and delete things in any article again. Hoping that you will better yourself, I send friendly greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 13:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Walter Samuel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 13:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is not considered as a reliable source and this revert you made was completely incorrect. Please dont accuse others of vandalism when it is not vandalism. Perhaps you should read WP:VANDALISM.

I would lik you to take a look at your own edits instead, the date formatting in this edit is completly wrong for the reference as we should use dmy dates. And in general your referencing looks a bit weird. Scores are also written with ndash and not colon i.e. 2–0 and not 2:0. Qed237 (talk) 12:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't really expect an answer to this do you (???) If someone doesn't believe what they are reading, they could mark it with ^{[citation needed]} if they wanted to (this I would consider as positive), or they could delete it (this I consider as negative) and thus considered by me as vandalism --Huligan0 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the dates wrong (???) If I write 2016-01-06 someone corrects it to 06.01.2016 or to 6 January 2016 and if I write 06.01.2016 someone corrects it to 2016-01-06, or if I write 6 January 2016... ...and so on. Please be constructive and let me know which is correct. Okay with the scores I did use a colon instead of ndash, which was wrong. Greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not considered as WP:VANDALISM on wikipedia and removing unsourced content or content from an unreliable source from a BLP is good, we can not have unsourced content to BLP's. So once again stop accusing others for vandalism when it is not vandalism and tone your languagae down. Qed237 (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I asked you to be constructive and you react negative. I repeat, if someone doesn't believe what they are reading, they could mark it with ^{[citation needed]} if they wanted to (positive). Or, on the other hand, they could delete it (very negative) thus this is considered by me to be vandalism. So, you tone your languagae down, mine is constructive, yours is insulting. Plus you did not answer my question, altho' I admitted my error. --Huligan0 (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using three question marks (???) is not a good tone, you are practically saying "Stupid question, I wont answer" in your first sentence, instead of assuming good faith and there you set the tone. And the fact is that removing that content is not considered vandalism on wikipedia no matter what you think. Accusing people of vandalism when it is not is considered disruptive and may have you blocked, so please read WP:VANDALISM before accusing people. Qed237 (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo again Qed237, in our language using three question marks in brackets or three exclamation marks in brackets (usually happens in jokes) has a completely different meaning to your interpretation. (???) = :-/ and (!!!) = :-P But anyway the ^{[citation needed]} would have been a lot better. Deletes like this for example are not constructive (if not to be described vandalism), especially when all the refs are included within the text. Agree? Then I asked what was wrong with my dates? I admitted the incorrect use of the colon, but you did not answer the question. Please do, because I still don't understand what is wrong. Looking forward to your response I send greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. However I would advise you to be careful with characters like that as it may be interpreted differently. Removing unsourced content to a BLP is not wrong and not vandalism, but yes adding source is the best alternative. For different reasons the editor choosed not to do so and it was within their rights. About the dates, this article as well as many other articles has a template on top, Template:Use dmy dates, and I suggest you look at that because the explanation is probably better than mine. Basically it says what format to use in the article and is used by automated bots. Qed237 (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so far so good. We are mainly talking about the article Alexander Fransson. Why has his current club been reverted to IFK Norrkoping? He plays for Basel! Basel announced this on 30.12.2015, the Swiss Football League confirmed this on 2 January. In fact he's played the first test game on 09.01.2016 against Biel and he's travelling with the team to their training camp in Marbella tomorrow. --Huligan0 (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not completely sure, but I think an other editor reinserted Norrköping as the Swiss transfer window is currently closed. Every nation has different windows in which they may register players and apperently the Swiss window is closed so Fransson can not play any competitive game currently (but he can play test matches). Qed237 (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can for example look at [1] (which I think is reliable) and [2]. Every league that play autumn-spring seasons hs 1 month but can have open when they want. For example England has 2 January-1 February, while Switzerland has 16 January-15 February. Qed237 (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Huligan0/Cedric Itten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. C679 00:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Huligan0/Manuel Akanji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. C679 00:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how to move pages from user space to article space? It looks like you have done many copy and paste moves from your userspace. Let me know if I can help. Thanks, C679 00:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note from reviewing admin: Cloudz679 was wrong to tag these for speedy-deletion, but right that the best way to put a userspace draft into the main encyclopedia space is to use the "Move" tab. That leaves a redirect, which you can tag for deletion with {{db-user}}, or leave, as you wish.

WP:FAKEARTICLE is mainly about things in userspace that would not be valid articles, but it is generally not a good idea to have duplicate copies of pages. If they are nominated at WP:Miscellany for deletion, the usual solution is to redirect the draft page to the article, and I have done that for these two. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Granit Xhaka, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has been explained you before, but it bears repeating. Transfermarkt is not a reliable source, since most of its content is user-generated. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with a number of articles on Swiss football referees. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	thank you FabianFrei (talk) 14:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Huligan0, thanks for creating 1997–98 FC Basel season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Huligan0. Magst du deinen Artikel nach der Namensanpassung überarbeiten? --Leyo 10:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thanks --Huligan0 (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ricky van Wolfswinkel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo talk, I beg your pardon. I added a longer text in the article with a reference that shows that Basel won the final by two goals to one against Thun on 19.05.2019. It also shows that van Wolfswinkel played in the final. I presumed that this addition resolves the problem. What more must I do please? I do not want people to think that my edits are not disruptive and I do not want that my account is going to be blocked? Please inform. Kindest regards from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 23:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, but there should also be a reference in the honours section. Readers who go straight there won't see the reference in the prose. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably Gerrit Bouwmeester [3] He was living in Basel at that time. His first league game after he returned to the Netherlands was in December. He was a centre half, played for Haarlem and Quick (not HVV). Also a cricket international (Haarlem, VRA, HCC) profession: mining engineer. Cattivi (talk) 23:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cattivi for this very usefull information. I will follow this up and see to which results I come. Looking forward to the results of my research. I remain with kindest regards in these difficult times and send best wishes from an empty Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Separate to the discussion at WT:FOOTY, MOS:DATERANGE forbids the use of * and † to denote birth/death on English Wikipedia. These are not common English terms and birth/death dates should be written simply as (1909 – 2006), (1 April 1909 – 31 March 2006), (born 1909), (died 1996) etc depending on what information is known. Cheers, Number 57 01:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay --Huligan0 (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS, positions should be written in lowercase unless at the start of a sentence or in an infobox. Number 57 01:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know

Hello, Huligan0

Thank you for creating Werner Martin.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add wikiproject templates to talk pages. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 12:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982–83 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Binningen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huligano. You created the article Max Lehmann (footballer) im March this year. There had been an article about the same person under Maxime Lehmann though which is why it has been proposed to merge both articles. I also have informed User:Canadian Paul, main author of Maxime Lehmann, so you both may sort out which content should be integrated into which article. The final article should have as title the name under which the person is best known. --Proofreader (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Klaus Huber (footballer). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Klaus Huber), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 09:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo PamD, yes you're right, I'm sorry I forgot. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987–88 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Schaub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016–17 FC Schaffhausen season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016–17 FC Schaffhausen season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 15:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:FC Schaffhausen seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1989 Klötzli incident, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo John B123, Hey no, honestly, needs more citations for verification? They are all there! 1) There is a reference to Watson online for the verbal statements, which is quite a long news article from October 2014. 2) I state as source "SFL Glory", which is the official online archive of the Swiss Football League and it's all writen there. 3) I state as source "Blick", a Swiss national newspaper, and an article from October 2019 with a long interview with the referee, 30 years later. 4) There is the external link to the Swiss televsion broadcasters SRF, with the recording of a 1 hour 15 minutes program from November 1989. Where is a problem? Thanks in advance for clearing me up. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 12:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article lacks inline citations to verify the content as per WP:UNSOURCED: All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. It's unreasonable to expect the reader to search multiple sources to find the information. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 12:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fedayi San has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a BLP on a subject that does not meet WP:BASIC from a quick WP:BEFORE search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 12:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1992–93 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Weber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1989 Klötzli incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

For "one of the most discussed scenes in Swiss football", there is virtually zero sourcing found in searches. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo User:onel5969, I have removed the "doubting Thomas" Proposed deletion tag. To enhance my thoughts, I have added a small amount of text, I have also reformated the text and, last but not least, I have added a ccouple more refs in both german and french. I therefore regard the subject as done. Please note PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected. It must never be used simultaneously with a deletion discussion (AfD or FfD), and it may only be placed on a page a single time. Any editor (including the article's creator or the file's uploader) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 23:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000–01 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laufen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Football Barnstar
		For taking the time to create so many old FC Basel players articles JW 1961 Talk 21:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birger Persson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birger Persson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernst Buss, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernst Buss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter Flück, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Flück until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1902–03 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emil Meyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw you on several Basel Wikipedia articles. It seems like you are really knowledgeable. Would you be interested in a Swiss Football Task Force? Thanks Kwafsdnva (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kwafsdnva, thank you for you message and enquiry. I have focused myself on the history of FC Basel. I don't really know what you expect from a task force. I'm not going to turn you down, but a concept is needed. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 15:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would mostly be maintaining season reports for other teams that are smaller, as well as transfers incoming and outgoing. It could also be making articles for players without one, and updating the stats of those that already do have ones. Thanks Kwafsdnva (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Kwafsdnva, but I think you are thinking more of present day seasons. As I mentioned I'm working back in the past and I still have a few seasons and quite a few players to. Are you going to open a Task Force page? User Sakiv opened a number of Swiss clubs seasons (2020–21 FC St. Gallen season, 2020–21 Servette FC season, 2020–21 FC Vaduz season and so on), but he has never returned to continue or maintain. Greetings from Switzerland Huligan0 (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I see what you are saying. Maybe you can join the task force and maintain these pages sometimes if you get the time. I understand that you are busy with the historical aspect. I'm going to make the task force now. Thanks! Kwafsdnva (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2003–04 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nationalliga A.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurt Spirig, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Spirig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of FC Basel players (2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary, CRUFTY, and just a way to list unnotable players in one article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 01:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of FC Basel players (2). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of FC Basel players. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of FC Basel players. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ... discospinster _talk 01:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Basel players (2) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Basel players (2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme₁₄₉₉ 22:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please provide a source that Remay played international football for Hungary? Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ 00:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nehme1499, the information came from weltfussball.de (but I understand that weltfussball.de is not a reliable source) and this matches with the Hungarian Football Federation, hu.wiki and tempofradi. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please try to include all sources you find in your articles, also as inline citations (which look like this --> [1]). Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nehme1499, yes I always do, but then transfermarkt and weltfussball.de are always deleated with the comment not a reliable source. Because this can get frustrating, I've stopped using these. Greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, true. But you can add the other sources such as the Hungarian FA. Make sure that any sentence in the article has a source. If it doesn't have a reliable source, it shouldn't be in the article. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2008–09 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Abraham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 2008–09 FC Basel season has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Diannaa, would you like to look at the four qualification matches, which I have re-entered with an altered text, before I work on the group stage matches. Thanks, greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The match at St Jacob Park could use a little more work; please have a look at this report. Otherwise okay. Thanks for taking the time to do that. — Diannaa (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Youth Campus Basel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2002–03 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Esposito.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, kindly stop adding controversial edit summaries like "added, because we are looking for someone to help completing the results". Don't expect anything from any editor. This is a voluntary project, not a compulsory one.--Sakiv (talk) 22:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004–05 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Giménez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting silly comments like this: added, because we are looking for someone to help completing the results. Looking for someone is not your job! We also have a private life like you. If you want to edit in peace, you have to act with maturity and know that you are involved in a volunteer project. You can't force editing articles on anyone. There are hundreds of thousands of articles that need updating and we haven't seen protests every month.--Sakiv (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to e.g. this edit? I don't really understand the edit comment and even less why you feel offended. --Leyo 14:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Leyo: Ok.. Why is this important to you? I already sent him a message above but he didn't even bother to reply.--Sakiv (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sakiv and thank you very much for your Warning and thank you very much for your previous message about my edit summaries. Dear Leyo, with my edit comment, I meant solely, that I am just hoping that somebody (who is interested in Swiss football) will join in and edit the latest results of the envolved teams, because this is not happening at the moment. The first comment from Sakiv on my talk page was solely the suggestion that I no longer add to my edit summery the phrase ...because we are looking for someone to help completing the results. No, it's not because I didn't bother to answer, but it is because such a suggestion does not require an answer (!!!) Or am I wrong (???) Does it really require an answer (???) And I don't really understand why Sakiv feels himself offended either, but obviously he is (!!!) In conclusion, I am not trying to force anyone into editing articles, but I am hoping that someone will join in. My moto is: let's get on and improve the project... and then let's forget such pointless discussions. Greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 23:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huligan0,

My name is Lara, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights.

The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email us via the 'Email this user' tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.

Best,

Lara aka Wanderingpotato (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grüezi Huligan0,

könntest Du Dir es vorstellen, bei meinem von mir geschriebenen Artikel über Liam Chipperfield, der im Jungfischbecken geparkt ist, mitzuwirken? --Fußballfan240395 (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Fußballfan240395, ja, okay, auch weil ich den englischen Artikel Liam Chipperfield geschrieben habe. Da er hauptsächlich bei der U-21 Mannschaft eingesetzt wird gibt es eigentlich nichts neues über ihm zu berichten. Ich habe Dein Entwurf angeschaut, es braucht am Anfang den Vermerk <Schweizbezogen> also geschrieben...: ... und es braucht auch ein <"Infobox Fußballspieler">. Aber, bitte, mit was genau kann ich behilflich sein? Es Gryssli us Münggestai --Huligan0 (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gibt es was zu seiner Zeit in der FCB-Jugend? --Fußballfan240395 (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010–11 FC Basel season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Abraham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2021–22 BSC Young Boys season. Sakiv (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sakiv are you back on my page again (???) Go away (!!!) I don't need you and you don't need me (!!!) You are constantly vandalising me (!!!) Please stop it. I'm not vandalising you, you are vandalising me. Please stop vandalising me, please. --Huligan0 (talk) 02:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, you have a habit of harassing editors and disrupting their efforts. I will not repeat, stop putting provocative summaries like these. Your presence or absence on Wikipedia will not change anything. Don't make the editors feel like you're the master here and you have the right to underestimate their efforts.--Sakiv (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012–13 FC Basel season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nemanja Nikolić and Paulo Vinícius.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at 2021–22 FC Luzern season, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sakiv (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for your additions at Alex Nyarko. I fixed a few minor issues I wanted to inform you about for future edits:

• Per MOS:NUMERAL, "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words.", so "eight" instead of "8", "two" instead of "2" etc.,
• per WP:KARLSRUHER, Karlsruher SC should not be piped to "Karlsruhe" – WP:KARLSRUHER also applies to many other German clubs –,
• per WP:FOOTY consensus, for match scores the larger number goes first, so always 3–2 instead of 2–3.

Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of FC Basel (1893–1918), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello onel5969 in the meantime I have added a few more refs and a couple of days ago I submitted the draft for review. Please take a look and let me know what you think. I would like to use your feedback in the modifications to the other articles that you also pushed into the draft space because you don't like them. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't review articles any longer, but taking a look at what you've done, I think it's eons better than when I moved it to draft. There's a rule of thumb that each paragraph should have at least one ref. But that's not hard and fast. If moved to mainspace, anyone could remove any of the un-footnoted stuff, and then, as per WP:BURDEN, you'd need to supply a valid ref before putting the info back in. Hope this helps. The articles (if I remember correctly there were several) are well done, with the exception of sourcing. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of FC Basel (1939–1965), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of FC Basel (1965–2000), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of FC Basel (2000–present), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello onel5969, I have added more refs in all four of the articles that you pushed into the draft space because you don't like them. Please take the time to look at them to see if they are now to your liking. If so, perhaps you would like to put them back into the mainspace. In the meantime I have submitted the drafts for review, but nothing has happened. I've been on wiki since 2009/10 working on FC Basel. I created all the season's articles and about 600/650 articles on the players, but until now, have never been confronted with the situation of articles being pushed into draft space and so am pretty confused with this situation. Thank you in advance for your attention and your help. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a results of the Swiss Serie A (except Basel) from 1899 to 1919? I didn't found them anywhere on the internet, on the sites eu-football.info, datasoccer.it, rsssf.com etc. Jolicnikola (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jolicnikola no sorry, my sources and fcb-archiv.ch only have the results of the Basel games and before 1919 many goal scorers are also missing. The database dbfcz.ch only goes back to 1932, but they are working on it continuesly. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of FC Basel (2000–present) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of FC Basel (2000–present), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of FC Basel (1939–1965), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 22:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of FC Basel (1965–2000), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 00:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of FC Basel (1893–1918), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fedayi San, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jacques Zoua

added a link pointing to Champions League

Mohamed Elyounoussi

added a link pointing to Champions League

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bruno Berner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2nd Bundesliga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Zé Maria (footballer, born 1976), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello onel5969, I don't think that it is fair, that you push this article to the <draft space>, because now, only you and I now know that it is there. If this article is in the <draft space> nobody else on wiki can add any new facts, because they cannot see the article. With your action, you are pushing the responsibility onto me for further information. However, I do not know anything what so ever about Brasilien football, therefore I am unable to add anything new. Obviously you cannot add new facts either, otherwise you would have done so in the mean time. You declaire <notability>, but I consider that being a Swiss championship winner is indeed a notable fact for any footballer in Switzerland or any where in Europe. If this article was in the <acticles> section, somebody with knowledge of Brasilien football could add further or new informtion, if they could. I have now added more information (although I cannot prove to myself that this is correct), references and sources. Perhaps you would now like to move this article back into the main section, otherwise it will stay in the <draft section> until deleated in a couple of months. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. You created the article, so it is your responsibility to show that the footballer is notable. You need to have several in-depth sources about the footballer, that go beyond routine sports coverage or database entries, or are primary sources. Of the original 3 sources, one was primary, one was a brief blurb, and the third was a boxscore. One of the two you added is from the team's website, so again primary. The other I can not access, but it appears to be about the team, not about the player. It was in mainspace for two weeks, and no other editors worked on it. If I did move it to mainspace, it would most likely get deleted in its current form. I'm not that interested in football (although it was the sport I played in my youth), so I do not work on footy articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of FC Basel (2000–present), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Argemiro Veiga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fedayi San".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Adriano Onyegbule, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Turnagra were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

While the footballer may be notable, the article needs a few more sources which help demonstrate this. Articles for living people also have stricter requirements for referencing (see WP:BLP), so the sources probably need to be improved from this aspect before it can be approved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zé Maria (footballer, born 1976) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Thank you for your work on Adriano Onyegbule. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zé Maria (footballer, born 1976), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Turnagra were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The issues I've raised previously haven't been addressed and there are still large portions of the article which lack inline citations, which means this can't be considered for acceptance yet due to the requirements of WP:BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zé Maria (footballer, born 1976) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 04:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Balmer (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dirk Lellek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oldenburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2008–09 Swiss 1. Liga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Round-robin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Thank you for your work on 2009–10 Swiss 1. Liga. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add clear inline citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Thank you for your work on 2007–08 Swiss 1. Liga. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add inline citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've moved 2003–04 Swiss 1. Liga to draft, as it's an unreferenced table with no lead for context, created last night. Thanks for starting the article. Wikishovel (talk) 08:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed, I started it in the wrong place.  :-( I've now copied it into my sandbox area, so that I may continuing on it during the next few days. There's a lot more to do and it will take days before I can publish it. Thanks. Huligan0 (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. Thank you for your work on Arlet Junior Zé. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2000–01 Swiss 1. Liga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and practically no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know what happened here, because I am starting this article in my sandbox area and am continuing to work on it over the next few days. Indeed, I know there's a lot more to do and it will take days before I can publish it. Some thing similar happend a few days ago as well. Because it is in my sanbox area you can even deleat the draft. Thanks. Huligan0 (talk) 01:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0,

Thank you for creating 2005–06 in Swiss football.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huligan0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zé Maria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi @Huligan0! I think you made a small mistake in this edit [4] from 2015. You wrote that FC Basel played 6 Champions League games, but that Sommer played 10 Champions League games. I assume this was a rather funny typo and have corrected it [5]. I was then surprised to see that you're still around, so I came by to leave you this message. If possible, it would be cool if you could check the book you cited to see if this change is correct. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 01:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Toadspike, yes you noticed that correctly, I did make a mistake. Indeed Basel played 10 Champions League games that season.^[1] Thanks for the correction. Yes I'm still arround and I'm still writing about Swiss football, mainly about FCB, their players and their seasons. The autor of the book I cited, was a dear friend of mine, but he passed away a couple of years ago, nevertheless I have spent some 10 years translating his work into English and posting it here on Wiki. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982–83 Nationalliga A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1977–78 Nationalliga A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gossau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1972–73 European Cup Winners' Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Mostyn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Straight Point is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight Point until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]