Archives
27 May 2004 – 31 January 2005
13 February 2005 – 29 March 2005
31 March 2005 – 1 May 2005
2 May 2005 – 5 Jun 2005
6 Jun 2005 – 6 July 2005
7 July 2005 – 7 August 2005
7 August 2005 – 8 October 2005
8 October 2005 – 27 February 2006
6 March 2006 – 19 August 2006
22 August 2006 – 12 October 2006
13 October 2006 – 12 December 2006
16 December 2006 – 15 March 2007
3 April 2007 – 8 October 2007
11 October 2007 – 10 February 2008
12 February 2008 – 2 December 2008
2 January 2009 –

The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on PTF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ShornAssociates (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei, I was about to update the YOG Swimming page but you did a wonderful job in keeping the page up to date. But just a little note. The probability of some of these young athletes to have a page created is actually quite low, and should this be the few events that they represent their country in their life, they would probability fail the notability criteria. In fact none of the swimmers have a page of their own. So may I suggest that is naming the swimmers, we can forego the [[]].

As for the country page, none is created task far as well. While it would be nice to have a summary page for each country, it's notability is also questionable.

Just a piece of my thoughts. Keep in touch and keep up the good work. :) Frankie goh (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei, thanks for your compliment. I was wondering whether you have the time, cause I thought it will be good if we can divide the task up. Apparently there is only those few of us, and there isn't a portal to coordinate all these efforts (hopefully there will be one in next years YOG). If you are on, then just let you know I'll updating the girl's section first. So maybe you can "hoot" the boy's one! :)Frankie goh (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just given my little input on Mohsen1248. Basically wants to see the Olympic format to be follow, because it is not difficult to follow and won't need to add a lot of byte space because the changes would be minor.Frankie goh (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Useage of "flagIOC" templates.

I strongly suggest you reconsider your revert of my edits. Please look at the links you have created for the nations articles ... e.g. "South Korea at the 2009 Asian Youth Games Olympics", "China at the 2009 Asian Youth Games Olympics" ... see the problem? The "flagIOC" templates are designed to be used as {{flagIOCmedalist|[[ATHLETE NAME]]|XXX|2008 Summer}} - then the word "Olympics" is appended by the template to create a link to the "Nation at the 2008 Summer Olympics" article. Yboy83 (talk) 14:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, however the flag template changes were not the only edits I made to the article... Are you going to put back the other changes I made? ... table fixes, common nouns->lowercase etc. Yboy83 (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huaiwei, is it convenient for you to photograph the Airline House, the Singapore Airlines headquarters by Changi Airport? WhisperToMe (talk) 08:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ghee Hin Kongsi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dave1185 (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei; I saw on the WP:SKY participants list that you are a senior editor with Emporis. There is currently a debate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reliability of Emporis in building articles as to whether information submitted by registered users of Emporis is verified by senior editors, and (if not) if Emporis is even reliable to use as a source in lists of tallest buildings and skyscraper articles. Since you are probably the most informed on this issue, could you take a look at the discussion when you have a chance? Thanks! Cheers, Rai•me 14:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Religious organisations in Singapore ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Religious organizations based in Singapore ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry The point is not to change the spelling, but to add "based in" into the name. I have amended the entry, so please review your comments and change them as necessary. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-stop flights has been undergoing several modification based on ideas to expand it. Basic changes are, new tables and separate organisation of "discontinued flights" info (note, the table has atleast 6 items now!) , non-stop flights between cities, non-stop flights of respective airlines plus many many more. Please have a loook. Cheers Smet (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discontinued flight table now has 12 entries Huaiwei. Hope you now understand that it is very useful to have a 'strategic vision' on the management of content when you start creating or editing a wiki article section. That was the whole reason why I argued for a separate table back in 2008. Information is best kept when it is simple for another person who knows nothing about it Smet (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hope you are fine. Have you checked non-stop flight recently. The discontinued flight table now has 16 entries. It reads much better than 'colour coding' and embedding information clutter in the main table. Doesn't it? Smet (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly do you do for date format fixes using AWB? I've so far been successful ONLY at delinking multiple links using AWB. Any help would be appreciated. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i would be VERY grateful if you gave me a copy.. Thanks, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave the dates as they have been typed, that is the American way of writing dates and that is how we want it to read. In addition the line spaces were left intentionally, to give the article a clean and neat appearance, it was reviewed by an admin and they found no problems with the article. Please do not remove the line spaces, I have undone your edits, please do not re-do them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farahs51 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I requested that you please do not edit this page by changing the date format or by removing the lines and you have once again done edited the same. I am once again requesting that you DO NOT edit the date format or remove the spacing from this article. This has been reviewed and approved by an admin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farahs51 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked an editor to review the article (Ram kapoor) after I undid your edits. So please do not change the article again. It does state in the Wikipedia policy to not go back and forth and undo/redo edits. So please adhere to the policy and let the article be until reviewed by an admin and an editor. I have also provided them the valid reason for spacing and the other material.

Plus an admin did review the article after it was written, she made a few changes and did not remove the spacing or any sections. So once I would like to inform you that I have submitted the article to an admin/edior for review, until they have reviewed it and provided their opinion and feedback please do not edit the Ram Kapoor article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farahs51 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I requested that you do not edit the article until the editor assistance has been sought. But you still added and the tag you added is fault because this is a professionally written article, besides the last section there is nothing about the article having a fan flavor to it. Before you add the add again please do show which section besides the "What Ram's Fan's have to say about him" seems written from a fan point of view. This article besides the last section adheres to the Wikpedia standard of writing. IF not please first prove it in my notes. As for the resource the technical person on the team is in the process of adding the refernce link to the source after which we will remove that tag as well.

Once again please do not add false tags, lets wait for the editor and the administrator, I did tell the administrator to look at the history and have provided your notes to him. So at this time, just have patience and lets wait.

I am also forwarding this to the administrator from whom I have requested help. Like I said before, as adminstrator came to the page and made the necessary changes, she did not find the article sub-standard, so please refrain from adding tags.

--Farahs51 (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to:

• Burma (and not Myanmar)
• People's Republic of China (and not China, PRC, China, People's Republic or anything else)
• Republic of China (and not Taiwan, Taiwan ROC or anything else)

There are established naming guidelines, especially for China and Taiwan. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In your AWB cleanup efforts, you've been changing the date formats on Cosmopolitan (film) to European style. This is an American film, and so dates are in American style. Please remove this article from your cleanup list. I've reverted your changes to it four times, and would rather not have to do that again. :) Thanks. Softlavender (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huaiwei! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Simon Chua Ling Fung - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei, I'm not sure if you're around a lot these days but, if you're interested, would you be interested in adding your 2cents to an article about Wikiproject Singapore? Wikiproject reports are presented in interview format and I've got a bunch of questions up at User:RegentsPark/WPSingaporeReport if you want to take a look (and add your own responses). There will be a few more questions. I apologize for the short notice (the report is due on the 15th) but I picked a couple of active contributors (Jacklee and Hildanknight) for the interview and only just recalled that you're, sort of, the grand old editor of Singapore related articles. :) Let me know, or just pop in and answer questions! Regards. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 15:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DES ^(talk) 16:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous edits to over 20 airline destinations article have been reverted, as this does not comply with the consensus reached between editors of the WikiProject Airline community. Any further controversal changes to article should be discussed in the article or WikiProject talk page first. Thank you for your contributions. Aviator006 (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tabitha Nauser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 14:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this exchange: while it may be hasty to nominate an article for deletion 1 minute after its creation, please remember that any article in the main article space is required to meet Wikipedia inclusion guidelines. If you intend to create an article incrementally, you should really do so in your own user space, and then only move the article to the main space when it meets minimum requirements. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Would you be interested in joining WikiProject Multi-sport events? We work on improving Wikipedia's coverage of multi-sport events. If so, please feel free to add your name to the members list! Thanks!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Companies listed on the Singapore Exchange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Companies listed on the Singapore Exchange until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radin Mas SMC should be coloured in pink instead of green. Thanks. Littlearea (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes thanks for notifying!--Huaiwei (talk) 11:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Singapore Youth Festival Central Judging results for display/marching bands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –Dream out loud (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Singapore Youth Festival Central Judging results for display/marching bands has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The SYF is indeed notable and has its own article. But why would the yearly results of one competition within that festival be notable in any way? That's like saying that because there is an article on the State Fair of Texas, that we have to have lists of the yearly winners of the cow-breeding and pie-making competitions there. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• FYI, I've watchlisted the aforementioned page now, as the offender had spill over from Lee Hsien Loong. Anyway, he's been reported by me and has been blocked for using socks. Best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 15:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the quick response and notice! Cheers! ;)--Huaiwei (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• No problemo. BTW, please keep this talk centralised here, I have your talk page watchlisted so no worries... and if you insist, just leave me a talkback template will do. Best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 10:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The blue colour is represent for PAP instead of pink. Littlearea (talk) 02:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no standard official colour?--Huaiwei (talk) 15:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. About to head to bed here. The article Singaporean general election, 2011‎ is now linked from the Main Page so there might be increased activity, so this is a bit of a heads up in case you hadn't noticed. Hopefully you can help to keep POV (both pro- and anti-government) out of the article for now, as it seems the Internet campaigning effect of strong anti-PAP sentiment might spill over onto Wikipedia. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 15:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Camps and bases of the Singapore Armed Forces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, unsourced table. Wikipedia is not a directory of information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 08:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camps and bases of the Singapore Armed Forces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camps and bases of the Singapore Armed Forces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 11:07, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

→ Special:Contributions/Yappy2bhere ←

• Hello H, are you aware of the mass movement above? If so, was it discussed and approved by consensus? --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 09:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The phenomena of this social reaction here is itself worth documenting because it is encyclopaedic" - nice statement, but a huge assumption, and incorrect. Is a fad that lasts a week notable in the grand scheme of things? Probably not. That's why it is important to see what the scope of the matter is (hence "notability is not temporary") before deciding on its utility. Case in point - Cheerleader Kristi Yamaoka got three days of press in the news for injuring herself at a college basketball game here in the US during a cheer. Her eventual article was all about the accident, had no sources dated more than three days after the event, and we didn't even have basic biographical info about her in the article, like when she was born. She wasn't notable, and the accident was only a temporary news flash. Nobody cares about her now other than maybe in a "where are they now" way. In short, neither she nor the event had any lasting impact that could be verified once time had passed and things could be viewed objectively as opposed to the subjectivity of mass media frenzy.

What makes this encyclopaedic? Again, sounds nice, but a couple of news articles in a short span of time do not an encyclopedia entry make. Case in point - before the Internet, people had to decide what was worthy of inclusion in an encyclopaedia, even when looking at the news. So the question is, if we're going to look at newsworthy events as material, is this "Mark Twain serializes new story" or "Local woman has cat stuck in tree"? Just because the news picks it up is no indication of its encyclopedic value.

Most importantly, Wikipedia is not a flash mob info dump - if something is notable and worth documenting, it is not Wikipedia's job to take the lead in doing so. In fact, there are policies prohibiting this. This is not a blog, nor a "breaking news" or "new trends" site. When someone else does the research and decides that this is some watershed moment in social scientific history, that's one thing, but it is not the job of WP to make that decision for itself. MSJapan (talk) 15:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• H, please read → WP:NOTNEWS point 3, see also → WP:Notability (events)#People notable for only one event. Best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 18:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marina Mandarin Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building, article resembles business-directory listing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shearonink (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marina Mandarin Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Mandarin Singapore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shearonink (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment here, please consider assuming good faith about other editors. You are referring to a mistake I made when a person came into IRC-Help and asserted the driving direction to be so. I admit it, I did not do the research, I took them at their word and changed the text. It was quickly reverted by Chipmunkdavis with this edit. Alarics came on my talkpage, informed me I was wrong, and I admitted my mistake here. I already apologized on my talkpage. --Shearonink (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I personally do believe pointing out your ignorance on Singapore-related matters can be a contributing factor behind its nomination in the first place. This is the WP:Bias that editors in smaller countries have to regularly handle when editors from bigger countries nominate items and call them "non-notable" out of their own sheer ignorance, or in their believe that things related to smaller countries are inherently non-notable (I found myself having to defend keeping articles over the years, like Jurong East Bus Interchange (because some people simply could not understand that a "Bus Interchange" here is much bigger than a simple "Bus Stop") and Jurong Point despite the mall being the largest sub-urban mall in the country, which is considered "non-notable" just because it is not as big as gigantic sub-urban malls in much bigger countries.) While I do agree ignorance is a universal phenomenon, the least I would expect nominators to do, is to judge not just the current quality of the article, but to do at least a simple research on google, in order to ascertain if it was truly a case of "obvious non-notability" or simply a badly written article which could have been expanded and thus saved. If editors may just spend more time building up worthy articles instead of arbitrarily flagging them for deletion and force others to waste time defending articles, I do believe this site would be as enjoyable to contribute as it once was for me.--Huaiwei (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the consensus is for the article to be kept then the community will have spoken that the subject is notable enough. When I nominate any Wikipedia article for possible deletion, I am not making a blanket judgement about the article's worth...it means that I have been personally unable to tell if the subject is notable from the article's content (and yes, I do research the subject as much as I can at the time). If references can be found and text written to prove that the subject is notable and should be kept? That is great! I'm happy that an article will be kept instead of deleted.

Personally, I would like to remind you that I am not other editors and have treated your posts here and elsewhere with dignity and respect. Perhaps you have run into others who arbitrarily flag articles but I do not do so...I have participated in resurrecting many articles on a variety of subjects from stubs and poorly-written beginnings. If my previous apology for a one-time mistake is not enough to mitigate your continued assertions, then there is nothing more to be said. Shearonink (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps my tone was too direct, but I do not think I have to mince my words if my direct message to you is to first do simple research first, try to build up the article, and then flag it for deletion as the final step if all else fails. What you may have done is probably not as arbitrary as other cases I have come across, and if you are offended by my sweeping remarks, I do apologise, but I find it extremely hard to believe that it is that difficult to note the scale of this building both from the pictures already on the page and from google search as what Yk3 did. I am not sure if this is due to ignorance over architectural appreciation or what, but I am a senior editor in the very source cited in that page (Emporis, which you consider inadequate), and I would have researched on thousands of buildings to know how notable a building actually is. Of course all these are pointless when it comes to supporting notability of an article, but I do question if we spent enough time combing through 662,000 google search results and sieving out commercial travel sites before coming up with the conclusion that there are no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I personally do not have the time in recent days to do this amount of research, but this being a collaborative effort in the first place, I certainly do hope others may chip in and pages do not disappear just because I am not around to build them up. I simply do not WP:own any article, and I am tired of having to defend so many of them, which fortunately or unfortunately often have my thumbprint on them. It is indeed sad that smaller countries often invariably have a smaller pool of editors to build up articles to an acceptable quality, and the few which do appear disappears as a result.--Huaiwei (talk) 07:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• As a neutral third party to all this, I agree with Shearonink's rationale even though the article is important when in reference to Singapore related articles. Huaiwei, the fact remains... we need to find a reliable source to establish its notability. Arguements and discussions won't solve the problem and even if Shear had not nominated it for deletion, someone else would have done so sooner or later. What are you going to do then? What if it was me? Don't let the problem manifest itself when you can take the proactive approach by solving the notability issue with a solid reference that stands. And if that solid reference is still being ignored, rest assured that I'll be the one contesting it, in turn. That much I can say. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 05:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• If you may act as you preach, perhaps you could be helping to improve on the article right now as well instead of weighing in on a discussion which is non-consequential. My personal view on a particular problem of this site based on the actions of relatively ignorant nominators remain intact, for I have seen more than enough of odd nominations, and yes, including from fellow Singaporeans such as this one: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camps and bases of the Singapore Armed Forces to feel somewhat jaded and even offended at times. And if any Singaporean wishes to delete a page such as this based on "non-notability", I would love to personally meet this person to ascertain his familiarity with his own country and cityscape and perhaps bring him on a much-needed architectural tour around Singapore myself. In reference to solid references, I do believe I have already noted the title of one book, which I unfortunately do not have ready access to right now. If you may be of some help beyond making the above posts, how about checking up the book for us in any public library?--Huaiwei (talk) 07:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holland Village, China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holland Village, China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 22:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rcsprinter (talk) 12:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw the discussion about the country name of Myanmar. I would say, if the Aung San camp (like Fyunk(click) belongs to) was consistent, than they have to use the Flag of the exile government too. :) 222.127.231.29 (talk) 03:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, his main interest is tennis (a boring sport) so no wonder why weighing arguments can't persuade him. 222.127.231.29 (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a problem with me personally, complaining about me here ip 222.127.231.29. I'm not the one who used the term fanatic while soapboxing or called Aung San Suu Kyi "a whore" while vandalizing her page. Please keep things civil. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So do I hope, the Aung San camp will remain civil, too. 222.127.231.29 (talk) 11:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd like to know what is the source for the information on the table at the 2006 Bangkok bombings article, because I'd like the spanish version of the aticle to be a good article too. May you help me please? Thank you David0811 ^(Talk) 21:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted two of your recent edits to two airline destination articles [1] [2]. Hong Kong and Macau have always been separate airspace blocks as mainland China, and the long-standing consensus on Wikipedia is that redacted following Huaiwei's response below. 21:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC) they should be listed separately in articles relating to civil aviation. I hope also to remind you from refraining to use edit summaries like "Correction" and "format" to describe such edits, as they are rather misleading considering the implication of your edits. Thanks. Deryck C. 19:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't the convention. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

As a matter of fact, I have been editing airline-related articles far longer than you, and I, in fact, am the one who first came up with the first systematic list which listed airports under the continent-region-country-city convention. That convention has remained consistant for a much longer time until someone went about changing all of them without consensus from the community. I am just too tired to keep changing them back, but I do so each time I have time to spare. The country which the two SARs belong to is the PRC. There is absolutely nothing factually wrong about this, and it IS factually wrong to have Beijing etc listed under the PRC while HK is listed separate from it. Hence, the reversions will continue to occur, and I do think you should help to change them back too.--Huaiwei (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's factually wrong about this is that the airports do not belong to the "PRC airspace". The main problem here is a wholesale disregard for context in favour of political correctness under the continent-region-country-city system. I do accept that you've been far more involved in editing aviation-related articles than I am, but I hope you'd also refrain from asserting ownership of the airline destination list system. I'm ready to file an RfC to attract more opinions on this issue. Deryck C. 21:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In response to a specific case: you raised the query as to why Hong Kong and Macau should be listed separately, when Beijing etc. remain listed under PRC. This is again a matter of context. Visit the flight schedules page on the official Singapore Airlines website: [3]. (This is your flag carrier airline, and I do hope you're proud of them!) The drop-down menu says "Beijing, China" but "Hong Kong, Hong Kong". A similar situation occurs for the SEAir route map [4] which lists Hong Kong and Macau with the same font-size as Thailand and other country names (and bigger than Bangkok). Regardless of what the reason for such listing is, be it historical legacy or division of airspace, this is the convention adopted by SQ (and the civil aviation industry as a whole, as far as I understand), and this is the standard Wikipedia should follow, in line with the concept of "reliable sources". Deryck C. 22:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not factually wrong when the list is a list of political entities, and not of airspace. Just about anyone except sinophobic HKers will see the list of countries precisely as that, and not over who has jurisdiction over airspace. Kindly note that wikipedia serves the global community, and not the views of ant-Beijing, pro-democracy Hkers. Clearly, NPOV is far more important than any policy you dare to cite, including the "reliable sources" you tried to use to substantiate your point. If we are to use airline sources, then are you going to change the way these destinations are listed especially for the Chinese carriers, for almost all of them do not classify HK and Macau as international, choosing instead to call them "regional" destinations? This inconsistency means as an NPOV site, we will use a non-debatable reality, which is the fact that the political entity called the PRC includes the sub-political entity called the HK and Macau SARs. And this is the basis of the original list, which I highlighted not to assert ownership, but to point to you that it was the established and accepted convention for a much longer time. As such, the lists will be corrected and reverted as is deemed fit.--Huaiwei (talk) 10:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I filed an RfC on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists. Please see my response there. I hope you'd also refrain from the personal attack of alluding that I'm a "sinophobic HKers" and that my writing is aimed only towards "ant-Beijing, pro-democracy Hkers".

As for Chinese carriers, I'm fine with their destination lists listing Hong Kong and Macau as domestic (or PRC) destinations, as long as the airline's official publications classify them as domestic rather than international destinations. Deryck C. 12:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just revised the layout of the Singapore Airlines destinations pag. Could you have a look at it if you have the time. - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 12:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Singapore Post, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GrayFullbuster (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Water polo at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph)^Talk 15:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water polo at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games whether the article Water polo at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Water polo at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph)^Talk 16:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5-with 3rd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:64TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5-NoSeeds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 23:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Protected areas of Singapore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Psaogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have some concerns. I noticed that you reverted the format I did on the article for all sports, which is putting "did not advance" using "n/a" template. The problem is that it becomes easier to confuse especially when this does not follow from the example in the manual. Can you please put simple "did not advance" only without using background color, or {{n/a}} template for those who are eliminated in the rounds? Only {{n/a}} template can be used only for "n/a" and "bye", not for "did not advance" or vice versa. Always follow the manual on WikiProject Olympics: WP:OLYMOSNAT. Thank you and I hope you understand. Bear my patience and hardwork regarding on editing and updating the results. (T.C) 13:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too, have my concerns:

• The idea of using that template did not originate from me. In fact, I simply used what was used in other existing country articles from previous games. Hence, it is pretty obvious to me that there was no universal application of the MOS as you claim, which leads me to the next point:
• You appear not to really understand the whole spirit of the MOS. It is, at the end of the day, a guide, and it does not explicitly insist on background colour nor the font, which you claimed the MOS does. The MOS actually only gave an example from one page, which btw, is not representative if you bother to look around.
• Your claims of "confusion" is confusing in itself. How in the world should a template cause confusion, when the viewer will not see the code unless he tries to edit it? And even if he tries to edit, I certainly was not confused, and clearly neither where you. So just what exactly is the issue here?

So it appears to me that you are nitpicking with me over a ridiculously trivial issue, just because you believe in complete conformity. Well I am afraid I hold different values, and I believe minor deviations can lead to improvements, including this case where the template in question is better antithetically in my view. I will therefore continue to use it until I can be convinced that somehow a white background looks better. Enjoy your day.--Huaiwei (talk) 15:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of stadiums in Singapore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Australian International School and Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the result was completely expected. Another one of those reasons why I decided to contribute less to wikipedia, which is a failed experiment as far as this article is concerned.--Huaiwei (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Tuesday evening (4 September). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 00:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on Wednesday the 31st of October. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 7. Hope you can make it. JVbot (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programmes broadcast by MediaCorp Channel 8 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programmes broadcast by MediaCorp Channel 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 08:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article National Cadet Corps (Singapore) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have no doubts that this IS notable, definitely. However, the current state this is in is rather crappy and perhaps we should just rewrite from scratch. This reads like a horrible and unreferenced promotional flyer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on National Cadet Corps (Singapore) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of bridges in Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North-South Expressway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The wikipedia airlines project do not consider the detail in the article Singapore Airlines fleet‎ you want to restore as notable. This is why it was removed. Because of this you will need to seek consensus before restoring this. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where and when was such a discussion done? Is that project some secretive authoritarian establishment who rules merely based on the views of a minority?--Huaiwei (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei, you are invited to participate in this discussion. Please note that participation is optional and the discussion closes at 12:15am sharp tonight (GMT+8). Cheers. --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 14:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on National Police Cadet Corps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://npccwrss.blogspot.sg/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2006 in Malaysia and Singapore, which you created, has been nominated for merger. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You are author of this article. I write about this film on Polish Wikipedia. Maybe you known more similair films? Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Singapore police officers killed in the line of duty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Singapore police officers killed in the line of duty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Industrial estates in Singapore, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's largest port. Since you had some involvement with the World's largest port redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Table tennis at the 2014 Commonwealth Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Cadet Corps and Woodlands Secondary School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marina Bay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 01:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis mixed doubles bronze has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 01:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boyconga278 (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Events at the Southeast Asian Games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 11:34, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Burma (Myanmar) which affects the recently renamed page Myanmar. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Sawol (talk) 16:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPP has a new party logo. You previously used their old logo. Please would add the new logo which is a blue circle, a red star and the letters "SPP" to the entry on Singapore People's Party. If you can, please do so soon in view of upcoming GE2015. If you can't, please seek help from someone who can or ask Wikipedia.(User talk:Trainspotta2) —Preceding undated comment added 11:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC) I have since added the new party logo at the main entry. 17 August 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trainspotta2 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC) No further action required. Thanks.(User talk:Trainspotta2) 25 Aug 2015[reply]

SDA has a new logo. You previously used their old logo (with 4 rings like Audi car brand). Please would add the new logo with the circles no longer overlapping but just touching. I have changed in on the entry on Singapore Democratic Alliance, but I don't know how to make the thumbnail size changes on tables found in two or three sites like Politics in Singapore and List of political parties in Singapore. Would you please do so soon. Thanks. (User talk:Trainspotta2) 25 August 2015 —Preceding undated comment added 14:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Huaiwei,

I have recently overhauled the Bishan, Singapore article. Since I noticed that you were one of the article's original editors (the others seem to be retired), could you have a look at it and give some suggestions on how I can further improve this article? Any help would be much appreciated.

Happy editing!--Lionratz (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Café Cartel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Places in Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places in Singapore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WdS | Talk 15:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Singapore police stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox National Day Parade has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Football at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Group A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All information found at Football at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games, rendering this article unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Football at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Group B has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All information found at Football at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games, rendering this article unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Athletics at the 1959 Southeast Asian Peninsular Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, non-notable sports event. Violates WP:Sports event

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Huaiwei. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Singaporean school bands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^{T go beyond} 18:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article N.y.d.c. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure advertising and unsourced material. Clearly a WP:GNG fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 00:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cinemas in Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cinemas in Singapore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collab-singapore has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of busiest port regions (which you created in 2006) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_busiest_port_regions Fob.schools (talk) 08:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedian! Andrew Lih (User:Fuzheado) of Wikimedia US Consortium is in town next week and he is asking if anyone of you can come at Han's Cafe, #01-01 National Library Building, 100 Victoria Street (S)188064 on 22 August 2018 (Wednesday, Hari Raya Haji). Should you wish to reach me directly in real time, please contact me using the Telegram mobile app @Exec8 --Exec8 (talk) 01:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Singapore NLB libraries has been nominated for merging with Template:Singapore libraries. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons cannot host media which have no proper permission from the author. I therefore listed all your files on User:Huaiwei/Photo Gallery/Third Party as having no permission and no source. They will be deleted after 7days unless permissions can be given. To provide permission for these files, you may provide the original permission email In the page regarding, add C:Template:god and clear the deletion tags. If the permission email is not detailed enough, you should then request a permission email from the author's and send them to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (or a language specific email address), add C:Template:OP and clear the deletion tags. Should you have any questions, feel free to ask me onmy Commons talk page, thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaiwei. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Singapore general election, 2011 comprehensive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of busiest transshipment ports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As the maintenance tags say, " It is unacceptable that this extensive list has not one single working source provided and this has been the case for YEARS. Wikipedia has strict prohibition from making up stuff at this scale." If the information is noteworthy, then WP:TNT is called for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Institute of Policy Studies (Singapore) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there is no indication as to the importance or significance of this article. it is only one of several centres of a school of NUS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--Officer781 (talk) 06:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equinox Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equinox Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

We have never conversed, but I know you are one of the pioneer Singaporean Wikipedia editors from seeing your username plastered across many pages of Singapore in the past. Recently, I have revamped the Republic of Singapore Navy page massively to improve its contents and bring it in line with the pages of other navies. I also note your photo of the Sea Wolf-class Missile Gunboats.

After searching through US archives and Singapore's NAS, plus official RSN channels, your photo remains the only one which may be used on Wikipedia due to copyright issues. While I am aware you do not really edit Wikipedia anymore, may I know if you have more photos of the Missile Gunboats, or even the Missile Corvettes? This would assist greatly in my pursual to improve the page.

Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of major crimes in Singapore (2000–present) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List article does not conform to MOS:LIST guidelines. It should consist of links to existing articles about the subject rather be a WP:NOTDICT directory listing. The article as it currently exists appears to be a collection of news articles rather than an encyclopaedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of insurance companies in Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of insurance companies in Singapore (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 01:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Precincts in Sengkang New Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of public housing estates and blocks which are non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R22-3877 (talk) 13:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SG/JPS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SG/PKR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SG/PLDP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Singapore Youth Festival logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:6TeamBracket-Tennis3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:4TeamBracket-Tennis7-with 3rd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 18:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis men's singles A has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis men's team A has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2015 Southeast Asian Games football templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Health specialist centres in Singapore has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Delta Air Lines destinations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per the 2018 RFC with respect to WP:NOT, there is consensus that lists of airline destinations do not belong on Wikipedia.

Lifetimelucid (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:True Files Lee Kim Lai 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tanah Merah Accident.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Singapore Airlines Cargo destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Singapore Airlines Cargo destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 16:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]