Perhaps you're looking for Hrodulf? (not Hroðulf aka Hrothulf) See User:Hroðulf/disambiguation

Archives

2006—2009, 2010—2013, 2014—

Thanks for finishing the AfC on his Te Deum. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing!

If you still visit the library or access periodicals, could you do me a favour? Most of the refs in Te Deum (Kodály) are to dead trees. Yet many of the refs were "ibids" that got scrambled up when the OP ran a ref correction tool. I am sure I made matters worse when I cleaned up the article for mainspace. (I guessed that all the ibids were to the Cecil Gray article, which is almost certainly not correct.) Could you have a go at correcting them, please? The OP may be in a better position to do this, but I don't think they are active on Wikipedia.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stifle, Six years ago you closed the AfD on this article, which was deleted on notability grounds. Since 2008, several more papers appeared in the peer-reviewed literature.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sophie+multimedia+future+of+the+book&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

Per the deletion review rules, I am asking you before posting there. Please consider undeleting or userfying Sophie (software), so that it can be cleaned up and updated, or if necessary merged with another article.

-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied to User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software). Stifle (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your suggestion, at Talk:Bomis/GA1.

Thanks very much for your recommendation, the article is better for it.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I followed up at the above link. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for catching this one early. I'm very convinced this is the IP-hopper I've met several times before -- see here. Nick Levine (talk) 12:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is funny you say that: I didn't catch anything - I actually accepted the changes to Catchphrase (UK game show). I merely asked them to use edit summaries. That is a troublesome pattern you have been watching. How do you tell the fact from the hoax? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Their editing pattern stands out. You saw something was odd even though you didn't know you were looking for it! I've been watching this for about a month but it goes back further - see my talk page for examples and also for discussion I've had with other editors about how/whether to revert. See also here.

The pattern is: BT Openzone IPs, edits every 5-10 minutes over several hours (today being an exception to this!), apparently random edits to ITV related pages, nonsense edit summaries (sometimes proveably so, eg when all the summaries say Undid revision 583137604 by My name is not dave and all cite the same revision number). I half suspect the damge is automated, but can't think how to go about testing that out. And all this said, it's possible I got this one wrong. In which case the human concerned will do something different (talk to me, perhaps?) Nick Levine (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you for your message about my contribution to the peptide page. I don't really understand why you said it is adverstising as when i did my searches I often found the commercial name Matrixyl as from the pages listed below and I found it was discovered by a French company which has produced many others. So it is an interesting reference for readers. http://thedermblog.com/2008/06/23/do-peptides-in-skin-care-products-work/ http://www.antiwrinklereview.org/wrinkle-cream-ingredients/what-is-matrixyl-3000/ http://www.antiagingwrinklecreaminfo.com/blog/matrixyl-3000 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2288955/Anti-wrinkle-creams-really-work--magic-ingredient.html#ixzz2OBPizg8c http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/matrixyl-miracle-anti-wrinkle-ingredient-found-1747224 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/07/scientists-find-miracle-ingredient-anti-wrinkle-cream_n_2826946.htgards,

Please let me know your thoughts as I spent a long time wirting this contribution.

Regards,

Pcriton (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)pcriton[reply]

He won't be playing for Bayern until July and has played for Borussia Dortmund since the contract was signed. Kingjeff (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you commented just once on the thread on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and seem pretty disinterested and concerned for the welfare of RetProf I'm coming to you for advice on what to do next - because that discussion is going nowhere and the problem isn't getting resolved.

As I see it, RetProf's problem has two dimensions. The first is that he's concerned over a revert on Gospel of Matthew that I made some time ago. Here's the diff: edit. In a nutshell, he'd put in material saying that there's an ancient mss of GM which includes a superscript to the effect that Matthew the Apostle wrote it. RetProf calls this an "attestation", which is a good-enough term.

RetProf says he wants a source - for the deletion, apparently. I've tried explaining that I can't source a deletion, and, more to the point, the class of attestations to which his example belongs is well known to scholars, but uniformly dismissed - they all derive from a single tradition, so have no independent vale, and the weight of other evidence is that the gospel can't be by Matthew, and was written in Greek. I believe I've pointed him to books saying this is the current consensus, but it seems to have no impact.

Anyway, that's what sparked this current row. The deeper problem is that RetProf keeps returning to this over months and years - he makes an edit inserting Hebrew Matthew, someone deletes, he goes away for a while, than months later he does it again. That's not a problem I'm worried about, but it's what the other editors are concerned about - they just want him to stop.

So what to do? I think the dispute processes have hardly been touched, to tell the truth, because he always backs off at any sign of resistance, only to come back months later. So what's the best step? An external mediator? If so, how is one found? PiCo (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am disinterested, to a degree. I recall reading many years ago that Matthew was possibly written by a Jewish person or Aramaic speaker for a Jewish audience, though I don't know if or how it should be reflected in the article.

My concern isn't for the welfare of any of the editors involved, but for the quality of the article. An ArbCom hearing is likely to leave everyone that cares one way or the other banned from the article (or at least distracted for the duration of the hearing) and will only address behaviour not content. In my humble opinion, it is always a mistake to jump directly from an argument to a request for arbitration without exploring the alternatives.

In my opinion you are right: you can't source a deletion.

I get an impression, which might be mistaken, that misguided opinions of the Church Fathers are dismissed as fringe theories by some editors. I think some middle ground could be found on that aspect. After all, nobody believes in the religion of Ancient Egypt any more, yet it has Wikipedia articles. (Perhaps the same could be said for Pelagianism or Flat Earthers or any number of unusual or obsolete world views.)

Isn't there a register of volunteer mediators somewhere on Wikipedia?

I have notified RetProf about this conversation.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I believe that if I write @RetProf the system automatically will alert him that he's been mentioned.I hope.

Anyway, the ANI discussion seems to have reached a pretty good conclusion - half a dozen or more people, including RetProf, have said they favour formal mediation. My own note has added that the mediator should be asked to provide a binding resolution, and that the parties agree to accept arbitration if they can't accept/keep the resolution.

On the matter of Gospel of Matthew, the lead of the article and the section on composition jointly say that the author was anonymous and Jewish and wrote for a Jewish Christian audience (meaning a community of Jews who accepted that Jesus was the messiah - something the majority of Jews did not do in the late 1st century and which led to the final split between Jews and Christians). All with reliable sources supplied. ::RetProf's sources are reliable too - it's just that he keeps misreading and misrepresenting them, not deliberately, but because he's just not very good at critical reading, despite his claim to be a retired academic. Yet when I look at his user page it says he spent his career working in Africa, including with the anti-apartheid movement. I like him, and that's why this is personally painful.

I'll leave a message on his talk page suggesting he start approaching people on the mediator panel - best if he chooses his own mediator, as I'm pretty sure he's going to get the rough end of the pineapple and I don't want him feeling he's been framed. PiCo (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to create a 'Special:NewDraftsFeed' system. Your comments are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smallbones/Questions on FTC rules - Smallbones_(smalltalk) 15:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anup. No source confirms the date of death of Shirley Temple (If you do not mind to re-read the sources again). And You keep introducing original research. Can you please explain? If you've some source that says, Feb 10 or Feb 11, cite it in the body of the article. Thanks, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anupmehra: Trumplump added a BBC article that says She died on Monday at home ... bbc. Sorry I said 'warring' in my edit summary - your edit was in good faith. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Happy editing! Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Though Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have a joint capital as hyderabad for 10 years, The powers ruling the capital i.e. hyderabad goes to Telangana State only. So Technically, Hyderabad is just an acting capital for AP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh13j (talk • contribs) 09:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahesh13j: Naturally. When the Act is implemented, why not put "acting capital"? It is easier to understand than 'no capital'. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:31, Thursday, December 26, 2024 (UTC)

Please post a close explanation at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2014_January_14#File:New_Chippenham_Campus.jpg.

Cassie.reid (talk · contribs) is a new user and won't be able to understand that their upload was deleted even though I added a discussion of the image to the article the text. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - on both the discussion and the user's talk page. I read through the comments on the talk page and see a common problem. She works for them in a promotional role and like many only came here to fix errors in here company's article. The long learning period to get your head around Wikipedia is then absent and frustration ensues. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patient attention explaining the AfD and reading the talk page, Peripitus.

I agree about the learning period. I like to help newcomers understand us, because aaronsw's research said that most of the encyclopedia text is written by the long tail of hundreds of thousands of editors who are only interested in 1 or 2 articles, rather than the few thousand at the core who make the most edits. Patient, specific explanation from the horse's mouth helps a lot. Even if she never comes back here, I bet she will tell others about her experience.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olga Taussky-Todd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I deleted the part that offended StAnselm. Would it be possible to reinsert the sentences now? Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamduker (talk • contribs) 16:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly to clarify, I am a contractor for University of California, Santa Cruz, specifically, hired to be webmaster of the University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center ("UC-HiPACC"). UC-HiPACC is a co-sponsor of Project AGORA.

As to the AGORA Project, I think it's notable that http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2669 shows that the technical paper describing the project has been accepted by the Astrophysical Journal Supplement, a prestigious scientific journal. As displayed at the arxiv link, the authors of the paper are Astrophysicists from 27 institutions around the world, and thus the project is vast in scope. The technical paper is footnoted in my draft Wikipedia article, as are references to two other outside publications, Universe Today and Science Daily. There is a website for the project, https://sites.google.com/site/santacruzcomparisonproject/, referenced by footnote, managed by an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology, which is not part of the University of California. The project is supported by the National Science Foundation, among others, according to this website. I would think that students of Astrophysics should be able to find out about this project so as to keep abreast of such a major developments in the field. I will happily leave it to the wisdom of the Wikipedia community to decide, based on its merits, the worthiness this article for inclusion in the Encyclopedia.

As to the UC-HiPACC article, I will follow the procedures you outline for suggested changes or updates to the article.

Thank you for taking the time to help me with my Wikipedia work! Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sjzaslaw: Steve, it is good to hear from you. I downloaded the paper a few hours ago, and, though I didn't read it all, I appreciate the eminence and scope of the enterprise. Students of astronomy might learn about AGORA better in the journals and from your website. I would like it to be in Wikipedia, but I fear that without significant coverage outside the Universe Today piece, it is likely to quickly be the subject of an Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion discussion. (I didn't mention Science Daily as it simply republished UCSC's press release.) As far as I can tell, lots of big ideas have one paper in a major journal, and their articles get deleted. It seems odd when we have articles on Pokemon characters. If you don't mind a wider debate and the risk of deletion, then by all means get the full copyright release, or rewrite, and see if an AFC reviewer will accept the article. Until then I'll move it from the AFC queue for you to work on (you should soon see an automated message about that.) --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a person's name "Oommen Chandy" in "List of Indian Christians" page. I gave government site as reference as he is presently Chief Minister of Kerala. Still it is removed. Please help me to understand why it was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robin7013 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Robin7013: The government website only tells us his job. You need to post a reliable source for his religion. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EastofEnglandlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Of Human Feelings. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited InterSystems Caché, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Array. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Five pillars. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Events at the 2014 Asian Games. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators open to recall. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hroðulf. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Way back in 2008, you proposed that Pikey was better off as a dictionary definition. I recently converted the page to soft redirect to a dictionary definition. That has now been reverted, if you are sill interested in the subject perhaps you would like to have another look at talk:Pikey. -- PBS (talk) 23:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Goryeo. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wicked (musical album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you gave the correct answer. [1] Atsme☯^Consult 23:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to take sides. There are understandable emotions, and understandable confusion about the sources. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a given. I never expected you to take sides. I simply felt the reply to you was incorrect, and didn't want you to be left wondering. I feel fortunate to have been the recipient of a great deal of input over the past few months regarding my journey toward a better understanding of RS. I have learned from highly experienced Wikipedians, some with over 100,000 edits, and an admin who collaborated writing some of the policies we adhere to today. I can say without reservation that what I've learned is simply that RS are and always will be subjective until a list is created with some form of classification. I don't see that happening anytime soon. Thx! Atsme☯^Consult 21:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad the conversation has progressed since the RS/N posting: I appreciated the update. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hroðulf. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants.
Message added 01:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Accelerating_universe -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a sincere thank you for the polite way you showed me i had the wrong template, i was doubling down on my error every-time someone commented, embarrassing. doesnt matter who long i edit here, always seems to be more to learn. Darkstar1st (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf

I went through the Schumacher Center AfD ensuring I had only voted once, as per discussion. But accidentally changed your vote, mistakenly thinking I had once voted 'merge' - when I thought the article could be merged with the NEC article. Sorry for my mistake.

Regards Jonpatterns (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes we all make. No explanation was necessary, but I appreciate your comment all the same. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Something New. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestions for issues that need to be raised, modified, or deleted at COIducks would be greatly appreciated. You can comment here User_talk:Atsme/sandboxCOIduckery or at the essay's TP. Thank you in advance....Atsme☯^Consult 18:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew West (linguist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew West (linguist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic London 15:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now it's a moot point. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judge advocate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judge Advocate General. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf , thanks for your assistance with getting Community_First_Credit_Union merged. Its much appreciated on our end as we're only trying to do everything correctly. One question I have is that The Red pen of Doom keeps removing cited and referenced content (see change log) and hasn't given any explanation as to why he/she removed it. The information is consistant with other WP:Corp's who are similar. I would like to undo but would be appreciated if you could have a quick look? (obviously happy if they were removed within any guidelines, but would like to get feedback if they were)

Cheers Mate Bowey21 (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will answer at Talk:Community_First_Credit_Union. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf I have responded back to you on Talk:Community_First_Credit_Union Bowey21 (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Kumanovo shootings. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other information about the not-so-nice party not allowed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.102.202 (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 16:10, Thursday, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mukti Bahini. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the welcome/introduction message on my page. :) Hope this is the right place to put this. AudreyTruong (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AudreyTruong: Don't mention it. Yes, this is the right place. Welcome again. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fire Emblem Fates. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hroðulf, back in June you responded to my request to make some updates based on the new BP Annual Report. I am wondering if you would be able to return and help with the remaining requests, as these have as yet not been answered. Also, a few weeks ago, the BP logo was removed from Wikimedia Commons. I have uploaded a new logo to Wikipedia as a fair use file and am looking for help in adding that to the infobox. Are you able to help? Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 20:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:University-ulster-belfast-exterior-closeup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesus. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Flag of the Ulster Nation.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gun laws in the United States by state. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "physical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here← --Rosiestep (talk) 03:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason De Carteret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason De Carteret (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Egghead06 (talk) 07:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hroðulf/WABCO, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hroðulf/WABCO and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hroðulf/WABCO during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Post-coup unrest in Egypt (2013–2014). Legobot (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox medical condition. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us!
	Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - a Year of Science initiative Hosts: Women in Red, Women Scientists Sponsor: WikiEdu April-December 2016 #wikiwomeninred #yearofscience #contentgap

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peptides in skin care, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hroðulf. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Peptides in skin care".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Peter Sam Fan 19:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Portal talk:Right-wing populism. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hroðulf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Train Simulator (Dovetail Games). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. (Delivered: 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC))

Hi Hroðulf. A couple years back, you helped me make updates to the Vianovo article—would you be interested in helping again? I have a new set of minor updates on the Talk page that have been hanging out for about a month. As last time, I prepared these on behalf of the firm, so I won't make the changes myself. Thanks so much for your time! Heatherer (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Im currently rebuilding the WikiProject Investment.

Since your a member of the project/were one I wanted to ask if you were interested in helping me re-start the project.

I already am pretty much finished with updating the project page.Take a look at it. Ping me if you want to help! Thanks. WikiEditCrunch (talk) 21:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Hello, Hroðulf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 2, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Zoo Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2018 The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want! Participation: This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 3, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Zoo Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2019 The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want! Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl. Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! Hello Hroðulf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019

Any input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The People's Choice (political party)/meta/color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. doktorb _words^deeds 14:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. At some point in the ancient past you were either involved in the creation of the above template, or the successful AfD for the party's article's deletion. I've just put the template up on TfD so am letting editors involved at some point, even fleetingly in most cases, just in case you want to chip in the discussion. Cheers. doktorb _words^deeds 14:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yapperbot (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hroðulf! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since you're a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Utterly Butterly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utterly Butterly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sandstein 15:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]