Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Yamashita: The Tiger's Treasure, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Yamashita: The Tiger's Treasure. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Yamashita: The Tiger's Treasure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to English, Japanese, Sound mixing, Filipino, Cinemagic and MMFF

Bulong (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Horror

Jologs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Cinemagic

The Unkabogable Praybeyt Benjamin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Action

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In American Adobo, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Gloria Romero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mila (2001 film), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Mila.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid that your rewrite of the plot remained too close to the one in the WikiPilipinas article. We can't copy content from them, and we can't follow what they have too closely. They're no longer compatibly licensed with Wikipedia. You're welcome to add a plot description, but please start from scratch and explain what happens in the movie in your own words. Plots can't be copied from other websites, even official ones, I'm afraid. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited American Adobo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caucasian, Social butterfly and Illegal alien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that radio stations have a naming convention. All radio stations with a callsign should be titled with its callsign, not its brand name. Please read WP:RADIONAMING for details. -WayKurat (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited ABS-CBN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	i like your page Kiozuki (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hollyckuhno (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked your article Spirit Warriors[1] as patrolled but it be nice to have a few more references on it. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 06:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roadrunner Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Spirit Warriors: The Shortcut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloria Romero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Shirt58 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Star Cinema does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Cinema. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yamashita the tiger's treasure.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 14:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azkals logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Banana Fingers (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you got another person saying its fan made!! And it is!! There you go!! Tirade?!?! LOL!!!! You're deluded!! You can't even figure out that is fan made yet you're accusing me of having an agenda?!?! LOL!! Go buy yourself a brain and maybe, just maybe we'll be able to talk!! Banana Fingers (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will not indulge in your personal attacks. I do not contribute to the Wikipedia just to hurt someone's feeling, as long as i'm assuming good faith, I have nothing to lose. Whether the image will be deleted or not, at the end of the day, i'll be the one who'll be happy because I know that I have a proper manner and etiquette. Hollyckuhno (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're "hurt" from me telling you that you can't seem to figure out that what you uploaded was fan made and that you need to sort yourself out.... then you've got some serious issues that you need take care of! lol. It also begs the question... how do you get by in everyday life?! It sure beats me! Banana Fingers (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're so overdramtic its untrue!! But I guess it goes hand-in-hand with you being so sensitive to criticism! I also bet you're one of them people that never gave a rats ass about football and when the Philippines national team overachieved in 2010, you jumped on the bandwagon. lol! Banana Fingers (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue? what untrue? hmm. It seems that you are now getting away from our point here. The only truth here is I am a real football fan but not particularly to Philippines National Football Team. If you'll just take time to see my contributions timeline, I have never been involved in any football articles before. The only truth here is I know the football team well because i'm a Filipino living in the Philippines who watches sports and news, reads newspaper, and browses the internet on a regular basis. I'm not sensitive to criticism in fact (thanks to user HTD) I am now ready to stop this conversation until I've got a full proof. Happy? --HollycK (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're not even familiar with the expression ".....its untrue"?!? lol. And you're ready to stop this conversation until you've got "a full proof"? Say what?!?! My initial thoughts were right. Dealing with a person like you is like dealing with a brick wall. Banana Fingers (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I was right all along. This is not about the logo's nature anymore, this is now about your self centered ego and your I know-it-all habit. You're mad because you didn't succeed on removing the image and because of me commenting on your manners and conduct. Well if that's the case in here, then I have no time for you, I don't deal with people that doesn't seem to understand simple things. If you had just started this right and not with your foul tirades, then maybe we haven't have any problem on the first place because me, myself have no problem debating with people. The only problem here is your out-of-line point and nonsense opinions. Maybe you should start changing yourself first before posting any comments on Wikipedia (Wikipedia is not a forum) because this conversation is not about you. Please bear that on your mind. --HollycK (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!! Yeah yeah yeah.... whatever... Why would I be mad?! I'm frustrated as hell though because like I said, dealing with a person like you is like dealing with a brick wall! You can't even realize that what you've uploaded is some random fan made logo and your insistence in your opinion which you are trying to pass as fact is just laughable to say the least and it's also why the discussion can't seem to go anywhere! It's clearly you that needs to look in the mirror and start changing yourself! Banana Fingers (talk) 21:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Emir (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilocano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charo Santos-Concio2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Azkals logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kumusta? Agdahon mi man ika sa Bikol Wikipedia. Mabalos! --Filipinayzd (talk) 09:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marhay man po baga. Salamat po sa imbetasyon. Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the policies on the usage of non-free images on Wikipedia, non-free images are not allowed on pages outside of the article namespace, including userpages. Two images on your user page is copyrighted and unlicensed, so I had to remove them. I'm sorry if you are upset by my editing your page without your permission, but this is a rule where Wikipedia allows no exceptions. I want to make sure you know that this isn't personal. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or to seek another editor's opinion at the WP:MCQ discussion board.

Thanks for uploading File:Jollibeeonglee.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I just ask why you removed this edit here?. I don't think that it was necessary. Look at The X Factor (UK) and The X Factor (U.S.) for example. I'm just following The X-Factor's series template. Even The X Factor (Australia) has it. Masterpeace3 (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a directory. It is already stated and linked on the body of the article so why put it on top? Hollyckuhno (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's only listed as 1 in the article, so it would kind of make it hard for people to find it. I think that we should follow the structure of the other articles. I will change it to One in words instead. Masterpeace3 (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AKA Jam2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kcconcepcion.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is to let you know that your request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist has now been processed and will soon be closed and archived. To find the request, search for your username at that page. Stifle (talk) 17:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thevoiceph.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Renzoy16 | Contact Me 17:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Voice of Philippines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Renzoy16 | Contact Me 15:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jollibee, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hollyckuhno,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Sky Harbor ^(talk) 04:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myxrated.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a web ad for businesses. The content on the article needs to be appropriate, appropriately sourced, and appropriately presented. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But I would retain the availability on the infobox. Unless it is agreed by the Wikipedia community that it is removed indefinitely. See CNN, MSNBC etc... you might want to start on those articles since they are more important. Hollyckuhno (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Film Archive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudy Fernandez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Here Comes the Bride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pilitac.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Charicep.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Garyv.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Martinn.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:STAR CINEMA logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Star Cinema logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myxrated.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Azkals logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Azkals logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Join us at Bikol Wikipedia! --Filipinayzd (talk) 02:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Enrile-on-headstart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The voice ph.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 10:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hollyckuhno. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

--Kevjonesin (talk) 10:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hollyckuhno, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:STAR CINEMA logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Theworldtonight.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myx old.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ABS-CBN Corporation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• = Lopez, Inc. <small>(57.24%)</small><ref name="owner">{{cite press release|last=Masilungan|first=]Eulogio Martin|title=Public Ownership Report|url=http://edge.pse.com.ph/companyDisclosures/form.do?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High-definition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shake Shake Go England Skies EP lo res.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBNnews.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicken Pork Adobo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patayin sa Sindak si Barbara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN News Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On demand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBNmobile, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Servers and Prepaid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANC2014variant.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StarCinemalogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Starmusic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Starcinema.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Server. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abs cbn 1963 logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It's Showtime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

ABS-CBN

added a link pointing to Tagalog

ASAP (variety show)

added a link pointing to Live broadcast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANClogo2014.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ABS-CBNHD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy Development Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malitbog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films produced and released by Star Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Ramsey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please read WP:MOSFILM, esp. WP:FILMRELEASE. The release date in the infobox is for a) the first release and b) the first domestic release. In this case, it's for the debut at Toronto only, as it's not yet been released domestically in the Philippines. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please read the links I've posted, above. I see you doing the exact same edits as another user did to this article, so I suspect you of being a sock account too. This could lead you to being blocked. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noted in my revision that the MMFF premiere is the first commercial domestic release of Honor Thy Father. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up if I may, I have read the guidelines carefully and it clearly states that 1) The release date should be the earliest release date in the country the film originated 2) Screenings like the one in TIFF is excluded. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop - this is your only warning. I'm quite happy to take you to WP:3RR to get you blocked (or for being a sockpuppet). Did you read the film MOS? You do know that you should not pipe "cinema of Philiphines" in the lead too? Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who needs to stop. The only thing you have been doing so far is warn me without even considering my points. Obviously you just keep reverting my edits because your ego was hurt. You can't accept that you're wrong. Wake up and please carefully read WP:MOSFILM and WP:FILMRELEASE. As for WP:3RR be careful because you're the one who keeps on reverting my edits without bases. Hollyckuhno (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you being thick or just trolling? The Toronto Film Festival was the earliest release date! FFS READ the guidance. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And see this. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. I did not say that it isn't. But the guideline states that screenings and previews are excluded. The guideline also states that the earliest release date in the country the film originates (produced) should be the one listed. You're the one being funny. Hollyckuhno (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll spell it out as you can't see it. WP:FilmRelease - "Release dates should therefore be restricted to the film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival..." TIFF was on 12 Sept 2015. Now, I don't know what calendar you have, but on mine 12 Sept 2015 is before 25 Dec 2015. Read the rest of the guidance carefully and you'll see it's the first release (festival, whatever) then the first release in the country it was produced in. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will also spell it out for you in full - "Release dates should therefore be restricted to the film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival, a world premiere, or a public release, and the release date(s) in the country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings. Take note of the country or countries that produced the film and excluding sneak previews or screenings Hollyckuhno (talk) 14:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pres. Noy on YouTube Worldview.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Davao and Tagalog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MYX logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Try. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DanceKids.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skylogomain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Digital Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It's Showtime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Goodbye-america-movie-poster-1997.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Legacy 1998 DVD poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Goodbye-america-movie-poster-1997.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Legacy 1998 DVD poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ABS-CBN Film Restoration Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Here is a barnstar for your effort. Great job to you! Filipinayzd (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hollyckuhno (talk) 16:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hollyckuhno, join us at PhilWiki Community. ESEAP Conference 2018 will be happening in Bali, Indonesia on 5-6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for the Wikimedia communities in East, Southeast Asia and the Pacific regions. You are very qualifies to join! --Filipinayzd 11:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MV5BMTA0N2IyOWYtMGE5Yy00OGVlLTk3MTctNjI5YmM5ZjQwM2Y5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjY5NTQ0Mjc@. V1 SY1000 CR0,0,656,1000 AL .jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:MV5BMTA0N2IyOWYtMGE5Yy00OGVlLTk3MTctNjI5YmM5ZjQwM2Y5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjY5NTQ0Mjc@. V1 SY1000 CR0,0,656,1000 AL .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please give the source from GMA High definition quality pictures. Oripaypaykim (talk) 09:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as GMA HD and this user has been vandalizing the articles related to GMA programs. While several GMA programs are shot using HD cameras, none of these are broadcast in HD. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is too long ago. Please do not reply to any of this messages, and I assume you to stop replying to this messages. (talk)

Please stop putting misleading, non-factual, soap-boxing, no citation contents in Wikipedia. Your account may be block if you do not follow the guidelines of Wikipedia. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before to this article GMA Films and Regal Films, Viva Films, APT Entertainment, Octo Arts, and M-zet Productions they are in studio partner, so I called it subsidiaries talk User: Kazaro

Subsidiary and partner are two different terms. By definition, subsidiary means that it is a company owned and controlled by another company. GMA Films, Regal Films, etc..., as you have said are studio partners, while it might be true, this is a partnership per film only (or in the film industry this is called co-production). This is also true for Star Cinema, VIVA Films, etc... Please use terms accordingly and please use citation to your edits to support it or else you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is my last warning to you. Hollyckuhno (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disrupting the articles of Wikipedia. Do not add misleading and non-factual contents or else you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not put GMA Records/GMA Records and Home Video as a subsidiary or division of GMA Films because they are two separate companies. GMA Records/GMA Records and Home Video are under RGMA Marketing and Productions, Inc. while GMA Films is under GMA Network Films, Inc. I have already added GMA Records and Home Video as a division of GMA Records so please stop putting it on the article of GMA Films or else I will report you for persistent vandalism. If you want to verify, you can look it up in the Philippine Stock Exchange website: *GMA on PSE Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you need to clarify what's in the website, and also GMA Films is part of GMA Records and Home Video. This is part of the company. GMA Films produce the Marimar series CD's and other series and used as the GMA Records and Home Video to connect with GMA Films to produce the series. So please may I suggest you to stop putting a non-factual contents, and I did not see GMA Records and Home Video on the website you provide to me. For more information see [2]. Kazaro (talk)

No they are entirely separate from each other. GMA Records and Home Video is under GMA Records as shown on GMA's official website, and I quote "RGMA Marketing and Productions, Inc. (GMA Records) - Music recording, publishing and video distribution" : www.gmanetwork.com/corporate/subsidiariesandaffiliates/ Hollyckuhno (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Star Cinema, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hollyckuhno (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay right now I read the website from page 60, that they provide me Thank you!. Kazaro (talk)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hollyckuhno (talk) 12:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you need to talk to me, just leave the message on my talk page. however, I'm only available during Saturday and Sunday Pacific Standard Time Hawaii. Kazaro (talk)

Hi, Why would you delete any of article I created on Wikipedia? It seems like your watching me about my activity on here? And You need to inform me by deleting the article becuase you just inform me in about 1 days and already does not exist this article GMA Worldwide Inc. ? Kazaro (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Kazaro[reply]

Why did you remove my edits on ABS-CBN article? I know it's overcrowded but it's more informed. I'm so dissappointed! ThePhilipTimes (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images are already well presented on the article of ABS-CBN Corporation. There is no need to put that on the ABS-CBN article since the images only makes the article bloated. Hollyckuhno (talk) 06:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hollyckuhno,

I got your message and I do know the format.

But why is my update unacceptable? Why are you calling it disruptive? I followed the rules. I have appropriate citations. Now, let me point out the flaw in one of your updates that I was trying to correct.

First your update, "Je C.C. of Philippine Entertainment Portal gave a mixed review writing about the film as "still falling into the pitfalls of Star Cinema cliches, Barcelona: A Love Untold becomes a film of blemished beauty, but that is fine." is misleading because the author's review was not mixed. In fact, he was saying that even though the movie falls into the usual cliche of blemished beauty, it was fine and the whole article was positive but your update was putting a negative spin to it. So I just added a few more blurbs in the article to show that it wasn't a negative review. And the fact that you explicitly stated that Oggs Cruz of Rappler had a "negative review" is redundant because the readers can already read that it is negative based on Oggs' words ""dull and ineffective" and "feels too mechanical, too designed to work." It shows malice and subjectivity not objectivity, which, as editors, we should uphold.

Rod Magaru provided a positive review and you deleted it. Why, because it was positive? What makes you the authority to only include negative reviews and not the positive ones? Unless you are biased. Editors should not be biased and provide only facts. And my updates had appropriate references.

Please review my updates again. I'm contesting and requesting reinstatement of my update. If I have appropriate citations, my updates should be acceptable and NOT disruptive. We can discuss this amicably or we can take it to an admin for arbitration.

Thanks, Darkamhi Darkamhi (talk) 20:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your revision because it does not conform to MOS:QUOTATIONS. Hollyckuhno (talk) 02:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response Hollyckuhno. I have read the manual. I just don't see the non-conformity of this sentence and quotation, Rod Magaru writes, "Olive Lamasan’s BARCELONA asks you to forgive & live." VERSUS this, Oggs Cruz of Rappler gave a negative review stating that the film is "dull and ineffective", and added that the film "feels too mechanical, too designed to work." Why is the latter acceptable to YOU and not the former? Why is adding to Je C.C.'s quote the sentence, He wrote, "Kathryn Bernardo is brilliant and (surprisingly for me) commanding as the ambitious, but easily discouraged Mia. Daniel Padilla has an equally persuasive depiction with his restrained Ely, a character who possesses compelling dignity ..." not acceptable and disruptive as you called it? It was stated in the article itself. Please explain how that's supposed to be disruptive? Explain to me why that doesn't conform with MOS while the other quotations do?

This isn't the American Journal of Medicine. These are Critical Reception comments to a Filipino movie. The statements aren't false. They are based on the articles being referenced. And the quoted sentences are succinct enough.

Again, it's a bit obvious that you want to censor information that doesn't conform to YOUR own bias, it seems. Otherwise, you could've just corrected the quotations yourself but NOT DELETE it completely.

I'd welcome suggestions from you on how to quote or phrase it correctly but request again for you to reinstate my updates before I submit a dispute to the admin.

- Darkamhi Darkamhi (talk) 09:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You said you have read the guidelines but judging by your reply it seems that you did not understand it well enough to understand why I reverted your revision. The quotation from Je C.C. is enough since it summarizes his/her review for the film. The MOS states that quotation should be keep into minimal. Now, the quotation from Rod Magaru on the other hand is out of context. The sub-article is about the critical reception of the film but the quote "Olive Lamasan's BARCELONA asks you to forgive & live." is obviously not a review. It sounded like an advertisement for the film. Hollyckuhno (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But that's your subjective opinion. I have read so many filipino movie pages without this kind of censorship. They're horribly written and one of them, by the way, is an article that you have often policed and edited - "Imagine You and Me" - it is badly written with grammatical errors all over yet you don't correct it. Who are you to say that Rod Magaru's review is not a review? Everyone's review, even Phil Dy's and Oggs Cruz, are their SUBJECTIVE opinions, what they think of the movie regardless if it agrees with the actual reception of the public or not. You're deciding that Rod's review is an advertisement for the film because you don't agree with it. But that's YOUR opinion. You're supposed to be an objective editor. Did you read his article? Was he directly selling the film to everyone? In fact, he had several issues with the film - the length, the product placement, etc. How can you claim that he was trying to sell the film when he listed both the pros and cons, something I can't say about Oggs Cruz who just found everything wrong with the film. You're an editor. Are you also an admin to police and censor everyone? If it's inappropriate I can understand it but it's not inappropriate. You're not the police of the internet. The review, no matter how slanted it is, is a valid review, the same way that Phil Dy and Oggs reviews are slanted. And you have no right to censor it from wikipedia just because you may not agree with it.

If you are going to police all Filipino movie pages, then do it FOR ALL PAGES, not just selectively for pages that you may not like. Don't play god of filipino movie pages. Stop censorship. Wikipedia is for everyone.

And FYI, I'm actually a donor of Wikipedia. So technically, I'm part owner of this free page. Are you?

- Darkamhi (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am only referring to the quotation from Rod Magaru that you have added to the article. It is out of context because it does not fall into the article's purpose of giving the readers a bird's eye view on the film's critical reception. Furthermore, the quotation you have provided does not summarize the review of Rod Magaru to the film, instead you have deliberately chosen it because it sounds good but in Wikipedia, soap-boxing and advertisement is not allowed. The MOS:QUOTATIONS clearly states that quotation should be used only "to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea" and in this case, about the critical reception to the film. Does the quote "Olive Lamasan’s BARCELONA asks you to forgive & live" the best quote to show the point of view of Rod Magaru about the film? The quote does not say anything about the film's execution, production values, etc... but instead it sounded like a one-liner from the film's producer itself. I would rather put this on the article instead "overall, the story, acting and scenes gave birth to what I call masterpiece of 2016. I like to commend Carmi Raymundo’s way of rewriting flashbacks. It is one of her best." or Rod Magaru called it a "masterpiece of 2016." By the way, may I remind you that Wikipedia is free for everyone to edit, use, and distribute. Donating to Wikipedia does not make you a part owner of it. Hollyckuhno (talk) 16:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like your edit of "overall, the story, acting and scenes gave birth to what I call masterpiece of 2016. I like to commend Carmi Raymundo’s way of rewriting flashbacks. It is one of her best." Will you do the honor of adding this to the page since you wrote it so well?

Ok, my bad. You are correct. Just because I have a standing monthly donation to Wikipedia doesn't make me part owner.

Thank you for the discourse and I'm glad we were able to discuss and settle this between ourselves.

- Darkamhi (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pandokokoy. Please enlighten me on what specific words I added on my recent contributions to Sky Direct are promotional. If you find it promotional, i suggest delete the whole sentence alone. Thank you. Pandokokoy (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful. I templated the other editor. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hollyckuhno,

Have you read the entire International release and box office section that I added? It was peppered with citations and reliable sources. Have you heard of Movie City News? It's a legitimate facts/figures only website based out of Los Angeles that only publishes legitimate movie box office results. I have seen many Wikipedia pages citing Movie City News. Their source is the same source used by Box Office Mojo. So why would you remove that entire section when it is from citations. I have seen many Filipino movie pages in Wikipedia where anonymous users constantly update it with bogus figures that are not cited yet it's tolerated whereas what I added actually had reliable & legitimate citations.

You said be prepared to cite reliable sources so please tell me what in my section was not cited from reliable sources and why you deleted the whole section?

Thanks Movieloverinlove (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Movieloverinlove[reply]

Barcelona A Love Untold - Why was the International release and box office section completely removed?

Hi Hollyckuhno,

Further to my response, you said, "it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say." and that's exactly why I cited Movie City News. I looked into all the Filipino movies that they published and only 5 movies had citations where the movie gross passed $1,000,000. So in your words, "published sources that imply something that none of them explicity say" is what I did with the 5 movies. MCN is not a biased source. It only publishes facts & figures. They published that those 5 movies made over $1 million in 10 days therefore it is a fact.

So, in your own words, please be prepared to explain why that is not considered a citable contribution to this page.

Thanks, Movieloverinlove (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Movieloverinlove[reply]

Hi, first of all, I did not removed the international releases you added. I only moved it in the proper section under the sub-article Release. Second, I have removed the second paragraph because it does not cite any references. Third, I removed the third paragraph because it is a synthesis of published materials that advances a position; meaning it is an original research stitched together from various sources to imply a conclusion. Hollyckuhno (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So instead of talking to me first, you just decided to remove the entire section and moved it where it pleases you? And you didn't even say that in your original message. All I saw was the entire section was deleted by you. Shouldn't you have communicated with me first and discussed it? All you said in your message is that "we cannot accept ..." which implied that you rejected my entire contribution. But you just picked and chose what you liked about it then moved it. May I ask what gave you that entitlement? Are you the administrator of this page or just like me, a contributor?

To your comments, "Third, I removed the third paragraph because it is a synthesis of published materials that advances a position; meaning it is an original research stitched together from various sources to imply a conclusion." and from your original message to me, "Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say." is exactly what I did. I cited all the references from Movie City News because they track all foreign movies that make over $1,000,000 in its second week and those are the only 5 Filipino movies that have been cited so far. So that is a fact from published sources that I put together to form a conclusion. C'mon, these are just movies we're talking about, not scientific journals! And it's not like I'm just pulling facts out of air. I actually cited every single movie in that list. So why can't we come to a compromise and include the entire section since those are facts.

Thanks Movieloverinlove (talk) 10:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Movieloverinlove[reply]

And as to the second paragraph, I will cite the references of the theatres that extended it to October 13th, which makes it 3 weeks from Sept 23rd. Will that please you and let me add it back?

Thanks Movieloverinlove (talk) 10:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Movieloverinlove[reply]

No, Wikipedia has manual of style (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film). Formatting of articles should be based on that. As for why I removed the third paragraph, kindly read and understand this very carefully: Synthesis of published material that advances a position Hollyckuhno (talk) 10:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hollyckuhno. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hollyckuhno, I don't dispute the fact that Vice Ganda, Coco Martin, along with Awra Briguela and Onyok Pineda are the main cast, however Vice Ganda and Coco Martin are the only "starring" actors. And Briguela and Pineda are billed as "Introducing...". If the parameter of the infobox says "main cast" then I have no qualms. Look at the theatrical poster, it lists Vice and Coco Martin's names at the top, while Briguela and Pineda is listed below along with the rest of the principal cast although they are mentioned first (again as "introducing").Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the film industry, the term "starring" is synonymous with main cast. The term "introducing" is used informally to label cast members that will made a film debut in a particular film project. Hollyckuhno (talk) 14:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myxtvlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lifestyle2015.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's a discussion where it made's by the administrator. Do not add some tags when the discussion is not finished, and also please refrain using the word biased and unverifiable sources about GMA Worldwide because the sources has enough proven for the article I created. If you can't follow these rules you might have some problem, since you don't have the right to put those tags, and however the administrator or the highest level account from wiki only put those tags. Kazaro (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's no such rule here in Wikipedia. Every users are entitled to tag an article provided that the tags are appropriate (See WP:RESPTAG). What are you talking about biased and unverifiable sources? Are you on drugs? This is not a personal vendetta my dear. I am doing all my best to improve Wikipedia by staying true to the guidelines it provided, now if you do not know this, please take some time reading before contributing because the next time you mess with me, I will make sure that you will be blocked indefinitely. Hollyckuhno (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on saying Are you on drug?, and also Can you please look at the reference I provided? and not just looking at the article. If you keep putting those tags again, I will report you from the administrators. The article I created has not been reviewed yet. If you can't stop reverting you may be blocked from editing, If you can't follow this instructions. It seems like you've been stalking my account, when I make an edit's for GMA Network Inc..Kazaro (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know everyone have the right to put the tags but the article is in discussion and not been reviewed from the administrators. Since the administrators has not been decided yet.

Then go ahead report me and let see who's side the Administrators will support. Why the hell would I stalk you? Are you being funny? By the way, a reference from one source is not verifiable and if you have actually read the guidelines of Wikipedia then you would have known this. Hollyckuhno (talk) 08:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant, that is not a valid reason. The moment you created an article it becomes public, everyone can see it. Now let me remind you again for the millionth times, tags are used to improve the articles, if the issues the tags are referring have not been solved, then it should no be removed. Hollyckuhno (talk) 08:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might have to study those guidelines carefully where it's been taking place. The sources come's from the company btw. And you really think there going to support you?, but however I don't really want this discussion specially to whose not an administrators. Kazaro (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly the opposite of what the guidelines says about references. The guidelines says that references should be from third-party sources (Not from PR, press release, company website) to be considered verifiable. You really have to read the guidelines because it shows how much you do not know about citations Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have point, but the guidelines said, the article needs to come from the reliable sources to create our article, and can you please tag me about this discussion, I can't even received any received an message about this. Kazaro (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A reliable source should be verifiable, it should be published by more than one third-party sources to be considered reliable. If you have read the guidelines very carefully in the first place then you would not have any problem understanding that. Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the point, that's why I placed a reliable about all of the article I created. Kazaro (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not reliable sources because it all came from GMA Network. A reliable source should come from third-parties (meaning sources not associated to GMA). Look, I really don't have time to lecture, I am just here to patrol vandals and to improve articles. Just start from here Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is you keep putting non sense tags which may not be followed to the article. However if you really can't resist this discussion, you may have to talk to the administrator so on, or I will start the discussion between these problem your involving. Kazaro (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those tags are all valid and you would know that if you have read the guidelines. This is my suggestion to you, resolved the issues the tags are referring to and I will be more than happy to remove the tags myself. Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing.

You have so far removed two of my posts [3] [4] at WP:ANI. Please stop or you many be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 11:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed that you moved "KidZania Manila" to "Kidzania Manila" with the rationale simply saying "Naming Standard." I'm just wondering what WP:MOS standard exactly you're referring to, given that "KidZania" is a brand name? And also given that the international "KidZania" still retains the big Z? Just wondering. Thanks! - Alternativity (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boyband PH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop group. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines‎. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only protect the integrity of the article. A user want to add unreliable and unverifiable references to the article. Most of the citations the user added are all press releases. Hollyckuhno (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ~PogingJuan 18:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Onthejob.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onthejob.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source that supports the statement "All copyrights to the films restored and remastered are owned in perpetuity by ABS-CBN Corporation" which you placed on the ABS-CBN Film Restoration Project article? I looked up all the sources that were linked in the article and even tried Googling this, but I was unable to find one such link that will support the statement. If you cannot provide any supporting link for this, then I will be removing this unsupported statement after some time. --- Tito Pao (talk) 07:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I edited the revenue and operating income based on virtually the same source. I noticed that the source in the version before my edits is already dead. I found another ownership report from the same website which had different figures.

In hindsight, I also thought that the low revenue and operating income (based on this source) is the reason why Rappler is recently asking for donations, which kinda justified the edit.

But anyway, thanks for the tip on finding more reliable sources. :) Neotyrannical (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already updated the link. Hollyckuhno (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! May I ask where did you get a higher resolution file of PGT title card? Thanks. Hiwilms (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shake Shake Go England Skies EP lo res.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hollyckuhno. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chickenporkadobo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Filipino On Demand, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Störm (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Popup-iwantv-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hollyckuhno. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jologs (DVD cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sky-direct-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SKYlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myxlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hollyckuhno,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, ABS-CBN Foundation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABS-CBN Foundation .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Abs-cbnfoundation.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SKYONDEMAND.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Assets owned by ABS-CBN has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. robertsky (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abs-cbn-mobile.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs shown on the ABS-CBN News Channel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs shown on the ABS-CBN News Channel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

  // Timothy :: talk  21:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Myxtv.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abs cbn 1963 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Restaurant 9501, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restaurant 9501 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Restaurant-9501.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kidzania-manila-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ABS-CBNHD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:StarMusic.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:C1-ORIGINALS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]