Hello, HiWikiEdit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, , or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  

==References==
{{Reflist}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HiWikiEdit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet account. But rather I have reported sockpuppet accounts. And if we see my stats all my edits are live on Wikipedia. I am yet to receive a policy violation notice or a vandalism notice. As far as being sockpuppet is concerned, I copied the items from EditWiki45 's page. That doesn't prove that I am his sockpuppet. I was editing the page Bhima. I checked the page's editing history and found this blocked account. I went on to see his user page and kinda liked that, so I copied it. And as far as editing his user page is concerned I tried to put a "blocked or retired tag" on top of his user page. And to add to this he was repeatedly vandalising articles but I am yet to do so which I will never. Please unblock me or discuss this block after reading my POV. Waiting for a reply. And plz do something so the block notice appears on my talk page. WikiEdit^talkHiWikiEdit (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I do not believe that, out of the tens of millions of accounts on Wikipedia, that you chose EditWiki45's at random to copy from. That, combined with other clues, leads me to decline your request. 331dot (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot, What are the other clues? Or, Just this reason of declining my unblock request? Had I chose some other A/c to copy you might have said so for that also. And for a sec, Just bcoz u guys r saying even if I was (which I am not) a sockpuppet, I have not done anything that violates T&C of Wikipedia. So there must be a reason to block this A/c, I should be blocked if I violate T&C, or vandalise any article or add or remove something which is unconstructive. Just bcoz that guy did many wrong's and I copied his Userpage doesn't mean that I am his sockpuppet and that I should be blocked immediately. If you see that this A/c of mine has been used for any bad things then keep me blocked but tell me what. WikiEdit^talk HiWikiEdit (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wish to give you more information to better evade detection as a sock. 331dot (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331dotHiWikiEdit (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Well How can I evade by sock detection? I am not allowed to edit anything. And this might sound rude but I am asking you straightaway, You say I don't wish, does Wikipedia run by your wish? Tell me what wrong doing has taken place by this A/c which lead me to getting blocked? WikiEdit^talk[reply]

331dot plz tell me HiWikiEdit (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing else to say about this matter. You may make another unblock request for someone else to look at; this matter is out of my hands now. 331dot (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331dot You can't just reject any request and then not even explain your actions. Well I am surely making another unblock request hope you wont turn that too down.WikiEdit^talk HiWikiEdit (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, someone else will look at any request you make and make a determination. For it to be seen, though, you will need to format it as an unblock request just like you did the first time. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HiWikiEdit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet account. But rather I have reported sockpuppet accounts. And if we see my stats all my edits are live on Wikipedia. I am yet to receive a policy violation notice or a vandalism notice. As far as being sockpuppet is concerned, I copied the items from EditWiki45 's page. That doesn't prove that I am his sockpuppet. I was editing the page Bhima. I checked the page's editing history and found this blocked account. I went on to see his user page and kinda liked that, so I copied it. And as far as editing his user page is concerned I tried to put a "blocked or retired tag" on top of his user page. And to add to this he was repeatedly vandalising articles but I am yet to do so which I will never. Please unblock me or discuss this block after reading my POV. Waiting for a reply. And plz do something so the block notice appears on my talk page.HiWikiEdit (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Likely sockpuppetry. Combined with the behavioural evidence, I'm very definitely declining this request. Yamla (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is the behavioural evidence? Yamla And as you guys say, even if I am a sockpuppet (though I am not) what wrong have I done with this A/c? HiWikiEdit (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HiWikiEdit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet account. But rather I have reported sockpuppet accounts. And if we see my stats all my edits are live on Wikipedia. I am yet to receive a policy violation notice or a vandalism notice. As far as being sockpuppet is concerned, I copied the items from EditWiki45 's page. That doesn't prove that I am his sockpuppet. I was editing the page Bhima. I checked the page's editing history and found this blocked account. I went on to see his user page and kinda liked that, so I copied it. And as far as editing his user page is concerned I tried to put a "blocked or retired tag" on top of his user page. And to add to this he was repeatedly vandalising articles but I am yet to do so which I will never. Please unblock me or discuss this block after reading my POV. Waiting for a reply. And plz do something so the block notice appears on my talk page.HiWikiEdit (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I am yet to receive a policy violation notice or a vandalism notice." There is no requirement whatsoever that you receive any warning of any kind before being blocked for sockpuppetry. All you have to do is repeat the previously blocked user's edits, which ... can you honestly blame us? Copying the items from EditWiki54's page sort of looks that way, don't you think? Saying "that doesn't prove I'm a sockpuppet" is kind of like showing up at a crime scene with a smoking gun in your hand and some bloodspatter on your face and clothes, then saying "That doesn't prove I'm the killer". To which I should add that, per 331dot, I should sooner expect to answer a knock at my door and find a very large group of monkeys who want to show me this screenplay for Hamlet they've just finished than I should expect to learn that the preposterous string of coincidences you have pleaded is actually true.

Since this is your third request, I shall follow the example set by your other socks as well as the master and revoke access to this talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It appears that revocation has already been done. So here's the notice:

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EditingGodguru per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditingGodguru. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  --Blablubbs (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:HiWikiEdit/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 02:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]