Welcome Guilherme Burn!

Hello, Guilherme Burn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sexy Hot Award, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sexy Hot Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Hot Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm curious if you are affiliated with the org, or any other related entities, in any way. If you could let me know, that would be great. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman: No, in any way. Why do you think it? Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you declare your previous accounts as its clear that this is not the first time you have edited wikipedia. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spartaz: I edited using this account [1]. A long time ago I lost your password. I edited on other wiki projects and only came back to wikipedia recently. In this interval I have edited as IP, mostly in Portuguese wikipedia. I am editing the wikipédia in English partly for the study the language. I do not speak English very well and I make regular use of google translator.Guilherme Burn (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monica Mattos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for April: April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Thank you. I will not participate in the project because I do not speak English. But I will help whenever possible with articles about Brazilian women.Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of erotic and sex workers with unnatural death is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of erotic and sex workers with unnatural death until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of erotic and sex workers with unnatural death that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you recently edited Kandi Barbour. Another user deleted the content and made the page a redirect. I undid his edit but he undid my reversion. To avoid an edit war, I have reverted his last edit and nominated the article for deletion. Whilst I have no wish to see the article deleted, this action will stop the other editor changing the page to a redirect again. You may wish to join in the discussion to save the page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kandi Barbour (2nd nomination). (it's odd that to save the page you need to nominate it for deletion but WP has these quirks. Cheers John B123 (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:This Ain't..., which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guilherme Burn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Gamma Entertainment, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nick Moyes (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nick Moyes:. OK. I add more covarege. Could you check the article again? See[2] The Company seems to me significant.Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phew - that was close! My daughter came out of her room and nearly caught me checking your extra references! For the page to be accepted in mainspace we really must see in-depth coverage, and I'm not getting that. The Forbes/Breslin ref is all about Mills, not the company, and only makes brief mention of it. The Lemco reference allocates just 12 words to Gamma. We know the company exists, but you need to come up with evidence that independent sources have talked about it in detail, and these are still lacking I'm afraid. It's only then that a business will stand out above the millions of others and be deemed notable by Wikipedia's standards. The problem I see you've got is that a company providing IT services to the porn industry is probably unlikely ever to garner great coverage in books or news media. Until it does, it'll simply have join the ranks of millions of other non-notable companies. Anyway, the page has now been patrolled, so is unlikely to be immediately put up for deletion by another editor, though I can't guarantee it. So, what I always do is add articles like this to my monitoring list and come back in a few weeks time to see how they've got on. There's no immediate rush, so hopefully you might be able to dig something stronger out. Sorry to be a killjoy - but the recently revised guidelines at WP:NORG set a high bar for the millions of companies out there to meet. If it can't meet them I'll then feel obligated to submit the article for consideration at WP:AFD. But please don't let this put you off writing about really notable elements of the porn industry.  Kind regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! :O Thats all right @Nick Moyes:. If it's consensus, I do not see problems with exclusion.Guilherme Burn (talk) 22:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MiKandi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wasteland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Outline of erotica and pornography, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guilherme Burn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Catrìona was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Unfortunately, I don't think this subject qualifies for an independent Wikipedia article. It would best be covered appropriately on the articles for pornography and erotica to avoid POV.

Catrìona (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guilherme Burn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Not safe for work has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 16:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usually porn Afd members @Gene93k, Davey2010, K.e.coffman, Johnpacklambert, Subtropical-man, and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz:, and per IT @Toglenn, Steve Quinn, and SamWinchester000: I would like your opinion here, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards#What categories of an adult award are notorious?. Thanks.Guilherme Burn (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest changing the word "notorious" to "notable" in your RfC, if that's what you mean? It would also be useful to do some wikilinking to categories and/or articles and make it clear that you're talking about adult entertainment awards and not just awards given to/by adults. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 16:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Sex work, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sex work and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Sex work during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 09:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think the template tree is a good idea. You may need to add an "if" statement to prevent errors. Try changing each line to something like:

{{#if: {{{1|}}} | └ {{portal-inline|{{{1|}}} }} }}

(except the "pagename" line) --John B123 (talk) 18:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@John B123: Thanks! It works.Guilherme Burn (talk) 18:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Alternative views, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Alternative views and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Alternative views during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sex workers with HIV/AIDS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in helping build this group nomination? Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal MFD Results/people Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: I believe that all portals based on biographies should be excluded. Per @EggOfReason: "Why have a portal when the biography for the people themselves do the job already? What a gross misuse of the Portal mainspace". This logic also applies to corporations (Ex.: Portal:Google) and object classes(Ex.: Portal:Submarines).

For really important biographies, the focus should be on your class, or your legacy, for example: Portal:Barack Obama -> Portal:United States Presidents, Portal:Jesus -> Portal:Christianity, Portal:Karl Marx -> Portal:Marxism, etc.Guilherme Burn (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We are on the same page. Bands is a similar class with a lot of portals. I went ahead with Individual Portals A-C as a larger test nomination. Be sure to commnet there. Hopefully we can ammend the WP:POG Legacypac (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac:I realize that the portal/article pageview relation is smaller in narrow scope theme.

Is there any tool that lists the links in an article? These portals basically have the same links as the article.Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That makes you wonder what the point of an Obama portal is. I don't know of a tool like that but that is not my area of expertise. Maybe ask at the help desk? Legacypac (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... Should I nominate this for WP:MfD or would you be willing to tag it with WP:G7? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL:Give me a few more days, I'll try to expand it. Or we can move it to the Draft space.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. I mean, like, sure. Let's put it in your userspace instead, though? I just think the scope is a little small (for example, it could grow into something like Portal:Women's health.) This is your thing/topic area, so I'll defer to you here. I just don't think this is ready for portalspace and has already been around for months. You have nicer portals than this, so it might just make sense to let this one go rather than spread yourself thin. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL:  Done Db-author.Guilherme Burn (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you nominating portals for deletion manually, or using Twinkle? If you are using Twinkle, it isn't notifying the originators. If you are nominating them manually, you aren't notifying the originators. I see that User:KeithTyler, who created Portal:Discrimination, is an active editor and has not been notified. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency sake Sports portals browsebar should probably be included on the portal, as it is now the only portal included on the browsebar not linking back to the browsebar. --Phospheros (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Outline of erotica and pornography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm taking it upon myself to try to moderate a discussion among Portal power users with the intention of creating a draft guideline for Portals, and I'd like to invite you to join this discussion. If you're interested, please join the discussion at User talk:Scottywong/Portal guideline workspace. Thanks. ‑Scottywong| [spout] || 02:49, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Conduct in portal space and portal deletion discussions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, ToThAc (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamma Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 20, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, SQL^{Query me!} 20:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Technology topics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_12#Template:Technology. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: I did not understand. It is to exclude the redirect. You moved the tag to the template. The template created is not the based on the deleted.Guilherme Burn (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You stated that you do not understand how G4 works, as applied to Template:Technology.

Speedy deletion criterion G4 "applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title [emphasis mine], of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion" that "do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted."

In your case, it was incorrect to move your template and apply G4 to the redirect; it is the template itself (currently at Template:Technology topics) that should be nominated. In any case, G7 (Author requests deletion in good faith) likely applies to the template even if G4 does not. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But @LaundryPizza03: I don't want to delete the template. I want to exclude only the redirect.Guilherme Burn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is plausible enough that it doesn't need to be deleted. It's okay. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Outline of erotica and pornography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guilherme Burn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of erotica and pornography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Technology topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kaldari (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Portals tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sex workers drug-related deaths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Here's a page I created for tracking outline drafts, that shows the date of the latest edit for each.

Such as for this outline draft you created: Draft:Outline of erotica and pornography.

Drafts that haven't been edited in 6 months get deleted from draft space. This list lets us see if any drafts are getting close to the 6-month danger date. Once an edit is made to an outline draft, the date for it in this list automatically updates.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Draft tracker.

I hope you find it useful.

Cheers,    — The Transhumanist   08:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]