User talk:Grootwillrise
FYI
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Budisgood. The Banner talk 23:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am not a sockpuppet Grootwillrise (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Budisgood per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Budisgood. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.Izno (talk) 19:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- I am not a sockpuppet and that sock puppet investigation mentions 2 other accounts not mine I am not even mentioned in it, so the reason you have used to block me is t even true because apart from that I am not a sockpuppet the investigation you referenced as proof does not mention me. All that I did was revert an edut that seemed to remove a large portion of an article when doing so I notified the editor on their talk page and asked why they removed the information. Grootwillrise (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- So blocking me before the sockpuppet investigation is finished so that I can't defend myself on the investigation page, great treatment of a fellow Wikipedian when all that I did was question one edit, if you are not allowed to question the edits of another editor how are you supposed to uphold the integrity of Wikipedia. Grootwillrise (talk) 00:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I gave you the link to the case-page where you could have defended yourself. You replied on this page and another page, so you had been editing. Beside that, a check-user is based on a technical analyses. I have no information about the exact technical info used (most of it will be non-public anyway) but Wikipedia:CheckUser is a good read. The Banner talk 03:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)