Hi. I did not add that information to the article, though I see why you were misled. The article, when I got to it was full of statements violating WP:BLP, and I attempted to remove some of them, as well as fix the style, etc. If you look at my edit, I re-arranged a paragraph which stated "Rebroff is famous for singing Russian folk songs (his parents are Russian immigrants) ... occasional consumption of a fine red wine." I removed the comment pertaining to his drinking red wine, as well as the parenthetical comment about his parents, choosing instead to just mention it at the top in a more condensed and stylistically better way. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure what the consensus is regarding this. I have started a survey on the talkpage. Cheers, Nk.sheridan   Talk 22:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Bez [1] Ja, eigentlich war das frech von mir, diese Quelle anzugeben und damals habe ich nur darauf gewartet, dass es rückgängig gemacht wird. Doch es ist immer noch darin. Als Brand Manager war ich oft auf der PR Agentur, Hill & Knowlton, Covent Garden (London), und die haben das oft als "USP" (Alleinstellungsmerkmal) gelobt. Doch in welchen Materialien das publiziert wurde und wo man das noch heute, gute 18 Jahre später belegen kann - keine Ahnung. Sorry, aber es liegen keine Beweise schwarz-auf-weiss vor. BuzzWoof (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I found citation an in memorian site-Washington State for Earl Pulvermacher. I added the citation on also please see the talk page-Thanks-RFD (talk) 13:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eugster/Frismag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Altavista-1999.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Thanks for that information about the Bürgergemeinde. While I read German well, I missed the subtleties of the laws. Thanks for the improvements. Tobyc75 (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the translation into German. Now everybody who reads German can know what a strange breed we Americans are. You may be interested that I just ran into a picture of Kinman at the Library of Congress site and had to know something more about him. A google search turned up more photos and a few biographical bits and pieces and it just kept getting stranger and stranger. Google books turned up a lot. (Might there be something in Google Books in German?) Someday I'll go to the Humboldt University Library in California and read the manuscript "Story of Seth Kinman" to really complete the article and maybe shoot for an FA. I guess what really attracts me to the story - other than its strangeness - is that Kinman wraps up the absolute best and worst of American character all in one person.

Thanks again.

Smallbones (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm somewhat attracted to strangeness, so I simply couldn't resist translating an article about "the man who gives chairs to presidents" :-). The many "red" links show that the German Wikipedia's coverage of America is still rather fragmentary... let's hope that they're an incentive. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the further comments on my talk page. While your initial comment came across as a tl;dr kind of complaint, your second comment made it more clear. I think that the statistics explain the people who live in each Swiss municipality more clearly that some general, unsourced statements. But I can see where it has started to expand maybe further than is good.

Please continue to expand the details about the history and the notable buildings in those municipalities. While I read German pretty well, it takes me quite a while to translate that information.Tobyc75 (talk) 21:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit from my talk page: "Hi Bzuk; over in the German-language Wikipedia, a user noticed that this file is available here and on flickr with differing licenses and by apparently different uploaders, see there (in German, of course ;-) ). Here on Commons it's uploaded as your own work with a CC-zero license; on flickr, a certain james_gordon_los_angeles (a photographer from Washington DC, according to his profile) uploaded it using the restrictive CC BY-NC 2.0 license: http://www.flickr.com/photos/james_gordon_los_angeles/6473868677/ (so it seems to me that he claims to be the creator of the image, and, according to this license, would require attribution and only non-commercial use). I therefore suppose that james_gordon_los_angeles took the image from you, as your original upload in the English Wikipedia was on September 24, and james_gordon_los_angeles uploaded the image on flickr on December 7. As you licensed it under CC-0, of course everyone may use it freely and without attribution, but the flickr uploader wouldn't be entitled to tag it with a more restrictive license himself, I'd say. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)".[reply]

Hi Gestumblindi, that's my poor attempt at depicting a XF-108 Rapier so that's why I uploaded it to Wikipedia, and left it as a public domain image. James simply re-uploaded it on Flickr, but probably should not claim it as his, but anyone else who wants it can take it off the Wiki or Wiki Commons for free. That's not the worst thing that has happened, my wife got me a book for my birthday, and, lo and behold (to be trite), I opened up the book to find some of my photographs, unattributed, of course, in the book. C'est la vie. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the answer! :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Wieso Gestumblindi? Sca (talk) 21:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nun, ich interessiere mich für nordische Mythologie. Als ich mich vor langer Zeit in der Wikipedia anmeldete fragte ich mich "hm, wie soll ich mich denn nennen? Irgendein Pseudonym... was nehme ich nur?" und dann kam mir eine Idee, die ich damals ganz originell und witzig fand - mittlerweile finde ich sie nicht mehr so gut, da ich den Namen immer erklären muss... - Also, die Idee war: Der Mann, der unter dem Namen Gestumblindi vor König Heidrek erschien, war gar nicht Gestumblindi. Ich dachte also, es sei pfiffig, mich so zu nennen, also einen Namen zu wählen, der gleich "das ist ein Pseudonym! Der heisst gar nicht so!" besagt... wobei ich nicht behaupten möchte, Odin zu sein ;-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also! Interessant. Ich dachte, daß hätte was mit (Eng.) "dumb" und "blind" zu tun. Sca (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... wir hatten andernorts eine Diskussion darüber, ob externe links auf meine Diskographien für die/den Wikipedia-Leser(in) hilfreich sein könnten oder eher als link-spam einzustufen sind. Gerade is mir ein wunderbares Beispiel dafür über den Weg gelaufen: Der Artikel Frank_Hovington. Als "Weblinks" sind dort zwei links, und zwar einmal auf die "Diskographie" bei Allmusic.com, zum anderen auf diejenige bei Discogs.com aufgelistet, die jedoch beide nichts anderes als Hovingtons Rounder LP aufzuweisen haben. Als ich im Frühjahr 2008 den ursprünglichen Artikel (zeitgleich mit dem entsprechenden Artikel bei en.wikipedia) geschrieben habe, hatte ich noch einen link auf meine (sehr ausführliche, um nicht zu sagen "umfassende") Hovington-Diskographie [[2]] hinzugefügt, diesen link dann aber Ende 2008 selber wieder entfernt, als mir der massiv vorgetragene Vorwurf einiger besonders eifriger Wikipedianer, ich produziere damit "Link-Spam", doch zu heftig auf den Geist gegangen ist. Das Ende (?) vom Lied: Der Englische Wiki-Artikel enthält jetzt den link auf meine Diskographie, der Deutsche nicht - was ich schade für den Leser (nicht für mich - mir is es fast schon egal!) finde. Da ich wahrscheinlich die gleichen Schwierigkeiten wieder produzieren würde, wenn ich "meine" Weblinks wieder einfügen würde, wäre mir (im Interesse der Wikipedia-Leser, nicht aus Eigeninteresse - über google werden meine Diskographien ohnehin gefunden, meine Seiten haben derzeit etwa 3.000 "visitors per day") daran gelegen, wenn irgendjemand anderes die links wieder einfügen würde - just sayin' ;-) StefanWirz (talk) 03:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You participated in the previous Persondata RfC. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Thanks, —Msmarmalade (talk) 08:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question for you about admin re-election. My knowledge of German is non-existent, and in drafting the barebones of a potential RfC regarding the admin re-election concept you brought up at WP:BARC, I'm unsure what a certain category means on de:Wikipedia:Adminwiederwahl/Kurzstatistik means. Could you describe what the four categories are in order, if I have any of these incorrect? I think the mean the following:

1. Re-elected
2. Not re-elected, but went through the re-election process in full
3. Made a decision to retire
4. Did not make any decision within the given time period, and so automatically lost sysop privileges

Am I off the mark on any of those? Also, if you're at all interested in helping draft such an RfC, especially in providing further background than what I'm able to, I would certainly welcome that. ~ Rob^Talk 19:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Yes, that's what they mean, you got it entirely right. Note that all categories refer only to the "Adminwiederwahl" process, so don't contain the names of admins who decided to stand for re-election or retired outside of this process. - As I'm only an occasional contributor to English-language Wikipedia, I wouldn't see me in a major role regarding such a RfC, but if you have any further questions... if I can help clarify things, I'm certainly willing to do so. - I wrote a longish essay on my views of the state of the "Adminwiederwahl" process in 2012, see de:Benutzer:Gestumblindi/AWW2012 - of course it's in German, and I'm not going to translate it now, but trying to give the gist: In the part preceding the paragraph "Update - Ende Mai 2012", I said that I consider the system a success, as admins were only called for re-election if there was widespread serious concern in the community, and there was neither a flood of frivolous requests nor seemed it too hard to collect votes. But then, at the end of May, I was quite disgruntled with the way the system was used. It was about admins with low activity... the issue is rather complex to describe, as it needs knowledge of various rules and customs that are specific to de-Wikipedia; trying to summarize: There are formal requirements for a "right to vote", I described them in the BARC thread. Now, there was a proposal to automatically desysop admins who have lost their right to vote (Stimmberechtigung) due to low activity. This proposal was rejected, but then its supporters got creative, realizing: You also need the Stimmberechtigung in order to be eligible as an admin. So, they only had to call the low-activity admins for re-election - resulting in them automatically losing their privs, as they weren't able to stand for re-election. You may have noticed that in 2012, there is an unusually high number in category 4 (fifteen - only two in 2013 and three in 2014); most of them are due to this affair. That seemed unfair to me (for totally inactive admins, we already have automatic desysopping after a year), and so I was, for a time, rather disappointed by the system resp. its (mis)use. However, it went back to normal. Now I'd say (again) that the system basically works well for de-Wikipedia. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind taking a quick read through User:BU Rob13/RfC for Administrator Re-election and letting me know if I've summarized the German system properly or if I'm missing anything? I want to ensure I'm not accidentally misstating how your system works. I greatly appreciate your analysis of the system above and any help you're willing to give. Thank you so much! ~ Rob^Talk 19:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: I think you're summarizing the system quite well. Maybe it's worth mentioning that the total number of admins declined after introducing the system, see here - it may be seen as an argument against it (or not, if you say "better have only admins the community really trusts, not as many admins as possible"). - Another thing to note: From 2009 to 2011, the system worked a bit differently. Admins not actively standing for re-election and not relinquishing their rights were not automatically desysopped after 30 days, but instead there was a "forced" re-election vote. It was changed through de:Wikipedia:Meinungsbilder/Abschaffung der Zwangswiederwahlen to the current process. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To add another bit of information, on the practicalities: There's a bot removing outdated (older than six months) re-election votes (there's a dedicated page for each admin where people can post them). Gestumblindi (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That will definitely be useful in the future, but I'm not worrying about the practicalities of this at the moment. It's obvious that it can be done, but first we need to find out if the community is interested in the idea. ~ Rob^Talk 21:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Gestumblindi. I stumbled across the article on Schweinepriester and wonder what the reason for including it in English Wikipedia could be. What is the relevance to English-speaking WP users? Wikipedia surely cannot be a repository of expresssions in other languages without proven notability. Your view would be helpful, before considering improvement or deletion. mfG Guffydrawers (talk) 12:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Guffydrawers: Well, that was seven years ago... I have to admit, I'm a bit at a loss here; can't remember why I thought it would be a good idea to add it. In defence of the article, I could mention that it seems to be fairly popular for such an obscure topic: 217 views in the last 30 days; more than the typical random niche article, I think - Peter De Clercq had 32 views and Georgetown, Arkansas 128 (first results of "Random article"). But I don't feel strongly about it. Maybe you're right and it's rather a case for Wiktionary. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand the distinction here: [3]. I would consider a ferry any passenger-carrying water transport smaller than an ocean liner. Not all ferries carry cars. Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mackensen: Well, I can say that the boats (or ships, as these are called "Schiffe" and not "Boote" locally in German) are not considered ferries (Fähren) in the region, the term never comes up for most of the passenger boats on Swiss lakes (so it's not unique to Lake Lucerne). A reason for this might be that, for more than 100 years now, it has been mainly pleasure/touristic transportation. Even the paddlewheel salon steamers in the late 19th century and early 1900's were built mainly with tourists in mind. They do serve as a means of transportation for commuters to a certain, small degree (mainly the stops between Lucerne and Weggis), and they are integrated into the Swiss public transport schedule, but the whole enterprise wouldn't be viable as a "ferry" business. I don't feel strongly about this, though, if you really want to classify them as ferries. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gestumblindi, oh yes, I understand what you're saying. It's the integration into the schedules that makes me think of them as ferries, though of course just about everything in Switzerland that carries people is so integrated. I'm at a loss as to what to call them otherwise; I don't know that the distinction exists in English. Regarding viability, I suspect you could say that about half the narrow-gauge railways too :). Let me think on this for a bit. Mackensen (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

• New bundle partners:
  • Newspapers.com
  • Fold3
• 1Lib1Ref January report
• Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

• New partner:
  • Perlego
• Library access tips and tricks
• Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

• Suggestion improvements
• Favorite collections tips
• Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

• New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
• Tech tip: Filters
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

• Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
• Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

• Three new partners
• Google Scholar integration
• How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

• Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
• 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

• IEEE and Haaretz now available
• Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
• Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

• One new partner
• 1Lib1Ref
• Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

• The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
• Wikimania presentation
• New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

• Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
• Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
• Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]