@Frankish Human Your actions on the page of Matzoon is a vandalism. You can not delete a sourced material without firstly discussing it in the talk page, secondly without providing proof of the argument you are proving and lastly engaging in an edit war goes against the policy of the Wikipedia. Lemabeta (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its your job to cite the sources, you added sources, but didnt cite them or give a page to where they said that it is also from georgian origin. So you made a claim and didnt properly back it up, also Imma recite to u the history and etymology page of this article:

„The name of the product originates from Armenian matz (sour, glue).^[1] The etymology is provided by Grigor Magistros, in his Definition of grammar (11th century).^[2]“

and

„The first written accounts of matzoon are attested in medieval Armenian manuscripts by Grigor Magistros (11th century), Hovhannes Erznkatsi (13th century), Grigor Tatevatsi (14th century) and others.^[2][3]“ Frankish Human (talk) 20:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are different theories over the etymology of word Matsoni, in different Georgian regions different words are used. In Kiziki word წველა(ts'vela) is used which means milking of (a cow, sheep so on). In Svaneti word Marts'ven(მარწვენ), is used which means to milk(a cow, a sheep or so on). in historical Hereti (Qax region of Azerbaijan) word Ts'ola is used which also means the same thing. Therefore linguistically speaking etymology of the word should be examined by the linguists existence of a word in certain dictionary doesn't give a nation claim over the product, since linguistics and migration of loanwords are quite complex. Lemabeta (talk) 08:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didnt cite any sources, so what you said cant be verified, fact is that the word matsun or matsoni in georgian is of armenian origin and that even If there were other names the first time matson was mentioned was in armenians texts. Accept it. Ur reasoning is unreferenced and doesnt fruit. Frankish Human (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only two references you added for your claim were unrealiable sources. Literially one Georgian language, Georgian website and one also a georgian website that counts some names, stop with this vandalism already. Frankish Human (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous sources i have cited. One you call Georgian language one is a Radio Liberty a journalistic U.S sponsored news. Lemabeta (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You havent linked two articles which dont dive into the origin of the product and also which justs tate basic info, on top of that being unreliable sources. The books you linked, werent cited, let me explain what that means..If you link a book and want to prove a claim with it you gotta cite/recite the exact line or page where it was stated so we can verify your claim, If that isntbzhe case, ur source cant be verified, aka isnt valid. Frankish Human (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained to u how this is notbthe case on the matsun wikipages talkpage

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Franks. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. That does not make any sense to add to this article. There are no other encyclopedia articles that conflate information in this way. Remsense诉 08:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for also removing french language Frankish Human (talk) 09:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so concerned about removing mentions of the French language from articles? Please don't.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it wasnt spoken in by the franks by the time and what I meant was that I added old german and old dutch too in eventually, beacause franks also lived in those regions, what Im thanking him is for not only removing my additions, which are just as logical as the french one, but also the french one Frankish Human (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matzoon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanezi (talk) 11:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Vanezi (talk) 12:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Əzərbəyəniləri per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]