Hello, FrankSier, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To read

• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article

carefully - and also look at other articles as to how they are created - thanks SatuSuro 02:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oh My God Hot Springs is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh My God Hot Springs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kayau Voting IS evil 12:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed your addition of London Friend. You may be interested in thinking about how to improve the UK section of Gay Liberation Front which is rather short on detail about how the organization/association was interconnected with other organizations. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 13:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, I'll take a look at that.FrankSier (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on London Friend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mandi (bath) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mandi (bath) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandi (bath) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Very close, but right now you have 3 primary references (the ftm web site) and only 2 independent sources. Maybe you could find some more references from when it was being proposed? And I can't quite figure out the nature of the group that awards it -- is it a non-profit? a gov't sponsored group? More info would help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fair Tax Mark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! FrankSier, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Tax Mark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrankSier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrankSier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrankSier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrankSier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bridges in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millennium Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrankSier! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:34, Sunday, July 5, 2020 (UTC)

This playlist created in this format by FrankSier. Please feel free to copy for the purpose of editing Wikipedia. You may edit this copy: I think that would mainly be adding extra info. Please sign your changes with 4 tildes.

I made this originally as a reference for myself. Hope you can make sense of it. Please confirm info for yourself before putting info in actual article.

1 Ed Pratt - Unicycling around the World

2 to lancaster

3 1 Setting off

4 2 France

5 3

6 4

7 Danube, Hungary

8 Baja

9 Sister joins

10 Thunderstorm

11 Regis Frenchy cycling Africa

12 Balkan mtns

13 snapping unic

14 magic biscuit

15 meeting Alexander

16 bake bread Azerbaijan

17 1 Caspian Barely catching

18 2 Exploring ship

19 this is Khazakhstan

20 almost hit

21 arrive Bishkek. START OF 6-MONTH BREAK IN TOUR.

22 travel light

23 snowboarding

24 snowboarding

25 frozen trees

26 tandeming Karakol. LAST OF 6-MONTH BREAK IN TOUR.

27 across Kaz. back on road

28 across Kaz. Dinosaurs

29 across Kaz. mozzies

30 across Kaz. mozzies again

31 across Kaz. police

32 across Kaz. film camels

33 across Kaz. 40mph winds. From an instagram: “This clip was shot soon after my winter break in Bishkek, so I’d recently taken the train back to Aktobe to reconnect my ride. ...Oh, and if you’re wondering, like these guys, why I mounted on the wrong side of the road, it’s simply because of the wind. It was howling in from the left, so on days like that I’d turn my back to it and use it to assist me up onto the unicycle. Then straighten up on the remaining width of tarmac once I was balanced.” https://www.instagram.com/p/B_UaX9KFPrI/

34 across Kaz. 2.5 bicycles

35 across Kaz. juggling

36 across Kaz. dog attack

37 across Kaz. blocked by police

38 across Kaz. pedalo

39 across Kaz. electric storm

40 across Kaz. how can drink it!

41 across Kaz. don’t pick up unic.

42 across Kaz. 'final’. See 127 below for more Kaz.

43 China smelly

44 China Enter

45 China dude magnet

46 China no bicycles!

47 China SWAT

48 China Daughter & dog

49 China saddle sores

50 China kicked out of town

51 China Edward’s bad idea

52 China only bread

53 China spelunking

54 China 45 hrs train

55 China parents

56 China Hong Kong

57 China superman

58 China monks basketball

59 China tTibetan new year

60 China self-filming, reality of

61 China inner tube bskt bll

62 China crashed truck

63 China dance on police cars

64 China buttock destroying

65 China police Segways

66 China leaving Super

67 China what doing here

68 China walk

69 China how motivate

70 China 210 km, 25hrs

71 China 21 yr old

72 1 SE Asia Hijacked camera

73 2 SE Asia refused Laos

74 3 SE Asia Skinny-dipping

75 4 SE Asia 6000ft mtns

76 5 SE Asia Wildfires

77 6 SE Asia Police escort

78 7 SE Asia Sister [again]

79 8 SE Asia water fight

80 9 SE Asia cocconut booze

81 10 SE Asia Meet the guy

82 1 Austr. 3000 mile

83 2 Austr. Big & empty

84 3 Austr. Cracked seatpost

85 4 Austr. Mark Beamont

86 5 Austr. Failure [of tyre]

87 6 Austr. GoPro taped to wheel

88 7 Austr. School talk

89 8 Austr. ...89 days

90 NZ Highest paved

91 NZ [parents] 10 hrs

92 NZ worth your life?

93 NZ Parents, drone

94 NZ Longest place name

95 NZ Gear list

96 NZ Shark bite

97 NZ Secluded waterfall

98 NZ no naked

99 NZ Xmas lights

100 NZ Meeting Magali

101 NZ camera in sea

102 1 USA 6000km

103 2 USA 2 person unic.

104 3 USA Pacific Coast Hwy

105 4 USA US Army Base

106 5 USA Modern Cowboys

107 USA Death Stranding. No USA episode number.

108 6 USA Deadly Mojave

109 7 USA Death Valley

110 8 USA SA to LV

111 9 USA Route 66

112 10 USA Grand Canyon

113 11 USA Meteor Crater

114 12 USA on Street View

115 13 USA Dudley pig piano

116 14 USA $100,000

117 15 USA Coldplay

118 16 USA Perfect saddle

119 17 USA He unicycled Alaska to Sth America

120 18 USA How not fix tyre

121 19 USA USA Finale

122 1hr14 Returning home

123 Q&A. SEE BELOW FOR NOTES FROM Q&A.

124 Cost

125 Not Guinness https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CXhDmwurK0

126 Wally Watts

127 Kaz, How I Survived Unicycling the World's Loneliest Road, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IjzTzcfbjs One of the more difficult bits. Published 27 Aug 2020, added at end of sequence, after the main part had been put in chronological order.

Unicycled from age 17 & found a community.

Carried up to 7 L water at a time. purification tabs.

4 tyres got through.

enjoyed filming: a focus, something to talk to,

worst weather (? means what/),

3 weeks without shower.

Tried to do 50, but 40 to 45 miles a day while cycling. Average over whole 22,000 miles, over whole time = about 20 miles/day.

Something about a 54” unicycle tried on the trip.

Had roughly 80 punctures, was worst in USA I 40 highway, when on hard shoulder [other vid said it was due to bits of wire from blown out lorry tyres].

Battery recharging, charge from laptop, multiple batteries, charge from laptop, use sparingly, Filming limited by batteries. Tried solar charger but did not work out because of slowness.

Met girlfriend Ishola, Nov 2015 in Bishkek where he was staying for the winter. (coming back from library in Bishkek where she was learning German I think she meant, not “learning in Germany”.)

Visas: in Istanbul wanting to apply for Uzbekistan visa at embassy. was filming in Embassy, visa refused and was told he was on watchlist so could not enter that country. Decided not to try again partly because other route planned.

23:36 map of original and final routes in that area. That ‘original is not the same as original one I looked at (see earlier in Talk).

He said original route was a rough plan, nothing set in stone.

Regrets: wishes filmed more of preparation for trip, ie month or 2 of footage.

Water drunk in day? 7 or 8 litres at most, 2 or 3 if reasonably cool, plus 1 or 2 for cooking.

One bear seen in wild Blue Ridge Parkway USA, not caught on camera, Pandas in China in zoo.

Had stolen: head torch from helmet by security guard in Kazakhstan. Also in Kaz. USB speaker stolen by child, later returned by other, older, child.

Storage of video: about 11 or 12 TB in all. Got most on hard drives in Bishkek plus 2 copies in the UK. Carried few hard drives, backed up via laptop onto 2 copies on external hard drives. If one hard drive failed would shop locally to get a replacement so that he could have 2 copies again. Started tour carrying 2 hard drives, later carrying 4 or 6. Did not have time to backup onto cloud. Parents or sister occasionally visited and brought fresh hard drives & took ones with data on back to UK. [I think he said in other vid that HDs were 1TB each.

Model dino picked up somewhere I kept on unic. to end of tour.

Most helpful apps? By far: navigation: borrowed a dedicated device (Garmin) but did not want to carry around £800 piece of equipment and wasn’t using it very much, so used (free?) app on smartphone that used data from OpenStreetMaps. Did not use it to tell him where to go. Found it accurate enough to see where he was and where he wanted to go and chose his own routes from options he could see.

Furthest in a single ‘day’? 130 miles over a 25 hr period 2pm to 3pm the next day. Was in China wanting to get to Kunming before Christmas and did not want to be on the road over Xmas. Wanted to be with people instead.Had a couple of hours sleep during the night. Doesn’t recommend it.

He estimated wheel revolution for whole tour at 12,340,000.

Did he, or others, feel there was danger of death from wild animals or people? Girlfriends parents said someting(??) "Maybe that’s a bad question”(??) He felt very safe out in the world.

Asked about tricks: He’s done very little in the way tricks as on smaller unic.

“Advice for someone who wants to do a unic. tour?” Work out how to put stuff on a unic. Probably a custom job. Does not recommend putting in a backpack, on back. Work out smallest amount of gear. Try it out, and then maybe do something bigger.

Planning another long dist. unic.? Probably not for a long time. Another cycling, ie bicycling not unicycling, focusing on a specific area, prob with Ishola....after pandemic restrictions over.

Some of these are already at least partially in the article.

• How he first got into unicycling
• Preparation before setting off: planning, long distance try-out
• To what extent extent the tour was a "first" (Pratt and many of the refs refer to it as the first)
• To what extent it is a "record", and the reason it is not a Guinness World Record, and not really attempted to be one
• Pratt's motivation, both why he started in the first place, and what he says about motivation as he went along (at one point local road officials say that it is too dangerous for him to traverse a section by unicycling or by walking, but they allow him to continue with particular extra safeguards, though Pratt looks prepared to continue without these - Pratt said that if he had given in he was worried that he might lose the motivation to continue)
• To what extent it is as-joined-up-as-possible, in other words, as much done by unicycling as continuous route on land. For some sections there was no land route (even off-road), but there are at least two places where he took ferries where some sort of land route existed: across the Caspian Sea, and across river in New Zealand. For latter I think he says that it was to save time. Google Maps shows roads as alternatives in both cases. On land, whenever Pratt went anywhere other than by unicycling or walking with his unicycle, he ensured that he came back to that point in order to keep the tour joined-up.
• To what extent a world tour? (as opposed to simply a long tour visiting a number of countries) Guinness has various stipulations about a route to be considered a world tour, including approximately visiting two antipodal points.
• Special difficulties, and benefits, of using a unicycle, as opposed to another human-powered land vehicle, such as a bicycle.
• Incidents along the way: some of the people met, and people who shared part of his journey, difficulties & enjoyments, other people's reactions (+ve & -ve), accidents/health problems eg heat exhaustion(?),
• Equipment used, just notable bits (& not brands): largest commercially available, 36", unicycle, luggage-carrying modification by grandfather, custom made luggage, camping: tent, multi-fuel stove (used it with petrol), clothes, recording equipment: cameras, a system to make selfie stick invisible in shots, drone; computer equipment: laptop, 1 TB external drives, GPS tracker provided tracking info for website and had special button for possible emergencies; tools, maintenance equipment, spares. Total weight: typically 40kg which Pratt says "is ridiculously heavy for a unicycle" (ref Gear list below)
• Gear List: Travelling the world for 3 years https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD6JRZzt-vk&list=PLocRYksAqGOJnr-Y0eyP87P5banlFicp4&index=96&t=0s
• Equipment failures/breakages, lost, stolen, difficulties/successes with, saddle sores
• How he got video shots of his progress, especially apart from simple "selfies"
• Some editing done and video uploaded as he went along
• How much he had a specific planned route, and how much he followed it; reasons for changes of plan: his choices or force of circumstance
• Costs/income: amounts quoted by Pratt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw51zoXtk6E (this video gives other information about the tour apart form costs, such as some other info the things money was spent on):
  • total cost, £22,982, initially coming from savings; initial kit, £1,674; rest on visas, paid transport, food and accommodation, replacement kit, tracker subscription,
  • income during the tour £14,800; from advertising related to videos, teaching, donations (this money kept separate from donations to charity), during the trip people also gave him, or paid for his, food, accomodation or equipment; he often (mostly?) wild-camped (for free); income is continuing after the tour from giving talks, from videos; as of video published on 8 May 2020 whole cost of tour has been recouped; Pratt said "I'm now going on to work out to kind of turn this kind of adventuring into a business

Two possible ways of including topics:

• Chronologically,
• Under sub-headings

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]