Hey Fopam, first off thanks for joining the D.C. United task force! One of the most recent additions I've added for the franchise is a page about D.C. United's Hall of Tradition. I based the page layout heavily off of Norwich City F.C.'s Hall of Fame article, but made a sort table of my own. If you have anything to add or verify re: the club's hall of tradition, feel free to do so! Quidster4040 (talk) 02:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the Hall of Tradition article. It's currently rather late, but I added a few edits for good measure. I'll try to add more later. ~ Fopam (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just with the MLS Cup Final. But if you take a look here; here; here; here; here; here; here; here, here; here and here, then you'll see that it's very much consistent. I really don't care about if "Final" is in the name or not. The problem is that the year should be in front. Kingjeff (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the word "Final" to be eleiminated, the redirect, "2011 MLS Cup", must be deleted. Kingjeff (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited National Soccer Hall of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Gutenburg will likely be unable to verify that Man of High Fidelity is in the public domain, because of the incredible amount of research required. They did post "all Copyright Renewal records for books from 1950 through 1977", but I can not find a link to that resource.[1] A good resource for further information may be a Project Gutenburg mailing list. If it can be verified that Man of High Fidelity is in the public domain then the Scanning FAQ page may be helpful. ~ 128.197.245.7 (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Boston Breakers (WPS), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Clara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]