Dear Fmmarianicolon: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

• Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Community Portal
• Frequently Asked Questions
• How to edit a page
• How to revert to a previous version of a page
• Tutorial
• Copyrights
• Shortcuts

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Yanksox ^(talk) 06:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the article for you, and it should be deleted soon. For more info, read WP:CSD. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 03:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmmarianicolon (talk • contribs)

It's deleted. If you ever see the nonsense back up on that page again, just add {{csd-g4}} to the top of the article, and an admin will come by and probably delete it. And dont forget to WP:SIG sign your posts on talk pages! Daniel.Bryant 04:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it's been protected against recreation. Daniel.Bryant 04:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coolness! Again, many thanks for your help! Fmmarianicolon 17:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, I've often seen people stating they've "reverted" a page to a previous version. Is there a specific link or button to revert to a page's previous history version, or is it simply removing the changes so it matches an earlier version? Thanks!

See WP:RV. Thanks. --Alex (Talk) 21:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. I might have missed some of your comments on the WoW deletion article, can you try to dig them up and add {{subst:unsigned|Fmmarianicolon}} at their end? Thanks a lot and Happy Editing! -- lucasbfr ^talk 17:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really like your rewrite of my edit on Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). Moving the "modernised retelling of the classic 'X-Men'" sentence into the plot outline was genius. I just hope this page doesn't get deleted out from under us. ;-) I know if this was happening after we fixed it, it would be a keep. - Peregrinefisher 10:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to shape up these Ultimate ... (story arcs) pages and could use your help (it's a lot of work). I love the refs you added, so I did a bit of the same to Ultimate Fantastic Four (story arcs), although it's far from done. Luckily, Ultimate Spider-Man (story arcs) is almost done, except refs. And, of course we're about half way with Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). One idea I had was to put the current summaries on the talk page and replace each with a blank

Published between: 
Artists: 
Plot outline:
First appearances: 
Deaths:
Notes: 

What do you think? I'm hoping that would encourage people to fill out the sections instead of adding to giant summaries. - Peregrine Fisher 09:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for cleaning up the Reception section. The 11th reference, the one for Time Magazine, is messed up and i have no clue how to fix it. If you have a moment, you might wanna check it out. dposse 20:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. dposse 02:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could use a hand again over at Talk:List of characters in Heroes. SOmeone's again created a table, even worse than the first. I thought we were getting to some consensus, but too many peopel are eager to throw up any old table and make a mess of it. ThuranX 05:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edit reference #7 on Heroes (TV Series), which leads to an MP3 audio-only podcast. I'm not sure whether to use the citation template for web or video. I also thought about the using the episode as it has an entry for the timestamp of the specific reference, but the template is designed for TV episodes. (The series of podcasts do have episode numbers though. If there is no podcast template, which other template should I use?

Well, we have Template:Cite podcast, which you could use, but it doesn't seem to take many parameters (no episode or timestamp, I think). You can use it if you want, or just type out the reference by hand--use of templates is optional, after all. --Sopoforic 23:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the changes on the articles to "Vidas de Fuego" and "Mucha Muchachas." I was going to make changes anyway but you took care of it. Again thanks for the contribution. Robert Moore 08:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good from here too. See the talk page for the process for resolving the copyvio. Jaysbro 15:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the temp page that you created to the original, since yours is more acceptable. Robert Moore 16:14 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Pretty good. Wish we could get something larger and completely fun made for other purposes, though. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the banner, the main project page, stuff like that. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O, ok. sorry about posting in the wrong place, and that makes sence. Now, how about this: what if Matt's kid....isn't his kid. What if it's the kid of the guy she had a affair with? --Stone11375 20:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

true, but speculation is always fun, epically with such a great show like this.--Stone11375 20:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great job. Thanks for the great edits you made to the article. McKay 07:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, that template was {{subst:blatantvandal}}, a first or second (not final) level warning template. --science4sail ^talkcon 02:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assert that I am Commons:User:Fmmarianicolon - fmmarianicolon | Talk 04:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for adding the production notes to the Hiro and main articles. Not only is it interesting material, but it also helps to make the articles more than just fancruft. Good work. --Ckatz^chat_spy 23:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll try to let you know when I have the article up on FAC!

For now, before I take it to GA, my priority will be getting that production history article split off. Daniel Case 12:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice comment, thanks. if you get the chance to see any cricket on cable etc, do as I did when I first started watching baseball. Work out the basics of the game and ignore the jargon and complexities. Basically, in baseball, the batter needs to hit the ball so he can get round. The pitcher wants to get him out. Similarly in cricket. It's a wonderfully deep and strategic sport that rewards careful watching. Enjoy! --Dweller 13:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We've got more than 45 refs, now, and I went through and copy edited the whole page. I took out what I thought was OR, and I think we're ready for a peer review or whatever it takes to get a GA designation. Here's a dif of the changes. What do you think? - Peregrine Fisher 20:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put it up for peer review at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Peer_review#Requests, although it doesn't look like there's much activity on the page. Hope you don't mind. - Peregrine Fisher 00:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool, a detailed critique. Judging by the other articles up for review, we're doing well, since they barely got a response. Lot's of things to fix is actually good, counterintuitively. I think asking the 2nd AfD people to have a look would be good, since I think they would be likely to respond. I'm going to post something on the comics wikiproject talk page, too. - Peregrine Fisher 04:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll decline. Thanks anyway. Davidpdx 07:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll work on it tomorrow as well. It's going well, I think. - Peregrine Fisher 08:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Just wondering why my additions to the .07% article on Heroes were removed? I wasn't experimenting, I was adding information on what the episode will be about. How was this wrong?

I'm not entirely sure if I've been "warned" or something, but I find it strange to say the least. Granted that I might've missed something on how exactly this information should be edited, and I admit to that mistake, but the information was right.

You can reach me at stormhierta @ gmail.com - I will also try to register a user account with Wikipedia to see if it becomes any easier then. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.141.92.46 (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Heh. Oops. I missed adding a summary to the episode list during my short edit spree after finding those pictures. Thanks for adding that. I meant to go back and do that when I realized that I had forgotten. Valaqil 13:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trampton 11:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Well, I guess you could say I'm everywhere, no just kidding!I saw you respond to another user and thought I'd leave you a message.Also I love to put a smile on everyone!P.S.: Cool user page!Cheers!Trampton 21:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hey what, you don't think "therefore there" is good English or sumtin? LOL. j/k. Thanks for fixing that! :) - Jeeny ^Talk 05:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fmmariancolon,

No problem. Just trying to keep the page clean from the idiots. Thanks for the heads-up though.

-imp9824

Hi, you were a great contributor to the page for a while. The Helix has come back up for discussion, and more inputfrom regular contributors ot the page would be welcome. ThuranX 18:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mgabrys (talk) 09:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The origonal link wasn't going anywhere near the site tho - it was going to corrupt-justice.com which of course was patently wrong, which is why OCD me changed it. Your re-direct goes to the right place now of course.

I think you responded to the wrong user. I didn't contribute to any articles relating to justice. --fmmarianicolon | Talk 11:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, your work has crippled mine, since mine was more complete. Bad timing!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we separate the films and the TV shows (and specials)? The films I think can go OK with the chart, but I'm not sure if the TV shows can (or should) go in a chart because of the number of guest roles he has performed. - fmmarianicolon | Talk 18:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we can!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I separated the two categories. I also adjusted the chart to include the additional information about the episode appearances. How does it look? - fmmarianicolon | Talk 21:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs some disambiguations, like in The Guardian. I'd have kept the rest of the information, as well as the red links for, in the Future, when the pages are created, they automatically appear instead of having to search and add the links. The rest is fine. G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 12:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it appears that you are the main contributor to the Artwork of Isaac Mendez, I would like to ask you if you have ever thought about expanding it and perhaps take it to FLC? Because with a little expansion I think it has a pretty good chance. I'd be glad to help out. Thanks.--Music26/11 18:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

bah wrong reply sorry

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fmmarianicolon/storage space, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fmmarianicolon/storage space and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Fmmarianicolon/storage space during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fmmarianicolon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]