Clara Miller Burd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an invitation to WikiProject New Zealand, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on New Zealand. Please feel free to join us.

Sheldybett (talk) 12:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Adrienne Martyn, does not have enough citations to significant coverage to meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Currently all the provided citations are to gallery listings or non-independent sources, which are not enough to establish notability. I would suggest looking for articles that discuss the subject's life and work in depth. Alternatively, if you can demonstrate that the subject's work has received significant critical attention, or is housed in the permanent collection of a major art gallery, you can satisfy notability via WP:NARTIST. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tracey Tawhiao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora - sadly I missed the last meet-up but I am in need of a bit of local help as a new editor, with time and motivation on my hands before the next meet-up. I have started creating articles and wonder if I can get some guidance to ensure they will be ok, or even what to do. I had one rejected that I think I have fixed and resubmitted: Pacific Undergound. And a draft that I think is almost good to go: Pakoire/Te Ohu Whakaari. Do you know any experienced editors else I could reach out to for maybe a short sit down together / guided help? Or who could look at my articles and message me? Pakoire (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Einebillion, Thanks so much for your encouragement and support. I attended the Black Lives Matter rally in Auckland as an observer and someone who was shocked and outraged by what happened to George Floyd. I thought it would be good to put my interests and social science background to good use for Wikipedia. My main focus is New Zealand politics, government, and media. One of my pet projects including the Sixth Labour Government of New Zealand. It's to help maintain a record of policies and other developments for the sake of memory and history. Will be happy to connect with other Wikipedians in New Zealand. Have a good weekend. Kind regards. Andykatib 10:23, June 6, 2020 (UTC)

I am writing an article about Jane Yandle a professional female taxidermist b.1843 in the UK d.1915 in NZ, some of whose taxidermied birds are displayed in the NZ Timber Museum in Putaruru. I contacted the Museum to ask if they had any photos of the displays free of copyright restrictions for possible use in the article. I received 10 photos taken by a volunteer at the Museum, and the accompanying email from the Museum Manager said I was free to use then as I like. My question is whether that email is sufficient permission to include a photo, one of which looks to be of an acceptable quality. Noracrentiss (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Noracrentiss#Use_of_photographs Einebillion (talk) 23:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Thanks - will follow up suggestions.Noracrentiss (talk) 08:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to cite a letter and other documents held by Te Papa as evidence that Jane Yandle (subject of an article I am drafting) made the items. The Catalogue details provided by Jennifer Twist Senior Curator at Te Papa are: 1) "CA000294/001/0001/0055; Kiwi Muff & Tippet; 21 September 1872; Yandle, Jane – receipt/account"; and 2) "MU000147/004/0054; Forwarding box containing the tippett and muff. Protecting kiwis from exploitation from fashion. Auckland Institute meetings.; 23 September 1872; Kirk, Thomas" Entering these references in the Search bar on the Te Papa website brings back a Zero result. Could you please advise the correct citation method? Thanks Noracrentiss (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply I have to declare a conflict of interest here. I'm a Te Papa employee closely connected with the Te Papa team that includes Jennifer Twist, Archivist. I'm not sure whether you searched the Te Papa website or Te Papa's Collections Online website. If you searched Te Papa's website - you're unlikely to get a result. If you search Collections Online, there's a tip you need to know in order to find the record you are interested in. When searching using a collection item registration number, you need to put the search term in inverted commas. e.g. "CA000294/001/0001/0055"

If the archival item has been documented to the item level then the collection item record should appear.

CA000294/001/0001/0055 has the Collections Online link: https://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/object/1843367 - you can use this link to develop your citation. MU000147/004/0054 has not been published in Collections Online to the item level. Archives are ordered and described by a hierarchy - Series (in this case the MU000147), Box (in this case 004), and if the box has only a few items then item (as in this case 0054). Sometimes it goes Series, Box, Folder, Item... it depends on how much material is in the archive series. Because it's a hierarchy you can go up a level and see what's been published. I searched on "MU000147/004" and found that there were 10 items in that box that have been databased and published to Collections Online. See https://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/search/%22MU000147%2F004%22/results

If you require a link for the archival item you refer to to create your citation I recommend that you email Jennifer and request her to database that entry and publish the entry to Collections Online so that you can cite the Collections Online link. But you don't need a link to cite a physical archival item. Here's a citation template for archiveal holdings and guidance on how to use the template. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_archive

Einebillion (talk) 21:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Thanks for your help - I'm following up as suggested. Noracrentiss (talk) 23:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to run a tech rehearsal with James on Saturday evening. Do I need Jitsi admin to be able to record the rehearsal? Quilt Phase (talk)

• Belay this - have successfully recorded a test to my DropBox - will use this for Sunday's session. Quilt Phase (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Māori Sidesteps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had every intention of turning up to the meetup this coming Sunday, only to realise this morning that it was last Sunday. I've been working on bringing on to enWS the s:Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute—at least at the level of the table of contents. That way we can look at gradually having direct links to the sources for many of the NZ science articles here. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora, I was going to add our project page onto the meetup for 6 March - but there isn't one - maybe you made space for it? Please help me figure out how to make an address for it. The draft is currently sitting here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pakoire/Women%27s_Day_Edit-a-thon_New_Zealand Many thanks Pakoire (talk) 01:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
• The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
• Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! Canley (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC) --Canley (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just edited the meeting date and shifted it to the 5th of June. Ambrosia10 (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Einebillion (talk) 09:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Einebillion! Hope all is well with you. I remember from May's meet-up that you've got expertise in the copyright area, and was wondering if you could assist with a question. Say a photographer takes a photo and then it's used on the cover of a book (with her permission). The publisher of the book owns the copyright of the cover image (incorporating the photo & design/text elements). Could the publisher then upload the cover image to Wikicommons under a free licence?

My instinct says no and that you would need the photographer to release the photo under a free licence herself (eg through publishing it on Wikicommons) before the cover image could then itself be uploaded. But I figure I should check with someone who has more actual knowledge than I do -- especially since if the answer is no I'm going to have to explain this to the publisher. :) Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 09:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. Think of copyright like an onion. The copyright in the photograph is the inner onion ring. The copyright holder has granted permission for that photograph to be copied into a book cover and for the publisher to add additional creativity to create a book cover. The additional creativity of the publisher adding text and formatting the image to create a cover is the outer layer of onion. But you can't put all of the onion into Wikimedia Commons without all onion rings being licensed to permit this type of copying and reuse. Einebillion (talk) 08:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC) Just to clarify - as the copyright the publisher owns covers only the additional creativity they added to the original photograph - they can't licence the photograph section to be placed into Wikimedia Commons. They don't own the copyright in the photograph - they are just licensed to use it for certain purposes which aren't likely to include an open resue licence. Einebillion (talk) 10:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; that's helpful and a very clear explanation. :) Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		For all your great work! — Jon (talk) 10:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jon! Einebillion (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was great to meet you at the edit-a-thon! Paisleyapples (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was great to meet you. Einebillion (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Special Barnstar

A huge thank you for your support of Auckland Museum's successful Alliance fund application "Understanding our past:using Wikipedia as a tool to support local history in Tāmaki Makaurau". The strong support from editors greatly strengthened our application and we're looking forward to collaborating with the community in the new year to implement the project. Best wishes, James (Auckland Museum) Jetaynz (talk) 04:11, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wcl.govt.nz/blog/index.php/2023/05/15/te-whare-pukapuka-o-he-matapihi-closing-30-june-2023/

Could the Brandon Street branch accommodate us?

Quilt Phase (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent emails to both the National Library and Wellington City Libraries to get their suggestions. I'll bring that information to the next meeting so the group can decide what's best.... Waiting to hear back from my emails. Einebillion (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ya, I'm now free for the full day and so will be heading down to He Matapihi Molesworth Library on Saturday morning to spend the day working on Women in Architecture. Hope to see you there! Ambrosia10 (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Einebillion, and thanks for writing interesting biographies of women connected with New Zealand. It seems to me you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In any case, I look forward to reading more of your biographies. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alexeyevitch^(talk) 11:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I hope you're having a Merry Christmas too! Einebillion (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia:GLAM/TP participants (staff) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Flora of New Zealand

added links pointing to Dione, Clymene, Jania and Centroceras

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]