Thanks for your advice a couple of days ago....Eagleash (talk) 02:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're always welcome :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Thanks for your help. I knew it was going to be something really simple which I had failed to spot!! I pored over it for ages too!! I am able to claim that the areas causing the problem were not ones I'd actually done myself. :) Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash: It's ok. As one of my colleagues @lvwiki said: "Nobody has born as Wikipedian" :) And here you can't screw up something. And I was glad to help --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 08:51, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edgars - would the following text (about Lord Hill nominated as Britain's next EU Commissioner) be a welcome addition to Latvian Wiki? M

Regarding meta:Steward requests/Username changes, I confirm I wish to be renamed to Edgars. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 21:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the talk archiving information. Pcproblemdoctor (talk) 08:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 10:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Why You deleted drawing "Rūdolfs Jurciņš 1934.jpg"? This was nothing to do with any offence or insulting memmories about him or Latvians as a nation. Rūdolfs Jurciņš was a European Celebrity and any addings (even such as friendly carricature from Lithuanian magazine) about him would show how well known and popular he was and would increase his popularity now. The more pics about him - the better.

Merry Christmas!

Svetys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svetys (talk • contribs) 10:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That little "Ajax preview" that shows my sources before updating is truly a time saver. I cannot thank you enough. My frustration level has decreased about 5 levels. :) Did I say thank you? SusunW (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're always welcome. Was glad to help. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Edgars, please escalate the protected page status of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_Synagogue that you have been recently involved in. there is a block in place, for no reason, other than one user does not like having FULLY sourced and referenced material added to the page in question.

This is not, patently, in the spirit of Wikipedia and as such should be removed.

Kind regards

I.W — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internetwikier (talk • contribs) 15:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean that because the chances of two teams from Group A being relegated are so slim that it dosen't bear mentioning so the note is not necessary there?18abruce (talk) 09:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@18abruce: I think I don't understand something. So, if Russia is 8th in Group B, then which 7th team is relegated? Group A or B? I think it's logical that relegated are 7th team from Group B, because Group A doesn't have anything to do with that. Am I right? --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wrong, thats the whole point, the rules state that it is two lowest ranked teams so as the note says it would then be the lowest ranked 7th place team. It remains incredibly unlikely, but possible.18abruce (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm really sorry. Thought, that the system is as it always has been, so didn't read the note carefully :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, someone pointed it out to me a couple of years ago when I was trying to evaluate who was still able to be relegated, or I would never have noticed or thought of it. It is possible that the wording has never changed since they did the four groups of four format.18abruce (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Every day that you spent in Wikipedia you learn something new :) Thanks. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First you show any reliable resources saying its Adam's Bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.16.4 (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007,

thank you for your comments on my suggested edits. I have now (hopefully) outlined the changes in the format you requested, however, I am unsure if I have submitted those so that you can see my response, hence my message here to you now.

Regards, Dhambly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhambly (talk • contribs) 09:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okafor can't wear #15 for the Sixers. The number was worn by Hal Grier and has been retired for years. Irish brotha (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 01:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just requested semi-protection for this article. Don't think it'll work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rube Dali (talk • contribs) 01:48, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged my talk page today and said: Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Add some links etc.
Go ahead and delete or what-ever you plan to do to that template, me making that was a unintentional mishap.
M1grand (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)M1grand[reply]

Thanks for your help with this. Unfortunately, the period at the end of the paragraph has accidentally been deleted - please could you reinstate? Thanks again... 119.76.65.14 (talk) 23:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops :) Thanks, fixed. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 06:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thank you. 119.76.65.14 (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I don't understand how a template would help here. I've finished the project (all articles now have their maps, unless I've made mistakes), so the error-checking is all that remains. Nyttend (talk) 23:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reply. Yes, I'm still interrested in doing that job. Can you run your bot for that mission ? If you need a bot flag in Arabic Wikipedia just ask here [1]. --Helmoony (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Helmoony: no, I wont need bot status. For such tasks this is all what needed. But I would do that probably after some days. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After I connect those, which have the same name, I can give you other templates. Actually, I think you'll (that is, Arabic Wikipedia) have problems with other namespaces, at least my Wikipedia (Latvian Wikipedia) had :D --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm gonna wait. -Helmoony (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Helmoony: I did some connection job. I think I connected somewhere 2000 items. I am counting only those templates, which are basepage, I'm not counting subpages. As I found out, there was quite little number of templates, that do contain only English name, the most of them are at least partially in Arabic. I will work on those templates, which have been moved at enwiki, but you can take a look at those in Arabic. So here are the lists:

• Templates, that don't have iw and Wikidata item (currently: 12 338)
• Templates, that don't have iw, but have Wikidata item (maybe they should be merged; currently: 10 278)

If you're interested, can go trough those templates, which are subpages, just say, under what name is documentation subpages. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 19:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like I put them in talk page space. You can freely move them to right namespace :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 19:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for your job. At least 2000 were connected to wikidata. That's a good job. Do you have a link by the way ? I'm working on the rest by mearging, deleting or simply adding an interwiki. Now you are a reviewer in Arabic Wikipedia so you can make some changes without waiting for reviews. I may need an update of the lists next months. Thank you. --Helmoony (talk) 21:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. I see that the suggestion set targeting longer popular red links didn't work out well, largely due to the tools poor understanding of country names and nominatives in Latvian. To help me tune the tool to improve future runs, is Maldivijas considered an acceptable (if lazy) variation of Maldīvijas, or should the tool always prefer variants with macrons ? Cheers - TB (talk) 16:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Topbanana: Yes, Latvian language isn't very nice in this case :) No, Maldivijas isn't good form. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 16:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Amy Swensen —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Red Fiona (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars! I noticed your page User:Edgars2007/Women from German linked into some athletes that I'm working on. How did you get the data for these missing articles and the number of articles in other languages? I ask because I've been recently thinking about how to get similar results for articles on athletics. Thanks, SFB 22:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have some few secret methods of creating such lists, that I would like to keep in secret. But I can surely provide you with such lists. Here are some missing athletes articles from frwiki. Number of iws are number in table +1 (frwiki). Included those articles, which have infobox. Choosed frwiki, because I noticed in last few years (yes, athletics is in my zone of interest), that usually there is article. If you need some other such lists (based on category(-ies), templates, wikiproject banners in other Wikipedias), fell free to ask. If you need updating that list also - don't hesitate to ask. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one more note - in list there are included only those articles, which are in frwiki and some other Wikipedia. If you and other Athletics Wikiproject members will create all those articles, which will take some time :), then I probably could provide those articles, which are only at frwiki. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging you just in case you missed my answer. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is great stuff! Exactly what I was looking for. Would you also be able to produce similar athlete lists for German and Polish Wikipedias? Those are the other languages where athletics is well represented. Foreign language coverage is often a very good indicator of what we are missing. I do find your secret methods quite intriguing! Thanks, SFB 22:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sillyfolkboy: included de and plwiki. Later will think about removing dublicates, I think, more than 50% are dublicates. Those lists are useful in one more way - some 10 articles we're not connected to other Wikipedias, so before writing new article, make sure, maybe it already exists at enwiki :) You could organize some red-link removal drive at Athletics Wikiproject, there would be work for everyone :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sillyfolkboy: the lists are updated, dewiki list may be incomplete, there were some problems. These should be better than previous ones, because I and other guys have done some clean-up at Wikidata by merging duplicates. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - thanks for letting me know! I've done quite a bit of clean up and done some of the more popular links but looks like there are still plenty to go. SFB 22:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sillyfolkboy: yeah, no matter how much hands (users) you have, there will be endlessly much work left :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. What I am looking for is something that would be easy to use and replicable. How would we about doing it for the Category:Cichociemni? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the configuration. Done ! --NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 18:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WRT the Village Pump discussion, here's the kind of thing I'm thinking about: any upmerged stubs with over 60 transclusions are eligible for being given their own category, and we have a huge backlog of overly large stub cats. Take Category:Kansas geography stubs for instance -- any of those which file into this directory (except {{Kansas-geo-stub}}, which is the intended stub tag for that category) with 60+ could be spun out, cutting the cat size down quickly. But checking which are eligible takes a while, because in many cases there are like 70 of them. (As it happens I've checked all these ones manually, but it took a while and was pretty tedious...!) As to how often it would need to be done... hard to say. Many don't have upmerged templates as yet, so it wouldn't be useful there, and you'd only need to check once a year at most I expect, but there are a whole bunch of oversized ones, many of which do have upmerged tags filing into them already. But if it's not gonna be often enough, or requires too much server strain, then don't sweat it. Would be nice to cut out 10 minutes worth of manually checking, but it's hardly essential :) Cheers! Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 15:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look here. Is that what you wanted? Look just at the results at the second part of page. Don't worry about formatting - that can be changed. I just took those stub templates at Kansas geography stubs (except {{Kansas-geo-stub}}). If the results are OK, then my answer is yes - I can help you. You can come here anytime, probably better with multiple requests and maybe give me some page at WP:Stub sorting, where I can place the results in wiki-friendly format. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging you just in case you missed my answer. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did, so thanks for the ping :) yes, that's exactly the sort of thing I'm after, thanks very much! Will keep this in mind. The best place to store the results, though... Dunno there. The usual procedure just says to link to the results, so linking to whatever URL the tool generates would be perfectly acceptable. Alternatively, appending the results to the bottom of Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/To do under "Upmerged stubs eligible for speedy creation" or similar would be fine. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 18:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK then. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 18:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you respond to the original request, please? (124.180.197.248 (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hi User:Edgars2007! I started the Abderrahmane Benkhalfa page, and I'm interested to know what it means to have it listed on your Requests/Persondata page.

Thanks in advance! RubyALG (talk) 14:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RubyALG! As the article was created after June 1, 2015, it doesn't have to include {{PERSONDATA}}, which is deprecated. See also Tracking category for new Persondata. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say I appreciate all the behind the scenes work you have been doing on my files. Since I don't speak most of the languages that I translate or create articles for, nor do I understand any of the technical aspects of WP, I really do appreciate your help. It has not gone unnoticed. SusunW (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SusunW: you're welcome :) Anyway, I have checked only 3 of your articles, which were about Latvian people. Those articles contained some really interesting facts, especially Lidija Liepiņa. As I don't actually write content of enwiki, I like to help with technical stuff, if I can. I try to be useful here :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 08:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with this? --Obsuser (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not a Lua programmer :) Wait for some while, Trappist the monk will most probably help you there. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 20:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at this lady from your User:Edgars2007/Women_in_religion list: a bit messy as she already had half an article at Adela and Irmina, shared with her sister - who had a separate article at Irmina of Oeren, not linked from the one about the pair! I ended up MOVEing the dual article to Adela of Pfalzel, editing it to remove stuff about Irmina (which was already in her article), and creating a little navigational page (which someone is going to want to delete as it's not a proper dab page) at the joint title. The Wikidata is a mess because there's a "two-person" record, but I've left a message on a Wikidata project talk page asking for someone to please try and fix it. I wonder whether the next on the list is a similar case? I might dare to have a look at her. PamD 22:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, although Irene von Thessaloniki († 304) is a red link, we have Irene of Thessalonica redirecting to Agape, Chionia, and Irene. I leave it to you to decide what to do about her. PamD 22:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I've also created a minimal stub for Catherine of Palma, with lots of incoming redirects which include Catalina Thomás. PamD 23:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: thanks for the comments. Yes, there are some bad things about automatically generated lists - they may contain errors. I added a note about Irene of Thessalonica and a general note to double-check :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your amazing success in expanding lists of new articles for WikiProject Women in Red. --Ipigott (talk) 08:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: thank you! I appreciate it :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bzuk: Thank you! The same to you! --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a request at Wikipedia:Files_for_upload/December_2015#Logo of Latvia-based airline Alpha Express Airlines concerning an article on the Latvian language Wikipedia. I don't know Latvian, so I can't check what their non-free content policy is, or fill the non-free use rationale. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 13:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop: OK, will handle that. Have two questions - how he get there (at Latvian Wikipedia I don't remember putting link to WP:FFU) :D and how did you choose to get in touch with me (it's ok - I really don't mind). Thanks. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As for how they got here, I have no idea. As for why you: Wikipedia:Local Embassy#latviešu (lv). Thanks and happy holidays! Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 13:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now understood. Thanks and the same to you! --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I looked at the link you suggested but as usual I didn't see any edit link. what can be the problem? I'm using "Safari" on "IOS." earlier on I used to see the links but they stopped appearing sometime early December. Dilone61 (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dilone61, I would suggest post to WP:VPT, describing the problem. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 10:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I visited WP:VPT but I couldn't post as the link to add discussions does not appear on my browser. Now what's next? Thanks. Dilone61 (talk) 04:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dilone61, as you may notice, I posted your problem. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is going on at Wikimedia mailing list on using AWB on Ubunutu. Please check the discussion and update documentations. If needed, please send me an email, so that I can forward conversations till now. Please add a {{YGM}} on my talk if you mail me. --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Titodutta: I'm just a little bit curious, why I get notified? Thanks, of course, but I even don't have rights to use AWB here at enwiki. Magioladitis should get notified (if he isn't), not me :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I am not on Wikimedia mailing list :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hm right, I saw your name in WT:AWB, sorry, Magioladitis, the discussion is on using AWB on Ubuntu. --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edgars, may you continue to make Wikipedia a better place in the New Year. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dirtlawyer1: thank you! Wish you the same, lets make Wikipedia better :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! Here you had told me that you can do iw link of some English named Templates for sa.wikipedia with Bot. Please guide me to do that or Please do as per your time. Thank you. NehalDaveND (talk) 12:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NehalDaveND: Hi! Whoops... I forgot to say, that I already done that. I think, I connected some 2000 or 200 templates. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgars2007: here can you put new list, which don't have iw links ? NehalDaveND (talk) 03:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NehalDaveND: I haven't forgot about you. Give me some one day. Currently, I have many other things to do. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 11:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NehalDaveND: I updated sa:सदस्यः:Edgars2007/Connect/Other/Without doc. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 11:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was doing a bit of searching for someone active that could speak Latvian. I posted at the Latvia WP, but I'm not sure if it would be seen given that the talk page seemed to be fairly inactive.

In any case, here's the situation. I recently restored a userspace draft, which I moved to Draft:Mazsalacas Secondary School. The article has some issues with tone and grammar, giving off the strong impression that the editor speaks English as a second language. They have a fairly good grasp, but there are very likely going to be policies and other things that could maybe pose an issue, if the language barrier is too large. The user in question is Nona118 and while there's nothing to guarantee that they're a native Latvian speaker, I think that it's likely given that they're writing about a Latvian secondary school and if this is the case, I think that it's also likely that they're affiliated with the school. Explaining policies about promotional content and COI tend to be one of the most difficult things to explain when/if there's a language barrier, hence why I'm here.

Can you help out any? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyogirl79: hi! OK, I will try to fix some language, so it is more English not Latvian and it can later be improved by native English speaker, and I will remove all that unencyclopedic stuff. But I don't know is the school itself notable enough. OK, it's located at historic manor (not unique, but also not very usual place for a school in Latvia), but there are definetily more important schools at Latvia. Writing to user, trying to explain COI and other stuff - don't know is it needed. That most probably is one-time user, and judging by the time, articledraft was created, it was a school project to write an article about it in English and Latvian. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 10:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• They'd recently asked for it to be restored at WP:REFUND, which is what brought it to my attention for the most part. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tokyogirl79: Oh, then most probably I should watchlist the page and make changes when the user has finished. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 11:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007, this is in relation to a request for help I made at the Village_pump which has since been archived. I'm not familiar with the SQL and I would be happy to get some direction. Thank you.—M@sssly^✉ 15:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Masssly: yes, sure. Just tell me, what page and what revision dates you want to get. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need entire revision history for John Kufuor, Aliu Mahama, John Dramani Mahama, Kwesi Amissah-Arthur, Mahamudu Bawumia, John Atta Mills and Nana Akufo-Addo. Maybe if you teach me how to run one of them I should be able to handle the rest. Thanks —M@sssly^✉ 15:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Masssly: OK, so... Here is all revisions of John Kufuor page. I assume you have some technical knowledge, so you most probably understand, what is what in example. Just remember to change all spaces to underscores in page titles and search for precise page titles (no redirects) - in this task. Press login and follow other steps later; then press "New Query" and have some fun :) These tables most probably will also help. If you need addition help, don't hesitate to ask. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you've really made my day :) Thanks so much for your help. —M@sssly^✉ 17:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2022 Summer Youth Olympics. Since you had some involvement with the 2022 Summer Youth Olympics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the new template! Per your suggestion, I'm taking it to TFM to get input on merging it with TFD. Being bold would be reckless here, at least on my part, because I don't have a clue how this type of template works. Nyttend (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tito Dutta (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your tireless contribution you get a barnstar. Tito Dutta (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 22:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007

You were previously nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!

Please email us at merchandise@wikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.

Thanks! Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 03:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last database check gave almost 6,000 pages with unclosed center tags. In most cases the center tag is not needed at all. The list can be found at User:Magioladitis/Sandbox. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magioladitis I was speaking about Wikipedia in general :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know. I just wanted you to face to reality :D -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could I trouble you to update this list again. please? I put bot-archive templates on most of them, so I need to see if any haven't worked, and what the next batch are. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing:  Done. List. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 21:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again, please. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Done. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Sorry for the delay. Done. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide me the updated list here. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: see this post. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I started getting ready to run a trial on the new list you gave me, but there are some results that clearly aren't correct on that list. For instance, when I downloaded the wikitext version, 1978 smallpox outbreak in the United Kingdom was present. Could you detail how you generated this list and how to reduce such errors? I'm guessing the direction we should move in is someone from the WikiProject manually checking sections of the list and letting me know when a section is ready for tagging. ~ Rob^Talk 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Hi! Well, for this particular article the problem was, that at dewiki (and all other wikis) it is about the person. Actually, from Wikidata PoV these articles shouldn't get connected, because they are describing two different things. I think the list is good enough to tag articles. If you spot some errors, then you remove them, if you don't spot an error - well, tagging using enwiki categories also wouldn't be error-free. How I get the list you're asking? Simply going to dewiki's category "Frau" (Women) and converting links to enwiki links (via SQL, of course). You could also upload the list of potential tagging articles here, so that we don't work with 40 000 articles. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I guess the problem is potential blow-back for errors. I'm going to upload the full list (in parts, because it's too large to just throw on one page) into my userspace tomorrow and I'll link that to you. If you could post it at WP Women and give people a chance to object in general or to pour over the lists if they care to, that's probably the best way to ensure no-one feels wronged by the few errors that are committed. ~ Rob^Talk 05:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me some details on how you've generated the list you gave me here? i.e. Exactly what tool you used to do so. I'm trying to figure out how the Ace Ventura one wound up there. I'm wondering whether it showed up due to a redirect. If that's the case, I'm not going to be able to weed them out, because the list I received would have changed redirects to their target. ~ Rob^Talk 19:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: S*, really, how did Ace got there... Serously, I thought, that tagging articles, based on dewiki category would be the most easy thing :D Yes, probably it could be caused by resolving redirects... OK, give me some time, I will try to generate normal list (sorry for giving such bad list). But the articles themselves I got with this query:

select lde.ll_title
from dewiki_p.langlinks lde
#join dewiki_p.page pde on pde.page_id=lde.ll_from
where lde.ll_from in (select plade.page_id
                from dewiki_p.categorylinks clade
                join dewiki_p.page plade on clade.cl_from=plade.page_id
                where plade.page_namespace=0 and clade.cl_type="page" and
                                              clade.cl_to="Frau")
and lde.ll_from in (select mde.ll_from from dewiki_p.langlinks mde where mde.ll_lang="en")
and lde.ll_lang="en"
group by lde.ll_from

--Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 19:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. In an ideal world, I'd just have a list of all pages that Category:Frau was placed on (like list the redirects themselves, not the target article, if only the redirect is in the category). If you want, you can save that in a text file and email it to me so we don't have to use that wmflabs thing. I'm not a huge fan of that list. It makes for more work when I need to place the list onto the wiki. ~ Rob^Talk 19:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: OK, now I think, I have a pretty good list. Those are dewiki Frau category articles, which don't have any of these banners: WikiProject Women, WikiProject Women artists, WikiProject Women's Health, WikiProject Women's History, WikiProject Women scientists, WikiProject Women's sport, WikiProject Women writers. I see there some redirects, section links, redlinks - all those should be skipped. Only 3tk items, but don't worry - you'll have many more articles to tag - one of next phases will be Women by nationality :) And there are so many projects to tag :D --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 20:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by section links? ~ Rob^Talk 20:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: "Page#Section". --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 20:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars! You did such a great job on Women photographers, I was wondering if you could help us out with Women entertainers in connection with our June editathon. It looks to me as if we should be covering actresses, comedians, dancers, filmmakers, models, radio and TV people and possibly the stage. The list on photographers has been a great help. I have frequently drawn on it myself and you will see it now contains a fair number of blue links.--Ipigott (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ipigott! Hmm, this will be a little bit trickier than with photographers (which was simple, because I had to include simply photographers). So I should include

• all kind of actresses (I assume, except pornographic ones, right?)
• comedians
• dancers
• models
• directors
• screenwriters
• producers
• television presenters
• radio hosts

Currently I'm thinking about splitting lists, because there is time-limit for generating lists. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 11:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you'll need to proceed more or less along these lines as we have no general category "entertainer". If you are going to split things up, I think the most useful list to create first would be actresses (and I don't see any real need for exclusions) as they probably also cover radio, TV and the stage. You may be able to cover directors, screenwriters and producers together too. In my opinion the dancers are less important as they have to some extent been covered by our work on music and ballet. Don't make things too difficult for yourself!--Ipigott (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: actresses done. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Looks great. I've already linked it to the editathon page.--Ipigott (talk) 06:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Had some free time. Created User:Edgars2007/Entertainers (everything except actresses, models, producers) and User:Edgars2007/Models. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million. It arrived just in time for our June editathon. We now have really good lists of redlinks for those interested in participating.--Ipigott (talk) 06:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Washington Wizards Logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your hard work in helping to provide simple interfaces between Wikipedia and Wikidata. --Ipigott (talk) 12:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Thank you! But I wanted to note, that I'm not the author of that tool ;) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That hardly matters. You were the one who brought it to our attention and told us how to use it. It looks as if it came from the Russians. In any case, you've really been helping us along with the technical stuff and have generally tried to make life easier for us on Women in Red. We might finally be able to ensure that all those women biographies are at least shown as "female" in Wikidata. Well done once again!--Ipigott (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Further to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 144#Comments subpages, would you mind running one final query to find these pages?

Specifically, could you list all subpages of the form /Comments in the article talk namespace which are not blank and are not redirects. (There should not be many left now.)

Could you separately list any which are blank?

Many thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: List. Currently, there are some problems with redirects at database. In this list I do see many redirects, but at database they are not marked as such. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sergio Fernández (athlete). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sérgio Fernández. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sérgio Fernández – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. SFB 14:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Zeltner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landquart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No one answered, but this sounds like a question that should be asked on WP:VPT. If you want to know how to convert a template, the people who might know are more likely to be there.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars! Sorry to have to bother you are but I have been trying to set up a list of Wikidata red links for women philosophers based on the work you did for photographers, etc. You can see what I have done here. Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Could you check through it any see what is wrong. If you can explain my mistakes, I should be able to create lists myself in future.--Ipigott (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ipigott! Fixed. This is the version, that has to be saved. And did you press that "Manually update list" link? If not, then you have to press it. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million. Works fine now.--Ipigott (talk) 09:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edgar2007, Thanks for your attention to page Oļegs Latiševs. In this case, I believe that a non-standard template allows to present more information about the hero of the publication. In particular, the special career achievements and the special role of the person to basketball officiating at the national level. There are some good examples, when in Wiki such extended templates are used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haywoode_Workman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Wood https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Bird etc. Therefore I beg you to save the original author's text of the information box. Amatour82 (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again but I seem to be having trouble with this one. I've recently added a number of female anarchists to Wikidata from the FR and ES wikis but they are not showing up on the list. Can you help?--Ipigott (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that's a bit better.--Ipigott (talk) 12:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Key to colours has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 13:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007; I trust all is well with you. I would be grateful if you could explain to me how EdgarBot undertakes the addition of links from Wikidata to a Wikipedia article for Women in Red. I'm interested in a high-level algorithm. I ask out of interest, mainly, and because I know that counting new women articles is non-trivial given shortcomings in categoristion & talk-page tagging. Of course, please explain only if you have the time and are willing; I don't want to cause you great effort; you're probably busy.

I understand that you're polling category:Women by occupation. And doing what? Spotting new additions? How many levels of category do you look at? And then I guess, you're asking wikidata whether it has links for any of the articles you found. And if wikidata has no link, then you're doing what? Checking to see if there is an appropriate wikidata item against which to add a link? And is there is not, creating a new human/female item against which you post the link. Finally, how does the addition of new categories into the category:Women by occupation tree affect the bot: does it poll the new category in its entirety? Finally, how often does the EdgarBot WiR task run?

thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tagishsimon. Currently the short answer. This whole "Edgars2007 has written a script to mark enwiki articles as women at Wikidata" is a little bit too overestimated or what the proper word for that is in English. I don't have a script that I run frequently - this is one of many tasks, that I do at Wikidata when I remember. Yes, I look at new Women by occupation category tree. For enwiki articles, that don't have Wikidata items, I create them and mark them as persons and women. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 16:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I greatly appreciate what you do; I've flicked through your bot's wikidata contributions list and have an idea of some of the other things that occupy you time. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Latvia. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Latvia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Estonia. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Estonia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nicole McKay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject fail to meet the relevant notability guideline WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingstoken (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please see User talk:Peter coxhead#Testcases page in mainspace. There simply is nowhere satisfactory to put testcases for a Lua module when they are written in the template language. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was a good initiative, but has proven to be ineffective - nobody id watching it and picking up the requests. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your request on the village pump ..... are you aware that you can make SQL queries to Wikipedia's database itself? You can... the url for this is right here, quarry.wmflabs.org/query/561 . It's for real and will work. ... Just in case you weren't aware!  Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ  20:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KoshVorlon: believe me, I am aware :) But for this particular problem Quarry didn't seam to be the right area. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 21:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgar. The edit I'm here about was quite some time back, so you may know about this already, but please be aware that when you copy content from one Wikipedia to another—generic copying, splits, merges, etc.—you must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary by stating what you are doing, and linking to the source of the content where the page history is available so that the heart of our dual free copyright licenses – credit to the authors – is met. The specific instance of this is from this edit to Sapana Sapana, where you merged content from Sapna Punia without copyright attribution, and then redirected the latter to the former. For further information on the issue, please see generally Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia – and since this was a merge, you might also look at WP:MERGETEXT, where instructions on mandatory copyright attribution are also provided. There's nothing you need to do here, as I have repaired the issue (see WP:RIA) in this repair edit summary. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for letting me know. Will be more careful in future. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars. Since you introduced me to the WE-Framework gadget over a year ago, I have made wide use of it, particularly in connection with biographies. Unfortunately, I see that alterations have been made to the gadget in the past day or two with the result that it no longer displays fields which are empty. This means that the only way of updating Wikidata entries is to go to Wikidata itself which many of us find too difficult or too time-consuming. Is there anything you can do to have the old version restored?--Ipigott (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipigott. It looks more like an error, not an intentional thing. I have contacted probable cause of the problem. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me on this. I hope they can sort it out soon. We have, for example, a long list of Wikidata biographies on women where the profession is missing. I also try to add missing Wikidata info on many of the new articles I review. Please let me know if you receive any responses on this.--Ipigott (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: should be fixed. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems fine again now. Thanks for your help.--Ipigott (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Women at the Olympics
	For creating the behemoth. Amazing work! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Women in Red barnstar
	This barnstar is awarded to Edgars2007 for supporting the Women in Red Wikiproject with the development of Wikidata redlink lists and follow-up on the WE-Framework gadget. Your assistance is invaluable.--Ipigott (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For Moving the 2018 in baseball article from the Talk Page To The Draft Page I Thank you For it. Next year we can talk about and move on to the 2019 in baseball article Next Year. 68.102.39.189 (talk) 14:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For the excellent work on the multi lingual medical editor stats. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:34, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar2007 thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I misread that line I edited and that you reverted. Thanks for keeping an eye out! Bless you Latvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stkmccarthy (talk • contribs) 03:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are preparing a list of tools and techncial support for Women in Red. I have tentatively added your name as you have provided assistance in metrics and Wikidata listings. Please let me know whether you agree to be listed. You are of course welcome to make any additions or corrections.--Ipigott (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On many of the articles in Wikipedia, there is a Template : RDT incorporated within it, which can be accessed as a separate entity. However, as hard as I can try, I cannot seem to access this separate entity for the Leamside Line.

I went to the "Download as a PDF" link, but all that gives is a broken line diagram. Could you assist or help in any way in this matter?

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Xenophon Philosopher: The diagram is currently used directly inside the article; I'll move it to Template:Leamside line RDT. Jc86035 (talk) 05:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Most historically interesting lines do have their own Template RFT which can be accessed easily.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Skonto Riga Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007, you helped me with a query for gl.wiki a few months ago, and I wanted to know if you could help me with another one O:).

I need a query that returns the list of articles in gl.wiki that contain a certain text string. It's to make lists of articles with spelling errors and use them with the AWB. Can you tell me how I would have to do that query? For example, if I want to get a list of all the articles that have the word "extender", what would it be like? Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Edgars2007, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Also I have some tech requests. Will email you :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, James! Wish the same to you :) Answer: User:Edgars2007/WPMED. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 14:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if we can adjust this list to just those items were a specific "ref name=X" is used in both the infobox and the lead? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: I assume this is not needed anymore because of this, right? --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks User:Edgars2007. I have found someone who can take care of it with a bot rather than me doing it manually. Apologies should have posted here sooner. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This for 2018 like you did for 2017?

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Stats/Top_medical_editors_2017_(all)

Many thanks :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And an updated version of

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Stats/Number of articles by language 2018
• And total references [2] would also be great

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: sorry for late reply. Real life and million things onwiki. Here is top medical editors 2018 --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 15:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. Thanks you :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wondering if we can also get an update of this Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Stats/Number_of_articles_by_language_2018? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: WPMED articles by languages are here. Ref stats are here. Don't know which you're interested in, so including all info (with basic search expression - of course I was searching more complex variants). --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent data. Is the number of articles for Feb 2019? And what date is the references from? Can we also add the number of refs with an "ISBN"? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: number of articles - yes, basically February (maybe it was something like January 30th, so pretty close). References - something like February 5th. ISBN - can we do this next year ;) The data crawl took approx 2 days. Don't want to put the stress on servers again. OK, it wasn't sooo much, but anyway. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 16:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect thanks! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way wondering if you can add / link the code you use to generate these numbers in our github repository [3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages with graphs, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Pages using the Graph extension. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]Category:International Association of Athletics Federations Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Mitt Romney, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Mitt Romney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Mitt Romney during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 23:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FC Nordsjaelland.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Spartakiad of the Peoples of the USSR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect with history blocking move to grammatically correct name of subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SFB 16:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Biathlon. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Biathlon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 07:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Module:PetScan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Juventus Turin.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edgars, I'd like to ask about the method to create such lists: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost. Thank you--Mustafa (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mustafa. Did you post the correct link? :) --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edgars2007, Sorry, I meant Wikipedia:Articles in many other languages but not on English Wikipedia/Update--Mustafa (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mustafa: oh, that one. For that specific list I just run a database query for German Wikipedia (because... it is other large WP) and took those articles that doesn't have corresponding article in enwp. Now for such lists I use Wikidata (for example lvwiki). --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latvian Encyclopedia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:External link ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Edgars2007,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgars2007,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

HI Edgars2007,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you have common.js setting to add a button to your old toolbar. If you are still using the toolbar, does the button still add? I used to do that enWS, though cannot get it to function that way any more. So just checking whether it is my incompetence, or more general. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FS Metta Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edgars2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jake Puckerman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edgars2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jake Puckerman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Useless redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Thanks for uploading File:Musiqq Angel in Disguise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weightlifting links has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to become a member of Skiing and Snowboarding, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to skiing/snowboarding, athletes, resorts, events, brands, media, and mountains on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, add yourself to the participants list, where you can join the project and view an overview of available tasks.

VarietyEditor (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let'srun (talk) 15:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pushkin Statue Riga.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 15:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FK Jelgava Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edgars2007,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gatis Kandis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dream Focus 19:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alvaldi (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm working to resolve all the issues in Category:Pages using WikiProject Mathematics with unknown parameters, and User:Edgars2007/tag.js is in this category. I believe the issue is that the |field= parameter is no longer supported by the template. Could you please tweak your script to remove it from the category? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgars2007 hey, not sure if you saw this, can you take a look at this? Gonnym (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym and GoingBatty: ah, sorry. yes, probably went unnoticed the original reminder. i don't have any idea why i created that script - probably some copypaste to do some testing or stuff. now the maintanence category is clean. Edgars2007 (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Marie-Sára Štochlová requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FromCzech (talk) 04:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article IAAF Hall of Fame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage in independent sources; the entity seens defunct.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with WP:SPORTCRIT? Specifically the last point of this guideline; "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources" ? Geschichte (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]