Hello, Duncnbiscuit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Valentina Murch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask you please to check the guidance on short descriptions, so as to be sure that you're applying them in a manner consistent with the Wikipedia community's expectations. In particular, where an article already has {{Short description|none}}, it means that another editor has deliberately decided that there is no need for a short description there. You should not overwrite this unless you're certain that the previous editor was mistaken. Thanks. XAM2175 ^(T) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XAM2175 noted thanks Duncnbiscuit (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting most of the content of this article. You've done it twice already and been reverted, and need to stop.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SMcCandlish no I haven't deleted article content. I would only do that to a page I am very knowledgeable about. I think I just added a short description to the Tartan article are you sure you contacted the right editor.? Duncnbiscuit (talk) 07:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This [1] is you nuking the entire "Scottish clan tartans" section aside from its intro. (In your defense, it was some other editor who did that the first time.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SMcCandlish this is really unsettling to discover that I could have accidentally nuked the page, given that I was making a small edit to an article description :-(.

I will have to improve my checking at the preview stage in future. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 08:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is a helpful feature. :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greenlane Clinical Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede66 09:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add a cite for each officer, use the exact dates, and link to their rank. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sturmvogel 66 the source does have exact dates for some but not all the changes of Command. I missed out one of the Commanders because I can only infer from the article and the source timing that they were briefly in command for the Sierra Leone trip, but could not be certain. Also, I will add links through to their ranks. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edington, Somerset, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buttle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your feedback @Duncnbiscuit] wrt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banks_in_New_Zealand#List_of_Banksc "This list article is aimed to be simple list of banks operating in NZ. The information added about banks' rainbow tick status would find a better home on an article about Rainbow Tick certification or as a section of a none list article about banking" content now on new page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rainbow_Tick MarkD1234 (talk) 22:03, 6 May 2024 (NZDT)

Hi, I noticed that a while ago you made edits like these ones. They make the article worse, not better, pulling in unsourced items from Wikidata which contradict the article. In general, it is best not to use Wikidata entries in Wikipedia, or else at the very least only take those that are verifiably sourced. Fram (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram I'm from the school of Wikipedian's that are of the view that facts in Wikipedia articles should be sourced from Wikidata to allow for cross use across different articles, e.g. different language versions. Totally agree that the Wikidata properties need to be properly referenced just like anywhere else on Wikimedia. Where the faces a relatively static, such as the Peter Blake, sailor article I'm not that bothered about the Wikipedia article not being integrated properly with Wikidata but where facts are regularly updating such as school roll numbers, then Wikidata statements should definitely be used in infoboxs.

I would note that your reversal of my edit lost information about events Peter Blake participated in. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 04:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, an infobox is a summary, not a detailed unchronological list of everything. Editors on enwiki decide what goes in and what doesnnt, not editors on Wikidata. Fram (talk) 08:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram ultimately, Wikipedians who edit Wikipedia, Wikidata, Creative Commons, and any other Wikimedia are all driving for the same goal. I use whatever medium to get the information out there. yes, Wikipedia articles should follow the Encyclopedia format, but that is supercharged by using wikidata and Commons as sources to make the articles more engaging, maintainable, and current. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 12:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using Wikidata does none of these things though, and isn´t a source in any case. It is not engaging but offputting, and is lots harder to maintain and requires edutors to edit two completely different environments. Their policies are not aligned with ours, and the way you used it produces shoddy results. Fram (talk) 14:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram we'll have to draw a line under this conversation and agree to disagree. I don't regard the different wikimedia projects as an us and them scenario and used well together the different tools enhance the information available to everyone. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pensford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Hudson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that it's a big issue, but whenever you add content, if only a single word, it's never a minor edit. If you want to know more, have a look at Help:Minor edit. Schwede66 07:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]