Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 5:25 PM where this user lives (South Korea). [refresh]

So, why does it violate free-use policy? I got it restored via an undeletion request and there was no issue then. NorthTension (talk) 11:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthTension: Please see WP:NFC#cite_note-4: The NFCI#2 allowance for logos only applies to the use of the logo on the infobox or lede for the stand-alone article about the entity, and should reflect its most current logo. The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo. ✗plicit 14:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So since it's still in use, albeit unofficially, can I put it in the infobox then if I'm reading your post correctly? NorthTension (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthTension: Not quite sure what you mean by "unofficially", but the contextual significance criterion of policy only allows the use of one non-free item. The article's infobox should use a singular official, main logo. ✗plicit 14:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The emblem/patch is still very frequently used despite the one at the top of the infobox being the official legal symbol of Wagner ever since they became part of the Armed Forces. I can provide sources if needed showing the still constant usage of the skull emblem as it's basically their most famous trademark.

Personally I feel like that logo should be exempt from copyright because of it like all other Russian military emblems, but I don't exactly know where to argue that.

Also, if removing the flag version is a requirement to keep the skull emblem on the page then I'd be fine with that, it's literally a seal on a bedsheet. NorthTension (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Action Masters and Nucleon (Transformers). Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Action Masters and Nucleon (Transformers). ✗plicit 14:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Sharita Jackon, Throttlebots, and Monsterbots. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Throttlebots and Monsterbots. I'm guessing Sharita Jackon is a typo as it never existed. ✗plicit 14:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the re-directed article Rollbar (Transformers) and deleted articles Doublecross (Transformers), Hailey Dunn, and Danny Mann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Rollbar (Transformers), Doublecross (Transformers), Hailey Dunn. The draft Draft:Danny Mann contains the same content as the deletion version. ✗plicit 00:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Get Hezbollah Flag Back To The List of Lebanese Flags. Mrclubgreentokyo (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrclubgreentokyo: File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg has not been deleted, but its use is restricted. ✗plicit 14:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who restricted it? Mrclubgreentokyo (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But How Can't I Should Add Hezbollah's Flag Even It Is restricted? Mrclubgreentokyo (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm responding to your deletion of my page request. Appreciate you taking the time.

Augie K Fabela is a prominent American public figure, Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Nasdaq-listed VEON (previously Vimpelcom) and a serial entrepreneur and founder of multiple startupts in the technology sector. He is also a dedicated philanthropist and founder of the Fabela Family Foundation, as well as the author of two books, including a #1 Amazon bestseller. He is referred to briefly in the VEON entry, but it would be beneficial for Wikipedia readers to have his complete biography on the record. We are committed to only contributing factual information and Wiki-approved citations, and will do so with consensus from other Wikipedia editors. VEON.MNS (talk) 08:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you G8 deleted City University of Mogadishu while closing the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guul University. The two names are distinct universities. The City University page was hijacked and moved. The recent histmerge should have left City University as an article, not a redirect. Also City University was previously kept Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City University of Mogadishu, although it might not survive current consensus. In short, City University should not have been in the scope of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guul University. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gene93k: I have restored the page history. For whatever reason, I keep running into a fatal exception error in trying to restore the most recent revision that redirected the article to Guul University. ✗plicit 14:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response. Guul Univeristy was a tangled mess. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, the "delete" close it was only four days after the requested relist -- I was expecting I'd have a week, and was planning on looking into it tomorrow. At the very least, it should be redirected with the history preserved for when coverage eventually surfaces. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: Per WP:RELIST, A relisted discussion may be closed once consensus is determined, without necessarily waiting for another seven days. There was a pretty clear consensus to delete here. There was no suggestion to redirect the page in the discussion, so that's not an WP:ATD I could have taken, especially when the subject is listed in at least nine different competitions from 1986–2003. ✗plicit 00:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, that's disappointing, given that I had an in-depth argument I was set to make tomorrow. Could it be restored to draftspace or something? I was in the process of contacting the Djibouti Post (the country's newspaper) to see if they knew anything about him, and I'm almost certain that coverage exists, so losing that page history would make things more difficult to return if its found. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: Yes, the page is now available at Draft:Omar Daher Gadid. ✗plicit 01:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you mind restoring Hershii LiqCour-Jeté to the draft space, please? I would like to continue working on this entry. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer:  Done, please see Draft:Hershii LiqCour-Jeté. ✗plicit 01:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding the recently deleted article: Vastav AI. The creator of the previous page was also found to be a WP:Socks that were making edits to this page. In lieu of that, the page has been recreated by [1] who has barely contributed to anything apart from his article. The other user involved was recently banned: [2] and [3]. I feel that these are a bunch of meat puppets and paid editors, as the current wiki article does clearly do read like an advert as well. I have nominated the page VastavX AI for speedy deletion. Thanks Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flyingphoenixchips: Yup, this was a word-for-word copy of Vastav Artificial Intelligence, so I have deleted the recreation as G4. ✗plicit 04:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see this was closed as delete yet did not see anyone refuting the WP:HEY. Not asking you to overturn, but if you could restore the last version I did to draft I would appreciate it. Thanks. CNMall41 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: The draft is now available at Draft:Boxabl. ✗plicit 00:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the rush was to delete Talk:Roosevelt dictatorship. Someone asked a question in good faith there on the fate of the deleted page. Even if you want to delete the talk page, you should at the bare minimum copy & paste the conversation to that user's talk page so they can see my response. I don't recall the name of the account but you should be able to see it in the history, but I don't see evidence of you doing such a thing in your recent contribs - apologies if I just missed it. SnowFire (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]