Do you think any of this warrants inclusion in the article? I realized later (after another editor shut down my discussion) that I failed to state my request explicitly (though I thought it was pretty clear). In particular, I felt the statement by the Amsterdam City Council member deserved mention.

--ΝΗΜΙΝΥΛΙ 22:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. This person is not impartial and I have not seen this description of events in reliable Dutch sources. I believe we should follow them instead of individual accounts Dajasj (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, virtually none of the people whose statements are included in the article can plausibly be described as "impartial." --ΝΗΜΙΝΥΛΙ 23:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but the description of events was not picked up by reliable sources. So that casts some doubt over the statement. Dajasj (talk) 06:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an interview to the Amsterdam City Council in aljazeera which also in mentined in Anadolu Agency, here you have the links (1) and (2). I have included them in the reference to the councilmen in the page. I am happy to discuss if needed. AyubuZimbale (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EL violations are often useful as references. Please don't systematically remove them without considering such alternatives. ~Kvng (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kvng, thanks for your comment. I try to consider them and I often turn them into references, but I see I might have been too quick with the Telecommunications in Nepal page. Dajasj (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]