Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, D7CY689, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Li Qianxin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 22:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kwan Ka-wing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Kwan Ka-wing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yarkand Massacre, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — MarkH₂₁^talk 20:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Draft:Yarkand Massacre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH₂₁^talk 21:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• How did I engage in an Edit War? Can you give an example? You move my article to the draft page and I added the source as you request, and you should give me time to edit the draft page without disturbing me, according to the Wikipedia policy. You consistently appears while I am editing the draft page. Thanks. --D7CY689 (talk) 21:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is a courtesy notice, because you removed the {{better source}} template multiple times. Keep in mind that WP:3RR says that An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. — MarkH₂₁^talk 21:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am not just removing your template without adding anything. I removed your template, at the same time I have added a better source as requested, so that's why I removed the template. If you don't think my source is a better source, you can put the template back and explain why you don't think that is not a better source.--D7CY689 (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The point is that removing the template, even if you add another source, still counts as a revert since it undoes another editor's actions. I am just letting you know what 3RR is. Thanks for working on improving the sourcing though.— MarkH₂₁^talk 21:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to kindly ask you to remove the log of accusations on your user page.

• I never claimed that I can block you from editing (said on my talk page that he can block me from editing) – the standard 3RR notice says that you can be blocked, not that I will block you (and I cannot block you as I am not an administrator).
• It is also not true that MarkH21 removed all my edits regarding latest developments of the events, so he can simply say "there is no new development of the case let's merge the article back" because he just removed all the latest developments and he don't allow me to add them to prove that the previous argument was wrong. As I have already explained in this edit summary and here, the revert was on purely procedural grounds because you should not implement a split out-of-process as you did here, particularly before the splitting discussion is closed and just 3 hours after this notification for broader discussion was issued. I have not even offered an opinion in the splitting discussion nor have I prevented you from presenting your arguments and new developments in the discussion itself.

In case you were not already aware, keeping a public log of unsubstantiated accusations (e.g. suggesting wrongdoing or misrepresenting actions) against other editors is considered to be casting aspersions and is not allowed. Please remove them. Thanks.

As a personal addendum, please know that I am not trying to antagonize you nor am I opposed to having the articles that you created. However, there are strict verifiability and neutral point of view standards on Wikipedia and also procedural standard for building consensus that need to be upheld. We can work on these articles constructively to meet WP policies, meet community consensus, and be as encyclopedic as possible. — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:November 11 2019, traffic policeman Kwan Ka Wing grabbing pointing a pistol at a white jacket protestor then grabbed him.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Raymond Hui Chi-fung. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Raymond Hui Chi-fung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kwan Ka-wing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Kwan Ka-wing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Li Qianxin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Li Qianxin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yarkand Massacre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yarkand Massacre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D7CY689! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D7CY689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Li Qianxin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D7CY689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yarkand Massacre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D7CY689. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yarkand Massacre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yarkand Massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that independent media and scholars estimate that thousands might have perished in the Yarkand Massacre in 2014? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yarkand Massacre. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yarkand Massacre), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,771 views (740.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]