Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 20:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.

Pool A

1. Shoemaker's Holiday (647)

Pool B

1. ThinkBlue (247)

Pool C

1. Theleftorium (455)

Pool D

1. Candlewicke (539)

Pool E

1. Durova (479)

Pool F

1. Sasata (961)

Current Wildcards

1. Useight (393)
2. Scorpion0422 (372)
3. Rlevse (329)
4. Wrestlinglover (307)
5. Paxse (285)
6. Ottava Rima (248)
7. Mitchazenia (226)
8. Juliancolton (181)
9. the_ed17 (179)
10. J Milburn (168)
11. Bedford (156)
12. Gary King (147)
13. 97198 (142)
14. Ceranthor (111)
15. Tinucherian (106)
16. Matthewedwards (98)

 GARDEN ,  iMatthew :  Chat  , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I am myself PXK ^T /_C 12:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

Regarding Talk:Desert Eagle, You will find that removing content that violates talk page guidelines is in fact constructive and fully in line with guidelines and you don't pay attention to what you're doing or notice when an edit summary is a joke. If you are confused, Wikipedia is not a forum. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but "That was an auto warning from Huggle" is a meaningless statement. If you are using a bot or script to automatically accuse people of vandalism, you need to make sure

• The system notifies the "vandal" that the message is automated by a bot or script rather than by a human who isn't paying attention
• The system knows the difference between vandalism and an edit summary

I generally tend to assume people are capable of reading the actual edit and in the past this had always proved the case. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I would think to reach the conclusion that the summary was insulting people would have required reading the edit; otherwise the assumption would have been I had added a bad joke or something. Either way, we can agree that hastily auto-processing edits and then discussing the results with me is much faster than briefly skimming the edit and realizing it isn't vandalism. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Was it? I guess you'd have to read the edit to be sure. I'm certain if it was an attack it was vicious, scathing, and completely baseless. He does seem to clearly be more interested in vandalism than improving Wikipedia while having a sense of humor. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi there STRAIGHT EDGE, this is VASCO from Portugal,

Now i am logged in, but edited here anonymously, and received a message from you, about civility. Although i'll admit i was out of order, this "person" which i attacked deserves nothing more but contempt, he does not want to work as a team, does not respond to a single message, does not write a single edit summary, etc, etc.

Do not believe me? It's fair, but have a look at this, incredible i'll say!! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pararubbas/Archive). Tell me, how does this "person" deserve to be treated?

Have a nice week, sorry 4 any incovenience,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

If you look at the change, I was merely removing irrelevant vandalism! I didn't bother to log in, hence IP 82.21.210.149. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.