Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

You have to actually create Category:Tornadoes of 2011 before you're allowed to use it on articles; until it actually exists, an article with that category on it is still uncategorized. Bearcat (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stephanie Edwards (singer) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Edwards (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind, could you add [1] and [2] to the article? Thanks. --Highspeedrailguy (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that the tornado that hit Presque Isle State Park, Pennsylvania was an EF0. All articles I have found regarding the event, including the main Wikipedia page on Tornadoes of 2010. However, your edit to the page on June, 2010 tornadoes lists it as an EF1. Is there and article that you cite listing it as an EF1 or is this something to be corrected? TornadoLGS (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask that you self revert this move. It's clearly NOT uncontroversial as I stated in the edit log when I moved the article back to Hurricane Karl earlier today. Many people at the last requested move argued that it should not have the year regardless of whether it's retired and indeed it was that rationalle used in the close. Therefore could I ask that you move it back to the name that last reached consensus and then start a requested move to see if consensus has changed. Dpmuk (talk) 22:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the self-revert. I didn't want to edit war over it's location and it's normal practice to (try to) keep articles at their "stable" name while discussions take place and as I'm sure you now see with how the discussion has gone this must definitely needed discussion. Dpmuk (talk) 01:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone appears to have jumped the gun and created an article over the tornadoes from the 21st-22nd...I touched it up as best I can, but with the forecast for tomorrow as meager as it is (only 5% tornado probabilities), I'm not sure that the article will be stand-alone unless the tornadoes in Iowa packed a major punch. This article could probably use a watchful eye as to whether to merge back to the Tornadoes of 2011 article and redirect there. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 06:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 04:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Just wondering if a separate article is in the works for last nights derecho event. The amount of storm reports is incredible. 63 tornadoes have been reported and the numbers are rising. Get back to me on this please.

Sharkguy05 (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Sharkguy05[reply]

Thing is that i'm a total newbie to this site. I usually just help fill in the descriptions of the tornado charts. Where do I start? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkguy05 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I put together an article on the April outbreak. It's pretty minimal right now. Any way I can let people know that it needs expanding? Sharkguy05 (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Sharkguy05[reply]

Still working on my April 2011 derecho article. Do you mind uploading a damage picture to the info box? It doesn't seem to want to work for me. The copyright process is really confusing. I would really appreciate it. I will get this figured in the future.

Sharkguy05 (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Sharkguy05[reply]

Not a problem, that's why there are two of us :) I've got two more ratings for yesterday to add from the reports page. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 04:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I would let you know that the NWS in Green Bay confirmed two new tornadoes from the early April outbreak. You should probably add them.

Sharkguy05 (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Sharkguy05[reply]

Alright, enjoy your vacation :) I think we'll be able to hold down the fort here. Thanks for the heads up, I'll see what I can do to keep things up to date while you're out. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You alright? I've been seeing just utterly catastrophic damage from Tuscaloosa and Birmingham. Watching The Weather Channel and Jim Cantore said the damage at the start of the track is easily EF4. I've also seen reports of meteorologists ranking it as EF5. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mass casualty trailer called into Catoosa County, Georgia. If you can, you should hop on IRC and go to the #Wiki-hurricanes room, myself and a bunch of other editors from the meteorology realm are in there. Better place to discuss things than here on wiki. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like your thoughts on this since you commented here earlier :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While not at all a requirement, the use of Edit summaries makes history pages much more user friendly. This is just a friendly nudge is all:if you can please bring yourself to start using some sort of edit summary, I at least would appreciate it. :)
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 23:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran across this while checking through all of the NWS offices for information on recent tornadoes and the Birmingham office posted a report on the April 1, 1981. The title is The Hurtsboro EF-3 Tornado of April 1, 1981. I'm not sure if they added the EF part by habit now or if they're actually slowly making a move to have older tornadoes listed on the EF-scale. Just something to think about. Article Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been compiling the list for this outbreak on the monthly list to avoid conflict with IPs interested in the event since it's on the main page. To save time, you can just c/p the info I've place there into the outbreak. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid today may be another terrible day of tornadoes...The SPC is going to expand their high-risk area in their next outlook. I don't remember one ever being this large...lets hope this busts. Mesoscale Discussion Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's just insane...it's like nature knows it has an average # of tornadoes to meet for this month and it's going all-out again to meet it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How often does the SPC specifically state that a "major tornado outbreak is forecast..." Another piece is rather unsettling... "The result will be a very dangerous risk of widespread severe thunderstorms this afternoon and evening...including long-duration strong/violent tornadoes." Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just remembered, this is an outbreak sequence. The first system is gone now (produced tornadoes May 22-24) and a new system moved out of the Rockies yesterday and produced the more prolific outbreak. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on June 17, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 17, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! ۞ Tbhotch^™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 18:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I've slowly been putting together a more comprehensive (content-wise) list of the tornadoes during this year's Super Outbreak. I've already gone through much of the reports for that time and updated states where possible (though I didn't add content for most of them yet). The ones that have been updated have the NCDC style coordinates of degrees and minutes rather than decimal. The plan was to have this be the sandbox for the list of tornadoes article and merge it into the mainspace once all the reports are out and I finish the list. For the time being, if you would like to copy/paste reports took make life easier for you, feel free to. The sandbox is at User:Cyclonebiskit/Sandbox7. Also, many of the reports for Tennessee are sub-standard as they really only mention downed trees and specifics on damage is limited. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Leap Day tornado outbreak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Plains and Mid-South (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Talk:Tornadoes of 2012.
Message added 22:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 22:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CrazyC83! I've removed your neutrality tag on the article Bill 78, simply because neither you nor another user has yet disputed its neutrality on the talk pages or elsewhere. Please feel free to add it back, but if you do so, be sure to make a comment on the talk pages regarding the tag and your specific expectations for improvement. Thanks, -Darouet (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi

joshua 02:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

There is an ongoing discussion at List of Category 6 Atlantic hurricanes as to whether this page should be kept or redirected to List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes. Your input on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. United States Man (talk) 04:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The unit is knots, not mph, so the sustained winds for the infobox for Hurricane Ernesto (2012) would be 75, not 85. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC) Disregard that... I didn't realize you were updating it based on the post-season report. My apologies Inks.LWC (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Ernesto (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storm chaser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Sandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cat Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones‎.
Message added 15:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jason Rees (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently a discussion about the format of the tornado tables ongoing at Talk:May 18–21, 2013 tornado outbreak#Changing tornado table format. Your thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

United States Man (talk) 02:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tropical Storm Andrea (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CrazyC83

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 22:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ks0awb (talk • contribs) [reply]

I am contacting you to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on that you might be interested in on Talk:Hurricane Sandy. I noticed that you were one of the top contributors to the article, so I figured I would let you know. Please don't feel like this invitation means that you have to participate, but feel free to do so if you desire. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in the discussion here, I though you may be interested in this discussion. United States Man (talk) 21:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another discussion you may be interested in is this RFC, a proposal to make the second comma in a date/place optional. United States Man (talk) 02:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of United States tornadoes from November to December 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wilmington, Illinois

November 17, 2013 tornado outbreak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wilmington, Illinois

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your membership in [[WikiProject Severe weather, I thought that the discussion going on there regarding proposed changes to the tornado table might interest you. If you are interested in participating in discussion, please feel free to join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Reference column in the tornado table. All views are welcome, and please do not feel obligated to participate if you are not interested. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to April 27–29, 2014 tornado outbreak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |>{{convert|0.5|mi|km|abbr=on|sortable=on}}
• |[[Georgia (U.S. state|GA]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know of anywhere that I can see or get information from the press conference confirming the rating of the Vilonia tornado? I am very curious as to whether it contains reasoning for not going to an EF5 rating. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just wanted to say I reverted your edit, the latest update seems to have been corrected to be 70MPH which would still make Cristobal a strong tropical storm. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you reverted my edit in the 2010 Pacific hurricane season? With this, I reverted you since you are wrong about it. Please reply in my talk page of why that I'm wrong about this. Typhoon2013 (talk) 05:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on Hurricane Diane‎ because you didn't provide any explanation or rationale for what you did. It would be courteous to other editors if you provided an edit summary or talk page note explaining substantive revisions like changing figures and removing sources. I see that several other editors have left you notes to similar effect. --Laser brain (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for keeping up with the reanalysis. I've seen you've done a lot of it. What other sort of work needs to be done to keep it up to date? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll work on the summaries at some point. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CrazyC38. An IP put in an edit request on the Talk:Hurricane Sandy asking why you altered the date of NOAA report cited for the storm from June 2013 to March 2014 even though the report is dated to June 2013. Perhaps you could comment? Altamel (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox tornado event has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was quite literally just getting ready to do the exact same thing, but you beat me to it. :) Dustin (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Delamor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Delamor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 06:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your change to Hurricane Joaquin removed the {{convert}} template that allows you to update only the speed in knots and wikipedia automatically replaces "{{convert|110|kn}}"it with "110 knots (200 km/h; 130 mph)". There was no edit summary, so I wasn't sure why you removed the template. If you want the units to be linked, you can add "lk=on", so using "{{convert|938|mbar|inHg|lk=on}}" outputs "938 millibars (27.7 inHg)". Using the template helps avoid calculation errors that wouldn't be immediately obvious, and ensures the data is correct for all the units. As a plus, it looks cleaner when you're editing.-Ich (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Southeastern Conference football season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiger Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Temperature extremes has been nominated for merging with [[Template:]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been using the {{convert}} template due to people getting the conversions wrong. Even NOAA is getting some of the calculations wrong. The {{convert}} template automatically does accurate calculations into whatever units you specify. I've put the {{convert}} template back in at Hurricane_Harvey_(2017)#Current_storm_information. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand a random IP adding nonsense to the page, but really?18abruce (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KLTV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KWTX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karyn White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTVR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of 'Including Hawaii's big island' because Hawaii county is only one island. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 22:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WSFA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WDFX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KFVS-TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KYTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 38 - I'm only sending this to you because you got a mention in the history of the tropical cyclone Wikiproject ;) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 6, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 6, 2019—Wehwalt (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Winterstorm. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Winterstorm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 08:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Danielle (2004) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Danielle (2004) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JavaHurricane 08:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Karen (2007) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Karen (2007) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JavaHurricane 08:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit would you please explain where in the cited source you got the information that Woods was travelling "likely at a speed much higher than the 45 mph (70 km/h) speed limit". The CNBC source states that Woods was travelling at a "relatively greater speed than normal". Sundayclose (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to work on your edits (both wording and formatting). These editors can help you out: @Sammi Brie, Mrschimpf, Wcquidditch, Mattdp, LooneyTraceYT, Mlaffs, Stereorock, Tvstationfan101, and Materialscientist: Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your work is appreciated, CrazyC83; thank you for what you did to start because there's certainly a lot to do here. Sometimes it's forgotten that Wikipedia is a collaborative project and we're not going to get everything perfect on edit #1. Nate • (chatter) 00:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to just get started on it. CrazyC83 (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CrazyC83, just wanted to let you know that I'm not totally crazy, and I had added tornado color params to {{Storm colour}}, but the template was superceded by a module which lacks those params, which is why it's broken now... WMSR (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WMSR: I saw that. I reverted changes on other templates that were using the new parameters so colors are displaying properly again. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HurricaneActiveExperimental has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how to get the map fixed?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you recently removed content from WINK-TV without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hurricane Juan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a minor question but do you have Discord, so that I can communicate with you?--The Space Enthusiast (talk) 09:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 03:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Groundhog Day tornado outbreak has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ChessEric 06:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asia'h Epperson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSINGER and WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf Stream has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current-Class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Fayenatic London 11:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Helene (2006) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Noah, AA^Talk 14:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of United States tornadoes in January 2024, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of United States tornadoes in January 2024".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]