When you write articles that are beyond WP:STUB, like Anne D'Arpajon, Countess of Noailles, please consider adding inline references and nominating your work at T:TDYK for a front-page exposure. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your signature appears to be contrary to the guideline on signatures because it contains an image. WP:SIG#Images expressly forbids the use of images in signatures, for a list of reasons you can see there. If you could alter it to exclude the image or to use unicode characters instead, it would be much appreciated. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have changed it.--ComtesseDeMingrélie 02:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the 72% figure for Northeast Georgia- the figure is given by the Nasidze 2004 study, so at least it deserves mention. Furthermore, the % is much higher than those of Chechens on average and Ingush on average- though I suspect the southern, mountainous regions of Chechenia and Ingushetia have much more J2. Dagestanis usually have mostly J1 and very little if any J2... Furthermore, I would assume that Nasidze et al were professional enough in their study not to do diaspora populations (though I might note that the Georgians- the Tush, the Khevsurs, the Pshavs and so on- of the region vastly outnumber more recent migrants). Thus, I've reverted your edit on that note... do you have any objections? --Yalens (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, forgot to mention. Generally, for haplogroup pages, the convention is to put the highest percentages at the top, rather than alphabetize. --Yalens (talk) 23:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really edit it much and yes, I suppose it wasn't EXACTLY by highest first originally, because its hard to figure out how to do stuff with varying frequencies in different studies... but if you look on other such pages, that's generally the rule- unless its one of those, like J1 for example, that do only macrogroups (if we were going to do that for J2, we would say Eastern Mediterraneans, Semites, Nakh and South Caucasians, or something along those lines). But for now, I'd let you have the alphabetic way, as it is a little easier to navigate. And also, I have made note of NE Georgia because in Nasidze's study, he didn't include NE Georgia and the Svans (who have 0% by the way) with the rest of Georgia, as it is better to make note of the detail so that the page can be most informative.--Yalens (talk) 22:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Leonida and Maria in 1960's.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from stolen from a June 2007 posting in http://forum.ge/?f=95&showtopic=33741730&st=435. As a copyright violation, File:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Valleys of northwestern Georgia (Europe).jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Golden Eagle in the Caucasus Mountains of Georgia (Europe).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence on bazieri.ge that this photo was relased under cc-by by the photographer.... who is the photographer? The website?? Are you kidding? --Martin H. (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vani image.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

photographic work of an 3D object, no evidence that the photographic work was released under cc-by by the Georgian National Museum. Martin H. (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Galaktion.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Galaktion Tabidze.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]