Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide lightning.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:West-coast-waves.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've seen your edits pop up on my watchlist a few times in the past few weeks, and it's especially good to have more people interested in the WAFL editting here. However, your edits tonight to Trent Dennis-Lane are not what I'd call an improvement. I'm a strong believer that detailed stats don't belong in these articles, especially for current players, mainly because they are a real pain to keep up to date, don't really add that much to the article and other sites do it so much better. So please reconsider this edit. Having two separate tables for totals and averages is also very strange. In terms of the infobox, there was recently a discussion on the various AFL infobox templates and the outcome seemed to be to merge them all into the one labelled "NEW" - so your change will probably be undone by a bot sometime soon. Is there something in particular that you don't like about the NEW template and like about the other one? Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 14:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the feedback. the infobox i have used is the template used for Barry Hall. i tried the NEW template but i seemed to have errors when entering the relevant information. the career stats are only for seasons completed and i agree that constantly updating the stats during the current season will be a pain. the idea for the stats i took from the Joel Selwood page which is well created. However, i'm ok if any of my changes/additions are removed.(ColRad (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Hi mate, always good to see new AFL editors. One question though: what was the reasoning for this edit? You appear to have undone my latest edit to the article and also updated the stats for only some of the players. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Perth Meetup Next: 11 January 2025 (watch) Last: 15 December 2024
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:46, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide lightning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]