Archives
Nov 2004 - 19 Jan 2005 20 Jan 2005 - 15 Mar 2005

You voted for Rum Rebellion. It has been selected as the new Australian Collaboration. Please help to improve the article. Thanks. Scott Davis ^Talk 12:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They've started changing my password as well. How long have you been putting up with this?--Shanel 05:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was first hit on 19 March, when they changed my password 20 times. Then again today with another 20 attempts. It appears that being blocked doesn't stop one from partaking in this kind of disruption. Cnwb 05:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you have been working on articles such as Robbie Muir, Making Losers Happy, and Xpressway, which mention someone called David Mitchell. David Mitchell is a disambiguation page, and I have been trying to sort out the links to it. Can you tell me what would be a good distinguishing description? Should he be David Mitchell (musician) or can you be more specific? Thank you. CarolGray 19:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Mitchell (musician) would be perfect. Thanks. Cnwb 21:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. CarolGray 18:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say that I really like your user page. That's all. Isopropyl 05:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. To be fair though, I should admit that the design is stolen from User:Vague Rant. Cnwb 05:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please increase the block time of 203.217.8.30? It seems to come back almost as soon as the blocks expire. There are zero useful edits from the IP and it has attempted to get multiple users passwords. JoshuaZ 23:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended the block to 1 week. Has s/he been attempting to change your password too? Cnwb 23:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was referring to in the block log, he has attempted to do the same for Jossi and Shanel. JoshuaZ 23:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I apparently spoke too soon. He has apparently tried to change mine as well. (about 120 attempts or so). JoshuaZ 01:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your statements in the lounge/talk. I don't see how the admin general could be appointed at 15. Too young. I went ahead and removed the picture. -- Damien Vryce

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I decided the source and tagging were good enough to keep. If you disagree, please nominate at IFD again and I will let some other admin make the call. -Nv8200p talk 13:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just thought that you should be informed of something about this particular I.P address. It is the I.P of a school in Australia, Tasmania, Glenorchy. The school's name is Dominic College. On behalf of my fellow students, I wish to apologise for all vandalism caused by students mis-using this brilliant website. Thank you.

CNBW; have created this page as a stub and would appreciate any editorial input. Thanks. Lentisco 07:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why do you remove the artists I add to the list of noise musicians? I'm curious to know. thanks, ~ Gudnason 11:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your enquiry. I removed some of the artists from the List of noise musicians because many of them were (what wikipedia refers to as) non-notable. If you have a look at WP:MUSIC you can see what is generally considered the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you believe the artists you added (none of which, by the way, had their own articles yet) are notable enough, please create an article for each which explains how they are notable. The list of noise musicians has suffered a spate of non-notable additions lately, and myself and other editors have been making a concerted effort to keep an eye on this. Cnwb 11:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Gnarloo? It is commonly mistaken for Gnaraloo and a redirect is appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vooose (talk • contribs)

I have changed the page to a proper redirect. Cnwb 11:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cnwb. I have started a proposal at Portal talk:Australia for an inclusion of an anniversary/on this day section to be displayed on the portal. If you are interested in this making this happen, you can comment there or go to the anniversary pages and adding in things that you consider to be notable events. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I admit the site isn't very large, so it's relatively negligable. Note that I'm not at all affiliated with the site so it wasn't personal advertising. As for whether or not it should be deleted, that's your call. I just read somewhere that people noticed it as a precursor to Digg, and the style and content seem to suggest so.

Mwastrod 17:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's everyone's call. The way 'prod' tags work is this - a user can tag an article which they believe should be deleted, if they believe most Wikipedians would agree (see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion for further explanation). If someone believes that it shouldn't be deleted (such as yourself), then the article can be sent to 'AFD' (Articles for Deletion), where users debate whether articles stay or not. If you believe the article should stay, you are quite entitled to remove the prod tag, although it's usually likely that someone will send the article to AFD for a wider debate. Hope this helps. Cnwb 23:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you have quite a lot of self-esteem (evidence is in ypur user page). lol. no offense though. nice user page, btw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.109.222.166 (talk • contribs)

Umm. Thanks. I think. Cnwb 04:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cnwb, I listed your speedy deletion of Vaginafaceitis on DRV. I know it was a dumb article and hoax, but unfortunately we don't have a speedy deletion criterion for that. G1 is only for "incoherent" articles, which (again, unfortunately) Vaginafaceitis is not. =( I thought I should let you know so you can weigh in on the DRV discussion. Thanks! Powers 00:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article 'Camperdown' which you started had degenerated into nonsense so I did a total rewrite. Thanks for your help on other things.Geoffrey Wickham 06:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I was about to prod this article for not living up to the usual notability guidelines for band inclusion, until I saw it was you that started the stub. Therefore, I have refrained from doing so due to your esteemed reputation on the 'pedia. However, when you get a chance, can you expand the article a bit. They sound kind of cool and I'd like to know more. Cheers. youngamerican (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting article. May I ask where you found info? Did William Drake name it? I had no idea that a settlement existed. As Kororoit Ck is my one of my fav Melbourne secrets would love to know. Cheers. Lentisco 05:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Discussion page is a "mess". The party declines to register, dos not sign his posts and continually changes his IP address. Under these circumstances could Arbitration achieve anything ? A 'without predjudice' opinion would be appreciated. Apologies, I forgot to log on first.Geoffrey Wickham --139.168.53.159 23:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try loggin in and then leaving a message. There is no proof that you are in fact Geoffrey Wickham. That Telectronics article is such a hornet-nest, I wouldn't be surprised if people are forging signatures. Cnwb 23:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & confirming --Geoffrey Wickham 02:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Cnwb. The message in the first posting above is as intended. " The party declines to register, does not sign his posts and continually changes his IP address. Under these circumstances could Arbitration achieve anything ? A 'without prejudice opinion' would be appreciated." ( have just finished an initial article Bernard Lown, wish to be a useful contributor but please accept that at age 72 my learning curve re Wikipedia procedures is a bit slow). --Geoffrey Wickham 06:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC).

==Thank you==
Thanks Cnwb; have studied 'requests for arbitration' and come to a tentative conclusion that it is probably an unproductive course. Seems there are only two alternatives for me: Keep on reverting the changes & hope other Wikipedians do the same, or to give up trying to ensure that a little bit of Australian technological history is not perverted. All the best--Geoffrey Wickham 07:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Note to self - a Lyotard quote for the userpage - "no self is an island; each exists in a fabric of relations now more complex and mobile than ever before... one is always located at a post through which various kinds of messages pass" Cnwb 06:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still am almost positive that the surveyor mentioned in Buttlejork page was Darke NOT Drake. See http://www.docklands.com/docklands/about/history/heritage.shtml. Otherwise please disabuse me.Lentisco 03:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to see some old plans or read any more information you have on the proposed rail lines in melbourne, particularly the east doncaster line. there was one or a few editions of the melways that showed the rail line to east doncaster during the 80's or very late 70's but I can't track down which one it is.

Also, if you have any information on freeways, or the freeway plans for melbourne that were drawn up at any time I'd like to see it.

Thanks Nick carson 05:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

they have hit me too with my password cnaged 100 times what can we do to stop them? well it got me thinking did you block them or what happened even though they did this to me how can i stop them??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mudvayne fan (talk • contribs) .

Perhaps I should have headed that Telecbloodytronics. I want to have closure on all this nonsense. In my last posting (bottom) on Discussion I asked for help. Can you help either directly of by referring me to another Administrator ? regards Geoffrey Wickham 02:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your request for help with the Telectronics article. To take on a matter as complex and cumbersome as the Telectronics edit war is beyond my means and abilities. You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes, which points to numerous avenues for resolving disputes. Hope this helps. Cnwb 00:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I have only been a Brunswickian for about two years. Well, I was correct, it's not in Brunswick at least. ;) I just associated Lygon St with all things Carlton.

So is there an official demarcation between Brunswick and Brunswick West? The railway line? I suspect I live in Brunswick West, although I'm closer to Sydney Road than Lygon is...

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, as a local East Brunswickian, comfy chair regular, and devotee of all things geographic, I can tell you that the suburb boundary between Brunswick and Brunswick East is actually the back fences of the properties on the western side of Lygon Street, rather than the middle of the street. That is - any property that has a Lygon Street address is in Brunswick East. Hope this helps. Mustard Pot 00:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that test4 did the trick. -- Steel 11:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

but he is really fat!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex steele (talk • contribs)

Regardless of whether he is "really fat", consider this your first vandalism warning. If you continue to make such changes, you may be banned from Wikipedia. Cnwb 12:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rex steele isnt my normal user name, i will just change my IP address, you & your lefty attitude wont stop my anti-fat crusade —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex steele (talk • contribs) - done!!! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexy steel (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked due to repeated vandalism, and explicit threat to continue vandalising. Cnwb 12:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol "anti-fat crusade". -- Steel 12:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for pointing to Wire issue. I have this theory that Melbourne is just as intellectually stimulating as anywhere else and produces many inspired autodidacts- its just that we are are burdened by dull, moribund, pandering, anti-intellectuals members of the rich and their arse-licking politicians. The problem with the Australian ruling class is that they have no class. End of rant. Lentisco 04:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very dissapointing to see such a narrow point of view on the ruling classes of Australia. This topic clearly warrants its own article - RS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexy steel (talk • contribs)

has your intro page been hacked or have you really copied someone elses blog? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.254.189.90 (talk • contribs)

Well, that's a strange question. No, it hasn't been hacked, and apart from the design being based on User:Vague Rant's page, it's all my own work. Why do you ask? Cnwb 23:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there. I saw this user's unblock request, and while I'd like to assume good faith, they don't seem to have much of a contributions history for a supposedly shared IP. Wondering if you had any thoughts? Luna Santin 02:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I've declined their request. Thanks. :) Luna Santin 03:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Enough. I was assuming good faith ( on his part ) as he was the article creator and has requested it to go. I'm just wish he'd find another hobby tonight - Peripitus (Talk) 13:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, I'm concerned about wikipedia. I've watched several articles that I've written over the last year or so be changed to be inaccurate. It's a pity because we need a good information repository. I think that the editing of my most recent article removes some history on a random basis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewcalvin (talk • contribs)

Andrew, the information I removed was not done on a "random basis". I brought the issue up on the article's talk page, and invited discussion about it. Your response was simply "i think you're a knob" [1]. Now it seems you'd rather delete the whole article than allow others to edit it. I have copied this comment onto Talk:Coopernook, New South Wales, as it's more relevant to take place there. Cnwb 23:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete, is real company. PLEASE!!!

--Atyndall 05:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Pascal.Tesson 03:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete all those things on the Carrum Downs Page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typo3198 (talk • contribs)

Hi there. The article on Volcanic Tongue could really use your help. Thanks! Leo44 (talk) 12:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cnwb,
Yeah, my article did indeed come about as a result of celebrating the centenary year. I spent the last semester of my undergrad doing a 'special' unit dedicated to writing a 6,000 word essay on Central Hall. Parts of the article were used by ACU for an event at the hall in 2004, but it was never published in booklet form as originally planned. I've been in contact with people at ACU just last week, and it seems likely that it will be submitted to an Australian Catholic journal next year. Rob Lindsey 02:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you've indicated that you're interested in future Meetups in Melbourne on this list, so I'm giving you this message to remind you that Melbounre meetup number four is currently in planning. If you haven't already, please go to Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne to suggest possible dates, times and locations. Thanks --Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it is possible, I have been in and out of the uni for five years. I've mainly dealt with the Education faculty (finished a Dip. Ed. last week) and the School of Arts and Sciences (being a History major). Rob Lindsey 08:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Cnwb,

I would be grateful for your assistance. The article on this street has been nominated at afd. I noticed that you had taken pictures in the Fitzroy area and was wondering if this street had any claim to fame. The article doesn't list any and I haven't been able to find anything that established a claim to notability.

Capitalistroadster 02:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, person who is listed as being interested in future meetups in Melbourne. The fourth meetup will be held on 18 December, at Lower House in Fed Square (in the Alfred Deaking building, Flinders Street end near the Atrium: map), starting from 7pm. We don't currently have a separate location for discussion beforehand, but there'll be plenty of time to talk wiki over dinner. --bainer (talk) 14:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Madita, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Madita. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Fram 14:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luxsound has also been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you previously prodded it, I thought you'd like to know that Yuyang is at AfD. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user has edited Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gender_Studies and has edited its aims so that it reads (the following quote is taken from the talk page):

* Correct articles where the term 'gender' is overused, used incorrectly, or used pejoratively to pander to (what Christina Hoff-Sommers, Wendy McElroy and other more moderate feminists call) a "gender-feminist" POV.

• Correct articles where the term "gender" is used (without reference to NPOV dictionaries and other NPOV sources) to replace the term 'sex' as a ploy to pander to "gender"-feminist POV. Correct the usages so that the proper definition is used without regard to UNTESTED and often invalid 'gender theories', so distinctions can be made between 'gender' and 'sex', and so that the usage reflects some sort of NPOV take on a highly loaded term. Just because some widely criticized academic fields have used totalitarian tactics to force 'gender' and censor the usage of 'sex', in US humanities programs is no indication of the validity of this politically-loaded term. Consult NPOV sources such as dictionaries, opponents of "gender"-feminists and NPOV mass media sources to balance 'gender' POV with 'sex' POV.
• Correct articles where the term 'gender' is being used gynocentrically as a front for 'oppression'-feminist political, legal or cultural power plays. For example, in feminism (Status) there is no mention that for the male 'gender', military mortality is 98% compared to 2% for the female 'gender' (in Iraq)...but other forms of far less serious female "gender" oppression are implicated (covertly and most disengenously) as having something to do with the gender "oppression" of women. This kind of blatant, gynocentric "gender" bias is no less POV than the other forms listed here.

Said user has further edited the talk page suggesting that (the following quote is taken from the talk page):

I suspect this project was created to pander to the points of view of misandric, gender-ginning, 'patriarchal oppression' feminists (please see Women's studies, misandry and feminism ) who use the term 'gender' as a cunning, covert, and blatantly gynocentric weapon of war. Many other more moderate feminists and non-feminists have challenged these blatantly gynocentric, and often misandric "gender feminist" ideologies. I insist on a non-sexist, non-'genderist', non-reverse sexist project...otherwise this project is just the usual type of cunning totalitarian tactic we see so much in other politically correct channels. To revert the above content just because none of the orginal authors of this project page like it is a POV stunt to have ones cake and eat it too. I am going to reinsert the content. I insist that before it is reverted again good NPOV reasons be provided. My aim here is some kind of GENUINE non-sexist, non-reverse sexist, and non-'genderist' NPOV...as may be shown well in Sexism (drop in editor) 00:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

The idea that the term gender (that is, the idea that at least some of the differences between the roles of men and women in society) is socially constructed, yet 'sex' (i.e. that any differences between men and women are essentially biological), at the very least, looks like misogyny|misoginist]] POV bias of the worst kind. Any assistance arguing against the point would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, - AmishThrasher 08:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor, you may wish to comment on this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Victorian election campaign. Peter Campbell 07:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for filling in the history of Watsonia. What source did you use? Thanks, LachlanA 07:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fifth meetup of Melbourne Wikipedians is being planned as a breakfast meeting in the city with Jimbo Wales (at a venue to be arranged) on Friday, 27 April 2007.

Jimbo has proposed breakfast as the one real window of opportunity during his tightly scheduled stay in Melbourne. Tbe precise time has to be sorted out with Jimbo, but the arrangements for the equivalent Adelaide meetup a few days before may give a good idea.

Feel free to edit the relevant page in any way that might be helpful. I feel like a bit of an interloper, not having attended previous meetups. If there's anything you can do to help, I'll be grateful. Please think about whether you'll be able to make it, assuming the arrangements are similar to those Adelaide is adopting (i.e. a block of time with people being fairly free to arrive when it suits them). Some indication on the page of your possible participation would be really helpful. Metamagician3000 06:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Surface of the Earth (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jerry 02:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cnwb I saw your article on Brunswick, which included a photo and potted history of Brunswick market, I now live in that building and would like to update the entry a bit.

Brunswick Market. The former Brunswick Market opened on 19 September 1930, as an attempt to stop the drift of locals towards Queen Victoria Market. The complex contained Melbourne's alleged first self-serve grocer. THE MARKET IS UNIQUE MELBOURNE EXAMPLE OF SPANISH MISSION STYLE, BUILD AROUND TWO AIRCRAFT HANGERS (BELFRAST TRUSS STYLE BOUGHT FROM THE RAF), The market failed to lure customers from nearby Sydney Road and the Queen Victoria Market, and was handed over to a liquidator in 1933. The building was subsequently used as a storage facility for the Red Cross, THEN BECAME A BOX FACTORY, UNTIL 1997 WHEN THE BUILDING WAS SUBDIVED INTO APPARTMENTS, ALTHOUGH HAFT THE BUILDING REMAINS INTACT TO SHOW THE BELFAST TRUSSES INTACT . The architecture, designed by local architect I. G. Anderson, is of the Spanish Colonial Revival style, popular throughout the 1920s.

Hi. This is a reminder to people on the Melbourne meetup participation list that the next meetup has been arranged for 19 June. Could you indicate on the meetup page your likely attendence, or otherwise. Regards. - Cuddy Wifter 23:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rema-Rema, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.129.23.69 18:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Luksuh 03:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Melbourne Meetup Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Brothers of the Occult Sisterhood, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Britt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Chris Britt. Deb (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beneath Clouds.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BMX Bandits.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beneath Clouds.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Christina Carter, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Christina Carter seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Christina Carter, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm looking for Eduard Friedrich Mörike's opera "Eduard auf dem Seil" (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silpelit), but I can find any information, who ever has played it. If do you know any link to the information about performance this opera please drop me an e-mail at fazoo@o2.pl, because it seems till now, that nobody's played it ever. It's really important for me so I'd be thankful for any information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.9.92.72 (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mouth (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable band

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 20:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mouth (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouth (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wizardman 17:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:John Meillon as the Mayor.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Closedmouth (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

clearly you dont know shit about anything. crotchduster owns your mom

Umm... what? Cnwb (talk) 07:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jessica Rylan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daniel Menche, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No evidence or importance or notability, and no references offered.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. magnius (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cnwb. I'm doing a study about Wikipedia (particularly about sysops) for my Masters in Communications and Media Studies at Monash Uni, and was wondering if you would be so kind as to take some time to talk to me. I'm contacting a few editors/sysops in hopes of hearing first-hand accounts of your day-to-day activities are and your relationship with other members of the community. If you're in Melbourne and can spare some time for a friendly talk (no more than 30 minutes), I'd greatly appreciate it :)

Please let me know if you're interested. Cheers, --In continente (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've deleted the page for the Detroit band "Shock Therapy", can you please restore it, as they were a great band with a large following. -- 24.208.241.89 (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree (though late), since I would not call a band that released 15 albums and that has been in the business for 20+ years as "non-notable". That's just plainly impudent. -andy 217.50.42.186 (talk) 00:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lysterfield Park. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lysterfield Park. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cnwb! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Ian Boddy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Andrea Belfi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Dean Roberts - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Anenzephalia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Kim Pieters - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Jaimie Leonarder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Faisal Meqdad - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Alastair Galbraith (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Genevieve McGuckin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Michael Sheridan (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Voloptulist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album by ba non-notable group

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inniverse (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User Cnwb. Recently used a photo you took and uploaded at this stub article Coal Mines Historic Site, but was not sure if the Saltwater probationary ruins you've photographed actually has been included on the National Heritage and now World Heritage lists?

If not, was wondering if you may also have photo of coal mines historic site ruins that are included on the National and World Heritage lists?? Just hoping you can help .. noting your having visited the area plus quality of photo etc??? Bruceanthro (talk) 10:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Coal Mines Historic Site article as it has been included on the world heritage list, as part of the Australian Convict Sites listing. If your photo of ruins doesn't belong in the article, then was hoping:

i. you might have other photo/s of ruin/s from the site; and

ii. you might be able to improve article by uploading the same into the article?

Noting I myself only once visited Port Arthur almost 20 years ago! Bruceanthro (talk) 23:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway! cheers Bruceanthro (talk) 23:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brain Donor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a search for references found the phrase "Brain Donor" in a song by the band The Piranhas in several published works. I did not find references showing the band Brain Donor was notable. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you did some or added something to peter bourke page and I am hoping somebody wouldstart a page of his first band Eden with Sean Bowley I would do it my self but I have very bad grammar skills etc... please consider it all the info is here .

http://www.blurredlipstick.com/sean/

(98.232.94.106 (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)wash)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim Pieters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bird Blobs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird Blobs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 14:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Menche has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant claims of notability, no references, other than external links.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Melbourne Meetup Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Max Gillies as Metcalfe.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 14:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

See also: Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2011#September 2011

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sacred Cowboys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Making Losers Happy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable album per WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)[reply]

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Xinlisupreme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 114.150.34.98 (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

The article Dumb and the Ugly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced band stub article of unclear notability; tagged as unreferenced since 2008

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mass (English band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass (English band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley 12:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leibniz Army.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:San Francisco LP.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cnwb

I have created an article for Hoffman brickworks in Brunswick, and noted that you had written on the site in your userspace.

Hope I haven't stepped on your toes.Garyvines (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dean Roberts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 14:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI @Chrislk02: and @DissidentAggressor: I'm using this as an example of a problematic speedy deletion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 119#Speedy deleting old pages. -- haminoon (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ecstatic Peace! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dion Workman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 21:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sigma Editions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 21:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rosy Parlane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 21:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luxsound has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NN recording

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 21:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sigma Editions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Editions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 06:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on MSBR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 05:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MSBR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSBR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 15:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bastard Noise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bastard Noise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bastard Noise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe _talk 22:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bastard Noise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jersey92 (talk) 01:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brain Donor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SwisterTwister talk 08:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bastard Noise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 20:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:This Is Not A Dream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pearson, Victoria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed. No primary or secondary sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gippsland phantom cat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

2 of 4 current sources have broken links and the other 2 don't mention the "Gippsland phantom cat". Google does not turn up any reliable sources on this topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —PermStrump(talk) 05:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gippsland phantom cat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gippsland phantom cat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —PermStrump(talk) 07:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Saxophone Solos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cnwb. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Xinlisupreme".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Belfi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Belfi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robbie Muir (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable musician, fails all points of WP:MUSICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Ammarpad (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Voloptulist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Voloptulist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Voloptulist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black Boned Angel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability issue raised in 2009. Sources are affiliated with the subject, except one, a blog about metal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K. ROTH 15:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Es (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 16:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Borsari's Corner, Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced since 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cat Hope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Hope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Melmann 18:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arcane Device has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NARTIST A quick search only finds sources like discogs, bandcamp and such SPS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borsari's Corner, Melbourne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borsari's Corner, Melbourne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pearls Before Swine (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

16 years after it was created, and 12 years after it was tagged as lacking sources, this stub is still only sourced to IMDB (not a reliable source). Even the claim about the premiere at Stockholm International Film Festival is unsourced, although that's the sentence the IMDB note has been attached to. It's ridiculous. Just get rid of the article if nobody can or wants to provide reliable sources. It's waited long enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | tålk 16:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grey Daturas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Daturas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 22:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From Oct 2005 to now, unsourced assertion that "In 1924 the Maryborough Knitting Mills opened, establishing the town as a centre for the wool industry." What is the source? There's considerable evidence in TROVE, and reliable Maryborough histories, that 1924 MKM was a whitework (cotton underwear) factory, with a recent Facebook survey of former employees and customers showing that in later years it ALSO produced SOME woollen goods from purchased yarn. The meaning of "wool industry" isn't clear. The area was colonial sheep/wool from 1840, with no evidence of wool processing I can find, all wool being sent south as unprocessed bales. In later years general road transporters did store wool in Maryborough store sheds until a full load for Melbourne could be obtained.(my gfather was one), but believe that that's transport industry, not "centre for wool industry". For a short period, much later than the 1924, the town also had some skin processing industry. I'm wondering if there's some confusion with the push by the State Tourist Board in the late 1950s for regional towns to have an annual festival. Maryborough commenced its "Wattle & Wool" festival in 1960 (I won a prize for poster design by a teenager). The "Wattle Festival" endured for decades, but the "Wool" element soon disappeared, perhaps indicating, beyond extensive primary production and consequent transport from the region, the area's "wool industry" was neither strong nor connected to the flourishing, tafiff-protected MKM. Apologies if I'm not following your processes. Not here very much. ~Bleating 30.8.2023~ Bleating (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]