Hello, CitrusHemlock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, , or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Thanks for your contributions to German Vexillological Association. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 00:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IntelBroker 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Encoded  Talk 💬 12:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trade Fair Palace, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first art exhibition in the Trade Fair Palace after it was rebuilt from a fire was named Like a Phoenix? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trade Fair Palace. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Trade Fair Palace), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I noticed you made some edits to the information about the Yomut people. I am from the Ak-Atabay, Atabay tribe, Tana division, and the Bekdash house, so this is something I care a lot about. While I appreciate the work you have put in, I think some important details were removed, especially regarding our tribal divisions.

I would like to clarify, the Yomut have three main tribes: the Jafarbai, the Ak-Atabai, and the Bayramshali. The divisions you mentioned are geographical divisions and not internal tribal ones.

I am currently working on restoring and improving the content, and my editing nor my writing skills are not great. I would be happy to collaborate with you to make sure we represent everything accurately.

If there is anything I could provide, please do let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khan yomut (talk • contribs) 17:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Khan,

Apologies for removing important information, I was definitely too hasty in trimming information in my initial edits, and I apologize. Your contributions to the article on the Yomut have been greatly appreciated, especially more detailed coverage of tribal subdivisions. In the future, I would recommend citing information you add to pages, as it is an important part of keeping articles Verifiable, and can help future editors add information to the page. Given that you are a member of the Yomut tribe you probably have access to more sources than other editors, which would be very beneficial. WP:CITE is a good place to start to learn more about citations on Wikipedia. Thank you again for your edits to the page, they are greatly appreciated. CitrusHemlock 02:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CitrusHemlock. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:German Vexillological Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CitrusHemlock. Thank you for your work on Regulus (painting). Another editor, StarTrekker, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Lovely article. Very interesting.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|StarTrekker}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

★Trekker (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw one of your edits on article "Flag desecration" and I would like to say that you made a mistake:

1. Your edit of cutting "irrelevant" information would be inappropriate. The "irrelevant information" in question is about the flag of Puerto Rico, which is an American territory and not an independent country.
2. The video I posted (involving the desecration of the Puerto Rican flag) is relevant. You decide to cut this off yet you don't do anything about the edit I made which mentions how a German advert involved the burning of a flag of Jamaica.

While all Wikipedia editors make mistakes, it is important to CORRECTLY remove irrelevant information. Please make sure not to goof up next time. OMGShay 92 (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OMGShay 92: I personally believe that the included information constitutes MOS:POPCULT, as the source "does not provide any in-depth coverage of the subject of the article." If you were to find a book, article, or academic paper about flag desecration that discusses the episode, it may be proper to include, though I would still likely question its inclusion. On your second point, I did not remove that information because I did not fully read that section. Since you seem to oppose its removal, I will abstain from deleting it. If you still disagree with my opinion, please open a discussion on the talk page. As a final note, I do think that you are coming across as somewhat rude, even if you don't intend to. You'll find that discussions are more productive if you maintain WP:CIVILITY. CitrusHemlock 15:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you have started writing articles about the conquest of the Kokand Khanate, I planned to do it myself, but my hands did not reach out, so thank you for that! In general, I will help you finish writing several articles, as well as update the sources (for example, I will add Terentyev's book in the 2023 edition). Hi! I see that you have started writing articles about the conquest of the Kokand Khanate, I planned to do it myself, but my hands did not reach out, so thank you for that! In general, I will help you finish writing several articles, as well as update the sources (for example, I will add Terentyev's book in the 2022 edition). So there is a small remark about Tashkent, the article should be called "sieges" because there were two campaigns, the first ended with the victory of the Kokand people. Thank you for your hard work! Dushnilkin (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for all of your edits and page creations regarding the subject, it's a surprisingly under-covered area. Help on the other articles would be much appreciated, feel free to contribute to any draft articles in my userspace. In regards to the naming of Siege of Ak-Mechet, the article primarily focuses on the second siege, with little focus on the first, hence the first being placed in the background section. I made this decision due to the imbalance of both importance and known information between the battles, though I am open to reformatting and renaming it if there is a broader discussion. CitrusHemlock 16:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a more detailed section about the first siege, and right now I'm doing an accurate description of the second one, I hope you don't mind. Dushnilkin (talk) 16:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I'm done with the second siege, I think you can describe the consequences in a little more detail and the article will be ready for publication. Dushnilkin (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some review I think that the first siege could be moved into its own article, perhaps something along the lines of Siege of Tashkent (1864). Currently the merging of multiple battles into one article is proving to be frustrating when it comes to presenting information clearly, and dilutes the importance of both battles. I was following the example set by RUWikipedia, but I'm questioning if the same treatment should be done with Siege of Ak-Mechet. Back to Siege of Tashkent, I think a good deal more polishing and information should be added before publication, especially regarding the aftermath as you mentioned. Thank you for your contributions. CitrusHemlock 18:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Regulus (Turner), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man stabbed Regulus (pictured) because he disliked the "misty state of the picture"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Regulus (painting). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Regulus (Turner)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		I really enjoyed your new article on the painting Regulus. I'm legitimately surprised given how much you were able to source that we didn't have an article on this yet. Best of luck with your GA nomination; I think it'll be a shoe-in. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]