Well it definitely needs a new title. That picture is insulting to drummers, calling himself (if it's him) a session drummer? Can't the caption just be left at "A drummer practicing?" I don't see how he's a session drummer, if you know what a session drummer is. If there needs to be a picture of a session drummer there, then that picture should be taken down and someone like Josh Freese should be put up. I think a different caption is needed, seeing as that drummer in no way is a session drummer or is using a session quality set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.188.132 (talk • contribs)

Hello, thank you for your Message. I was just messing about on James Masterton's Page. I only left my comments on his page for about an hour - if that - then I erased them.

I realise that it was childish of me. However, they were hardly the worst things ever written - certainly about him.

I will refrain from doing such things in future, but if I see errors on Wikipedia Pages, or omissions, I will correct them. I cannot bear to see errors on this or that matter or subject.

Mr. Masteron has a Weekly Chart Commentary Column, at Launch.uk. Nearly every Week he makes silly errors in it. If you try to tell him in an E-mail, his answer is to block your E-mails - THAT is what I call an extremely childish response.

He is not interested in being corrected - only in feeling untouchable & superior.

Hence, if the man annoys me - or anyone else - his Wikipedia Page, was the only place to show what I/we think of him.

However, as I said, I will not do it again.

Best Wishes,

Colin —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.5.163.139 (talk • contribs) .

Now the flail has been deleted, my userpage is without a good image for the award you gave me? Care to alter it a bit? Thanks. --Lord Deskana ^{I VALUE YOUR OPINIONS} 20:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this reversion because Your Only Real Friend's edit introduced a necessary apostrophe. Michael Slone (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. Pouint of contention: I was always taught that you put an apostrophe where there is a letter missing. I'm not really in the mood to argue it. I still think I am right, but for the sake of it being 3am, I'll let it lie.

This time.

xxx HawkerTyphoon 02:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The apostrophe is also used to mark case. The character Woz, as far as I can tell from reading Eureka 7, is not just one who hacks on ships, but in particular is the hacker of the ship Gekko-Go. That would make him the ship's hacker. But if you still feel the apostrophe is unwarranted, I won't argue if you remove it. Michael Slone (talk) 03:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, restrain from further vandalization of this article. There are so many who agreed to keep these two paragraphs - just check the history of changes!

<quote> Please do not re-add these paragraphs - they have been discussed on talk, and the current concensus is that they are NOT to be included. If you can find some other users who agree with you, I'll stop reverting your edits. But until then, the community doesnt agree with you. HawkerTyphoon 22:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

You seem to be the only person re-adding the changes in, is all. Who else has been? I can't see anyone off-handHawkerTyphoon 22:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) </quote>

Please, note that I am not the one who wants these paragraphs seen here! It is quite visible from the history of the changes! Also, do not speak about consensus nor about community - it's simply meaningless!

So, you are stubbornly removing the paragraphs! The same way - they'll go back!

Do you have anything to say for your nerdy little self? I can't believe you're discriminating against overweight people. I'm doing whatever the beep I want to, so lay off me, or you will be indefinitely blocked from editing wikipedia. user:Blubber

WOOP! WP:Vandalism HawkerTyphoon 23:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend that both you and 4.249.9.152 (talk · contribs) read the guidelines on dealing with edit wars.

<quote>

Edit Wars Alright. We shouldn't argue about this; I am not Croatian and I have no intention of ever going there. I do, however, feel that the two paragraphs don't really have much do with the article in question: I think they rerad a bit like an arguement for a cetrtain point of view! From your standard of English, i'm assuming you're Croatian (No offence intended) - why do you want the paragraphs in? HawkerTyphoon 20:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

</quote>

Just a few words:

• no need to tell me who you are not, nor to ask me Who am I

• these two paragraphs are just about revival of the neo-nazism in Croatia

I've done some rewriting per WP:NPOV, but I've also noted on the talk page that the passage cannot survive with the sources provided per WP:RS. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article Neo-Nazism, specifically the part about Croatia.... I'm involved in an edit war with an IP address. I reverted some of his edits, as what i saw on the talk page convinced me that the article wasn't NPOV. I've read into the matter somewhat, and I'm rather convinced it isn't. I removed the offending paragraphs, but the IP address added them back. I left notes on his talk page, but He doesn't seem to reply. he mentions on my talk page the Concensus and Community are meaningless, and when I tried to meet him half way, by applying an 'unbalanced' tag but leaving the paragraphs in, he removes it. Any suggestions? I think we'd both appreciate your input! HawkerTyphoon 20:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Edit wars are a bad thing here on the English Wikipedia and the three revert rule is a policy designed to eliminate them. The edit history of Neo-Nazism indicates that you have clearly broken this rule within a 24-hour period. By rights, I should block you and the offending IP address for this violation. I notice that you have attempted to resolve the dispute on Talk:Neo-Nazism, which is a good thing. As this hasn't worked so far, I will encourage you to take the next step and go on with negotiation in order to build consensus. Mediation might be better in this instance - I leave the choice up to you. I will report the 3RR violations on the administrators' noticeboard to bring this to the attention of the administrator community and hopefully prevent this from reoccuring.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  22:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is your warning and advice. Removing and re-inserting tags is *not* immune from 3RR. You were not reverting blatant vandalism, which is the only thing immune from 3RR. Please be more careful in future or you will be blocked William M. Connolley 09:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! It never hurts to try, so I'll revert him silently if I see it again. I've just recently discovered the joys of RC patrol and I have lots to learn, so I'm grateful for all the RC "gossip" I can get. :-) Thanks again! - BaseballBaby 01:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - got it. Thanks. - BaseballBaby 01:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting his vandalism of my edit. I left my response to your comment on my page. --Orion Minor 02:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks again, but it seems he's a troll with a lot of free time. --Orion Minor 02:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thats just crazy enough to work. :OKojiDude 02:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

quite all right your cause is noble Dragon Emperor 03:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom dropped out for civility with Wiki-star months ago, as edits over anime or manga have precious little to do with it; the issue isn't with the subject but the user. Wiki's got a laundry list of complaints over taking others' edits or suggestions as criticism or opposite of *his* truth, long before he ever touched the Buu article at Wikipedia. Compromise with Wiki is "I jump, you follow", and he's got a nasty tendency to tear into editors or delete discussion pages he disagrees with.

But people talk about home-skillet enough, so peruse his case file at WP:ANI for further info if you'd like. Papacha 03:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the following line from the Bill Gates article.

"Although he has never been officially diagnosed, many people have identified some of Gates' personality traits with that of someone with Asperger's Syndrome"

It was sitting there, obviously non-encyclopedic, with a 'citation needed' notice at the end. It's no mystery why something like that would be deleted, but if you're going to go and restore a sourceless claim like that you should probably back yourself up on the article's Talk page. I've deleted the sentence again, and if you decide you really want it restored, you should find a credible media source that makes this claim and cite it. --relaxathon 04:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted the obituary of Teresa M Halbach because she is worthy of remembrance. Besides that, she's mentioned tons of times on Steven Avery's page. If that monster gets a page, why can't she? Her story and her picture have been everywhere (in Wisconsin, and I believe it also made national news, too) the past nine months. As the victim of the most brutal, planned murder in Wisconsin to happen for quite some time, not to mention being among one of the reasons the death penalty is being discussed again. If you don't agree, well, that's your opinion and I have to respect it. It's just an obituary. I didn't write a ten page article or anything. Thanks.

24.183.7.236 16:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

on ebaumss world.....this information is 100% correct and was recently in the news.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, HawkerTyphoon! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. TBCTaLk?!? 02:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Juro seems intent on blanking and reverting this article of any infromation he does not personally agree with. Thank you for your support before. Please keep on this and see if you can catch this guy going beyond the 3 revert rule so he can be blocked. -Husnock 02:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was not intended. If I had deliberately removed anyone it would appear in the edit summary. The program is not identifying Tree Biting Conspiracy as a Moderator, and is automatically removing anyone he/she adds the next time another mod edits. Hold on, there are a lot of people I need to restore. Prodego ^talk 17:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you should be up and running, and I think I found the problem as well, although only AmiDaniel can fix it, if I am correct. Prodego ^talk 17:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand the edit comment, and you\'ll understand why your revert was wrong. 141.84.69.20 18:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yoo listen broo i got prblems with the labana page because that info is completly wrong so thats why im trying to get rid of it if you got problems with it then tough luck cuz i aint going to allow fake info on my community(labana)... so u better do sonething about it peace

well im just new here can you show me to add

listen broo i dunt what happens but you better get rid of that labana page

ur a tosser get a life instead of doing this for no money u r a freak of nature do 1 and get a real job dick

Hi.

The Canopy Group is under new management and the article and section you refer to fails WP:RS. A blog on hark the herald about \"allegation\" and \"theories\" of why someone committed suicide is anything but factual. If this were YOUR SISTER listed here I doubt you would like it either. The material down not comply with WP:RS and needs removal or to be moved to the talk page and discussed. 207.58.145.101 22:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are a dirty homo.

HOW may I ask was that "nonsense"? It was a useful link to a site that gives alot of information about From First To Last. I don't imagine how that could be classed as "nonsense". I think you should get off your high horse and start doing your job properly

for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. NawlinWiki 20:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Bedford School, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Charlesknight 20:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

DOH! did this by error dealing with the Bedford idiot - what's the procedure for removing this? (in the sense that it does not appear as a warning in VP for you)? --Charlesknight 20:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard,

I hope I'm doing this correctly, as I'm new here at wikipedia.org, and still trying to learn my way around.

On the 26th (I think) I added a coupled of links to the rape page and noticed you reverted the page and deleted the links. I hope I wasn't doing anything prohibited or something. I just added a couple of valuable recourses under the appropriate categories. One was After Silence, and the other Dancing in the Darkness. Because I didn't know how wiki worked yet, today I added them again thinking that they were deleted by mistake. Again, I hope I'm not breaking any rules.

Thanks in advance for any clarification you may give me. --Lost ocean heart 01:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome and the tutorials, I'm sure they will come in handy!

The two websites I added are not commercial sites actually. Hopefully it's not against the rules to add our own websites, as I run them both. They are created from survivors for other survivors, and don't "sell" anything other than support and information. I hope this helps clear the misunderstanding.

Thanks again for replying so quickly :) --Lost ocean heart 01:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The AC/DC article has, for some strange reason, not one...but two band member boxes. Discussions have taken place that, obviously, having 2 is stupid and that one has to go. More than one attempt has been made to remove the "non-standard" member box and it keeps coming back. Perhaps you did not read the edit summary? Just wondering why the rv? Good day mate! 216.21.150.44 02:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Any reason you reverted this edit? Thanks. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 19:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you didn't care for the wording, please use a regular revert (not one with VP). Doing what you did is saying that his edit is vandalism, which it wasn't. A little explanation in the edit summary would go a long way. His edit may not have been correct, but please be more discretionary when using VandalProof. Thanks. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 19:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The BNP does not favour ending immigration entirely. I have family members who are active in the party, and I can assure you it's policies extend only to non-Europeans. Please stop revrting my edits on that page and do not label them as vandalism.

Hi. You recently tagged elite basturds for speedy deletion. Thank you! However, I am afraid to say that I cannot speedy it since it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Alternate avenues that you can take to get the article deleted are WP:PROD and WP:AFD. I prodded the article for you, but if somebody removes it, I would recommend taking it to AFD. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. -- Where 21:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I've contacted you, because a fairly large amount of edits that I have done been deleted on the grounds that #1 I used copyrighted images, #2 I deleted other people's contributions. The page I am talking about is 'Budapest'. My reasons for deleting the 'picture gallery' and the part about the 'bridges of the Danube' were that #1 I thought they did not look proper at all, 2# I replaced the picture gallery with a series of much better quality pictures spread out through the page. If I may ask you to revert to my version, I would be really grateful.

Sincerely, Dome89

p.s.: From now on I will use the talk page to give reasons for the changes that I make.

Thanks for fixing the vandalism on the Ilaiyaraja page. It had escaped my notice. Splashprince 06:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your tip about Vandalproof. Cheers. Splashprince 04:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reading that article I thought maybe his parents were gay and had adopted him. Francis to me (an a heck of a lot of other people) is the masculine way of spelling the name. Jubella 14:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you recently applied an improperly formatted cleanup template. I have fixed the template, but felt I should tell you that it needed to be replaced. You can find a list of properly formatted cleanup templates here. Please note that it is never appropriate to substitute a cleanup tag.

Thank you very much for your contributions to Wikipedia. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Alphachimp ^talk 23:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hii

i just want to kno how to add a content in a page.

Curious, are you the one that keeps changing the information on the smod page of wikipedia? I now don't care if you change the drug reference anymore on top since I know what it's about, but I think you keep erasing my changes throughout the article everywhere else when you had re-added your drug description. Please inform TY.

HawkerTyphoon

I just made a lot of changes to the SMOD guide. Please leave it alone as best you can unless it violates the wiki standards. If you feel you can't leave it alone then please don't just revert to an old version that takes out all my new additions. Thank you.

If you view the history of this IP 24.76.63.180, you'll notice that this person has vandalized a few pages. I corrected one today which you can view here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashton_Kutcher&action=history

Am I wrong? I don't use this site that much to know. Just thought you might want to be alerted to it or possibly block this user. Cheers.

Just made an edit to mention the "Intergalactic" nickname, and you reverted over it saying something about blank content. I'm very confused. I would like to include that line (or something similar) in the article somewhere, wherever is appropriate. Thanks.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Zsinj^Talk 23:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was most likely a honest mistake. Please clarify if it was not. --Zsinj^Talk 23:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this diff and jumped to conclusions. You popups fixed the mistake just before I did the same. :-) --Zsinj^Talk 23:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have VandalProof, but can never fit into a groove of using only that to fight vandals. I'm a IRC and Lupins junkie myself. --Zsinj^Talk 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

who are you to decide anything?

you cant present a biased argument full of lies to favour one side, and then when that is corrected and balanced, you start crying and saying "oh, its unhelpful"

i will re-instate the edits. provide facts and evidenece to dispute them otherwise.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.204.152 (talk • contribs)

Hi HawkerTyphoon. I was wandering why you changed the definitions in the articles Richard Simmons and Wingman. Or in other words, where have you gone? Yeanold Viskersenn 01:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

n/t -- Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 18:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ,i did not vandalise anything.I deleated a one mounth warning.I have a dinamic adress ,this warning was pertinant only for that day, not for all eternity.You rognly asumed ,that i contracted this warning.--87.65.186.9 18:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you just delete my revision??? I have a right to edit my page. STOP. 71.143.19.196 02:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAWKER, YOU ARE NOT AN EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR. STAY OFF MY PAGE OR I WILL REPORT YOU FOR ABUSE. 71.143.19.196 03:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Call me a name again, limey, and I will report you. 71.143.19.196 03:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop harassing Hawker. Alphachimp ^talk 03:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I voted (although it's not a vote...you know the rest). Regards, Alphachimp ^talk 03:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I just noticed you have my archive box at the top. That's awesome =D. Alphachimp ^talk 03:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit my posts I am adding some good info and deletin nonsense put there by some one

Dear Richard, your user page starts with this quotation: "Quantity has a Quality all of it's own...". I do not believe it needs the apostrophe. It should simply read "Quantity has a Quality all of its own..." - you only need an apostrophe in "it's" if it means "it is" or "it has" - not as a possessive. I hope this helps, rathet than annoys. I wouldn't normally bother you with such a small matter but your Talk page header does say "anything goes" or words to that effect and I thought you might prefer to get this right. Best wishes JuniorJetKaptain 05:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC) (PS Please feel free to remove this edit just as quick as you like.)[reply]

I closed the debate and speedied the article. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 15:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]