Good contributor Ödegay31 (talk) 14:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Faruk Özgüneş, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Airborne gun

added a link pointing to MKE

List of equipment of the Turkish Land Forces

added a link pointing to APC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ağrı province. You reallyneedto stop deleting sourced contentjust because you don't like it. And no, warnings don't disappearjust because you remove all the numerous warnings you've received Jeppiz (talk) 09:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced content? The province is considered part of Western Armenia by Armenians ? WP:PROPAGANDA You don't need to send me useless warnings, first look what I deleted while following the edits I made. Erzurum Vilayet is confused with this province. Also this province got its name on 1941 First Geography Congress.. At the same time, such a claim should be added to the history part, not the lead section. For ex; West Azerbaijan Province of Iran. If i wrote on lead section The province is considered part of Whole Azerbaijan by Turkics Do you think we shouldn't see this as propaganda?? I don't know if your goal is try to ban me, but I'm not a vandal or troll. If I'm editing 100 things, I barely delete 1 of them. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to interrupt, but I made the revert. We can discuss where in the article Armenian topics should be placed, but the Armenian Genocide and the Six Vilayets had sure a strong impact on the provinces history. We can't just delete that a whole people mainly was ethnically cleansed away. That Agri Province received its name in 1941, could be added to the article and (as to me) would be quite interesting for the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but the immediate blocking warnings are not friendly and unpleasant. Of course, this information (Armenian Genocide and the Six Vilayets) should be added, but I do not find it logical to write it on an administrative province page lead section. Such things should be added to the history part like Ararat rebellion. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 11:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please show me exactly (word for word) where Magomedkhanov, Ibragimov and Miller talk about "Whole Azerbaijan". I have have full access to those articles, and there is not a word of "Whole Azerbaijan" in them. Your article Dergipark only mentions Iranian Azerbaijan. Parishan (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BÜTÖV AZƏRBAYCAN, Bütün azerbaijan etc you can search it by ctrl+F Cengizsogutlu (talk) 09:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+ Also added more citations Cengizsogutlu (talk) 09:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did use Ctrl+F and did not find anything. Please quote those sources for what they say (word for word). I am very curious to see where Magomedkhanov, Ibragimov and Miller use the term "Bütöv Azərbaycan" given that all three sources are published in Russian. Parishan (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you can search it by self I'm not a juggler here to prove you anything if you cant locate with Ctrl+F go to an ophthalmologist and ask if you have astigmatism.. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then. Please be aware of this [1]. Parishan (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lokma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lausanne Conference and Sherbet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khorasani Turks. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Katmerciler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cengiz,

First of all, thank you for helping with the previous issue. Sorry to bother you once more but I am having some trouble with uploading some photos related to Bayraktar AKINCI. Although I have received a written permission from the Baykar company to use their photos I was not able to upload them. On the other hand, the ones I have upload were deleted due to citation problems. Can you please help with this issue? How can I prove that I have permission to use these images? All the best. Omer

uppilolioliseilesy.dot.domname.aoai 2601:245:8200:7E90:7932:904C:E41D:16A0 (talk) 04:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bayraktar TB2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagorno-Karabakh war.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per the community consensus at this noticeboard discussion, you are hereby indefinitely topic banned from (1) from making edits related to Iran and Turkic peoples; and (2a) from Turkey-related topics.

Please read Wikipedia:Banning policy for further information, including the precise restrictions that exist for a topic ban (relevant section), as well as exemptions, appeals and enforcement.

Regards
Daniel (talk) 07:41, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you are fine. There has been some confusion. I have seen otokar akrep vehicle with my own eyes in Bangladesh. That's why I have added the photo. Otokar akrep has two versions. The photo I added is the first generation. And 2nd generation of akrep vehicle is not in service yet. পার্থ বড়ুয়া (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed Akrep has 2 versions but new version announced at IDEF 2019 and not yet produced. Akrep probably you confused with Otokar Kobra. The Photo you added totally other vehicle that's Otokar APV you can search the image's. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are Otokar Cobra. পার্থ বড়ুয়া (talk) 11:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh im sorry. Now I got it. Akrep is another version. Thanks for your time. I'm sorry for such confusion. পার্থ বড়ুয়া (talk) 11:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Your curiosity about the Turkish defense industry made me happy. good day bro. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 11:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please upload a photo of TRG-300 Kasirga MLRS? পার্থ বড়ুয়া (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any licenced right for it you can search it on wikimedia Cengizsogutlu (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have written an article about Bangladesh army future equipments in my sandbox. But I can't add this in "List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army" due to some edit restrictions. Can you please add this information?? পার্থ বড়ুয়া (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TRG - 300 is ordered i guess i will do first resarch than i will add thanks for notification Cengizsogutlu (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Otokar Akrep has not two version. (Just the two vehicles have the same name.) Ata Barış (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://defense.otokar.com.tr/tekerlekli-zirhli-arac/4x4-zirhli-arac/akrep-ii-4x4-zirhli-arac Cengizsogutlu (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again the photo you putted is not akrep its Otokar APV http://www.warwheels.net/OtokarAPCindex.html Cengizsogutlu (talk) 02:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

++ More details https://www.joint-forces.com/military-land-rovers/28528-otokar-zirhli-personel-tasiyici-revisited Cengizsogutlu (talk) 02:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read again the first source. Also, that source is Otokar's official site. (Otokar Akrep 2 new armored vehicle family) Ata Barış (talk) 07:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: [2] This photo is true. Ata Barış (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

indeed but the first one with dust color os Otokar APV Cengizsogutlu (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First one is the Otokar APV? :D First one isn't an Otokar Akrep? Ata Barış (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and our inssue not about Otokar APV. I just added the wrong photo. Ata Barış (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still editing on turkish related topics. You should stop if you dont want be blocked. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Im allowed to edit Turkish army pages before shitshow on my page search block reasons. "Turkish army pages oky unless i provide realible sources". What nonsense people here are, they keep people busy with stupid requests. Own your own business Cengizsogutlu (talk) 07:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can edit weapons but not turkish army pages Shadow4dark (talk) 11:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gendermarie is NOT ARMY Cengizsogutlu (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is turkey related, see your topic ban. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

İn Turkey we say "sana kemik atan olmadı" which means No one threw you a bone. If you feel you are a dog i can't do nothing. So friendly advice don't act like Wikipedia director Cengizsogutlu (talk) 09:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shortly don't interrupt my talk Cengizsogutlu (talk) 09:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OkShadow4dark (talk) 00:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce edit restrictions placed by the community,

you have been blocked from editing for two weeks. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. 
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

---

Reminder to administrators: Edit restrictions placed by the community are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic ban reads: "Cengizsogutlu is indefinitely topic banned (1) from making edits related to Iran and Turkic peoples; and (2a) from Turkey-related topics." You have violated your topic ban repeatedly in recent weeks. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yoo what? there was also mentioned about inventory of Turkish land forces pages etc was oky if i put reliable sources.. Just read the block policy. An unfair choice direct 3 weeks ban.. Cengizsogutlu (talk) 18:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atilla Ergün and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atilla Ergün, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cengizsogutlu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faruk Özgüneş and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faruk Özgüneş, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Living love ^talk 08:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cengizsogutlu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tokat kebab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 18:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for further topic ban violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 18:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cengizsogutlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In my block tag states List of Turkish land forces page might be okey unless i gave realible source. I didn't violate my ban violation read it please.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are banned from editing topics related to Turkey; topic bans are broadly interpreted. If a topic has anything to do with Turkey at all, you cannot edit it. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Cengizsogutlu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atilla Ergün, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cengizsogutlu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalekalıp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cengizsogutlu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cengizsogutlu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faruk Özgüneş, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. I have seen you have been blocked for 6 months for a violation of a topic ban and I am not aware that the ban was lifted. If so great, but if not, I encourage you to request a lift of the ban and then after edit Turkey related pages.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think it was a few years ago. Since my English has improved a bit, I will try to make better edit's and be more understandable to the discussions.Best regards, Cengiz Cengizsogutlu (talk) 01:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mehmet The Conqueror Barracks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• onel5969 The user may not edit this article anyway; see section below. Black Kite (talk) 20:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic ban reads as follows; "Cengizsogutlu is indefinitely topic banned (1) from making edits related to Iran and Turkic peoples; and (2a) from Turkey-related topics." You may not edit any topic that is related to Turkey in any way. Please do not continue to do so. Black Kite (talk) 20:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unfair, About Turkey because of a dispute over ethnicities in Iran, to get whole ban about Turkey. What & where is the link between a country and ethnic group in anyway? My edits about Turkey related articles are constructive one's not destructive. Considering my recent edits can there be lifting of some parts Such as editing Military stuff pages? I do deep research on this subject as a hobby and if I can add some stuff with confirmed citations can topic ban be re-evaluated? Even if I remember correctly, I remember that I have the right of exception editing on such pages like Military stuff? Could you recheck Admin decision please?

Regards Cengiz Cengizsogutlu (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The notification is still on this page - User_talk:Cengizsogutlu#Notification_of_topic_ban and is also listed here - Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions#Active_editing_restrictions. The original discussion is here. You can appeal the topic ban by posting an appeal at WP:AN - if you do so, please use those links so that people are aware of what you are appealing. Black Kite (talk) 11:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on BMC Amazon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UtherSRG (talk) 11:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Barracks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]