Welcome!

Hello, Catsmeat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 12:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just thought you might find it amusing to know you now have a homonymous article at Catsmeat, redirect to Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright. Cheers. — Komusou ^talk @ 10:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be lonely over here... or are you deleting your mail? I liked your recent article. Engineers don't feature enough. So the hook below should be on the front page in next 4-6 days. Did you know...

• ...that amphibious tanks which were used on D-Day were developed by Nicholas Straussler from Hungary? by Catsmeat OK? Victuallers (talk) 09:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicholas Straussler, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

I second that it's good to see an engineering article on DYK. --Royalbroil 00:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of HMS Graph at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nick Ottery (talk) 07:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Supermarine Walrus. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Expedition Seven.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 15:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure how to edit your submission on Hobarts Funnies, but was doing a bit of research on Canadian RAM tanks, and came across a photo at http://www.ramtank.ca/ram_experiments.htm, this has a photo of a RAM tank fitted out as a BARV (definetly a RAM, its got the nice little induction inlets that replaced the side doors), so at least one must have been produced in Canada for training (much the Australian M3 BARV), 94.14.91.135 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in WikiProject East Anglia?

If yes, please support us here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/East Anglia. Wilbysuffolk talk 07:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have just discovered that three of us are working simlutaenously on an article on the Disney bomb. You, me and User:Afernand74 (User:Afernand74/sandbox 6). Mine is nowhere near as good as either of yours but I think you two should ccompare notes. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. I suggest to work on one single page. I will merge my article with Catsmeat's one and delete mine afterwards. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA is a good starting point. ;-) Let's try to make it A-class... --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Victoryairpowerstill.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the fair use rationale you had supplied at the time and made it clearer. I suggest you move the article to Disney bomb (or Disney Bomb) then the image can be relinked making it no longer an orphan. GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Had a thought - if the system won't let you move the article to "Disney bomb" because of the edit history at that article name, you can either 1) move to "Disney Bomb" to get the article out there and sort out a pagemove later, or 2) we cna find an admin to do the move for you. A note on the milhist project should bring one out of the woodwork. GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please move the article to main space. Credits for the article should be yours. Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 18:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Catsmeat!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing and researching that paragraph on his wartime career.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you restored the dead link. I still can't get the document to open. I don't think the link is necessary, since I can source it anyway, and I'm planning to upgrade this article to GA/FA eventually, so it needs to be sorted. How can you get it to open , when I can't (tried Chrome and Firefox)? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 21:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the pages opened fine from the links on my talk. I'm tempted to put these in External Links. They are interesting, but redundant, and might be challenged in the main text as not RS at FAC. FAC is months away, I've barely started, and I need to go and take some pics too, so no rush to decide. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, thanks for the SS Vina bit. Two queries.

• What does +1944" mean?
• The newspaper refs are clearly RS. What about wrecks.org? If it's challenged when this eventually goes to FAC, how do I justify it as RS?

thanks again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I used local history groups quite a bit in my last FA, so they're OK, but this is one step removed. I'll leave it until FAC; if it's challenged, I think that your other two refs and my existing (print) ref 4 cover it anyway. Thanks again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Vina pic. I'm about to start the road to GA/FA. As I indicated before, one, possibly two, refs may be challenged, but I#ll worry about that when/if it happens Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:30, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited John Dundas (ace), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Flying Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I chucked a rely on your dirrection.©Geni 19:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	To a user whose page I came across by chance, thoroughly read and found quite cool; for tirelessly contributing to Wikipedia in a somewhat silent way since a long time and with a large number of high quality edits. Sincerely surprised at being the first, M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 18:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Sorry if this looked like an intrusion by a complete stranger, but I really thought your many fine contributions deserved a reward. Kind regards, --M.L.Watts_{Air Mail ✈} 22:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted what you have done to the Nicholas Fisk and David Higginbottom pages. I did this for three reasons;

• it was a cut and paste move. This is not the way to move pages.
• Articles should be called by the name they are most commonly and best known as. Higgenbottom is best known as Fisk.
• Please discuss page moves on their talk pages before you do them.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

. :No need for a wrist slapping! --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Catsmeat! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vulcan nerve pinch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'll try. I've got bits and pieces but nothing specific. Dapi89 (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening,

Have a look-see. Need a little more on the early life and a clean up but on track for an easy G.A methinks. Dapi89 (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Evening,

I'm scrapping the bottom of the barrel now with the sources I have. Have you anything else? I'm tempted to submit it for G.A now and just see what happens. Dapi89 (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. Sounds like an aunt and uncle of mine. Good work on finding the Wrk Nr of the Do 17. I don't think I had that, even though I did get the Dornier Do 17 article to G.A several years back. I have all the Chris Goss books you see (I used him in both articles in relation to this machine), but I don't think that was mentioned. I'll dig for it. Dapi89 (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was passed as G.A—FYA. Dapi89 (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks. You know it is probably the most satisfying yet. These people deserved to be talked about. Dundas was just one of tens of thousands of aces, very good at their craft, which are relegated to a mere footnote in history. Very few RAF personnel are recognised in this way on wikipedia. Misterbee1966 is an editor I have worked with quite often on German personnel, not so much anymore as we've drifted off to do different things, but we still swap information. He has done some epic work on aces and Knights Cross (and higher) winners. I think I'm going to try to bring GA to a number of other British/Commonwealth airman in the same way. Dapi89 (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I have gather some stuff on Noel Agazarian. I belif I have a full list of his claims. I might give it a go but it will have to wait in line. Some of the more prominent aces will come first. Cheers. Dapi89 (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fritz X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strasburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Private Charles Godfrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Bulldog Drummond. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roberta Cowell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Robert Bowreman Foote, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Catsmeat! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RAF Gambut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Tobruk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am trying to get Albert Stevens nominated for WP:Did You Know... So it needs a little more work, but I added a lot of info and a new reference or two that will knock your socks off! Anyway, it needs some help from the like of you!

The DYK project is fun, and you can help write a "hook" to get people to read about poor Albert. Like

Did you know... that when a researcher discovered government documents about him and tracked him down, that he had just died only a year before.

Thanks, I like to saw logs! (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's about done. Do you have a hook? I like to saw logs! (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it's nominated. My hooks may be too long. We'll see I like to saw logs! (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, here is a picture of Albert: http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/pubs/00326640.pdf Look at page 2 of the PDF. This is a photostat of Welsome's newpaper article reprint, which was published in 1993. I don't think that it is available on the web anywhere. Welsome's book is, and surely the book has a picture of Albert since the newspaper article did. I like to saw logs! (talk) 09:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Albert Stevens at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Senra (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carabinieri (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Highwayman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norwich Arts Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bunker Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lord Arthur Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Top hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Eastern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flashman in the Great Game may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indian Rebellion of 1857 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing the article on James Pratt and John Smith; an interesting and important topic. Keep up the great work :). Ironholds (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Graph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chatham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Leigh (writer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rushall and Richard Weston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About a year ago you made this edit where I suspect you copied text from the Disney bomb article, but AFAICT you did not give any indication that you had done so. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia which explains what credits you need to give (a link to the name of the article you copied the text from in the edit history is sufficient). This also has a practical use for editors who come to the page lager, if any of the long citations have not been copied across it makes finding them easier. -- PBS (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Temple Stanyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas Rowe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Catsmeat, I hope all is well. As a fellow editor of the H. C. McNeile article, I wondered if you realised that it is McNeile's 125th birthday later this month? I'm trying to have his article as the FA on the main page for the day - feel free to support of otherwise at WP:Today's featured article/requests#September 28 if you feel appropriate! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bay Psalm Book may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Richard Mather]], one the original translators, it passed into the ownership of [[Thomas Prince]] (possibly after the dispersal of the library of [[Cotton Mather]], grandson of Richard, in 1728. It

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Goliath tracked mine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• produced, the single-use weapon was not considered a success due to the high unit cost, low speed (only just above {{convert|6|mph|kmh}}, poor ground clearance (just 11.4 centimeters), vulnerable

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked at your addition to the Terrapin article and viewed the movie. The "Aquacheetah" seems to be something in size between the DUKW and the amphibious jeep - do you know of its official name? GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just had a bit of luck with "aqua cheetah amphibious vehicle" as search term. 3/4 Ton 4x4 Amphibian Aqua-cheetah by the Amphibian Car Corporation. With G-number G552. But still a bloody obscure vehicle. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finally putting that info on the dietary experiments into context. It was in there when I did a major rewriting of the article, and it kind of stuck out like a sore thumb but I was reluctant to get rid of it. Good job!Drow69 (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Wilkes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Kipling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hensleigh Wedgwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Criminal Court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Catsmeat,

I'm hoping that you can help me with some research on James Pratt and John Smith. I feel as though I have reached a standstill and, since you have made significant changes to that page, was hoping you could lead me in the right direction. Is there a good way to contact you other than here?

Benjaminfulk (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the interesting add re this. I didn't know Buffs had one -- I was stationed on Guam (USN) during the Vietnam war, and there was certainly no shortage of 52s up at Anderson AFB....

Do any of the remaning 52s still have gun turrets? Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Not a stererotypical Wiki-female profile.... Are you in/near Seattle? Do you know Nicola Griffith? --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the kilt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Weather Station Kurt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Station Kurt.JPG|right|225px|thumb|Weather Station Kurt on display at the [[Canadian War Museum]] {2007)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Felton (assassin), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catsmeat, I had been working on a biography for many months but it continued to get declined. The common reasons for the declination was that it needed to be written in a more encyclopedic tone. I finally gave up on the article. A few weeks ago I received an email (not a message on my talk page) from someone claiming to be a wikipedian editor with high privileges. She said that she could rewrite the biography in an encyclopedic tone and get it published (for a fee) and referred me to your userpage, claiming that it was her own. I just wanted to alert you because I know that this type of impersonation is happening with other legit editors as well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.195.2 (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are also being represented as this Elance account: https://www.elance.com/s/catsmeat/ Thought you would want to know. One of the jobs they took was to edit Bobby Yazdani. I'm going to report this impersonation at COIN after you acknowledge receipt of this note, please don't be alarmed. – Brianhe (talk) 06:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that. Although is it possible the individual simply chose a coincidental username on elance? I don't see any direct links to my wikipedia profile.Catsmeat (talk) 21:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No they weren't that bold. But the bio details somewhat match what's on your userpage. Specifically UK identified, and >10 year Wikipedian. It seems unlikely to be a coincidence. Brianhe (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Gorman (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antrim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PatriciaMcCormick1954.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this expansion. Could you add refs here? Maybe the article can be WP:GANed when those refs are added. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 04:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. An edit that you recently made to Mervyn Bunter seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of lesbianism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spartan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Knapping may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• year=2001 | volume=75 | pages=382-90}}</ref> Brandon knappers made gun flints for export to Africa] as late as the 1960's.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Handley Page H.P.42, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samakh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, due to your huge input on the Roberta Cowell page I thought it might interest you to know that a production company have just finished filming a documentary on her and in particular her relationship with Michael Dillon. There will be an interview with one of Betty's daughters (my mother) in the Telegraph on the 24th of this month with the documentary to be aired on Channel 4 shortly thereafter. There's plenty of recently rediscovered information about Betty which I think will add greatly to the article in time. I think there will be a renewed interest in her story and as such an increase in edits of her wiki page - AL_LOCKE|^talk 21:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I let the article on her drop a few years ago and my attention was taken by other things because I ran out of information sources I could easily access, unfortunately this was before I'd filled all the holes in the article I really wanted to fill.Catsmeat (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Catsmeat,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Brianhe (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AFM-IR, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vesicles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fighter Collection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warbirds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

just wanted you to know that I have just reverted you userpage as it appeared it had been vandalized by user:2001:8B0:2AF:AAA9:544:6F4A:6E1E:2CEE. if this was not case please revert back. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Home invasion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devils Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say I enjoyed reading your interests on your user page. Mine however is very sparse in comparison... I am not really note worthy enough for folks to visit. Eoinho (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catsmeat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious about how you got the idea that an airplane cannot glide (maintains adequate speed to prevent a stall, by using the force of gravity instead of engine power) if its engine(s) are still operating? [[1]]

FYI, airline pilots make regular use of the gliding mode during their descents, by pulling engine thrust back to inflight-idle thrust and then utilizing the power of gravity to keep the IAS safely above the stalling speed for any given weight and altitude. There really isn't any significant difference in an airliner maintaining adequate safe airspeed during a descent via the force of gravity, with engines still running or with them not running. About all one can say is that if the engines are running in idle mode, during the descent, the plane might be able to glide a bit further than with no engines running at all. But, it is still "gliding" if the main source of safe airspeed is gravity, rather than engine thrust. Thank you. EditorASC (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Catsmeat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gerald nabarro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Traditionalist (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Poulett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shadwell Forgeries. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shadwell forgeries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Shadwell forgeries at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catsmeat. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Shadwell forgeries.
Message added 23:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please respond to the comments on your DYK nomination, thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catsmeat. As there has been no response from you regarding this nomination in over a month, the nomination has now been marked for closure. If you wish for the nomination to proceed before it is closed, please leave a response in the discussion as soon as possible. There are currently referencing issues with the article that need to be addressed immediately before the nomination is closed. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMC Vigilant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weymouth Harbour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shadwell forgeries, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Shadwell forgeries, crude 19th-century fake medieval artefacts, are now sought-after collectibles in their own right? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shadwell forgeries. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Shadwell forgeries), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Most interested in the IWM picture of a synchroniser test rig! I have had a go at getting more details about it, but can't find anything but the IWM page. It is most certainly not a Vickers-Challenger gear, as the link to the "propeller" is either a hydraulic line (or perhaps a flexible drive?) - definitely no sign of the Vickers-Challenger's push rod. I suspect it is not a "CC" gear either - the roughness and makeshift nature of the whole thing seems to indicate a "field" experiment, put together out of bits and pieces available "to hand" at, say, an operational squadron.

I believe, in fact, that it is a picture of the experimental hydraulic gear designed and tested by Air Mechanic Betteridge of No. 1 squadron Australian Flying Corps in 1917 (his unit were serving in the Middle East at the time). Information about this gear, which was apparently reported to higher command and ignored, is hard to come by - but I have long considered adding a little note with what I can glean about it - and if I can connect it a little more firmly than my current surmise with this graphic so much the better! --Soundofmusicals (talk)

I may well restore the "separate" versions of the Vickers-Challenger pictures - the current setup doesn't really "work" - although I appreciate why you did it. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well! I ended up acting on the above without giving you time to comment - hope you don't mind! The illustration IS of the "Betteridge" test rig - so we can find a much better place for it in the new section. Thank you very much indeed for coming up with it, by the way. Regards --Soundofmusicals (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Brown (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest English, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may by now be aware of the requirements on copying text within Wikipedia if so apologies for reiterating something you already know.

With this Revision as of 08:55, 23 April 2012 to IJmuiden, you copied text from Disney bomb (and possibly another article). Editors have to attribute the copying of text from one article to another to meet the requirements of the guideline. It is a copyright violation not to do so. However see the section "Other reasons for attributing text" there are other reasons for attribution including making it easier for editors to fix citations in the editor who makes the copy does not copy over the full citation. -- PBS (talk) 18:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catsmeat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Beatrice Shilling engineer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir John Smyth, 1st Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hi, I noticed you contributed to one of the past Imperial College userboxes, and are one of the only editors who has who's still around. A little while ago I revamped the userbox colours and imagery, and more recently I have recreated a free-use SVG coat of arms, which it can use. Just wondering if you had any comments—I don't particularly want to go round messing people's userpages up. People have had their own... less-than-well-formated ideas for some of the ones I use, so I realised it might be annoying. Shadowssettle_(talk) 08:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Only Running Footman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pendulum rocket fallacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendulum rocket fallacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catsmeat, as you appear to have an interest in Royal Navy in the age of sail, I wondered if I might ask a favour of you? HMS Pearl (1762), is a current A-class nominee that requires another review to save it from being archived. If you are able to comment, I would be extremely grateful but if for whatever reason, you don't wish to, there will be no hard feelings. Just thought I'd ask. Regards --Ykraps (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• In that you've been a major contributor to the articles in Category:Months in the 20th century, you are invited to participate in a discussion among the contributors about a basic framework for the project, at [2] Mandsford 16:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		Awarded for your work on An Incident in the Rebellion of 1745. A great addition to wikipedia on an important artistic item in Scottish/British cultural history. Coldupnorth (talk) 15:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roberta cowell.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Careening, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Dunn (RAF officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Steel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]