Welcome!

Hello, Catgamer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kante4 (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we should wait until a decision is reached, unless we don´t add them. Kante4 (talk) 19:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A week after the Afd was opened, give your opinion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Challenger DCNS de Cherbourg – Singles Qualifying Kante4 (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the time, only non-notable players are playing challenger qualifiers. It was a discussion to include ATP/WTA qualifying draws in the tournaments. Challenger qualifiers are not important enough... Kante4 (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up: The articles are deleted so no Qualifying articles for Challengers in the future. Kante4 (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only finished sets, so no 3-2, 4-5, 5-4 or so... Kante4 (talk) 20:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No meant it in the way that if a set is still going and somebody adds a 6-4 or sth. like that into the stats,would this be allowed?

You mean, the match is still ongoing. You can add finished sets to the bracket. Kante4 (talk) 21:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing: When a player retires put the "r" also after the sup template. ;) Just like the tiebreaks... Kante4 (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Minuses' = dashes. ;)) You should use this combination (LINK) and everything's gonna be all right. ;)) PL Alvarez ^Talk 22:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tried it with copying the dashes and it worked, but anyway thanks for the quick answer.Catgamer (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why do you remove the last year´s champion when the new one is not known? Example: On the 2011 Cachantún Cup article you added the doubles champions but also deleted the defending singles champion before the final was played, why? Kante4 (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it at another challenger some time ago and thought that it would be right, but if it is not I have to admit that then I made a mistake that I will try not to repeat in the future. Sorry Kante4 Catgamer (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no problem was just curios as this was not the proper way. ;) Kante4 (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, when a player retired just put the r in the sup template, like you do at a tiebreak. Kante4 (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have already done it that way, but yesterday I forgot itCatgamer (talk) 10:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your opinion will be helpful. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
PL Alvarez ^Talk, 10:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, right here. Kante4 (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relax, man. I really appreciate your work and keep on trying. Soon you'll learn the rules of WP:Notability and it'll come with time. I can't exactly explain my rules. It's a little bit complicated, but my basic advice is that: always check on the website atpworldtour.com if the player has signed some performances on the important events (ATP 250, ATP 500, ATP 1000, Grand Slam) or in Davis Cup / Hopman Cup or if he won any Challenger title. Of course sometimes you must check other important things - read about them in WP:NTENNIS. You'll advise yourself. ;))
PL Alvarez ^Talk, 23:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

2011 ITF Men's Circuit (October–December) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Vladimir Ivanov, Mikhail Biryukov

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge – Singles. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge – Doubles. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2011 Al Habtoor Tennis Challenge, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catgamer!

I have seen you are a Tennis fan and you are very interested in Tournament’s results.

Would you like to take part in a project about Olympic sports, where you would take care of the Tennis section, posting results, draws, schedules etc. and taking part in the forum, following, if you want, all other sports in the Road to London 2012, supporting your favourite athletes and teams in all sports?

Let me know in your page, I will check it in next hours.

Thanks!

Grak. Eminn.A (talk) 20:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like to participate in that forum, but I have a question to ask, do I have to do certain tasks, because sometimes due to my studies I do not have much time to edit results so would it be possible to participate even with this little handicap.Catgamer (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure it is possible, don't worry about that, you will contribute according to your other duties.

So, to find the forum, just search on your search engine for "Men's Tennis ATP Challenger Tour Finals 2011" (with ") and you will find one of the threads we had in the Tennis section of the forum.

From that page, you can go in the home page, register and then we will write each other again from the forum itself, and I will give you more informations.

See you there!

Thanks.

Grak --Malediviseno (talk) 21:07, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but cannot find this page, so could you describe me the path to the page and of course how to register. Thanks for your help.Catgamer (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my fault. I can't post direct link, but you will find the link on this empty page: http://olympicdatabase.altervista.org/ Just click on the link you see in the right part of that page and you will be on the forum.

See you there!

Thanks.

Grak --93.33.102.215 (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have just registered on the totalolympics page,´was this the right page?Catgamer (talk) 12:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

:Very good. Yes, it’s right! I have sent you a Private Message there, we will talk through the forum.

Thanks! Rugo 77.222.3.111 (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately they're spamming on wiki, the private message will probably ask you to spam the forum on wiki, via email, which brings rapdly to a global lock. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your edits to 2011 European Curling Championships – Men's tournament and 2011 European Curling Championships – Women's tournament. Please be sure to do a complete job and help update the standings as well. Thank you! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you can just move the page. Give me the link to the article and the exact name. Kante4 (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected the page to the new one. Kante4 (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It´s ok, just use the little arrow next to History the next time. Kante4 (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will stay redirected i assume. Kante4 (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, by why deleting a redirect, just leave it as it is. Kante4 (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, done. Kante4 (talk) 13:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too low i say, not notable players most of the time. Kante4 (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In 2011 ITF Men's Circuit (October–December), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Diego Hidalgo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 Kolmangal ITF Women's Tournament – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 LIC ITF Women's Tennis Championships requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 LIC ITF Women's Tennis Championships – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 LIC ITF Women's Tennis Championships – Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 ITF Djibouti Open (1) – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 ITF Djibouti Open (2) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have placed or added info to several tournaments on wikipedia that are not notable enough for inclusion. The threshold is: "From 2008–2012 the ITF Women's $35,000–$100,000+ tournaments (excluding qualifications) are considered notable. From 1978–2007 the threshold for notability in the women's ITF circuit is a $25,000 event (excluding qualifications)." Please do not add these low level tournaments to wikipedia in the future. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the table of the ATP Calendar on the forum is ready to be posted, I have left you instructions through private message. Thanks, see you there! --RoadToLondon012 (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another PM :) --RoadToLondon012 (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PM for you :) --151.60.93.68 (talk) 20:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently created or edited many pages that are not notable per tennis guidelines. Please stop as it adds more work for other editors to remove them and clutters wikipedia with non-encyclopedic trivia. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

women's ITF $25k tournament. Fails WP:NTENNIS. Similar articles have been anonymously deleted recently. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ITF Djibouti Open (1)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

women's ITF $25k tournament. Fails WP:NTENNIS. Similar articles have been anonymously deleted recently. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ITF Djibouti Open (1)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament – Doubles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 NECC ITF International Women's Tournament until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

The article 2011 AAT Women's Circuit Buenos Aires (2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Copa Providencia BCI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Lenzerheide Open – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Rolls Royce Women's Cup Kristinehamn – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Hart Open – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Hart Open – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Femenino Ciudad de Benicarló – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Femenino Ciudad de Benicarló – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Latrobe City Tennis International – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Latrobe City Tennis International – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Copa Itaú – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Copa Itaú – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 William Loud Bendigo International – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 William Loud Bendigo International – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 OrtoLääkärit Open – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 OrtoLääkärit Open – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Vitality Trophy – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Vitality Trophy – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 AAT Women's Circuit Rosario – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 AAT Women's Circuit Rosario – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 AAT Women's Circuit Buenos Aires (2) – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 AAT Women's Circuit Buenos Aires (2) – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Copa Providencia BCI – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 Copa Providencia BCI – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 Internationaux de Nouvelle-Calédonie – Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Russell

2012 Internationaux de Nouvelle-Calédonie – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Russell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, from this year on those will be included on the Singles pages... Kante4 (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Kuznetsov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, done. But you can do it yourself, just check the article name of the player here at wikipedia, or use the search function. ;) Kante4 (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can add them. ;) Kante4 (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Wu Di and Chris Eaton

2012 Intersport Heilbronn Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Michael Russell and Andreas Beck

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brian Baker and Andrey Kuznetsov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artem Smirnov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alejandro Gonzalez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ruben Gonzales, Alejandro Gonzalez, Artem Smirnov and Mikhail Biryukov

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herzlia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 ITF Men's Circuit (January–March), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:2012 Boston Red Sox season#Boxscore links in the game log.

Thanks! :)

RedSoxFan274 _{(leave a message~contribs)} 00:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Houston Astros season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miller Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've noticed you have consistently made incorrect links in the GAME LOG ('Record') section that I have had to correct almost every time you post the game summary. The May 4th game link had the PREVIEW of the game instead of the RECAP. If you can't double-check the link to make sure it is accurate (with both the team abbreviations on it twice, and the actual date of the game) when you post it, please don't add the link; I'll do it. Thanks. Katydidit (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that; I only had it as it was because the disambig page for Chris Archer points to Christopher Archer for him, not Chris Archer (baseball), which is obviously the better title. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 19:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Every time I update the 2012 Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim season game log, you change the "GB" column to the incorrect color. Please take a look at the legend at the bottom of the section to see which colors belong for the division, wild card, etc. In the future, please refrain from doing this. Thank you. --CASportsFan (talk) 09:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you're doing consistent updates to the 2012 Cleveland Indians season article; is there any chance you would be able to make the font color for "show" in the monthly game logs a different color? Right now it's dark blue text on a navy blue background and might be difficult for readers to see they can click and expand that monthly log. Cheers! Zepppep (talk) 04:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Boston Red Sox season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel González (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you leave an edit summary when you make an edit, please? Thanks, Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - the thing is, I like doing it, especially the ones I created (Western, Southern, Isthmian, CCL) :) Haha, so I'm happy to keep doing it, but the ones I edit least are the northern ones (Northern Premier, Northern, North-West etc) and also the 2012–13 Wessex Football League and the 2012–13 United Counties Football League. There are a few minor leagues that don't have season articles yet though, like the Hellenic Football League, Kent League, Eastern Counties Football League etc - these are at the same level as the Western League, Combined Counties League etc. You might want to create those and update them, if you have the time. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. not sure if there's a bare template anywhere for the tables and results - what I usually do is copy and paste one from another league, and substitute the teams into it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You just did it ;) It's automatic when you use the Fb cl team formatting inside a table template like the ones in the articles. If you create the article so I can see it, I can help you with it if you want. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That looks pretty good so far. The biggest thing to do is to create the templates for the clubs who don't have them yet. That will fix the red links. I'll do that now, so hopefully you'll see the red links go blue as I do it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done that, so it looks a lot better. I've put it in the English football template so other editors can see it, and tomorrow I might look at some other small improvements, but I think it looks OK right now. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny, every time I go to update a table, you're already doing it. Anyway, doing the templates is quite easy - take another team's template (e.g. Template:Fb team Deal Town) and substitute the name of the new team into it, and the article name, and the abbreviation. If you have trouble with it, I'll do them later. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for all the work on these pages (especially the Eastern Counties Football League)Spudgfsh (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to English non-league football articles within Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, I thought I'd let you know about the English non-league football task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of English non-league football. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the task force page and add your username to the participants list. Thanks!

Seen that you do a lot of the updating of non-league tables (like myself, I do the Northern Premier and North West Counties League seasons) so thought I'd issue an invitation to the non-league taskforce! Del_♉sion23 (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello catgamer, I'm Sindo, how are you ? Any news about your return ? Please let me know something through Private Message as soon as you can. Thanks! Sindo --151.60.65.165 (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm still Sindo, another Private Message for you, please have a look when you can.

Thanks! Sindo --93.33.101.248 (talk) 22:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, another Private Message, let me know when you can :

Thanks! Sindo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.60.66.125 (talk) 12:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was disambiguating an item on the page and found that Colgate was on their own schedule. It appears that everything after November is actually Army's schedule. -Niceguyedc ^{Go Huskies!} 10:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to those when i have time, going around every team page and removing cbblinks for teams pages created right now. -Bearcats fan ^(talk) 17:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of things when editing 2012—13 College Basketball team pages. °When creating college basketball pages titles shoud look like this °When entering teams use the school name not the mascot. °make sure you add the right catagories (don't just use Army's Catagories for Binghamton). °If your not going to add the full schedule, that's fine but leave the rest of it blank and someone else will come by and add the rest. It makes it for much easier to edit if you follow the steps I listed- Just trying to help a littleBearcats fan ^(talk) 18:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, do you mean putting an image on team's season page or uploading a brand new logo, not already on wikipedia?Bearcats fan (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Bearcats fan ^(talk) 21:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never done it before, but this link should help=========>Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard Bearcats fan^(talk) 21:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

check the teams athletic page, UMBC's: UMBC Retrievers to add UMBC logo to team page Bearcats fan^(talk) 22:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2012–13 Troy Trojans men's basketball team, Catgamer!

Wikipedia editor Nkansahrexford just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

will love to see 1 or more references added

To reply, leave a comment on Nkansahrexford's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for all of the college basketball pages you have created recently but I have a few suggestions. I have edited pretty much every page you have created latley to make them better. First off do not use a non free image without giving it usage rationale, always use a free image when possible. Also, dont have to have spaces between the standings template and the opening. Make sure to watch the time zones. There are other small things, maybe just go back and look at some of my changes to help improve the pages you create in the future. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not like they were huge mistakes, easily fixable and I like doing it. I was planning on doing those pages anyway so its nice to have them done, especially now because once the season starts its going to be hard to create new pages while updating when games are played. And just a heads up, no need to do a team from the Big Sky Conference, I will get them done this week. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 03:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. Careful with Stetson, someone did a redirect of the season article to their normal athletics page, make sure to create it on the redirect and not just a brand new page. I'll also go over pages you create and tweek/add anything that needs done. We also need to start finishing the schedules as much as possible before the season gets going to much. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Othe users have created and will maintain pages for the larger schools but its fewer and far between for the smaller schools. I do it just because its something I like doing. I created about 100 season articles last year and started early this year and have done about 120. For most teams this will be the first season they will have a Wikipedia page. The ultimate goal for me would be to have every division 1 team to have a page but that takes forever. I have done it the last 2 years with FBS and FCS football pages, but those are easier to maintain since most of the games are on one day a week. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 23:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Basically if its anything other then just letters it is not free. If you go and look at the Atlantic 10 teams you can see that I found wordmark logos last night and uploaded them, yet to see if they will actually stay but for now it works. So if you don't know if its free or not just leave it blank and I will try and find one that is free.

The big west only needs a few more, be nice to have that conference done. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 19:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Any team that doesn't have a page yet you can do if you want. I'm going to be busy getting the schedules completed on pages you have already created and finding free images to go on the pages. I just think the pages look better with a picture in the infobox. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 23:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only league/conference that does not have a year end tournament is the Ivy League so if you do all the teams from conferences with year end tournaments and the Ivy League then that would be every team. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only two teams I didn't do in the CAA are unc Wilmington and Towson because they are banned from post season play, but that dosent mean we can't do a season article for them. The other team I didn't do because of a post season ban is Jacksonville state of the Ohio valley. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hard work getting all those articles up. I will try my best on adding to schedules and getting some free images up but weekends I mostly work on college football pages so it might be Monday before I get to the basketball pages. Only one more week before most teams tip off the regular season on the 9th so I hope to have at least the teams that already exists schedules done before then. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that non of the season articles you have added have included exhibition games. I just started to finish the schedule for Sacramento State and they have an exhibition game that you did not list. I don't know if you are leaving them off or just missed this one but if they play an exhibition game please still include it in the schedule, it is still part of their season.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to update the overall record in the infobox when updating the games, don't just update the schedule. Thanks. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE!! update the overall record in the info box as you update games. Every game last night that you updated you did not update the record and I've gone through today and have changed a bunch, but I noticed on Norte Dame's game today that you updated it but their record say 0-0. While you are on the page please update their overall record so we don't have to spend the extra time with someone else updating a page that you have already added the score on. If you don't know how just use the edit button on the top of the page and the first thing you will see is the info box. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing amazing work though. As much as I would like to I could never update as much information as you do. I am still trying to get logos up for every team as I go and that is taking longer then I thought, and I will always try and update games aswell throughout the season since in college basketball there are pretty much games every day from now until the middle of March. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 21:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work keeping the 2012–13 basketball articles up to date. One think I have noticed that's not getting done is updating the dates on standings templates. As of today a lot of them still say as of November 15. It's not a big deal, but something that should be done. Thanks. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place non-free logos in any article for a particular year or season as such use is in violation of Wikipedia's policy and guideline concerning non-free content. See in particular point 14 of WP:NFC#UUI. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Monmouth Hawks men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just finished the Southern Conference with all season articles created (except for exhibitions and matches played after the first match in December). Catgamer (talk) 22:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

great job on all your edits, when you get a full conference done let me know. created page for New Orleans (Independent) and added full schedule, you just need to add roster, will create pages for NJIT and Chicago State (Great West) with full schedule, then you just need to add rostes. once again great workBearcats fan (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)User:Bearcats fan (talk) 16:56, 2012 November 6[reply]

got MEAC, MAC, NEC, OVC, all complete will probaly finish rest tomorrow (patriot, SoCon, SLC, SWAC then everything should be done by thursday evening Bearcats fan (talk) 07:03, 2012 November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012–13 Columbia Lions men's basketball team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Round Hill, Virginia

2012–13 Dartmouth Big Green men's basketball team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Freehold, New Jersey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the Standings Templates, make sure you update the date on the template thanks Bearcats fan (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2012–13 Hartford Hawks men's basketball team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Niado. Catgamer, thanks for creating 2012–13 Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks men's basketball team!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi! Please try to add some references to reliable sources for this article. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 20:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 Hartford Hawks men's basketball team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Hartford Hawks men's basketball team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catgamer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2012–13 Eastern Michigan Eagles men's basketball team for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2012–13 Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers men's basketball team, Catgamer!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for getting the ball rolling.

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating 2012–13 Grambling State Tigers men's basketball team, Catgamer!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Make sure to include reliable sources to substantiate content. But thanks for getting the ball rolling on this.

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Catgamer and Merry Christmas!

I have sent you a PM on Totalllympics, I hope you will read it soon. Thanks, Sindo --93.33.100.10 (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PM with Instructions sent :) Sindo --93.33.102.26 (talk) 16:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Someone put results from last years tournament on that page. Nightfall87 (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012–13 UCLA Bruins men's basketball team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ucla90024 (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly changed the 2012–13 ACC basketball standings to place NC State fourth and Virginia fifth and I have repeatedly reverted your edits because you are incorrect in doing so. Please stop attempting to change this. The ACC determines the basketball standings based solely on in-conference record, using tiebreaking procedures where appropriate. This year, Virginia and NC State both went 11–7 in ACC play and Virginia beat NC State 58–55 in their lone regular-season head-to-head matchup on January 29 in Charlottesville. (NC State did win the ACC Tournament game, but that game doesn't count towards the standings.) Under the ACC's procedures, that head-to-head win means Virginia finished fourth.

The standings as shown on the ACC websites' "Standings" page confirm the proper order. There's no better exemplar than how the league itself lists the standings: http://www.theacc.com/this-is/accstandings.html#mbb

Accordingly, I will continue to revert any change you make in the order of the teams, although obviously continued updates to the non-conference records are completely appropriate as long as the order the teams are listed does not change. 1995hoo (talk) 17:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Kazakhstan Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Finnish Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HPS and HJK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After doing some thinking, I will do as many as I can, so I think we should just keep it as it is. After all, I have got other leagues to take care of, England, France, Germany, and Spain etc. Arbero (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I cannot accept your offer, even though I would like to help on some occasions but on wikipedia it's the only thing I know. And I see your into your tennis edits. Sorry but thanks for the offer anyway. Skyblueshaun 19:22, 02/05/2013

Hey Catgamer

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, all covered. Good work there, it's quite a job to get them all set up. Let's hope we can keep them all up to date throughout the season! Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, good work. Normally I will leave Essex for you to do, unless you want me to do it. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Bulleted list item

Thanks for your editorial contributions to 2012–13 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team, which has recently become a WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your editorial contributions to 2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, which has recently become a WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the pages you have done so far that you are not changing the tense in the opening. You are leaving it as represented instead of represents and they were in whatever conference instead of they are a member of whatever conference. If you could change those when you create a page that would be helpful. Also, there are years in the top of the template for the schedule that need to be change. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 23:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did amazing last year keeping basketball pages up to date and you started creating the pages for this year but it doesn't seem like you've done any lately. The season tips off tomorrow and there are a ton of teams pages that haven't been created yet. I am doing the best I can but there is a ton to do. Just wondering if you were going to be helping this year like last year? Bsuorangecrush (talk) 16:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, I was just curious because you were so fast and on the ball last year. I'm a lot busier then last year as well so the basketball pages might slip by the wayside a bit this year. Oh well, we can only do what we can with the time we have. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello catgamer, please have a look at your Totallympics Private Messages when you have some time :)

Thanks !

Sindo --151.21.30.136 (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello catgamer, earth have sent you a Private Message on Totallympics to explain you the new Tennis Season. Please have a look as soon as you can so that you can start with threads from next week.

Thanks !

Sindo --91.255.97.196 (talk) 21:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2012–13 Sacramento State Hornets men's basketball team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination' by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  ' Olowe2011 ^Talk 07:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015–16 Rhode Island Rams men's basketball team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 Rhode Island Rams men's basketball team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GLenhart1 (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]