Welcome!

Hello, Carthan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — ξ^xplicit 03:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I really have no interest in that article. Don't know why I went there, but it was edited by a known sock who may have somehow got me looking at the article. Good luck. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Also responding to the message you left me. Thank you for the note on my essay; I'm always a little surprised (or flattered) when people run into it. -- I looked at the infobox and I think it's fine. The topic is a hard one, but if you know that up front it may not be as bad: be advised that you, as a newcomer, are stepping right into the one of the most contentious topics, and one of the most sustained brawls, in the history of Wikipedia. (At least onto its periphery.) With almost anything that touches on the topic of climate change, be prepared for people who may argue with anything you do. Then again you may be no problem at all! I edit a lot of fossil fuel stuff -- oil and gas fields, energy companies, oil spills, refineries, because I find the topic interesting, almost no one else does, and it's a quiet corner of Wikipedia, at least for now. I'd write about renewables but there's ten times as many editors there. (I have to be very careful of WP:COI, as it's probably perfectly obvious I work for an oil company or something similar.) Regarding the ACCCE article: it clearly can be expanded. Source everything, make sure the writing is neutral, try to include both viewpoints on controversial stuff. Advice I like to give is this: write in such a way that it would be impossible for an outside observer to determine whether you are personally for or against what the organization stands for. All the best, Antandrus (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me -- it appears to be an improvement and expansion, so I'd say go ahead and update the article with your sandbox version. Needs a little bit of copyediting (e.g. it's --> its) but that's easy stuff. Nothing jumps out at me, but I didn't read it closely nor am I intimately familiar with the topic. (I know a little about "clean coal" and carbon sequestration, but I wasn't familiar with the organization.) I think you're on the right track! Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 23:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns this table which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Computing --RaptorHunter (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]