/Archive

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigamy (canon law) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigamy_(canon law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Veverve (talk) 02:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jurisprudence of canon law has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CanonLawJunkie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bigamy (canon law), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The article Collectiones canonum Dionysianae would really need some improvements, because most of the paragraphs are not sourced. Since those subjects seem to be down your alley, I allowed myself to message you. Veverve (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, Collectiones canonum Dionysianae states Dionysius' collection was officially accepted at the Council of Aachen, but I found no mention of this at Council of Aachen. Veverve (talk) 20:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the unsourced parts. Veverve (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CanonLawJunkie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bigamy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canon Law articles needing attention has been nominated for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 18. – Fayenatic London 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CanonLawJunkie,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fundamental theory (canon law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Fundamental theory (canon law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Philosophy of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Philosophy of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fundamental theory of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Fundamental theory of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Theology of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Theology of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canonical jurisprudence and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Canonical jurisprudence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canon law jurisprudence and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Canon law jurisprudence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jurisprudence of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Jurisprudence of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved those two articles. However, they would need to be updatee to be in line with the current Catholic canon law:

• Excommunication in the Catholic Church
• Heresy in the Catholic Church

This kind of job seems right up your alley, so feel free to lend a hand in improving those articles! Veverve (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph G. Prior has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]