Hello, C-randles, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Above is Wikipedia's standard welcome template. It contains a variety of links that you may find useful if you decide to stick around, and we all hope that you will. Dragons flight 17:10, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

I noticed you recently uploaded Image:CPView.JPG. Dealing correctly with images on Wikipedia can be one of the most difficult things to learn because of all the complexities of copyright law. Whenever an image is added to Wikipedia, it needs to recieve an image copyright tag in order to explain for future users why we believe this particular image is acceptable for use on Wikipedia. In this case, I have added {{software-screenshot}} to indicate that your image was created as a screenshot from a software program and hence likely to be fair use. It is also a good idea to provide in the image description a little information about where the image came from and who made it. (In this case, I presume you made it.) Don't worry you'll get the hang of it all. Dragons flight 00:34, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

I added a "cc-by" tag which seemed the closest to what I know. Further details/discussion on the image's discussion page. crandles 23:26, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for drawing that to my attention. See my reply on my talk page (I don't know how you like to do these things, but I prefer to answer where the question was, so don't talk here talk there) and on the trop cyc page. William M. Connolley 19:34:18, 2005-09-05 (UTC).

ps: Go on, edit your user page, even if just to say boo! - you don't have to identify yourself if you don't want to. Its a good idea, because many people react badly to edits by "red users".

Thank you for the explanation. The article has been deleted now. Regards -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 14:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give source for the image please.[1]--Pixel ;-) 22:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took the image from http://www.climateprediction.net/project.php where it is called http://www.climateprediction.net/images/sci_images/ipcc_fig1-5.jpg so I believe it comes from an IPCC report (probably a figure named 1-5). So far I haven't actually found the exact image in an IPCC report - I tried to find it to see if there was a better quality image. I have now referenced a very similar image in an IPCC report. Hope that is sufficient.crandles 11:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C-randles, have you seen the recent Wikipedia_talk:Modelling_Wikipedia's_growth#Logistic_growth_model and the picture of Gaussian growth? It is interesting that you name your image Wikigrowthlogistic.PNG HenkvD 11:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I had seen the talk which didn't seem to be improving the article though to me there seemed agreement that the growth was no longer exponential. So I decided to be bold. Assuming it is now linear growth seems a bit presumptuous. (The lines on the graph allow people to conclude that if they want but I am not forcing them to decide that.) Simply calling it logistic seemed a more general term than linear and that was what the discussion was about. crandles 12:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it hard to convice people that the number of articles in not an exponential graph any longer. Some say it is still exponential as on a logarithmic scale it gives a more or less straight line others call it sub-exponential growth. On de:wikipedia it is already for 3 year a constant growth of about 500 to 600 articles per day. See Image:Neue Artikel.png and Image:Meilensteine.png. HenkvD 14:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be much easier to convince people it is not exponential than it is to persuade them that it is logistic. Just calculate a best fit for steady growth and for exponential growth and see which is a better fit by calculation the least square errors. Suggesting logistic growth is probably not going to get agreement. You will get a better fit but that is only to be expected due to the higher number of degrees of freedom. With my edits I tried to leave a large number of options being possible without saying which one is to be preferred. (eg exponential, steady growth with or without annual cycles and with or without weekly cycles (7 day average selected to make these disappear) or logistic (in name of file).) crandles 15:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you creating a new "season INVEST history" section when all of the INVESTs have already been documented and archived in the respective month archives? – Chacor 12:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They probably are, but isn't a single summary easier to follow? Also helps you know which months archive to look at. The main point was I disagreed with removal of July invests from the talk page. I felt it more appropriate to not only restore but have a season record. If people disagree fine. crandles 12:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh now I realise we already have a July archive before end of July. Bit odd - but anyway self reverted. crandles 12:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah pretty much as soon as each INVEST dies after a few days it gets archived. – Chacor 12:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

95L was gone on 1 July but it was still on the page on 23rd July and July archive hadn't been created then. Anyway, where do I find the details of 91L? If it is missing from the monthly archieves is that a good reason for having an INVEST history summary page to prevent that happening? crandles 13:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

91L probably got lost in the hoopla around Andrea. The INVESTs are documented like that only the help in article-writing for storm history. Otherwise they serve no purpose (all storm discussion is at the Wikia, which is where you'd probably be able to find info on 91L). So there's no real need for having an INVEST history page. – Chacor 13:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being bare gives undue weight so consider working on:

User talk:C-randles/IPCC contributors

I've noticed that this image has contradictory copyright tags - surely it can't be CC1.0 and a non-free screenshot? If it is non-free then it needs a fair use rationale. I know it's quite an old image now but since it's still in use it might be worth clarifying which of the tags is correct? Ta, Purgatorio 19:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on the discussion page, I am sure I have seen something by the author saying images can be used provided they are attributed. However, I couldn't find it. I did ask on the development thread here but the only answer was not by the author here. I am not at all sure about tags; does this mean images that have to be attributed like this one should not have the non-free tag? crandles 23:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That means they're not free (even if you find the permission, it would have to be emailed to permissions@wikimedia.org to get proper OTRS clearance). I have updated the image page to suit, however it does need a Fair Use Rationale for each page that it's on. Cheers! --Storkk (talk) 23:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CPView.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope that rationale is sufficient. crandles (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wonder if gaussian process emulator will survive? I don't know anything about it just had it mentioned as al alternate technique to a neural net and random forests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by C-randles (talk • contribs)

See my recent edits to Gaussian process emulator. Wikipedia conventions require complete sentences, not dictionary-style definitions, and the title phrase must be set in bold at its first appearance, usually in the first sentence. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello C-randles! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Krishna AchutaRao - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Krishna AchutaRao, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna AchutaRao. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hindcast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability s not asserted nor verified. There are no citations nor references. There are no external links. Without any of these we are entitled to assume it is original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an opinion on this matter, please discuss at Talk:SHA-1#Collisions not yet found (Dec 2015). -- intgr [talk] 09:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. You have new messages at Talk:List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches.
Message added 18:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. I just observed something come up and have started a discussion over on the subject Talk page. Hope you'll join in.

It's kind of complicated, and was hard to articulate the issue, so I hope you'll bear with me as I tried to explain and offer an example, so that we might together improve Wikipedia. Cheers. N2e (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Space Barnstar
		For your work improving List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches‎. Regular editors like yourself are what make that page the definitive source on the history of SpaceX launches. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 15:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Citation Barnstar
		I forgot that I recently gave you a barnstar for the same article, but well done filling in bare refs on the List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches‎ article. — InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 11:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 19:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting invitation thank you. I suspect I would fail for lack of experience moving pages. Had a brief read of some of this, but doubt that gives enough experience. crandles (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the correct name of the conjecture? Some IP keeps changing it, but then you changed it to something else, not what it originally was. Could I please be provided some clarification on this? ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 23:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is "Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture" per this or this. The relevant wikipedia page is Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. I just changed a capital C for conjecture to small c so that link works. "Castillo-de Caro Conjecture" is as far as I can tell just vandalism, two different problems have been changed to this then changed back. Hope this answers your question. crandles (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, back in Jan 2016 in this edit you added a tag to our article on Satellite Temperature Measuremrents. The tag was removed today when someone else wasn't sure what the tag was for. I don't know either, to be honest. But I thought I'd drop a note here and encourage to take a look at the current text in case you can think of RS based improvements that still need to be made. Have a happy! And if you're so inclined, check out WP:WikiProject Climate change, which is just getting off the ground. New members welcome!NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Looks much better and fine without the tag now AFAICS. crandles (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoo whoo! Welcome! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 09:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome. crandles (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to say thanks for all your thinking about categories at WP:PROCC. Long ago and far away I did relational database programming. The concept of categorization is very much something I understand, but the wikipedia way of doing it is not. I confess I haven't studied your ideas and contribs there yet. Some of the help pages I've studied for the first time recently were hard to internalize and I'm giving project work a bit of rest. But I'll be back. Keep it up! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your interest in categories on climate pages. Question.... what is the goal? How do we expect to use these categories? Can categorization be harnessed to assist us in the clerical job of managing items on our to-do list? It's probably a discussion for the project talk page, so maybe I should have posted there, but I did wish to emphasize how much your enthusiasm for categorization is appreciated. I understand the how (I think) I just don't understand the how are we doing it to best HELP us? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect I may be more in the dark about usefulness than you. First item on to-do list was categories and it seemed useful to have a list of what categories are in use. Thought this was something I could usefully do even if no particular expertise. I'm still finding some. I think it would be useful to have project discussion on scope of project (maybe that is too much a moving target), intended use of Categories... Re how are we doing it to best HELP us I have no idea, any indications of intended uses might be helpful. So far my approach is not very systematic, aimed at finding as many of the categories as I can fairly quickly. A more systematic approach may evolve. In short, don't assume I know what I am doing. crandles (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we are in the same boat. I'm an old guy. My programming skills are obsolete but for awhile I was a relational database programmer. Setting up table structure and running set queries is an awful lot like wiki categorization. But, like you, I don't know how to match our editing goals with cat and banner design. For that matter, I'm not sure what the first editing goals even are. So your suggestion of a bigger picture discussion at the project page is a point very very very very well made. We need that. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C-randles, as a member of WikiProject Climate Change, I would like to invite you to support the Wikimedia Sustainability Initiative by adding your name to the list of supporters. Thank you, --Gnom (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I've just checked who edited the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, just letting you know that a Repeal Bill has been published, I've thrown up a rough and ready Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (Repeal) Bill article, in case you want to keep an eye on it. doktorb _words^deeds 22:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

any chance you want to help out on increasing coverage and info on this ? Carbon sink upscaling additional info on carbon sink upscaling (missing info) --Genetics4good (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on SpaceBEE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/spacebee.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it to Draft:SpaceBEE so you can work on it more - get rid of all the copied text and please don't cut-and-paste from any source in future. Fences&Windows 01:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was a dispute resolution request sent to Wikipedia about whether SN10's landing was a failure or partial failure. It has been decided that the landing outcome column shouldn't even be there because it caused Original Research. I am going to revert your edit. If you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link you should have provided is Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#List_of_Starship_flights. I didn't know that was ongoing as my username was not correctly spelled and I have only seen it now after it is closed. It's conclusion says "The dispute is about original research. The simple answer is this- if a source does not currently exist which clearly calls the launch a success or failure- any analysis of the data is original research and does not belong on WP at all." However there are plenty of sources which all prominently say it exploded, if that is not virtually indistinguishable from saying failure, I really don't know what you can reasonably expect to find. But if this conclusion tells us anything it is that "partial failure" is not supported. The talk page discussions discuss in more detail and I take it as saying show as failure but show the controversy ie that SpaceX did claim it as a success but later admitted that there were problems with engine thrust leading to hard landing way past leg loads. So the latest from SpaceX and Elon Musk twitter account is an official channel of communication is that the landing certainly had issues and you can't put it down as partial failure. crandles (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your note. Was curious if there is an easy way to do that with 800+ references on the page, other than a search through them?  DGrundler  talk  22:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dgrundler: If there is an easy way to find one ref amongst 800 then I don't know how, I suppose you could edit entire article and do a search for the URL. The ref concerned just happened to be one of three listed just under the Future Launches heading which I monitor for changes. That ref lists changes it makes on a date near the top so I try to update all changed dates (you missed one but no worries) then update the ref date. So I was just familiar with it rather than any clever trick. C-randles (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate the time you took to explain that.  DGrundler  talk  22:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that in the source, and cross-referencing it to the wiki definitions used for what mass cat LVs are super heavy lift. Might be a little bit of synthesis, but is okay by me since it is descriptively accurate and arguably not WP:SYN. N2e (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I nominate you for administrator?StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 00:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and nominated you. See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/C-randles. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 01:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination. Not sure whether I want the bother of going through the process or do many admin things but it is nice to receive such a nomination. C-randles (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@C-randles: Nomination canceled. I still think you would be a great admin, but other users think I don't have enough experience to make a RFA. Maybe I'll renominate you in the future. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I've had a look at your statistics, and although you've done a lot of writing for the encyclopedia, you've not participated in many admin areas (eg: four AfDs in 15 years), so I think you would get a tough time at RfA. I would leave it for now, unless you take an interest in the maintenance side. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SpaceBEE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are, can you please make a WikiProject proposal for it (I as an IP, can not make the proposal cause I would be stopped when trying to create the proposal page). @C-randles:

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SpaceBEE".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C-randles, my name is Anda Bordieanu and I am currently writing my master thesis about the WikiProject Climate Change. I could see you are a participant in the project and I was wondering if you would like to have a chat with me regarding your experience as an editor. Anda Bordieanu (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I never did very much so I doubt I have much of interest to say.C-randles (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your change here broke both the source for Psyche (missing </ref> tag) and also the source for USSF-44 mentioning it's indefinite delay. Ergzay (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles. Thank you for creating Cargo Dragon C211. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs a bit more expansion and more references yet. See other comments below from S0091 as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D-orbit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C-randles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Eddie Yongming WU has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 1 § Eddie Yongming WU until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 04:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello C-randles! Your additions to Eddie Wu have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ”text”. Additionally, Help:Referencing for beginners offers guidance on how to cite sources.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words and structure it properly, adhering to the principles of paraphrasing. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources to verify the information and demonstrate that it is not original research.
• Image use guidelines: We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. Any other images used on Wikipedia must be available under a free and open copyright license that permits commercial and derivative reuse.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. However, unlike many other sites that allow content licensing for site use while retaining non-free ownership, Wikipedia requires that content release be irrevocable, worldwide, and either into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without proper attribution. If you want to copy or translate content from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps outlined at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]