In fact;both China P.R and Vietnam claimed victory in Sino-Vietnamese war 1979! China also claimed victory in the conflicts against Vietnam from 1979 to 1991 as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OTD-Ông Tuấn Dũng. (talk • contribs) 18:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I hope you do not revert my fix 😀— Preceding unsigned comment added by OTD-Ông Tuấn Dũng. (talk • contribs) 18:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bumbubookworm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Please don't vandalise my page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cart Adolf (talk • contribs) 09:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ngô Đình Cẩn, Dương Văn Minh, and other articles between you and Nguyễn Quốc Việt - show that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to let you know I've opened a discussion regarding the edits to Li (surname 李), Lu (surname 陸), Lin (surname), Yao (surname), Yang (surname), which you have been involved in. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Applella reported by User:Sauzer (Result: ) Sauzer (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nguyễn Khánh into Thích Trí Quang. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Trương Đình Dzu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou dear sir. A banned user named Nipponese Dog Calvero (talk · contribs) adds Chinese characters to every article including for people who didn't use Chinese characters and I was looking at the 2016 edit where this was added and accidentally reverted to the version before him and wiped everything else out too Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification about the user's past behaviour. I agree the Chinese characters in this case were not appropriate for this Vietnamese subject. Dl2000 (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chế Mân, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I hope you do not revert my adding,respect you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.248.110.218 (talk) 11:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just add words to be more enough,do not delete,respect and goodbye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.248.110.218 (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, instead of starting a edit war, be aware of WP:3RR - if there is an issue with another user, after 3 reverts this rule has been violated and you can take action. You warned IP far too late. Please ask on my talk page if you need any help! Ed6767 (talk) 14:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lan Cao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cholon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Hồng Ngự, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hồng Ngự (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dyson Heydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cable 243 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 02:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cảnh Trị requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please publish only correct information. Refrain from falsehood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernard Florentin (talk • contribs) 03:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating edit war. We would not like to resort to legal action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernard Florentin (talk • contribs) 06:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^and that's why you are indef blocked, o wise Bernie

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Đắk Lắk Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you self-reverted. I have created these history/location cats today and am about to populate them, I see the disclaimer says it needs to be empty for seven days. They will get filled before then, I have started putting things under these cats. Bumbubookworm (talk) 04:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bbbw, thanks for all your good work and for creating the history categories for each Vietnam province. A bunch of them are currently empty; do you have plans to populate the empty ones you created, or can they be deleted? UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reinstated the original post and my reply. Yes, I am working through various historical events and putting them in. Bumbubookworm (talk) 04:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, appreciate it, I'll hold off with any noms. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But note (as you see from below) that the bot does not have the intelligence to hold off. I have removed the tags from the categories you have populated, but any that are still empty wil stillget tagged by the bot, so if you could populate any remaining ones asap that would be great. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chương Thiện Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Mỹ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:History of An Giang Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Cà Mau Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Khánh Hòa Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Kiên Giang Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Lâm Đồng Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Ninh Thuận Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Sóc Trăng Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Thanks for your edit last week to fix the typo in the COVID-19 pandemic data for Australia (176 deaths not 1676). For a while, Google (which source the information from Wikipedia) were displaying the wrong number in their COVID sidebar, and the typo was even quoted by a couple of journalists. Anjsimmo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nguyễn Văn Thiệu § Requested move 13 August 2020. ItsPugle (please use {{ping|ItsPugle}} on reply) 13:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your efforts in tagging articles for problems. If you wouldn't mind a little constructive criticism, I have some advice. There is no need to "double up" on tags. For example, in Battle of Burki, you added {{page numbers needed}} at the top and then {{page needed}} to each instance. Just do one or the other, but not both. In this article, since there are so many footnotes missing page numbers, the banner on top is good enough. Secondly, in the same article, you added {{unreliable source inline}} to all of the instances of one source. It would better if you just tagged the source directly. Lastly, when you leave a major tag like {{POV}} you really should leave a message on the article talk page to explicitly state your concerns, even when you think it's obvious. Editors are not mind-readers and what is obvious to you may not be to others. I know you put it in your edit summary, but it's a pain in the butt to have to search the article history to find it. I've come across many instances where an article has been tagged for whatever maintenance for many years, but there's no explanation why it's there and the tagger hasn't been active for a long time, so there's no way to figure out what someone is expected to do (I end up removing the tags in those cases). Thanks again for your hard work and keep it up. —howcheng {chat} 15:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me the reason why you remove all the hantus in articles I added? Each Vietnamese name has a hantu (hán tự), the literal meaning of a name is given on its hantu, like the way Korean names and Japanese names have their hanjas and kanjis. Model Seeder (talk) 14:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Han tu is not used in contemporary VN anymore and ther isn't any evidence that these people use it on a daily basis Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hantu is not used in usual writing but it’s still used in temples, relics,... Most of Vietnamese name their children by hanviet, and the writing system which indicates those names is hantu, you know? A word written in chuquocngu may have a lot of way of writing in hantu, for examples: my name is Minh (明) which means bright, not Minh (冥) which means dark. So i am not giving up adding hantus. Model Seeder (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Vietnamese)#The_use_and_transliteration_of_Sino-Vietnamese_characters Bumbubookworm (talk) 23:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding hantus helps us to realise the meaning of each word and avoid confusion between words. For examples, my sister’s name is Quỳnh (瓊) which actually means a jade or something beautiful, not Quỳnh (惸) which means solitary, do you understand? Model Seeder (talk) 03:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with recent scholarship on Vietnamese studies, especially Vietnam-centric ones? If not, just let others work on it. Greenknight dv (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thủy Tiên (Vietnamese-American singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability; ref is to the subject's website

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 22:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Thủy Tiên (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bumbubookworm, East Germany is a former country, why would you correct it wrong lol?! Free Bloc (talk) 11:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bumbubookworm, are you sure it was just a state??? I think East Germany was a country! Free Bloc (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bumbubookworm, you will be responsible for what you fix, right or wrong, ok, good luck, see you later. Free Bloc (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cabramatta, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Newman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Ruse Agricultural High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The existing sources cited do not support the changes you made. Gab4gab (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't know what I did wrong but I contributed right and got the source, I also removed my wrong grammar, please forgive if I made any mistake. Ong555 (talk) 12:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bumbubookworm, you will have to make a case that this account is a sock of User:Japanese555. What you did here is really unacceptable, besides useless, and I should block you both for edit warring. If someone is a sock, reverting them two dozen times is ridiculous, and I don't understand why you didn't notify anyone or file an SPI. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah good morning sir, unfortunately in my experience at WP, my reports to noticeboards eg AIV, RFPP tend to get ignored by admins or I get treated at the same level at vandals or people who deliberately put fake sources and get told it's a 50-50 content dispute or whatever, so I've learned that for peons like me, I should just sent a tale page notice to some admin who has prior experience in whoever the relevant vandal is. I have been around long enough to know that self-help is the best way here in the absence of having special admin armour or whatnot ... But it has amused me how easy it is for famous vandals and hoaxers to leave their mark around here. Anyways, if you look at the cat for previous socks of Japanese555, he also likes football and likes amusing us all by advertising his reincarnation status with the same -555 suffix, apart from the fact that you can see he has visited my fanbook quite often. Also, you can see in the history of the German football team page, his recent socks were tagged by others with the omniscient eye as reincarnations of a rather famous chap well-known to the sock-enforcement folks of WP Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day to you sir. Thank you for your tiredless contributions to our war against sockpuppets.
I am a non-admin sockpuppet investigator from vi.wiki community, and very pleased to see that you got ignored and criticized for reporting sockpuppets. Since most people there do not really care about socks, and vi.wiki does not have many active admins as it needs, I need your experience.
Please let me know if you agree. Otherwise, you do not need to reply.
Sorry for my awful English, UnnamedUser 10:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropped by to say that I agree with NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh here! Any of these "555", "Lok", and "OTDung" looking usernames in this topic area are almost certainly socks, and you can report them at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phạm Văn Rạng. You can see some of the confirmed examples at Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Phạm Văn Rạng. — MarkH₂₁^talk 01:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bumbubookworm, regarding this edit, the removed text was actually from another sockpuppet so apparently there's a few in the area. However, I was looking and could not find an SPI for Japanese555. Is there one? If not, it is helpful to file them, as they can help pick up other accounts that may not have been noticed. CMD (talk) 02:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis: This guy have suffered hundreds of blocks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phạm Văn Rạng/Archive. UnnamedUser 05:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you have dropped three unreliable tags on an article. All where the book by Southey was cited. Yet the first review Google brings me says "most authoritative, comprehensive and balanced work on the subject". I check the talk page and see nothing in the way of your stating your reasons for disliking Southey. What is going on? Shenme (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish male long-distance swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish long-distance swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I've rectified this one by populating a subcat. Thanks Bumbubookworm (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish medley swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I believe I've fixed the tree alignment. Thanks Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A new discussion has begun regarding the AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates. Please add your thoughts there. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yankalilla Football Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yankalilla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian backstroke swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Good morning, I believe I've fixed the tree alignment. Thanks Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Chilean male medley swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I created the wrong/unneeded category and there is nothing that goes within it Bumbubookworm (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Belarusian female backstroke swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, thanks for the prod, I am not usre what happened a few weeks ago but I have filled it Bumbubookworm (talk) 19:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of UAAP Final Four results this article should be not FA, citations are awful. 49.149.102.27 (talk) 05:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: That's nice, but I have nothing to do with this article. I had single revert of the article back in 2007. I clearly do not fall under the "Notify relevant parties" as I am neither: main contributors to the article, editor who originally nominated the article for Featured Article status, or any relevant WikiProjects. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note and for your contributions to the TNH Page. I will make an attempt at explaining the pedagogical contributions section - I have a friend who wrote a thesis on TNH and who may have references and explanations that are relevant. Regardless of the outcome (blurb / not blub), it is worth making an effort to make his contribution clear. It may take some time, though, so please be patient. I will attend to this again tomorrow afternoon. BTW TNH himself would have said "Wikipedia Front Page or Not Wikipedia Front Page... That is NOT the Question" :-). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellino (talk • contribs) 21:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Geology of the Lassen volcanic area/archive1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know what you were referring to in your comment about me on ITNC. I make a great effort to set aside my biases and support things from all corners of the Earth. This is not USApedia and I know that. I can't improve without knowing what I am doing wrong, even if I don't think I am grossly wrong. That's all. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Either give me a proper proof that they weren't in religion or stop editing. Usoejw9 (talk) 04:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate this edit was in September 2020 but the tip may still be worthwhile. Some older references such as those at Parsley massacre contain Google Books hyperlinks - you can open these to retrieve the page numbers or find "PA[n]" in the link and fill in the information rather than add a {{page needed}} ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 22:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I realised this later that the page is embedded in the link Bumbubookworm (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this dispute while patrolling recent changes and took the liberty of opening a dispute resolution. WP:DRN#List_of_Vietnamese_Americans   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bumbubookworm,

I noticed you're adding some scientific discoveries to Days of the Year pages. While the discoveries are indeed significant and you are citing them well, new entries for events are supposed to be notable enough to have an article about the event itself. For example in this edit, you added the publication of an important discovery about protons. However, the event of the publication isn't significant enough to pass WP:EVENTDOY. In contrast, the first detonation of a nuclear weapon is significant enough for inclusion as the article about Trinity (nuclear test) demonstrates.

Yes, there's a lot of crap already in the DOY pages, but the DOY project is trying to clean them up and remove the cruft.

Thanks in advance for your understanding and keep up the otherwise great contributions. Toddst1 (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for research discoveries, the only date that one would have access to is the day the research was unveiled to the public, ie published in a journal, or granted a patent or the like. We have no idea when some professor/inventor actually figured something out in their office/lab unless they livestreamed themselves [not likely]. Nuclear tests, satellite launches are publicly observable, but almost nothing else is. So the consequence of this is no discovery can be mentioned in the anniversaries? Is this what was intended? To exclude achievements that are observable by the public near-'live', on the same day? Do notable works of literature count then? Because they would also be categorised by thte day that they are published, and not when it was actually written Bumbubookworm (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the publication of the notable work was a notable event with an article about the event, then yes. However I don't think that will be very prevalent. For example, Roots: The Saga of an American Family is notable. The Publication of Roots: The Saga of an American Family is not notable enough to have an article about the event. Toddst1 (talk) 20:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canberra College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandra Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? She has another birthday? -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning sir. Every article can only be highlighted once across the calendar year. She already has a blurb. If you check the talk page of an article, there is a bot listing of when they have been OTD. She has a blurb in October Bumbubookworm (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zoom Meeting ID: 897 9589 8488 Passcode: 343 Or Zoom ：8432739775 Passcode：12345 -- Kasuga (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much. My mother listens to Vietnamese dubs of his teachings regularly. If you have any other links to livestreams of relevant funerary events that would be appreciated. Also, you may be aware that on the main page, there is a recent deaths section WP:ITN/C and T:ITN. Any person who is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page is eligible to have a link posted on there, if the article is is good condition, so I will be working on that now (the article does not have sources) at the moment. Bumbubookworm (talk) 00:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chin Kung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you explain to me why you removed Bell from the on this day? It will have been exactly 100 years since his death and he is a very influential person so it would be very helpful if you could explain your reasoning behind the removal. Interstellarity (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, as per hte edit summary, I overlooked it initially because there were several unsourced paragraphs. Also, when proposing something, please don't overwrite existing entries/suggestions and instead move them to the staging area. Thanks Bumbubookworm (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing all the OTD updates recently. Let me know when you get tired of it and you want to me to resume. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 17:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no worries. Hope you are enjoying doing other things! Bumbubookworm (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the edit concerning the geopolitical status of the city. Is there a certain agreement on the subject? 62.122.108.247 (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:North Korean female breaststroke swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:North Korean breaststroke swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Txkk § September 2022. Txkk (talk) 14:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, reverting an edit because you consider the source "an article by some obscure Slowiak" is not acceptable. This source has not been added by me and it has already been cited from on the article. When it comes to my edits, the information comes from pages 120-124 exactly. We will have to request a dispute resolution if you're still unsatisfied with that.

But if you meant my edit has typos, I'd love to fix them. Brat Forelli (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Miller's "Misalliance : Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States, and the Fate of South Vietnam" has the same talking points as Słowiak on page 261 and 262. Brat Forelli (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have already been called out about over-tagging articles. As I can see you from your editing history, you do not much more than add article tags. Word of advice if you want to be respected, assume WP:GF and try and find a reference first before tagging. What you are doing helps no one. 146.198.26.100 (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HowCheng recommended I check with you about my OTD questions. Philip Zimbardo is one of the most famous psychologists in history and will be 90 years old on March 23. Two questions: 1. Is his notability and 90th worthy of inclusion in OTD? 2. Is the existing quality of the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Zimbardo good enough?

if the quality is not yet good enough, What specifically needs to be better before March 22?

I know Zimbardo personally, so want to acknowledge my connection - i wont change the article myself, but have other wiki-friends who have offered to help if you can give us any list of what needs to be fixed. DrMel (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC) (sorry for typos - iPad user interface is not wikifriendly)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Kazakhstani female épée fencers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Kazakhstani female foil fencers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tajikistani male butterfly swimmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]