Hello! I've started drafting some edits for my assigned article. There is a section on opinion polling prior to the election that successfully passed the CCPR (proposition 24) into law. It seems redundant at this point since there are official results available, but I am hesitant to delete an entire section. The talk page for the article is basically empty except for a user planning to update it once official vote totals were out. Do you have any guidance on how to proceed? Lillianbroschart (talk) 04:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lillianbroschart, Hm. I think it's ok to remove the poll if you think it improves the quality of the article. Just be sure to explain in your edit summary why you are doing what are you are doing. If someone opposes that edit, then you can discuss it in the talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brianda,

Although I've used WikiEdu previously, it's been some years. Here are a few things that have come up for me so far:

1) how do I set deadlines for WikiEdu assignments? I'm not seeing anyway of doing so in the Dashboard Timeline under edit

2: does WikiEdu actually track individual student edits and additions? I seem to recall it does but I wanted to double-check

3) there's a third one but it's not coming b ack to me at the moment so I'll put it in when it does! Thanks.! (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with...

how to find my dashboard

--Elizabeth.uni (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Elizabeth.uni, The class dashboard is the page where you complete all the trainings and exercises, and that has a timeline for the project. You can access it at this link:

https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Arizona_State_University/JUS_437_Justice_and_Disability_The_Social_Construction_of_Disability_(Fall_2024)/home

Let me know if you have other questions. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth.uni, here's a tip that may make it easier for you. Your user page has a link to your dashboard, so if you know how to get back to your user page, just go there to find it. If you don't know how to get back to your user page, find the user avatar icon at the top of every page at Wikipedia (including this page!) and click it; it looks like one of these two images to the right. On a desktop, clicking the icon takes you straight to your user page. On mobile, you will get a dropdown; click your own user id to go back to your user page. Either way, click the link in the box to get to your dashboard. Voilà! (talk page watcher) Mathglot (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda. It looks like Cinnamonlover69 has chosen Ethics, an FA, for this class. That seems like a terrible idea. The FAC review was less than two months ago. Any additions to the page without opening a discussion on the talk page first will most likely be reverted due to PAGESIZE and SUMMARYSTYLE. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up @Guerillero. The instructor and student were notified, and will be discussing changes. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with editing the URL to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Username/New_sandbox

--Achaleun (talk) 04:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Achaleun, This is the sandbox you need to use to work on your contribution to Wikipedia, User:Achaleun/Pritchardia kaalae. Please take a look at this training module for more instructions on drafting in a sandbox.

As for that URL, that page does not exist, and doesn't need to be created. Do you have any other questions? Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with... Hi There, I need help with ensuring I'm editing in the correct sandbox as I begin to improve my article.

--LNTAYLOR (talk) 02:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @LNTAYLOR, It seems to me you followed exactly what you needed to do by completing your bibliography and the outline. I see you've edited the article directly in small chunk edits, and followed the instruction on the "Working live on Wikipedia" training module. I think you are on track for the assignment so far. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Looping in @AnitaMixonJones. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see this article has just been assigned as an education project, which may not be a good idea given it's currently being reviewed and revised for Good Article status. I think in fairness to the people working on getting the article to GA, it might be a good idea to assign a different article to the student. Kerry (talk) 02:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out about this and I completely agree. The thing is the students for this particular class are working on the French article for Gae Aulenti, not the English article. The Wiki Ed banner is being (erroneously) automatically populated by the Wiki Ed dashboard. We are trying to figure out how to fix this little bug. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with... making a Wikipedia stub

CharleneA

--Akuuuua88 (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Akuuuua88, Is there a topic you already have in mind? If so, then the next step is to find at least 3 - 5 sources of information on the article topic. Do you have a list of sources in the works? Looping in @Ian (Wiki Ed). Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hi Brianda,

I am currently working on updating and expanding the "Murder of Pregnant Women" Wikipedia page for my class. One of the edits I hope to make is changing the title to either "Pregnancy and Femicide" or "Pregnancy-Associated Femicide", and my professor recommended I contact you regarding this as this would be a significant edit. I was therefore wondering if you had any insight regarding whether or not making this edit would be possible?

Thank you!

-- Samdlb123 (talk) 22:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Samdlb123, there is a process for "potentially controversial" page moves. I think using that process is probably a good idea. As described in the instructions, you would add some code like the following to Talk:Murder of pregnant women:

{{subst:requested move|Pregnancy and Femicide|reason=I think the page should be named "Pregnancy and Femicide" rather than "Murder of Pregnant Women" because....}}

Edit: as I was typing up this comment, I see you just posted on the talk page within the last hour! Great job, that's exactly what you should do. You should wrap your comment in the wikitext above so that others who don't follow the Murder of pregnant women page will be notified of your proposal. If you need help doing so, just let me know.

Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Suriname0, I just used the code you provided for "potentially controversial" page moves on the Murder of pregnant women talk page, and wrapped the comment I had posted explaining my reason for the proposed change in the wikitext as well. Thank you so much for your help! Best, Samdlb123 (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda,

My teacher asked me to contact you; here's the dashboard link to our class:https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Concordia/Media_and_Gender_F24_(Fall)

I chose to translate this article from French to English: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chantal_Machab%C3%A9e, but it says that publishing translations is only for experienced users. I’ve already completed the translated version in my sandbox; here’s the link:User:WikiWriter1422/Chantal Machabée

Do you think there’s any way for me to publish it?

Thank you ! WikiWriter1422 (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiWriter1422, I removed the statement about the attribution a the beginning of the article and placed in the edit summary of my edit. I also added a translation template to the talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda,

I am trying to add a source to my bibliography sandbox, yet whenever I click on the "Bibliography" link under my assigned article, it forwards me to another students sandbox page and not my own. I was hoping you could help me figure this out. Thank You!

--MYeer (talk) 02:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MYeer, Since you are working in groups, the dashboard will assign one bibliography page and one sandbox draft page per group. It will assign those pages to the first student that signed up, which is probably why you are seeing the name of one of your peers instead of your own, but feel free to edit that page and contribute to it. Hope this clears things up. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with...

Under the reference section, when I try to edit my sources (add or delete) it opens the coding section. However, my peers are given a different option, they can use the citing tool that wikipedia provides to do so. I, on the other hand, do not have access to the same resource. Can you check this issue for me, please?

--Madutownsend (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Madutownsend, Check out this slide on Visual editing vs Source editing. It has a screenshot showing how to switch from source editing (wiki code) to Visual Editing, where you can use the cite tool. Give it a try and let me know how it goes. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brianda Felix!

My name is Savannah and I need help finding the sandbox page. I found a page that was "my page" however I know I am not supposed to write about Jaquira Diaz there so where do I find the sandbox for her article?

--Scr124 (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with accessing the sandbox where i should edit an article

Hedy gutierrez --Antiblu (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Antiblu, Are you working in a group? If you are then your group sandbox page is User:LanitaDelRey1/Javier Zamora. I recommend looking over the training, Drafting in a sandbox, for a refresher on this. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

 Done Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with...

hi. I am having a very hard time using wikipedia to edit my article. I need to find the proper sandbox to edit my article for my class and it keeps saying there is a "my article" section when I don't see one. I also don't know how to copy and paste the article over fully so that the citations and sources transfer over.

--Longislanduni2025 (talk) 15:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Longislanduni2025, If you check out this training module on the timeline, you'll see that the instructions are to work live on Wikipedia, without a sandbox. That is why you cannot find a sandbox to work on.

Can you share with me where you read the instruction's about copying and pasting the article over? Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just really confused on the whole thing so for some reason that's what I thought we had to do. So all I do is go to my article and hit edit and publish whatever changes I make? that's it? Longislanduni2025 (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well the first crucial step is to develop your bibliography and outline of the changes you'll be making. If you check Week 4 on the timeline, you'll see the trainings module, Building your bibliography for this. Once you know what sources you'll be using and have a plan for your edits, then you can start editing the article you've chosen to work on. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda. I watched the module again to move my article for grading and it won't let me move it because it says "source destination titles are the same, can't move page over itself". im not sure what that means. How can I move it? Longislanduni2025 (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Longislanduni2025, As part of the course, you are instructed to edit directly the existing Regime article. I am not sure what page you are trying to move, but if you selected to improve an existing article then you need to edit that existing article. There are other students in your editing the same article. Again I suggest looking over the Working live training module for instructions on frequet, small edits to improve a page. Looping in @TrainedPoliticalScientist. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda. I believe one of the students in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Wyoming/Architectural_History_(Fall_2024) named TMaese probably needs some additional guidance when it comes to uploading and using images. They upload the same file under different names to Wikipedia and Commons, and the copyright license they're using is almost certainly wrong. In addition, the way they've added images to Lehman-Tunnell Mansion is also not really how it should be done. Perhaps could discuss this stuff with them. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know @Marchjuly. I've called @TMaese's attention to the discussion to either chime in with clear evidence this is in the public domain or some other allowable license, or whether it was a beginner's mistake. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with...

Please review this page

--Ouakmc5 (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you're doing well!

For our class, we were tasked with either editing or creating a wiki page, and though I have completed all of the training, it's not letting me use my sandbox, so I've made my entire article on Google Drive so that I wouldn't be behind in the class. However, now I am unable to upload this article to the wiki. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me navigate this issue. I created a page for the Asian Pacific Environmental Network (APEN). I hope you have a great rest of your day, and I look forward to hearing from you!

All the best,

--JadynfBrayBoyce (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda,

I've had several of my students do great work on several Wikipedia articles. Can you please send the following articles for reclassification. I don't think that they should be S-class any more: Wadi el-Hudi, Umm el-Qa'ab, El Lahun, and Temple of Seti I at Abydos. Thanks.

KL 139.182.205.249 (talk) 18:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I planned to create an article on Bronzeville, the name Little Tokyo was called during a period of time during Japanese and Japanese American incarceration during WWII, focusing on the city during that time period. However, there is already an article listing several possible meanings of "Bronzeville," and "Bronzeville, Los Angeles" automatically redirects to "Little Tokyo, Los Angeles," so now I'm wondering whether there is even justification for creating a new article at all. It is quite late to change my topic, but I'm not sure how to move forward with this. Do you have any advice? StripesAreCool (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @StripesAreCool, I recently learned about Bronzeville earlier this month. Very cool that you've motivated to write about it. You pose a good question about whether to create a new article. If you have 3+ sources profiling this specific period outside and it's own culture, history, etc., then it is possible to write a new article, you would just get rid of the redirect and add the content onto the article page.

But you'd also be able to expand on the existing paragraphs on the Little Tokyo article, if that's what you want to do.

It really depends on the reliable sources you've gathered so far, and the direction you want to take as an editor. Does this make sense? Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher), hello, StripesAreCool. Thanks for considering this as a new topic to write an article about. The first thing to think about, is what the topic of your article is, and for starters, is it the term itself, like how the term Bronzeville was invented, who invented it, who used it, how it was used, and so on, or is it about "Bronzeville", the concept? I'm about 95% sure you are talking about the latter, as well you should, as articles about terms are rare and deservedly so.

So, assuming you are writing an article about "Bronzeville", the concept, how would you define that topic? In particular, what is the overlap and separation (think Venn diagram) between the concepts of "Little Tokyo" and "Bronzeville"? Are they intersecting circles in your view (i.e. are there some things that are part of "Bronzeville" that are not part of "Little Tokyo"? Or, is "Bronzeville" a subset of the concept of "Bronzeville", so that it is a little 'B' circle sitting wholly inside the larger 'A' circle about "Little Tokyo"? If the latter, then most likely you might start out by creating a new section within Little Tokyo, Los Angeles called Bronzeville.

If it is just a temporary name for something else, like "Liberty cabbage" (the word many Americans used instead of Sauerkraut during World War I) then it very likely doesn't deserve an article, as it won't have sufficient sourcing.

But swinging back to the case of a term becoming an article, in another case of a renamed vegetable during a war, there was a movement in America to rename "French fries" as "Freedom fries" during a period of anti-French sentiment during the Iraq war which took hold and gained national attention, and many news reports. There was so much reporting about this term, that the term itself became WP:Notable, which means it crossed the boundary preventing most words from ever becoming an article, and now we have the article Freedom fries, all about the word itself, and its history, and not about the vegetable.

So, you are faced with several questions: are you talking about a word Bronzeville itself that perhaps became notable as an alias (like freedom fries) or didn't (like liberty cabbage)? Are you talking about a neighborhood concept, more like Little Tokyo, but different from it somehow other than just a simple euphemistic synonym to avoid negative connotations of the main word? Once you answer those questions, you will have a better idea how to proceed. In the meantime, if you haven't read Help:Your first article, that may answer some of your questions. Mathglot (talk) 01:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda (Wiki Ed),

I'm not sure how to handle this, but for the last week and a half, I had to undo very large additions to American Gods, edits by Kent State University/HONR Freshman Honors Colloquium I (Fall 2024). Edits by SageSelios (talk · contribs), AshleyHarden13 (talk · contribs), Jordan.Gr5 (talk · contribs), and others. I completely assume good faith here, but their edits were in part WP:SYNTHy, unsourced and/or original research and used an essay-like tone. What is the best way to go about this? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda. One of the students in Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Oregon/UGST112 - Women in Science and Math Fall 2024 (Fall 2024) named Orinshriver recently uploaded File:Sibrina Collins Portrait.jpg and File:Young Sibrina Collins Working in Lab.jpg without providing any real source or copyright information, and the files have been tagged for speedy deletion per WP:F4 as a result. The files are attributed to a "Noah Stephens Photography" and "Wayne University" respectively, which most likely means they're not going to be able to kept per WP:F11 without verification of copyright holder WP:CONSENT since neither of these appear to satisfy WP:NFCC for conversion to non-free use. I'm sure the student meant well, but perhaps you could ask them to review whatever modules/materials Wiki Ed provides related to uploading images other media before uploading any more files. Mistakes like this are quite common and OK, but repeating them over and over again could lead to an administrator stepping in and issuing a more formal warning. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly, thank you for letting me know. I've reached out to the instructor and the student to let them know about this and shared the training modules on this. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Gabe Gomes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because too much peacock and he is not yet notable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with...

Entering my sandbox for the article 1996 North Carolina gubernatorial election and entering the citations that I found for it. Without going live yet, thank you for your time

Taniyah Pruitt

--Tanpwiki (talk) 20:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanpwiki, Here is a training module on drafting in the sandbox page and how to add inline citations for the project. Check them out for detailed instruction on how to draft in your sandbox page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Brianda. Two students in Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Texas Christian University/Video Game History (Fall 2024) named Cp143 and Sooner8112 respectively uploaded File:Screenshot 2024-12-03 at 1.35.05 PM.png and File:Screenshot 2024-11-21 at 12.49.51 PM.png under a {{Non-free software screenshot}} license, but neither student provided a non-free use rationale and neither file is being used in any articles. Maybe you could get in touch with these students and explain to them why the files they uploaded have been tagged for speedy deletion. There's also an issue with the file names chosen by the students per WP:FNC#2, but this can be sorted out after the above-mentioned non-free content related issues are resolved. Finally, given that this class is about "Video Game History", it might be a good idea to ask the class instructor to reminf their students to be careful when uploading non-free screenshots because they will need to meet WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly, I've reached out to the instructor and students. Image are tricky task on Wikipedia, bu thanks for letting me know about this. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda, I am instructor trying to reach one of my student editors, Scr124, to ask them to upload their talk or sandbox onto wikipedia. Another student and I wanted to add a subheading in which we summarized some of the themes the memoir addresses and cite scholarship on the memoir. It is on scr124's sandbox but this needs to get added to the Jaquira Díaz page. How to do that? How to ask scr124 to upload it? Thanks for advising: Laura Urmyotherme (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It happens too often that a student introduces an edit that strips formatting templates such as {{langx}} and {{IPA}} (example), presumably as a result of copying paragraphs on the HTML output (action=view) and pasting them onto VisualEditor. This not only inconveniences those of us who patrol, but also makes the edit less likely to survive since it makes reviewing the edit and identifying potentially admissible parts much more difficult. Copying using VisualEditor is slightly better, but it still breaks some templates and references, making copying the source the only way to get clean diffs. Can you please make sure your students are properly instructed to copy the source when copying between the main namespace and their sandboxes? Thank you. Nardog (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of these citations fall under the guidance of WP:Interview and, while may they be used for factual information, cannot be used to establish notability. Others are not independent or do not constitute significant coverage of the subject. The Sierra Club citation appears to be the most SIGCOV and independent but is about the book, and I don't see any reason this would alternatively qualify under NAUTHOR. As for WP:NPROF, this would require some of the less strictly defined criteria for the subject to meet; as an associate professor, the subject does not de facto qualify and I don't think any of these awards or positions currently listed qualify.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Emanuel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brianda (Wiki Ed)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Victor Valley Community College/CIS50 - Computer Ethics (Fall 2024)

(talk page watcher) @Sootren, Bristhekid, and Kapa.02: most of the content of this Draft is yours; anyone want to take on the task of bringing this up to a releasable state? (@Brianda: class ended 1 Dec.) Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 04:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I need help with uploading my draft. Whenever I try to submit it, it takes me to LanitaDelRey's article. Thank you

--Antiblu (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Guettarda § Javier Zamora. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brianda. Just letting you know about this as a courtesy since it might involve a student in one of courses you're advising. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Osvaldo Gutierrez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Hello.

I need help with...

--Aportz8542 (talk) 05:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As written and sourced, the article fails WP:NPROF. Reference 3 is significant secondary coverage, but all other coverage either isn't independent of the subject (the CMU, FSU pages) or is a passing mention in an article about another subject (many of the references are about the Coscientist AI that the subject developed). At least one more in-depth independent source discussing the individual is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabe Gomes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]