Older comments at User talk:Brian Kendig/Archive.

I just cc'ed you on an (apparently) stray email message. I decided to look you up, and lo and behold! another wikipedian who loves Star Trek (though it's not on my user page). My first computer was a TRS-80 Level II with 16K of RAM in 1978....

Be well, and I hope to see you around the wiki!

BCorr|Брайен 16:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits since there were four survivors: two walked down for help, and two survived in the snowcave. Actually there were additional students who turned back early in the hike, but since they weren't part of the ordeal, they don't count as "survivors" even though they still live. —EncMstr (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brian Kendig! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Bolo Yeung - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion because it does nothing but promote some entity or product and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brain

There seems to be something wrong with article milestones listed at the top Talk:Windows XP. Some of the dates do not match. I tried to pin the problem and edit it out, but I am unable to do so, because of my lack of experience. I feel there is one or two items missing to which you can find links from review pages; but I can't figure out what is wrong and what is right.

Perhaps you can help verify and rematch dates. Fleet Command (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll try my best to give you a few examples.

Item #5 from the top reads:

December 21, 2005 - Featured article review - Kept

Which points to this: Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Windows XP. It starts on 7 May 2006 and ends on 18 May 2006! What happened to 2005?

Now, this item is not amongst milestones: Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Windows XP/archive1? It start 3 December and ends 15 December. What happened to 21 December?

None of these two items are closed. Are they still pending?

Another example: Check third item from the top. It is Wikipedia:Peer review/Windows XP/archive1. The only entry in it is 10 September 2004 which has nothing to do with 29 January 2005!

You see? Dates do not match and items are not archived. I am officially confused, but I think you have a fairly good idea what is going on. Fleet Command (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and please check other items too. Gotta rush now; have an exam. If you replied, I may read it in two days. Fleet Command (talk) 11:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at the milestones; you're right that the 2005 "Kept" appears to link to a 2006 review and not to the review that took place in December 2005. The other dates may also be bad links. You're welcome to be bold and correct that milestones section; I recommend you have a look at some other articles with several milestones to see which events are considered milestones and which aren't. - Brian Kendig (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to continue our discussion regarding external links with an example. You seem to harden your stance in the e-mail you wrote me with regards to external links compared to your statement on Wikipedia.

Official website

Quotations related to The Simpsons at Wikiquote
Media related to The Simpsons at Wikimedia Commons

The Simpsons at the Internet Movie Database The Simpsons at TV.com The Simpsons Archive The Simpsons at the Encyclopedia of Television

Above are the external links for the Simpsons Wikipedia article, based on your comments only the first link to the official website is valid. I find this unusual because many movie and TV pages have links to IMDB and TV.com. The Simpsons Archive and the Encyclopedia of Television however seem to fall in your earlier (but changed?) comments regarding external links that provide additional information. I would say that just because the words archive or encyclopedia are attached to a site doesn't mean it's not a fan site. Shouldn't a small number of exceptions be made for sites that contain detailed information in the hopes that articles for every little niche/cult topic don't become excessively large and perhaps even for the sake of users who wish to find information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitigating (talk • contribs) 17:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brian Kendig, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faux Pas (webcomic) whether the article Faux Pas (webcomic) should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Faux Pas (webcomic), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! MikeWazowski (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brian Kendig,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brian Kendig,

You recently received either an AfD or PROD notification, as part of a template testing experiment. If you could go to this talkpage and leave us some feedback about the new version of the templates we tested, that would be very useful. We're specifically looking for info about whether the messages were more effective at communicating how authors of articles should participate in deletion processes. You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want. Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Disneys-contemporary-resort-mosaic-closeup.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brian,

I'm wondering if you happen to have the protocol information that you removed from the ImagiNation Network Talk page - I'm doing a write-up and would like to be able to see if it would be useful.

Thank you in advance!

24.160.105.178 (talk) 04:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about Talk:ImagiNation Network, on that talk page itself I had pasted the section that I'd removed from the article. Look below my comment there. - Brian Kendig (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert Hess (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the way you've managed this Brian Kendig. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brian Kendig.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kamehameha Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"I have not seen the term applied to an actual group of people whose members, activities, and goals can be discussed" they has been a group of them around since 2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alt-left#The_Alt-Left_already_existed_prior_to_reinvention https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alt-left#irl_altleft_movement https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/proposal-for-an-alternative-left/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeLeft/ https://www.facebook.com/alternativeleft/ https://altleftjournal.wordpress.com/ http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.co.il/2016/09/a-proposal-for-alt-left-political.html https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/10/26/liberal-race-realism-precursor-to-the-alt-left/ http://altleft.com/2015/11/14/a-clockwork-greenshirt-introducing-the-alt-left/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151119073815/http://altleft.com 110.141.68.184 (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of conjecture as to what the alt-left may be and proposals for what it could stand for; but, as I said, I don't see anything specific about its members, its activities, and its goals. Unless you could be more specific? - Brian Kendig (talk) 01:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jasmine Becket-Griffith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable§

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui ^雲_水 14:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anton.Bersh, I nominated GitHub Atom (which just redirects to Atom (text editor)) for deletion because no one really uses this name and no one visits this redirect page, nothing links to it.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on GitHub Atom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anton.bersh (talk) 23:13, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Conrad the Cat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Just a list of media appearances.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donkey Hodie (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Vogel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work reverting vandalism on Pinkalicious & Peterrific and Donkey Hodie (TV series). I'm pretty sure the IP (173.76.176.66) who did that vandalism is the same editor as an IP range that was banned for vandalizing the same articles in the same fashion (see this log). Wizzito (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also found an IP making similar edits: 2600:1000:B064:7921:6525:66BC:DADE:E0CD Wizzito (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the closure of Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York#Requested move 31 May 2024, I suggest that you should have applied WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE or just left it open for someone else to close (perhaps with a relisting). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I did consider invoking NOTCURRENTTITLE and picking another of the ones mentioned; but there were so many variations, and there have been so many recent successful and unsuccessful move requests of Trump-related articles, that I decided to leave it up to another RM instead of summarily picking an option. I didn't feel right choosing a name which had only been mentioned in a few comments, though I suppose NOTCURRENTTITLE allowed me that, and I did like your "Trial of Donald Trump for falsification of business records" and the variations of it. - Brian Kendig (talk) 01:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After further thinking, perhaps your approach was best – it clears the air a bit and should help focus the further discussion. As you may have noticed, I opened another RM. There have only been a couple of responses so far, and I find that somewhat surprising. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's kind of you to say, and that's what I was going for. I will come comment on your RM; thank you for opening it! - Brian Kendig (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you withdrew your requested move. I can understand why, and I'm also surprised at the responses during the time it was open. I'll keep an eye on that article; eventually someone will find a title that fits it better - Brian Kendig (talk) 21:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Robotics conventions, which still pending a rename, I modified it by removing the current (unclear) intro, removing the first heading so it becomes the intro, and editing the new intro to be more useful as an intro. I hope this change makes it more useful. RJFJR (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]