Hi Boyohboy231! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mario Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mario Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 08:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We Never Learn (manga), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to We Never Learn (manga) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Farix (t | c) 02:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creatures (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Blade Runner Black Out 2022 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from IG Port into Signal.MD. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Broadwaygenius. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Nintendo development teams without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Broadwaygenius (talk) 06:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nintendo instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Just part of the bigger company. Does nkt beed its own page

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mario Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mario Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supermarioparty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Splatoon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 16:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Nintendo development teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Splatoon series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Izno (talk) 02:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BoyohBoy, I’m NintendoMario456 from the List of Nintendo Products page. I would like to ask you why you think Go Vacation is a first party title. Thanks for the feedback! NintendoMario456 (talk) 21:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NintendoMario456, because Nintendo is publishing it on the west and Nintendo have the copyright of the game along Bandai Namco.

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Furukawapresident.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tokyorpgfactory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tookyogames.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tookyogamess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Mr. Osomatsu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 00:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satelight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C2C (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shinya Takahashi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fluidity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shinyatakahashi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SUNRISEBEYOND.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hitmanmanga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Bandoribll.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Anime and Manga Barnstar Thanks for creating and editing anime and manga related articles. Masum Reza📞 18:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Luigimansion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nintendo mobile games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daemon X Machina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvelous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you're adding new entries to the list, you need to provide a reliable source showing that it is indeed a franchise and that it is owned by Bandai Namco - in the case of Sword Art Online, you'll need to find sources that validate it being a BN game series. You also don't need to undo *all of my edits* to add it back, as it will just undo all of my work beforehand. Thanks. Also please stop removing the header entries from the Bandai Namco template. Namcokid47 (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Daemonxmachina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sumetal1nak.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moametal2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Babymetal2.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Kusuriya no Hitorigoto.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the book series "Kusuriya no Hitorigoto".

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Babymetal2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moametal2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sumetal1nak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Startwinkle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Twin Engine (company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. Currently there is only a single secondary source (interviews are considered primary). It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Studiocolorido.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Twinengine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Twin Engine (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sionk (talk) 10:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deca-Dence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dwango (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per consensus, this template should only include series articles as it is meant to aide readers in navigating to these types of articles, as opposed to it being intended to list Nintendo series. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, apologies for misunderstanding - I was mistaken about Xenoblade Chronicles and thought it was an article about the game. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 20:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Marvelultimatenintendo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nanabun no nijuni.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:14, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231,

Thanks for creating Sunrise Beyond! I edit here too, under the username Atsme and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This article is dependent on press releases published by a single source (Anime News Network), which may result in it being redirected to Bandai Namco Holdings.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atsme}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

^Atsme _Talk 📧 03:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Atsme and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sunrise Beyond should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunrise Beyond .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atsme}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

^Atsme _Talk 📧 12:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense. Why this should be deleted when it has plenty of sources to what I posted? It's also no different than other animation studio articles which have most if not all of the sources linked to Anime News Network, which is where the majority of the sources from anime are. Boyohboy231 (talk)

It's a new company and it's part of an established company so it really should be redirected until it earns its own notability. Notability is not inherited, and WP is not a marketing firm or promotional agency for start-ups. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 15:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cloverworks, ENGI, Geno Studio and other studios were also new but normally accepted. I don't see what problem is to have the page for the studio to show to readers researching about it and to complete information on wikipedia. Boyohboy231 (talk)

Hey, there, I saw your edit summary at 22/7 (group) listed at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=22/7_(group)&oldid=912232747 and I wouldn't advise putting that as an edit summary in the near future. Thanks! lullabying (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sunrisebeyond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Famitsu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bandainamcoarts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wandering Witch: The Journey of Elaina, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kindle and Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231. Thank you for the edit you made at the page Super Mario 3D Land. Unfortunately, the added content is not stated in the main body of the article, nor was there a reliable source attached to the added content. Since this fails verifiability, I have reverted your edit. If you want to re-add your content, please include a source to back up the edit. If you want to learn more about verifiability, please see WP:V. Thank you. Stefvanschie (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to HAL Laboratory, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mario Club, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satoshi Tajiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mario Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 22/7 (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited H.a.n.d., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 22/7 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Original net animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Goprincess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nintendo Entertainment Planning & Development, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kirby and Arms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ultraplus200.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electronic Arts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Way Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dragon Quest media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mariokarttour.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding Peter Fabiano in the infobox of the Resident Evil 3 remake article, the template documentation says if three or more people are credited as producer, then we should only include the producer who played the most significant role in the game's development. Fabiano is one of 5 producers on the game and Masachika Kawata is credited as Chief Producer making him the lead and the producer who played the most significant role. So stop adding Fabiano back, Thanks. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you've been putting "design" instead of "designer" in Infobox video game. This is an invalid parameter which causes the page to be added to a maintenance category. I've been fixing them to "designer" but letting you know. -- ferret (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't set image_size in the infobox, unless there's an issue with normal display of the image. image_size will override the user's preference for thumbnail sizes and should generally be avoided. Note also that the caption parameter is just "caption", not "image_caption". -- ferret (talk) 22:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shonenjumpplus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kensuke Tanabe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Video game director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StudioBind.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nintendo mobile games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Square Enix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just Cause.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manga Plus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burn the Witch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He isn't credited at all in that game, as far as I know. --PaperSplash (talk) 22:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to ZeniMax Media, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 23:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of best-selling Nintendo Switch video games, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've been here more than long enough to understand that reliable sourcing is not optional. -- ferret (talk) 00:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Watchdogslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Given the amount of reverts going on at Bandai Namco Holdings over what way to write its corporate structure, I thought I'd let it boil down into a discussion instead of a potential edit war. I'm rather upset you chose to revert all of my edits to the page, replacing paragraphs discussing its subsidiaries/divisions and instead replacing it with a pretty ugly, inappropriately-designed list of companies with no rhyme or reason. I legitimately do not understand your decision here. You seem very knowledgeable on the structure of Bandai Namco like myself, but I don't like the way you've been trying to structure this page. Articles such as Sega (a recent FA) talk about its corporate structure and subsidiaries, but they're well-written, properly-sourced paragraphs and not just long lists of random companies that don't actually explain their operations and leave the reader confused as to what they are (especially since most don't have their own pages). Namcokid47 00:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CygamesPictures.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eggfirm344.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gainakinos.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Graphinica.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SignalMD333.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sciencesaru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DeNA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 22/7.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Through every one of the many encounters with your editing that I've come across, I've seen only two instances of even attempting to cite sources. Please familiarize yourself with WP:V to understand the basic policy on what constitutes a verifiable source, refer to WP:RS as a guideline, and go to the WP:VG/S for general reference of what editors in the project have agreed to be reliable or not on basis of policy and precedent where video game content is concerned. If you still don't know how to properly make inline citations or use the syntax, refer to WP:CITE and the various templates that streamline the process.

All content in a page must be sourced. There's no excuse for edits that add claims without valid citations and the fact that you've attempted to add sources in at least two instances in the past that I know of and have been warned on a section above about this about the same problem shifts this from a matter of lacking an understanding of the requirement to one of willful negligence and disregard for policy. If that weren't enough, this becomes an even more serious problem in the context of biographical content as seen on the Toshihiro Nagoshi page. Editing pages with biographical content puts forth a note above the edit window explicitly and clearly outlining the biographical nature of the article and the obligation of the user to adhere to WP:BLP policies. This was explained in both the talk page of the article as well as the edit summaries alongside a clear warning of the potential consequences that come with it. Despite that, you ignored those things completely and still chose to revert the page simply because other WP:BLP relevant pages also break policy: something you heavily contribute to with your edits.

There's also the matter of consensus, which you don't seem to recognize or abide by when it comes to resolutions and conflicts. More information on this matter can be found on WP:CON.

In summary, there is no excuse for not sourcing claims, completely ignoring policy, and disregarding issues raised in talk pages or consensus established in terms of them. Make the effort to understand the policies, apply them, and abide by them. Fact Scanner (talk) 15:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 1TWO3Writer. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ui Shigure appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Shigure is a mangaka - she created the manga かんきつパンチ! She is also definitely a light novel character designer due to her work in Osamake. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Teamasobiteam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need help in my PUBG account pls Ig.bella07 (talk) 08:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. I need you to start following WP:BRD - most notably the talk page discussion part. You've implemented your edit three times now, and haven't said a word on the talk page.
2. I need you to start making edits according to what reliable sources say, not just this "look at the game" type stuff.

The amount of edits you've made while disregarding BRD or WP:V is unacceptable. I know I've warned you about this in the past too. Cut it out and start following protocol. I've started a talk page discussion on your behalf, so start there. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 11:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that a year is passed, and these situations are still happening, where you make changes repeatedly without a source or without a reliable source. This sort of behavior is disruptive. You clearly have been editing for some time now. If you're going to be here, start learning how to do things the right way before you get your account blocked for repeatedly doing it the wrong way. Sergecross73 msg me 21:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bandai Namco video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natsume.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Carpimaps. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pokémon (video game series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carpimaps (talk) 13:42, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Witchyprecu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creatures (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Efootbalf2p.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vroom in the Night Sky, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Your additions to Super Mario Bros. Wonder are extremely sloppy and riddled with errors. If you're not interested in cleaning up your own work, then post it on the article talk page for other articles to review and add. This is a a popular, high traffic article and all your errors and info without a source is simply unacceptable. Stop it ir you'll end up blocked from editing the article. Sergecross73 msg me 11:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take your most recent edit for example: "Takashi Tezuka is back again at a 2D Mario title as a producer like he has been since New Super Mario Bros., while Shiro Mouri, who previously directed New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe, is directing Super Mario Bros. Wonder at his debut in a directional role in a complete new game." This is written like a blurb in marketing materials, not like an encyclopedic article. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop unnecessarily adding WP:PIPE links too. You should never be writing things like [[Super Mario 64|''Super Mario 64'']] Just type ''[[Super Mario 64]]'' It does the same thing but doesnt clutter the article with unnecessary text. You only need to use PIPED links if, for whatever reason, you want text different from its name to show up in the article. Not for things like italics. Sergecross73 msg me 03:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing this. Is there something you don't understand? Sergecross73 msg me 22:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing Weekly Shōnen Jump based on leaks. While the leaks often end up being accurate, that does not mean that you should edit the article to reflect them. Please wait for the magazine to actually release. Link20XX (talk) 01:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wariowaregetit.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wariowaremove.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetsuya Nomura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parasite Eve.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've received enough warnings on this - add unsourced content to Wikipedia again, and your account will be temporarily blocked from editing. You simply cannot keep ignoring this core aspect of Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me 19:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what are you even talking about? Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if youre talking about mario wonder, I just put what is literally on the reviews SOURCED in the own article on opencritic. I used the general impression it got, do you prefer if I simply copy and paste it instead of using my own words to give the general idea? Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You made this edit.

• You didn't add a source.
• You didn't even provide any attribution for what you were getting this information.
• There is zero commentary present in the article about "level design, art direction, soundtrack and general creativity"

In short, there's simply zero indication this information came from any source. You need to add wording that explains where sentiments are coming from, and inline citations to show that you're following WP:V.

You should probably read up on WP:LEAD too, as your edit goes against that as well, but that's a smaller issue. The issue I'm concerned about is how many times you've received warnings on this talk page for making unsourced edits and you still haven't fixed this. Sergecross73 msg me 20:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'

Can you create a page for PUBG Global Championship. like this https://liquipedia.net/pubg/PUBG_Global_Championship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:56A0:8A3:43A:EF58:2328:DBC9:197A (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bezel Engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bezel Engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sparkl^talk 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bezelengine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boyohboy231. Thank you for your work on Masayoshi Yokoyama. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Naoki Hamaguchi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your absolute final warning - do not add/change content on Wikipedia without adding/updating a reliable source that verifies the change. I've warned you many times throughout the years. If it happens again, your account will receive a temporary block from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 16:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I added is literally on the credits, the only sourcce you'll have is a youtube video Boyohboy231 (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find a source for it, do no add it to Wikipedia, its as simple as that. Also be aware of WP:YOUTUBE. Do not violate our sourcing policy again or you're blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 17:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so if i want to add staff or companies involved that appear in the credits i need to go to somehow find a reputable website, tell them the content, somehow make them accept such a request, copy and paste the website and post in here instead of just posting a youtube video showing the credits of the game. bit complicated to make things complete in the pages if thats the case and something that most of the game pages don't even seem to enforce as staff and additional developers are barely if ever sourced.. Boyohboy231 (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Video game websites routinely report on game development staff/companies, so I have no idea why you're framing this as some sort of difficult task. Just use sources deemed okay at WP:VG/S and make sure you follow WP:YOUTUBE, and, most importantly, WP:V. Sergecross73 msg me 17:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

they do not, thats the thing. Monolith is the only one reported for totk on websites because its a known lead developer but other companies from nintendo who were involved have been credited and they dont get it. looking at the credits, its there, but no one care about support studios to make articles about them. Only thing im doing is adding info and the only way to do that is by sourcing youtube videos showing credits of said games. and once again, not sure if you look into everything, but as someone who look into the game pages, i never see any source for additional devs or staff most of the time, most people seem to open yt after the game is out or leak, and put what they see on credits in there so thats why it seems strange to me Boyohboy231 (talk) 17:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've continued to violate this even as we actively discuss it, so you're blocked for 3 days. Please take the time to learn how to properly contribute to Wikipedia in the meantime. You've got literal years worth of warnings to review. Sergecross73 msg me 17:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean.. this just means im violating by putting back and correcting something that I literally removed before months ago after i noticed it was wrong by.. verifying the credits again...

once again, i wonder where these sources for staff and additional developers are because I never see them so it seems 95% of the game pages at least dont have this enforced in the way youre saying to me. Are you the only one who enforces it in that way? because that doesn't make sense with how things are out there in most of the pages regarding this subject, honestly. Boyohboy231 (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with the phrase "two wrongs don't make a right"? You observing other people doing it wrong doesn't make it okay for you to do it wrong. And to continue to do it literally before, during, and after I was warning you about it? Come on.

When your block expires, follow WP:V, or your account will continued to receive blocks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i mean.. im pointing out because i dont see that being corrected or changed. Im just trying to understand how this is a thing while most pages out there dont seem to enforce that with most not having sources given for staff and additional developers. Boyohboy231 (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult to address such a vague, generalized statement, but generally speaking if dev teams/members are not sourced in the infobox, they need to be sourced in the development section. Perhaps you're not checking both places for sources. Or if there's are no sources present, then you're observing things being done the wrong way, and that should be fixed, not emulated.

Regardless, video game editors generally don't have a problem with this, so I'd spend less time dwelling on this, and more time on changing the way you edit so that you're compliant with WP:RS and WP:V. Sergecross73 msg me 19:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, here's some of the most nintendo games to give examples: Detective Pikachu Returns, Super Mario Bros. Wonder (has two credits for staff, while a good part came from youtube), WarioWare: Move It!, Super Mario RPG. None of those have sources in the page for the staff in there, clearly showing that its picked from youtube and put in there, without even youtube as credit, nothing. this can be seen in hundreds and hundreds if not more all over wikipedia, not just nintendo. staff and additional studios in most cases are out there normally without any problem, thats why this confuses me. It feels like very few people enforce this rule if so many of this isnt changed. Boyohboy231 (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "you're finding examples of it done wrong and not examples of it done right" do you not understand? No amount of errors you find will validate your approach. Feel free to report others who are adding unsourced content to Wikipedia. I'll gladly warn or block anyone else doing it wrong repeatedly even after they've been informed too. But that, and either adding sources or removing unsourced info, is all that needs to be done here. Sergecross73 msg me 23:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bushiroad has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ミラP@Miraclepine 06:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what edit to bushiroad? last time i edited this page was years ago. I dont even know what youre talking about.. Boyohboy231 (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was copied from https://en.bushiroad.com/company/ and https://animenewsnetwork.com/press-release/2017-03-16/bushiroad-unveils-plans-for-2017-at-the-gama-trade-show/.113510. Also, we handle year-old copyvios the same way we do recent ones. ミラP@Miraclepine 18:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your edit was years ago. Your edit was also a copyright violation. You must not insert copyrighted text into Wikipedia. Write in your own words. -- Whpq (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, help me understand. After coming off of a week long block for unsourced editing, you make this edit? What am I missing? Because it sure looks like you returned right back to adding unsourced content again. Sergecross73 msg me 14:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you looked at the history of the page you'll see everyone is the same whenever new series are added. The source is the website and its already sourced since the beginning. Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What source? What website? The entire section looks to be unsourced. Sergecross73 msg me 16:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the website for the magazine, for gods sake lol Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that entire section which btw i didnt built as im just one of the contributors, but it is yet again another example of what i said before on how in wikipedia things are added in the pages by the users without source as its easily verifiable. In the entertainment side of wikipedia at the very least, while a lot is sourced, other things aren't most of the time. Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I've already told you that's not acceptable. You're re-blocked for 2 weeks. When you return, always add sources when you add/change content, or these blocks will keep happening. Sergecross73 msg me 16:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source IS IN THERE, its the website of the magazine. Stop stalking me to sections of this website you don't even understand dude, holy moly. Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been completely obsessed with me for god knows what reason to the point that you don't even understand how that page is structured and to the point that you basically ignore everyone else in that who literaly do the same thing. Insane behavior. Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah and its so clear you don't even know what you're talking about in relation to that page that you didn't even remove what I added, showing your lack of knowledge in the subject and just the insistence of this behavior while the very literal source is IN the page with the shonen jump plus website where you can find the new series in there. Boyohboy231 (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's insane is that you've been warned about this up and down your talk page for years, and have ignored it. And now all of a sudden you're shocked you're getting blocked for it? And after that first block expired you return to the exact same thing again?

You need to get up to speed here. Follow WP:V. Add reliable sources. If you need help with that, read up on WP:REFB. It's not enough to just yell out "it's on their website, check it". Sergecross73 msg me 17:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro, you cant even verify this for yourself. How can you block me over a thing you don't even know anything about? why didn't you change anything back then? its clearly something completely outside of your area lmao the thing is available in there, the source is https://shonenjumpplus.com/, its already in there. Why dont you go to everyone who edited that page and block them too, huh? or give them warnings? or is it just with me that you will be obsessed with while ignoring everyone else doing the same thing? if this isnt a bizarre behavior idk what it is, because you are'nt even doing this to others in that same page. Boyohboy231 (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm struggling to see why you feel singled out here. I routinely block or page protect in response to editors not using sources. I'm currently on my 33rd subsection of responding to editors reporting misconduct to me. One of the most common reasons for taking action is unsourced editing. This is not a rare situation at all. The only rare part is that you've avoided blocks for so long. It looks like you've received a warning for unsourced editing literally at least once a year since 2018, most years more than once. I can't comprehend how you have such a blind spot for that. You've been given more chances than most, and have still refused to change. Sergecross73 msg me 17:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean... the fact that you blocked me over this editing on that page and you didnt do anything to everyone else who edted the same page and didnt put sources either is what bothers me. No one else got blocked, warned or anything.. Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like who though? I asked you a week ago, and told you I'd warn/block them too. You never followed up.

Regardless, it feels like we're talking circles here. Feel free to post an WP:UNBLOCK request if you'd like another Admin to review your block. But all this finger pointing isn't going to help your case. Sergecross73 msg me 18:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean.. literally everyone who edited the page that you blocked me and didn't add any source? the history of the page i there to look at. Much like in other pages, it feels like im the only one who have to add sources for every edit I do, even though some don't exactly need it. as someone who edit and have many pages in a watchlist, i see how many add stuff without sources, and it doesn't feel like they are blocked or have any problem.

btw since you want the source, this is the source for the new series I added: https://www.shonenjump.com/p/sp/shinrensai_2024/03/

you know why I didn't add it? because literally no one else did for any other series either. like i said many times, this behavior is all over wikipedia and dont seem like most admin do much against it, if anything,it feels like you are one of the only ones who make it a must to add sources to every single edit. Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how do you reconcile this stance with WP:V? Sergecross73 msg me 19:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know man, im merely saying that you seem to be the only one being this strict about this while everyone else isnt, to the point this is reflected in almost every page related to games and anime/manga Boyohboy231 (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the years of warnings from a variety of editors? What's your takeaway on that? Sergecross73 msg me 22:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

just 3 examples of the same thing happening in wikipedia from pages i follow without any source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Nintendo_products&action=history

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Good-Feel&action=history

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princess_Peach:_Showtime!&action=history

they put the development company without source. we know who it is due to datamine, but theres no source, and still is there and no one would change even without source. just an example on how things are done out there since you ask. Boyohboy231 (talk) 07:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. None of those articles are on my watchlist, so I did not notice them. I have reverted them and left some talk page warnings. Sergecross73 msg me 15:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in any case here it is the source if you want to update it back

https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/yoshi-studio-is-reportedly-behind-princess-peach-showtime/ Boyohboy231 (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so.. you removed the developer again.. if we can't use the credits as source and nintendo isnt going to confirm it until the credits are out, how do you expect for the development company to be put in here if you dont even want to put the datamines that prove this and are out there on articles? its been really hard to edit like this. lmao Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

theres 2 ways to do it, one via websites another via credits of the own game but.. neither of those you accept. Its kind of frustrating and im not even the one who edited that one.. the game will be out and credits will be on youtube but that cant be credited even though the entire staff is seen in there, which is another issue as every game has staff put in it but none of them have sources and if the source is youtube it cant happen (even though the entire game section has staff without source for it, clearly done with just looking into youtube for credits). Boyohboy231 (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Read your own source. It says a random dataminer on the internet made the observatation that a demo "uses a naming convention associated with Japanese studio Good-Feel". That falls quite a ways short of "proving" or "confirming" they're the developer. Between that, and Nintendo's refusal to confirm, and it should be pretty simple to see why it should not be stated as simple fact.
2. Follow WP:V. Use inline citationss. Learn how at WP:REFB. Don't violate WP:YOUTUBE. Examples of usable/unusable sources can be found at WP:VG/S. I cannot break it down any simpler for you. If this is too hard for you, you need to go find some fan wikia with more lax rules or something. If you can't follow these simple rules, your account will just keep getting blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 17:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   I understand everything you say. Im just saying that this doesn't seem to be applied in wikipedia for the game section in the staff tab that never has sources and clearly is just the staff picked from the credits on youtube. If you are doing your job as adm for this matter, it doesnt seem like others are doing at least in the same way and are actually being more lax. Boyohboy231 (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor made this report to me, which is correct, it appears many parts of your edits at that page are indeed not supported by sources. As promised, you are blocked again. 1 month this time, will be indefinite next time. Sergecross73 msg me 11:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I created and maintained that page for years. Second of all, I literally sourced everything I said and it's in there in japanese. Fuck you you pathetic fucker Boyohboy231 (talk) 00:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do a terrible job and have been doing it for ages already, leave all of that shit to you, you piece of garbage. Fuck you and all of your bullshit and obsession with doing things exactly your way. Throw all of this into your ass, tired of your bullshit already. Boyohboy231 (talk) 01:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  -- ferret (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Worldendclub.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pubgbattlegrounds.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Studiocolorido.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]