Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Ezra Cricket (talk) 00:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sunriseshore (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)". (This line will disappear when you save this edit.)}}[reply]

There is no discussion. Please ping me again if you took me to the ANI. Borsoka (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you check this? Talk:Budapest#Climate I think it is fringe that Hungary is "subtropical" OrionNimrod (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

):):):) Ez q..va jó! Yes, it is obviously fringe. Borsoka (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you join to the conversation? OrionNimrod (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. Climate is not my subject of interest. Borsoka (talk) 01:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Theodore II Laskaris, "about a young Emperor of Nicaea (the most powerful successor state of the Byzantine Empire) who wrote several treatises about theological, historical and philosophical themes. He preferred the company of low born intellectuals which led to conflicts with the Nicaean aristocracy. He expanded the territory of his empire but died young due to a chronic illness, likely cancer. His Great Supplicatory Canon to Our Lady is still sung in Orthodox ceremonies"! - I have a composer on the same page - sadly because he died - who composed music for the Orthodox church, Romuald Twardowski. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Peer review

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now spent a good bit of time reading and researching the Middle Ages - my weakest area of knowledge - and I see there has been a paradigm shift in the scholarship. I had no idea. I see now that everything I referenced was from the old view. You tried to tell me. I couldn't see how you could possibly be correct, but you were. I apologize for being such a pain. Thank you for persevering. It is due to your persistence that the article will be better in the end. So thank you. You were right. I was wrong, and I handled it badly. I apologize. Jenhawk777 (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to apologize. I am glad the article can be improved now. Borsoka (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should now offer the perfect response of arguing with you about needing to apologize for arguing with you ... Or maybe not. I am learning more than I ever wanted to know about the Middle Ages. This article has been a bear, and I think I'm losing the fight. I doubt it will ever get to FA, but at least I will know after this that it is accurate. I thank you for that. Jenhawk777 (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP is not about fights and losing them. We all are continuously learning when editing. I am sure the article can reach the level of FA, and you can contribute to it. Borsoka (talk) 09:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have addressed every issue raised in the peer review. I would love for you to take a look. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you start a GA discussion regarding Haile Selassie I? Its odd the page has thousands of views a day yet for over a month no discussion regarding it started? I saw that you are discussing Charlemagne which has only been nominated less than 12 days ago, while the Haile Selassie article a month, i would like this process to be quicker since again the page has [1] thousands of views a day on average.

Note: i was the nominator of the article, so i can't start a discussion by my own to make it a good article, you as a third party should review the article with some others on if the article meets the criteria. It is a simple invitation! CtasACT (talk) 02:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but my knowledge of him is extremly limited. Borsoka (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, is there any other Wikipedia's interested? Because i am not willing to wait for an article that gets 3,000 views an average and sometimes 9,000 or more in a day to be premises yet no one is willing as i am aware of to even discuss it. Thank you anyways for you open mindness! CtasACT (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sultanate of Rum on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to sound like an idiot - ever really - but I am wondering if you can define for me the bias you saw in History of Christianity. I took it to mean an anti-Christian bias because of all the mentions of corruption. I ask partly because I think the others understood it differently, and partly because I can't be sure it's fixed if I am incorrect about what it was. The peer review is still open. As I said above, I did as you asked and added more "History of..." sources. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can only share some thoughts on the article. I think that it is still mainly based on sources specialised on specific aspects of the history of Christianity, so it can hardly reflect academic consensus on the subject. Its sources could be decimated. After a short review, I found that at least some references to Collinson are obviously wrong: his chapter starts on page 233 in The Oxford Illustrated History of Christianity. The article concentrates on Western Christianity, making only general statements about other branches. (I know we can find statements about the history of the Byzantine and Russian states but it is about the state, not about the church.) The article's structure could also be improved, for instance the section about papal supremacy follows the sections about the Investiture Controversy and the Crusades. I already suggested that a GAR could significantly contribute to the improvement of the article. Borsoka (talk) 03:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I am so grateful. I will incorporate your suggestions. The article already has GA, so I don't know how to go about getting a second one, but I will see what I can find out. Thank you again, genuinely. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, that reference should be Colin Morris not Collinson. Thank you for catching that. I did add four new "History of C" sources as you suggested: A Short History of C. by Blainey, The Oxford Illustrated History, A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity by Dowley, and A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by MacCulloch, which I was told still represents the standard. Do these not represent consensus?

I can't find any precedent for getting a second GA. Can you help with that? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link above leads to the page adding detailed instructions. It is not a second GA, it is a reassessment. Borsoka (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I did as you asked. Jenhawk777 (talk) 07:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like let you know about this: [1] OrionNimrod (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for it. Borsoka (talk) 01:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems this started here [2] It is strange that how people have so deep wikipedia knowledge to find a such old ANI report, probably that info was spread by the blocked user who did that report to incite Romanian people against Hungarian editors. The outside article pretend the blocked editor is "admin" because that report is on the admin board. OrionNimrod (talk) 12:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Systematic distortion of historical articles. Thank you. ASmallMapleLeaf (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Middle Ages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Schism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Borsoka. Thank you for your work on Lieutenancy Council. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 08:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel–Hamas war on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to rewrite Antioch for WP:TCC (have made a start on it here). I'm good on sourcing for the ancient periods, but I was wondering if you, fresh from bringing Raynald of Châtillon to FA-adjacent status, might recommend any in-depth treatments of Antioch as a crusader state? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice topic! The history of the principality during the 12th century is best covered by Buck's work (Buck, Andrew D. (2017). The Principality of Antioch and Its Frontiers in the Twelfth Century. The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-7832-7173-3.). For the 12th century, I would still use the relevant chapters from the second volume of A History of the Crusades (Setton, Kenneth M.; Wolff, Robert Lee; Hazard, Harry, eds. (1969) [1962]. The Later Crusades, 1189–1311. A History of the Crusades. Vol. II (Second ed.). The University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-04844-0.). Borsoka (talk) 04:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Superb. Thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any opinions on Asbridge, Thomas (2000). The Creation of the Principality of Antioch, 1098-1130. ISBN 978-0-8511-5661-3.? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is an excellent source, but I think it is too specialised for an article about the city of Antioch. Borsoka (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you should review your other articles. Blatant plagiarism may cost your editing privileges. Borsoka (talk) 10:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Borsoka, hope you are well. I had some huge RL changes that impacted my ability to edit, right in the middle of the Charlemagne GA. Sorry for leaving you hanging. Thank you for the extensive work you did reviewing the article and making substantive improvements. It's a much better article for it. Thank you also for working with me as an inexperienced editor in the GA process, especially with such a large article. When I have some time free up, I will probably do another run at it but I'm proud of how far the article has come and again want to thank you for your contributions. Seltaeb Eht (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I enjoyed reviewing the article, and I hope you will renominate it. I think it needs only minor changes to be promoted (for instance, pictures could be improved :) ). Borsoka (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a fun and challenging article to work on as well - amazing how much I only thought I knew about the subject. Some of it from reading previous versions of the article!

I did see your note in the review page re:images. If you'd like to share any specific recommendations, I'm all ears. I'll take a closer look at copyright tags and overillustraion as you noted. Cheers. Seltaeb Eht (talk) 16:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seltaeb Eht: sorry for the delay, but I missed your message. There are 18 pictures (in addition to the map) in the article. I think most Romantic pictures could be removed, and we do not need at least 5 pictures about Charlemagne's imperial coronation. Borsoka (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arab citizens of Israel on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Borsoka! The article you nominated, Raynald of Châtillon, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

Congratulations to the FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Black War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Borsoka, and how are you doing. I was thinking if you can take a look at this FC. Even if you don't have time now, feel free to pass by when you are free. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know that you’re not allowed to change what you wrote in a discussion after someone has replied to it, per WP:REDACTED. Thus, you must fix it accordingly in the manner in which is described in WP:REDACTED. Raulois (talk) 08:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. Borsoka (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you be so kind as to take a look at the "Ilaria Salis" article? User Polygnotus is convinced that she was beating neo nazis during her tour - which is degradating from some of the victim's perspective. I just wrote: nine persons, and referenced the The Guardian and the Euronews as source - User Polygnotus deleted them. 84.206.11.96 (talk) 06:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a misrepresentation of what happened. Polygnotus (talk) 06:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sources specified: neonazis AND thos WHOM SHE REGARDS NEONAZIS:

Prosecutors allege that Salis travelled to Budapest specifically to carry out attacks against “unsuspecting victims identified as, or PERCEIVED as, far-right sympathisers” to deter “representatives of the far-right movement - The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/24/italian-anti-fascist-goes-on-trial-in-hungary-accused-of-attacking-neo-nazis

Salis is accused of attempted murder for allegedly being part of a group of anti-fascists that attacked people they BELIEVED were associated with the far-right event.www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/06/10/italian-activist-ilaria-salis-to-be-released-following-her-election-as-an-mep

and you deleted the source for the three Polish nationals, and deleted the video of her attack: https://magyarnemzet.hu/english/2024/02/incensed-italian-press-ignores-bloody-far-left-manhunt

What is your problem? You deleted other sourced infos too, that see owes 90 000 Euros to a house owner, etc.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.206.11.96 (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are now spamming this stuff on the talkpages of those you think will agree with you. That won't help you. Polygnotus (talk) 06:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calling people neonazis, whn they are not is libel. Still omited to respond the sources above.--84.206.11.96 (talk) 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using words like "libel" will get you blocked. See WP:LEGAL. Polygnotus (talk) 09:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually your version of the text calls them neonazis.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.206.11.96 (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian wrote: "Italian anti-fascist goes on trial in Hungary accused of attacking neo-Nazis". https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/24/italian-anti-fascist-goes-on-trial-in-hungary-accused-of-attacking-neo-nazis Polygnotus (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not have deep information on the issue. Borsoka (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Borsoka! The article you nominated, Alice of Champagne, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 5 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you today for the article, "about a Jerusalemite royal princess who ruled the Kingdoms of Cyprus and Jerusalem as regent for her son and an absent relative for years in the first half of the 13th century. She also laid claim to a French county but could not seize it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of my story, watch and listen! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and a third, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:New South Wales Police Force on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:History of Transylvania on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Borsoka:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 10:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this was changed by an IP a while ago.[3] Mellk (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edit. Borsoka (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I understand that it would have been better to have included quotes from both sources. Mellk (talk) 01:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Storrs, Connecticut on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borsoka (talk) 03:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Winnowing Fan Barnstar
		For many years of separating the wheat from the chaff. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Oh no, I didn't see this before. Now I feel redundant.) Remsense ‥ 论 07:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I offer this out of appreciation for all the labor-intensive maintenance and feedback I've seen you contribute concerning many highly important articles. Remsense ‥ 论 07:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, what happened here? For some reason, almost the entire text disappeared. Norden1990 (talk) 08:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio. Borsoka (talk)

Oh, great. He is an important figure in 13th century Hungarian history, now here is another shortage that needs to be addressed. --Norden1990 (talk) 09:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to make comments on the article Regency of Algiers? Monsieur Patillo (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chandragupta Maurya on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Isles of Scilly on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I just did my first GA review and I was trying to find out what to put in the oldid= parameter of the GA template (top of the Talk page). I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be the version of the page when it was accepted by the GA reveiwer, but it looks like you just typed "1" in there at Talk:Sun Jianai, which links to a completely different page. Could you please fix this? Best, Toadspike [Talk] 11:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I fixed the problem. Borsoka (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Borsoka, Sorry for some of the mistakes you might find in my additions, I usually work with copyeditors and I had massive help from them. Thank you for your work and I truely enjoy improving this article. Nourerrahmane (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So do I. :) Borsoka (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that I was away when you asked me to take a look at Alice, but I am nevertheless here. I have nominated the article about Queen Melisende for GA status. I do not think anyone could deliver a more helpful review. I would certainly appreciate it. Surtsicna (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciated your taking the time to help review Maria Trubnikova for FA earlier this year. I nominated Anna Filosofova, an article about another member of the Russian feminist "triumvirate", for FAC review several weeks ago and it's passed source and image review. However, it's not yet attracted a regular reviewer, and I'm worried it'll get archived soon without someone taking a look and helping develop a broader consensus. Do you have any time to comment on the article soon? If not, no worries of course, but if you do, thank you! —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]