/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 /Archive7 /Archive8 /Archive9

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandru Piru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Salvation Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Szatmárnémeti Nemzetközi Repülőtér is the native name of this airport in Hungarian in addition to the Romanian name. Szatmárnémeti has a mixed Hungarian-Romanian speaking population, and Hungarian is the second most widely spoken language in the region. User:Biruitorul has been constantly removing Hungarian names, this is unacceptable, and can be deemed as anti-Hungarian sentiment, and xenophobic. According to Romanian law, regions and towns where the native local population is above 20% bilingual signage can be used and Hungarian can be also used in official communication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.168.186 (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disgusting how this user biruitorul is constantly deleting Hungarian language entries.

This user is also a supporter of Romanian Fascism and is an anti-Hungarian provocateur that does not support autonomy or independence of Transylvania Transylvania and does not support the rights of Hungarians in Transylvania to self-determination. This user is a hypocritical Romanian Chauvinist that persistently vandalises pages where Hungarian names should and can be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.168.186 (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I interest you in this or a 1000 Challenge for Romania/Moldova?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

N-am cum sa citez din moment ce n-am gasit nici macar sursa pe Google. Pot doar sa iti dau cuvantul meu de onoare ca a zis la TV de ziua nationala. Eu zic ca e important sa amintesc ca e si un sfert egipteanca. Sudaneza nu e pe jumatate intrucat tatal ei era pe jumatate cu origini din Egipt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvinistul (talk • contribs) 03:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding Chez alexito listing you as a user involved in the dispute. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "C%C4%83l%C4%83ra%C8%99i steel_works". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an FYI. The case has not been officially opened as of yet, and I am not one of the parties listed under the dispute. I am merely posting this notice on your talk page, as the case filer did not do so.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Statue of Wendell Phillips in the Boston Public Garden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Bobroczky (basketball), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article is significantly different from the one listed at AFD. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garchy

All the mess could have been avoided if you would have explained on my talk page what I did wrong instead of pointing to the MoS which didn't actually say what I was doing wrong. It is easy to revert and point to MoS. But as you can see, quite unproductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mess110 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of other fictions by Eric Rohmer. Since you had some involvement with the List of other fictions by Eric Rohmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for properly restoring the sourced information at the Socialist Republic of Romania article. Unfortunately, the same user has repeatedly removed "state atheism" from the article about Polish People's Republic. Since you are Eastern European, I would appreciate if you could help add a native source that supports the category. My reference, despite it being in English, was removed by User:Xenophrenic. God bless, Jobas (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biruitorul should be banned from editing ion wikipedia because he is a Romanian chauvinist facsist who is constantly vandalising Hungarian related pages and information, he has repeatedly removed Hungarian language names of institutions that are also used by Hungarians in Transylvania.

Category:History of Soviet Moldova, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul, thank you for your contributions. In contemporary academic practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, we use "Historical" to refer to the post-European colonization period, recognising that the indigenous peoples had history, and that the "Historical" period refers specifically to not only post-European colonization, but when their (European peoples) record-keeping dominated the historical discourse. So I, as with my academic colleagues prefer the nomenclature of "Historical" rather than a generic "historical". Hope this clarifies the matter for you. regards Brunswicknic (talk) 15:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wallachian princely election, 1842, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the aged, hernia-afflicted Alecu Filipescu-Vulpea reportedly ran in the Wallachian princely election only to hamper other candidates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wallachian princely election, 1842. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wallachian princely election, 1842), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alecu Filipescu-Vulpea, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the aged, hernia-afflicted Alecu Filipescu-Vulpea reportedly ran in the Wallachian princely election only to hamper other candidates? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alecu Filipescu-Vulpea), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello are you Aromanian ? Kp4816 (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notificare despre o discuție ce ar putea să te intereseze. XXN, 18:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... și un AFD interesant‎. --XXN, 11:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came across Ioan Sterca-Șuluțiu today, which you created in 2006. My gut instinct was to just send it to AfD and let things run their course, but noticed that in a 2009 AfD you said you were confident you could find sources. I've spent over an hour googling and digging through my local library (also a long shot, admittedly) and I've not turned up anything. The only source I can really find is this, but I wouldn't like to bet that that isn't based on the enwiki article. There are a couple of obscure academic papers that Google scholar suggests might mention him, but as they're not easily available online and none of them are in English, I'm struggling a bit. His brother, archbishop Alexandru, is mentioned fairly liberally, but as far as I can see none of those sources mention Ioan.

Could you give us a hint where we might find sources to at least substantiate - if not flesh out - this article? GoldenRing (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stii cumva cum pot primi functia de rollback sau sa schimb numele paginilor? Editez de mult timp paginile fotbalistilor romani si uneori am nevoie de aceste chestii.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am aplicat acum pentru rollback. Multumesc pentru ajutor! :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Traian National College, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two students at Traian National College in Turnu Severin, Romania, were executed in 1949 for being part of the anti-communist resistance movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Traian National College. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Traian National College), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am propus ca pagina FC Steaua Bucuresti sa fie redenumita FCSB. Poti sa iti spui opinia despre asta la discutia de pe talk page, te rog? Te intreb fiindca esti roman si ar trebui sa gasim o solutie.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 18:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chiar daca articolul despre ro:Vasile Ladislau Pop nu este prea bine scris, totusi cred ca ar fi de interes sa fie tradus in engleza. Multe salutari, --Mihai Andrei (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liked your edit summary restoring csd. Panache. Dlohcierekim 05:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting without bothering to give a reason is highly disruptive. 2.25.45.163 (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.45.163 (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Biruitorul. Just to let you know: I have restored the article Moldova Veche. Although you created the original page as a redirect, the substance of the article was constructed by another editor (as a translation from German Wikipedia) Therefore, it did not qualify for WP:G7 speedy deletion. At this point, any merging of the article's text will require a merge discussion and a consensus opinion before proceeding. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why are you denying a historical fact? The Danube is the border between Dobruja and Bessarabia. Every island on the Romanian side of the Danube (Chilia arm) is part of Dobruja, and Ukraine has such islands, meaning that Ukraine has gotten a small part of Dobruja. It doesn't matter how small the area is, it is still part of Ukraine. And there's nothing wrong if the source is Romanian. Google can be used to translate. I've seen numerous people adding sources in other languages, no one was against it. TheBlueMapper (talk) 06:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just made this edit, a sourced information with citation https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Transylvania&diff=784140334&oldid=781491435 Please, if you can, keep an eye on it to prevent vandalism. (I'm a former WP editor) Thanks an keep up the good work ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.247.59 (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'd like to create a new article: Paolo Aldighieri. I write it in my sandbox User:99ernst/sandbox . What can you think about it? Can i create it? --99ernst (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You removed a link to Petre Sava Baleanu, the artist's first husband, a well known theater and tv director. Please restore the link.

The spelling in English is Naparus; the artist is well known iwith this spelling. There exists a wikipedia page in Romanian with the Romanian spelling. I added the Romanian spelling in the first line. Please consider when making disruptive changes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igandrew (talk • contribs) 21:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry about my misunderstanding. I didn't realize I'd copied the citations instead of cutting them. Can I make a request? When you write an edit summary, can you please document the change that you made? When I saw that you had written "sigh", I guessed your meaning to be "I had to change this back again", and I failed to notice the context when I looked at the diff. A description like "deleted duplicate inline references" is much more helpful (and assumes good faith). —Ringbang (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alexander Adamescu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not substantially identical to the version deleted at AfD. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Osebiţi, Biruitorul!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs additional references related to Its modern day incarnation not just ancient history.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Biruitorul, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of Tazlău Monastery. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 18:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is some contradictory information regarding Văitoianu:

• The Romanian wiki page states that he's interred at the Mărăști Mausoleum, while the English article he's laid to rest at Mărășești. More confusing still, I saw a picture taken by you with Văitoianu's grave at Bellu. While I'm inclined to believe that the General was rather interred at Mărăști along Marshal Averescu, why is his grave at Bellu? Was he laid to rest initially there and then moved to Mărăști, or is he still buried at Bellu?
• The Romanian wiki page states that he was imprisoned for 7 years at Sighet, however I could not find a single source for this.

Regards, Mentatus (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply and the infos. If the story about Văitoianu's remains proved true, it would be another sad affair about how Romanians treat the memory of their heroes. Mentatus (talk) 18:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your countless and valuable contributions! Codrin.B (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If there's "only one ethnicity to which someone named Ibolya Korodi could belong" then you'll have no problem finding a source for it. Please do not add categories that are not supported by such sources in the article. See also WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:BURDEN and WP:CATEGRS. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to read this: Romani. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you redirected the page Mihai Gruia to the Akcent giving the reason that it doesn't fulfill the notability criteria. You said it doesn't fulfill the point 6 of notability criteria. But you don't need to jump straight to point 6 because if any one of the points is fulfilled it doesn't fail the notability. The notability criteria say:

Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria. And for your information, it fulfills the point 1 of notability criteria. The point 1 says:

1- Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

There are hundreds and even thousand of non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published regarding the Mihai Gruia. Also, you said virtually all coverage of him is in relation to Akcent, not all but apart. He has been part of Akcent for 13 years and there is nothing wrong in mentioning the Akcent. He doesn't fulfill the notability criteria due to Akcent but due to his work. Out of 11 sources and two external links, 7 are those sources which are totally irrelevant to Akcent. How could you say everything is covered in Akcent?

You should respect the works of others and don't be aggressive and misuse your authority.TMOR (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Biruitorul. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you agree with what I said at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Daewoo_Mangalia_Heavy_Industries (at the bottom). I believe the name of the Mangalia Shipyard (Daewoo Mangalia Heavy Industries) is currently wrong and should be changed to something else, for example, Damen Mangalia shipyard or just Mangalia shipyard. What do you think? Dragnadh (talk) 01:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. AfC submissions Random submission ~8 weeks 1,831 pending submissions Purge to update I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 05:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: in year 2011, you reviewed around 5000 pages. —usernamekiran(talk) 15:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Maybe you have time to give some comments on my FLC above? Just overlook this if you are busy right now... Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand if you think that the photo gallery listed doesn't apply well to the Lupeni strike of 1929, but why did you tag it as spam? The web portal is the official portal for Jiu Valley, and the photo galleries are of the Lupeni miners. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyrja (talk • contribs) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely correct about Francisco Kröpfl, I was just going by what the sources said but that was obviously wrong. Thank you for spotting it! Dr. Vogel (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lasa te rog referinta la Uzina Mecanica Marsa din articolul Avrig. Se leaga cu articolul DAC 120 DE. Multumesc frumos. 64.71.94.2 (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Este nevoie de ajutor cu --> Draft:Universal Tractor Braşov . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Platinia Hotel, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Linguist^unEins^uno (Linguist111) 20:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul. You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to June 14 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been undone. If you restore it, please provide a direct reliable source. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded or restored , File:Statue of Charles Sumner in the Boston Public Garden.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Am trecut doar a saluta și pentru a-mi arăta aprecierea față de munca pe care o faci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupul carpatin (talk • contribs) 20:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC) --Lupul carpatin (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what is he doing?Skyhighway (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just wanted to inform you that we have the somewhat older WikiProject Alexandra Stan (which was not quite a success) and the new WikiProject Inna out there. These are great opportunities to discuss on things related to the two singers, how to improve articles related to them and so on. I would really appreciate you joining one of these two projects, but of course you don't have to. I think you're a great editor in this direction, and your help would definitely be needed. To join one of the aforementioned projects, just list yourself in the "Participants" column and put both the page and its talk page on you watchlist to stay updated on the matter. Have a wonderful day!! Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Merry Christmas! Crăciun fericit!
		Merry Christmas/Crăciun fericit! Mentatus (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lee McClung.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the following coordinates he deleted major article updates with no possible motivation, evidently trolling as proven by his note "Yeah, no" or "Rmv soapboxing"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Court_of_Romania (cur | prev) 07:14, 16 March 2019‎ Biruitorul (talk | contribs)‎ . . (12,050 bytes) -54,613‎ . . (Yeah, no) (undo | thank)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Romania (cur | prev) 07:13, 16 March 2019‎ Biruitorul (talk | contribs)‎ . . (2,064 bytes) -3,906‎ . . (Rmv soapboxing) (undo | thank)

A proper and only logical argument motivation structure to contribute to wikipedia consists of a particular premise correlated with an universal premise such as a law, and a logical inference, in other words a syllogism, which is verifiable and true according to wikipedia regulations. Since user Biruitorul is clearly a wikipedia vandal, he must be banned

Also typical to vandals, user Biruitorul doesn't use his real name, as I do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tudor.raneti (talk • contribs) 21:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Biruitorul, When nominating an article for speedy deletion, please don’t forget to notify the article creator on their talk page. This is an act of courtesy, and not doing so can really rile them if they discover their article deleted without any sort of notification. Also, I removed your tag - this article definitely has multpile credible claims of significance at the very least - see my edit summary. Regards, Zingarese talk · contribs 01:45, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019

Any input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, thanks for your corrections and addition to the Timișoara article, regarding the Cioca airfield. I live far away and do not speak Romanian (not yet, at least :) ) so I am sure you have better sources than I have. Do you have any information, with a bit of authority, regarding the current status of the field? On openstreetmap.org, someone claims that the airfield has entirely disappeared, leaving only pasture. This is what made me begin to look into the matter. Kind regards! Jan olieslagers (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page, I answered there. Kindly yours! Jan olieslagers (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bill King(rugby league player). Since you had some involvement with the Bill King(rugby league player) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Leschnei (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am o rugăminte. Să modifici la Wikidata informațiile despre Emanoil Bacaloglu. Cu mai mult timp în urmă ai modificat pe pagina lui data de naștere - 11 aprilie. Nu știu de unde ai luat-o, dar este greșită. Nu ai pus nici o referință. Data corectă este 11 mai (29 aprilie pe stil vechi) și este menționată de o cercetătoare a vieții lui, Florica Cîmpan, în volumul "Emanuel Bacaloglu" din Colecția Oameni de seamă, Editura Tineretului, 1963, p.19. Eu corectasem pe ro.wiki, dar cineva a modificat zilele astea preluând informațiile din Wikidata. Deci ar trebui să se corecteze la bază. Inclusiv sursa! Doar că eu am mai puțină dexteritate la operat acolo. Mulțumesc,PheonixRo (talk) 09:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mulțumesc mult! PheonixRo (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am dat întâmplător peste acest entry și îl consider ilegitim, o mistificare împotriva careia voi începe o procedura de ștergere. Entryul englezesc este abuziv legat de cel de la Rowiki Curentul latinist pentru a se crea o falsă impresie de legitimitate.

În timp ce **Curentul latinist** descrie un curent academic, soldat cu dezbateri și controverse, dar fără consecințe semnificative asupra limbii române, **Re-latinizarea limbii române** prezintă un fenomen lingvistic spontan, popular și desfășurat pe parcursul mai multor generații, drept o campanie intenționată și ideologică de ”re-latinizare” a limbii române.

Este o uzurpare de sens și o falsificare a istoriei. Niciodată nu a avut loc în România vreo re-latinizare intenționată a limbii: ”a process during the development of the Romanian language aimed at the strengthening of its Romance character.” așa cum este în mod fals prezentat in introducere. Aceasta este o veche teză ungară, fără nici un suprt in realitate.

În perioada 1830 - 1880 avem într-adevăr de-a face cu un foarte viguros proces de modernizare lexicală a limbii române, destinat a oferi limbii acele instrumente necesare vieții moderne. Acest influx lexical l-au cunoscut și alte limbi în sec XIX el fiind legat de necesitățile de modernizare. Entryul pe care-l critic prezintă lucrurile ca pe o campanie ideologică inițiată de Școala Ardeleană și Curentul Latinist.

Este o mistificare pe care intenționez să o combat. Am dorit să te anunț văzând că ai contribuit la articol. Te țin minte de acum 10 ani, pe când mai eram activ aici.

Sănătate și numai bine !

PS În afară de ștergere, se poate face și o scimbare de titlu, de exemplu ”Latinist school of thought” pe aceeași linie cu entryul românesc ”curentul latinist”, sau eventual ”Lexical modernization of Romanian”

The file File:SamDonaldson.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cosmin Alexandru Cernica, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. SoWhy 07:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dealul Mitropoliei Barbu Catargiu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Farhikht (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul,

You tagged this category for deletion, which is correct because it is an empty category. However, you didn't post a notice to the category creator's user talk page. Please set up your Twinkle preferences so that all CSD categories boxes are checked and that these notifications are posted automatically. Then you don't have to worry about posting user talk page notices. Thank you for your work. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aristide Blank, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a court in communist Romania found banker Aristide Blank guilty of high treason, based on his meetings with foreigners and notes from Blank's unpublished novel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aristide Blank. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Aristide Blank), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the article Voicu. I kindly ask you to expree your opinion on Talk:Voicu. 86.120.179.60 (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Pensions in Romania you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. DalbozDuncanthrax (talk) 23:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dave Brown*. Since you had some involvement with the Dave Brown* redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I came to you for help and I hope all is well with you. I'm working on an article on Anca Giurchescu and several things have me stumped. When she died, a post was made on facebook giving her birthdate as 17 December 1930. I can't find any other source that gives the date, but I'm thinking that is because I don't know her maiden name. I thought maybe this would help, but it gives neither of her parent's names, just her great grandfather's. It does however, state that she was the Romanian national shooting champion (with an 8 pound rifle, maybe that makes a difference). The article doesn't say when this was, but it does say she was the only woman on the team and sort of indicates it was when she was in university. A Hungarian source says she attended the University of Physical Education in Bucharest, beginning in 1949 and began working at the Institute of Ethnography and Folklore, Bucharest in 1953, which to me, gives a fairly narrow time range. Any idea how I might figure out what her maiden name was and if that is her correct date of birth? Any help you can give would be very much appreciated. SusunW (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back. She really did win a silver medal in the team shooting and a bronze individual medal in 1955 at the European championships, (pp=502-503) but I cannot figure out what this excerpt is taken from or when it was written. Looks like the name of the book is Cartea de aur and the chapter is "Medaliaţii la campionatele mondiale şi campionatele europene. Alte performanţe la nivel mondial şi european ale sportivilor români," but when I go to the website for the Ministerul Tineretului si Sportului, I cannot find archived documents or what this might be a piece of. I hope I am not wearing you out with my questions and truly do appreciate the help. SusunW (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really appreciate your help. I've taken it live here Anca Giurchescu. Will ask Ipigott if there might be Danish sources that have anything to add. If you could look over the spellings, etc. to make sure there are no huge errors, that would be greatly appreciated. I also wonder if there is a bot/script/assistant of some sort. Seems that various letters like "ț" and "ţ" or "ș" and "ş" end up being redirects on wiki, which tells me that the texts they are pasted from must use them interchangeably but they aren't actually interchangeable. If there isn't an automated way to correct them, which character is correct? Again, I really appreciate your help with this one. She was really interesting to write and I learned a lot. SusunW (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SusunW: I'm afraid I couldn't find much about her in Denmark apart from this interesting study of the Vlachs - or maybe Kahl, Thede (21 October 2016). Von Hora, Doina und Lautaren: Einblicke in die rumänische Musik und Musikwissenschaft. Frank & Timme GmbH. pp. 155–. ISBN 978-3-7329-0310-8.. I thought the section on dance was particularly interesting and perhaps pertinent to our coverage of folklore. There are also some interesting details about her time in Denmark in Anca Giurchescu (1930-2015): Memories from her ICTM friends.--Ipigott (talk) 07:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for your copyedits and help. I've added your info on her publication Ipigott. Loved reading the remembrances of her colleagues and added it as an external link, as I think others might enjoy it as well. As it is uncurated, and I intend to nominate it for GA, I didn't include any of the info in the body. I'm betting her legacy will more fully emerge over time, but as its a fairly recent death, most everything now available is a memoir rather than an analysis. Don't want to take up any more space on Biruitorul's page here, but I wouldn't have been satisfied with the article without your help. That maiden name was key to unraveling her full story. :) SusunW (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - back in 2011, you created a redirect from Mirsa to Avrig. I have just created an article for Olga di Grésy whose knitwear company, Mirsa, was pretty significant in Italian fashion history/American fashion and I just wanted to check whether "Mirsa" is a common alternative spelling of Mârșa, and if not, whether there was any reason why the redirect could not go to Olga di Grésy's page instead? If you feel that Mirsa should remain as a redirect to Avrig, that's absolutely fine - I just thought I would ask. All best, Mabalu (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vă salut. Ați uploadat la Commons imaginea https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CeausescuSatuMare1970.jpg, afirmând că ea ar fi fost făcută la 15 mai 1970. Am găsit în Fototeca ComInRO imaginea http://www.comunismulinromania.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1975-Inundatii-Satu-Mare.jpg unde scrie că ar fi fost făcută în 1975. Cele două fotografii par a fi făcute în aceeași zi. Vreau să vă întreb, prin urmare, dacă sunteți sigur că prima fotografie e de la inundațiile din 1970. Donarius (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatarani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bărcănești (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul.

You've recently removed my edit on the Romania article about the Romanian overseas territory, saying it's a very obscure chapter that shouldn't be mentioned on a country page. I do understand that I had initially added the information in a much too detailed way, but don't you think it would be OK to add it as a one-sentence note, like I did the second time? It's a part of our country's history, so I think it should be added to the History section. This will also help spread awareness of it, since it's a very little known fact.

Could you please express your opinion on that here? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Romania#Overseas_territory

Thank you. Lupishor (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for joining that debate. I've just responded to your argument. Sorry for doing it so late. Lupishor (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vecinii nostri promoveaza peste tot originea romanilor. Motivul il stim cu totii vezi. They should be more concerned about their origins vezi.

They have made a habit of editing a lot of articles concerning our history. They twist things to suit their agenda. I have nothing against Hungarian people I have Hungarian friends but this just too much. I think most of the editors here are Jobbik members.

These articles here are made for the rest of the world to read and the Hungarian bias is very unfair in this matter. It's a huge problem and you should address this issue to wiki administrators because it's been going on for a while. They mislead and making us look like liars, thieves. Edits should be objective and neutral for both Hungarians and Romanians.

If this is how the articles about Romania look on the English Wikipedia due to the edits made by some Hungarians then I can only imagine what kind of lies about Romanians are on the Hungarian Wikipedia. I won't bother editing any of those articles such as the Hungarian-Romanian War because It's just too much effort. The articles here are written in Hungarian points of view. These people ignore Wikipedia policies and guidelines.— unsigned comment added on 21 May 2020.

Hi Biruitorul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia. Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by Hunorastic on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 15:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:"Democrația"-class minesweeper. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20#Draft:"Democrația"-class minesweeper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heads of state of France has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Surtsicna (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like please to help to edit well History of Radaseni? Dealuri (talk) 10:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was working a lot, more than four months, to collect informations,now is rejected Dealuri (talk) 11:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just redirected it to the article about anti-communist resistance, but thinking about [1] shouldn't there be a viable article about anti-Nazi operations too? Perhaps something you could stub at some point. Probably needs some categories too, I see Category:Romanian World War II resistance members but nothing about the structures/etc. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tătaru (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tătaru River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

I have finished filling in the history of Rădășeni contents . Is it time to post it so I don't have to be turned down? Pictures still can not put, probably because of poor internet access in the area where they are.

Thank you very much Dealuri (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heads of State of Germany has been nominated for merging with Template:German presidents. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:German Presidents (1919–1945) has been nominated for merging with Template:German presidents. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://kehilalinks.jewishgen.org/Valea_lui_Mihai/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Privacy in Romania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cu aproximativ zece ani în urmă, am scris câteva articole despre familii românești, printre care familia Tașcă. La acea vreme ai recomandat ștergerea articolului. În discutarea cazului, am obiectat arătând că, dacă este vorba de familii din România, o familie veche din țară are o însemnătate mai mare decât o familie cum este Ovitz family, o familie de muzicanți pitici care au fost deportați la Auschwitz. Dacă îți mai amintești, la acea vreme nu ai susținut valoarea enciclopedică a informației, dar ai argumentat că articolul familiei Ovitz trebuie menținut deoarece informația se bazează pe un volum publicat. Spre deosebire, informațiile pe care le prezentam fuseseră, măcar în parte, publicate la Brăila, și considerai că nu este vorba despre o sursă de încredere. Deși nu am fost de acord cu argumentul, am încercat să mă adaptez condiției pe care o impuneai. Mi-a trebuit mai mult timp decât anticipam, dar am reușit să public un volum cu istoricul familiilor respective. Volumul este publicat de editura Corint din București, editură specializată în publicarea de lucrări istorice și genealogice. Este editura care, printre altele, a publicat lucrările regretatului Mihai Sturdza despre familiile boierești din Moldova și Tara Românească. Prezentarea volumului poate fi găsită pe youtube la https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S10u0rRG4KU și dacă mai ai îndoieli, o poți comanda la orice librărie din România. Indiferent de faptul că te așteptai sau nu la acest rezultat, eu am îndeplinit condiția pe care mi-au impus-o acum circa zece ani. Ceea ce sper să pot constata este că ești un om de cuvânt. Afil

The basic idea of categorisation is that categories should be defining. That means we dont always put people as "from" the place they were born, if they didnt do what made them notable there. People who emigrate are better defined as emigrants from their former country than as people of .... descent. Rathfelder (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tu tot scrii că Mangalia se află în nordul Dobrogei ? Florearazvan (talk) 06:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've went ahead and added the source you provided in your edit summary for your addition that Alito's mother is dead, but next time please source it in-article and not in an edit summary. Thank you. WP:V WP:CITE mossypiglet (talk) quote or something 00:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clear up my friend, the source had it uploaded wrong, requested a name change for the upload on Commons. the source which got it wrong >>>> http://www.tarihbilincidergisi.com/detay-teskilat-i-mahsusa-nin-gozu-kara-adami-yakub-cemil-110, kind regards, KirmiziAdam (talk) 11:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Armenians of Romania has been nominated for renaming to Category:Armenian diaspora in Romania. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi B. Missed your talkpage comment somehow, I've put a version reflecting the correct information you provided in the article text, feel free to tweak it if you want. Boynamedsue (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) ANI 2)you can't really.. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Best. --Boynamedsue (talk) 08:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He's really shot himself in the foot, I can't believe he didn't edit the Securitate thing, I was genuinely offering him a lifeline there. The wall of text answers were the worst possible thing he could do. Boynamedsue (talk) 16:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of WP:DOGS, I thank you for initiating action to bring an end to this issue. William Harris (talk) 09:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your initiative, Biruitorul! I took a two-month break from Wikipedia and I come back to see Kiengir banned. That's surely gonna make many editors' lives easier. I had actually planned to report him myself (you could have invited me to that discussion too), but it looks like you did a better job anyway, with more arguments to offer. Again, thank you! Best wishes, Lupishor (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi B. Hope life is treating you well. I wonder if you might be able to help me with something, I am at a bit of a loss for decent sources for the fate of those Romani living in Northern Transylvania while it was occupied by Hungary in WWII. Do you know of any sources that might be of use? The redoubtable Mr Achim has failed me for once. BTW, I can read Romanian (with a little effort!). Boynamedsue (talk) 18:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million, I really appreciate it. I will give it a go, I've used google translate with Hungarian before (for reasons connected to our mutual friend) and it usually turns out comprehensible.Boynamedsue (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for 7 years ago documenting how a cave man dropped a snow shovel in a bog. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Snow_shovel&diff=599608159&oldid=599606506 Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love your user tags. Great to see it. Keep up the good work editing Wikipedia. Amazing how you're one of the top 400 most active English Wikipedia users of all time.

Nyoome (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chairmen of the National Council (Namibia) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pgallert (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even need this for article work, I just genuinely wish to talk to an actual native of the place. I can only learn so much from books. So, if you have the time and can have a chat: how's Nicolae Ceaușescu perceived over there? How's his regime rated overall, mostly good or mostly bad for the country? How about Iliescu? Former Commie voted democratically 3 times. Transylvania1916 (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Biruitorul. I removed all of the content that you added onto Dracula. The article is very much a WIP as I work towards FAC, but I want you to know that–although I removed it—I do intend to reimplement some of it once there's a better place for it. Thank you so much for writing that, though; it is useful information that currently doesn't have a home or an appropriate place for it. I'll be writing a section about the novel's political dimension, and it definitely can go there. But it doesn't belong in Publication because that's for texts Stoker was aware of or involved in (whereas the Romanian translation was essentially an adaptation). If you have any questions, please feel free to ping me back. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 22:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Corneliu Codreanu—was a Romanian politician, founder and charismatic leader of the Iron Guard or The Legion of the Archangel Michael (also known as the Legionary Movement), AN ultranationalist organization active throughout most of the interwar period.]

This is in regard to the Iron Guard not Codreanu as a person. The Iron Guard's views coinccide what was previously listed, views that weren't solely anti-semitic. This shouldn't be this difficult to understand. --2600:8805:1900:600:28F4:E311:9F3E:4DC7 (talk) 17:36, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

special:permalink/1040666843 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

Hello, I found this source here which lists the dates when the "leading role" of the Communist Party was dropped from various Eastern European constitutions. But when it comes to Romania, it states - and I quote - "In Romania the Communist Party was so totally discredited that it was not seen necessary to revoke its leading role.". This...Would mean that Romania was - on paper - still a Communist state until the new Constitution was adopted in December 1991. Can you clarify anything on this? I'd imagine you have access to the relevant sources, since you speak the language. Did Iiliescu & Co really leave the deceased Communist Party a leader on paper until December 1991? Transylvania1916 (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fratie-Dreptate-chirilic.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

Hello, Biruitorul,

You are a very experienced editor but I wanted to remind you that any time you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator so they are aware of the tagging and any problems with an article they created. Many editors find it easiest to use Twinkle, once you set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post these notices for you whenever you tag a page for deletion.

Please remember to post talk page notices in the future when you tag a page for deletion, it's especially important for PRODs because the page creator might be able to address any existing problems in an article and make the deletion unnecessary. Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Although good practice, notifying the article creator is not an absolute requirement. Both PROD and CSD policy pages state that the nominator "should notify the page creator and any major contributors". For AfD the language is even more watered down "Consider letting the authors know on their talk page...".-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Renaissance architecture in Romania has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. You know that you've violated WP:3RR at Cluj-Napoca, right? So maybe... don't do that. El_C 12:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

Hi, I started the discussion over the deletion of this page on its talk page.--Kotys ek Beos (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul -- I've declined this after consideration overnight, at least partly because during that period the entire speedy queue aside from it has been cleared by multiple admins, none of whom decided to delete it. I do think it's borderline & Articles for Deletion might be appropriate, but it would be kind to allow the creator a few days to incorporate the sources they've listed on the talk page. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Barthélemy Boganda for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 05:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

Hello Biruitorul,

Given your past involvement in WP:BILATERAL, I wanted to point you towards a RfC on the topic of renaming bilateral relations articles. If you'd like to participate, please see the discussion page. Best, Pilaz (talk) 02:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UDMRBuc.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you mean "not really" Translated with DeepL Translator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporary tempuras (talk • contribs) 23:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Template:CSUHeads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CSUGenSecs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Îmi cer scuze dacă am creat o situație neplăcută pentru dv. cu acest articol. În ultimul timp am lucrat la o serie de articole legate de Timișoara, multe dintre ele neavând o pagină și pe Wikipedia în engleză. Nu am observat că articolul acesta avea deja o pagină creată de dv. (practic, am făcut un duplicat cu puțin mai multe informații la secțiunea „Istoric” plus încă vreo două secțiuni). Nu știam cum să cuplez cele două pagini și am pus un #REDIRECT la articolul dv. spre articolul creat de mine. Alexandru M. (talk) 08:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I started a section on the matter at the relevant article, but the info in English I could find on Google Books covers only 1993. The book is from 1996 and covers 1995, so there was no change in the matter for the following two years. But...Then? What's the status of Mein Kampf in Romania today? I used the only remotely comprehensive English-language source I could find on the matter, maybe you can help... Transylvania1916 (talk) 23:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Profa and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Profa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

hello, since you are part of the wikiproject romania i would to know why the page about the list of romanian words of possible dacian origins has been changed to this title https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Romanian_words_of_Paleo-Balkan_origin without consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B07:6469:985D:14B4:7476:268E:BD69 (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Category:Romanian magistrates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches completed in 1559 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I sow that Maneuti is cleared out, merged, with Fratautii Vechi. That is fine on one way. But in Fratauti section it written: 'It is composed of two villages,..." . In your opinion why those villages (communities) can not have separate page, specially that have a totally different history? I sow many communities that have it. Thank you for your answer. --László (talk) 10:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for honest and quick answer. When I am going to have more time I will add some more facts about Fratautii Vechi as part of the History of comune. --László (talk)

Template:Heads of State of India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Bears (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

The file File:Orasul-Slatina-chirilic.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Orasul-Slatina-chirilic.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Hi. Some years ago I setup a photo collage for Pitești which you have taken down, see this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pite%C8%99ti&direction=prev&oldid=800919591. I have done this for many cities in Romania, to showcase their historical architecture and other landmarks, in line with other cities around the world. You took that photo collage down with the message: "more work needed - at least two of the images are duplicated later on, which makes no sense". I will replace the duplicated images and will put the collage back up, but otherwise please be specific regarding "more work needed". Also, please write here if you have any other suggestions/feedback about the photo collage, instead of taking it down again. If you have any photos you'd like me to include, please send me the links here. I'll start doing it in a few days. Thanks! Razvan Valentin Marinescu 14:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Presidents of Fiji has been nominated for merging with Template:Heads of state of Fiji. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 14:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

I noticed on Ion Rimaru's page that you have Viorica Tatu listed as one of his victims. In the book Rimaru: Butcher of Bucharest by Mike Phillips and Stejarul Olaru they say this woman was identified as Margareta Enache. They usually directly cite militia records but for whatever reason they didn't in this section, so I can't give you a direct militia reference, although I was under the impression they were still referencing militia and hospital records. Can you tell me where you got the name Viorica Tatu from, and if you have a source for that name? I'm just trying to clear up who this woman really was and why there are multiple names cited for her. Feel free to send Romanian references, I do speak Romanian, I just haven't lived there for so long I'm not confident in writing in Romanian. Thanks in advance, and I appreciate all the work you've done to add to Wikipedia! MysteriousFox (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul,

You tagged this article with both a PROD and AFD and in neither case did you post a notification of the deletion tagging on the page creator's talk page. This is an important step of the deletion process regardless of your opinion of the article.

I suggest you try out Twinkle, an editing tool, to tag pages for deletion. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then when you tag a page for deletion, Twinkle will notify the page creator for you. Content creators are entitled to know when articles they started are being considered for deletion so they can participate in the discussion. Luckily, in this case, bots informed the page creator when you didn't post a notification but I don't think you should rely on bots, you should just make posting a talk page notice a regular part of any deletion tagging you do. Twinkle makes this very easy and has many, many other handy features to simplify tagging articles and posting to noticeboards.

I also think that your AFD deletion rationale in this case was unnecessarily sarcastic and insulting to the page creator. Every day I delete dozens of autobiographical articles that new editors have created, it's the most common subject that editors write about they start editing so the fact that Nasty Vlădoiu wrote about themselves was more typical than unusual in my experience of looking at hundreds of expiring drafts every day. New editors are unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies so they don't know that autobiographies are discouraged until they are educated that this is the case on this platform. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miniș.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Hi @Biruitorul: For the editor in question. Looking at it, they put a whole block of promotional unsourced content on Wikipie which is illegal. I would post a <nowki> Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. in twinke, as its meant to promote the company. 2nd I post a {{uw-unsourced2}} as they are now putting in references. Lastly, I would post a {{uw-coi1}} and post a note the coin noticeboard with their details and your suspicions, so the editor can be tracked. She clearly has a coi. Once the warning is ratcheted up to 4, i.e. that is why templates are named, an admin can be informed and they will block the person. They can be blocked for WP:UPE from coin. Hope that helps. Sorry I went off the deep end with the outing. I had a similar experience a few weeks ago, so its fresh. scope_creep^Talk 08:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2022-08-01/In_the_media#Chinese_history. For ro:Deportarea chinezilor din Uniunea Sovietică. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

Hi @Biruitorul: I see you removed the See also list, but you can add the relevant entries back. I was planning to through it. There needs to be some see also list as complex subject. scope_creep^Talk 13:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

I just wanted to know if you had reviewed your negative position regarding the romanian villages. I still think that you are wrong.Afil (talk) 04:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

Hope all is well with you. Seems like forever since we spoke, but I need help. I am working on a new article on Binder. As always, I am sure that the tails on letters will be wrong, but the bigger question is I cannot seem to find when the "Școala normală de fete din Sighișoara" opened. Googling this name, I get variations, (Şcoala Normală de Învăţătoare de fete din Sighişoara", "Şcoala Normală evanghelică de fete din Sighişoara", etc.) but nothing tells me when it opened. The only thing I can definitively find is that it didn't exist in 1904 (page 165) and was merged with the men's normal school in 1948. Any chance you can help me locate a date when it opened? If you are too busy, no worries. SusunW (talk) 19:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I finished it. If you want to look it over and make sure I didn't butcher the translations and letters to bad. I really appreciate your finding the article on the normal school. That helped a lot. SusunW (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Catholic Church in Romania. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the situation and at the moment don't have time to dig into it to properly advise. Hopefully someone else can be of assistance. Good luck. Star Mississippi 18:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

Okay, so I am back with another query. When I was working on Binder, I ran across Buțureanu's name. She seems pretty notable: wrote some of the first textbooks for primary students in Romania and the first social study on women there. I asked for this source from the Resource Exchange, but perhaps you know where an open access copy can be obtained? Then there is this (p 391), which seems to be a CV of sorts? Sort of like the Scandinavian encyclopedic lexicons, it uses a whole bunch of abbreviations, which are hard to decipher. I think that is says that she worked at the pedagogical institute of Iași from 1886-1888, then taught at a provincial school in Neamț county in 1893, 4th grade at Iași School #6 in 1894, but returned to Neamț in 1896. Does that look right? No worries if you are too busy. I always appreciate your help, if you can give it. SusunW (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And as promised, I am back. Did Romania use the Pupil-teacher system? That might explain the fact that sources are confusing as to whether she was actually teaching. SusunW (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I got the Maftei chapters. SusunW (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved her to mainspace. If you have time or interest, I'd welcome your copyedit. If not, no worries. SusunW (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Mircea Diaconu for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

Hello, Biruitorul,

Thank you for creating Craiova Prison.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating the article on Craiova Prison. If you get a change, try to add more citations to the article. it is usually best to have at least a few references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Garagepunk66}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Garagepunk66 (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Morea expedition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

The file File:Judetul-Oltu-chirilic.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Judetul-Oltu-chirilic.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 09:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:SMehedinti.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 21:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SMehedinti.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 00:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Romanian emigrants to Costa Rica indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

Category:Ethnic Romanian politicians in the Russian Empire has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Hi Biruitorul‎, hope all well. I'm working a bit on Talk:1917 Kiev City Duma election#full list of elected members. In the Russian-language ref I encounter a "Kowal, V. D.", elected on the Ukrainian socialist list. Could this be Vasile Covali [ro]? -- Soman (talk) 16:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Soman. Could be, but also might well not be. It’s a common name, means Smith, dozens of them on ru.wiki. Unless something more conclusive emerges, I’d refrain from conclusions. — Biruitorul ^Talk 18:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just found this source which lists "V. D. Koval" and "A. L. Kovaleva" as leaders of the Ukrainian Social Democratic Labour Party, which would point in opposite direction. --Soman (talk) 18:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correction Koval and Kovaleva were from UPSR --Soman (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

A tag has been placed on Category:Romanian computer specialists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you nominated more than 20 articles at AfD on the same day. As these discussions take place over the same timeframe and there is a dearth of regular editors at AfD, it helps to space such nominations out over time. I recommend two or three per day, which is common amongst regular AfD nominators. Cheers. —siroχo 02:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Romanian novels by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bună ziua și la mulți ani! Mai aveți cumva acces la această sursă citată în Constantin I. Iliescu? Dacă da, mi-ați putea spune și mie intervalele pentru fiecare primar al Bucureștiului menționate în carte la p. 173? Mulțumesc. Strainu (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Hi! Just wanted to reach out to let you know that, before nominating, you must always follow WP:BEFORE - which is not optional - which includes doing routine searches for sources before bringing an article to AfD. You clearly failed to do so in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Managua, Embassy of the United States, Tegucigalpa, Embassy of the United States, Quito, Embassy of the United States, Port of Spain, Embassy of the United States, Asunción, despite the online availability of sources, both in English and Spanish. Please consider this a procedural word of caution that should have come to you much sooner: nominations should always be done with the idea that the time of Wikipedia editors is precious, and it should not be wasted with frivolous nominations if sources exist. Pilaz (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:The Tea Party, by Henry Sargent (ca. 1824).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Better-quality photo available on Commons: File:Henry Sargent - The Tea Party - 19.12 - Museum of Fine Arts.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

A tag has been placed on Category:Charity in Romania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

On 7 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mihail Moxa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the first Romanian universal chronicle, Mihail Moxa shows "the God of the Old and New Testaments baptizing His stars with the names of Olympian deities"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mihail Moxa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mihail Moxa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dring is now created. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various other PRODs have been declined and I've taken them to AFD as well. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the {{!vote}} template to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akuma Saningong. You may want to adjust your SPA notice with the proper template listed therein. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

Category:Romanian people by ethnic or national origin and occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ilie Purcaru, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ilie Purcaru, as a contributor to Nicolae Ceaușescu's cult of personality, claimed that a young Ceaușescu had walked into the woods of Scornicești without fearing their wolves? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ilie Purcaru. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ilie Purcaru), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

Hello ! I would like to ask you to edit John Onoje's Romanian-language (and Russian language) page (including the infobox and the categories), to add information about his death. I can't currently edit it.

I got a source link now: https://newsmaker.md/ro/activistul-john-onoje-a-murit-acesta-a-locuit-in-ultimii-ani-in-belgia/

Please correct the Romanian-language page of ro:John Onoje, since I can't currently edit it (please edit the infobox and the categories as well). RAMSES$44932 (talk) 22:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You deleted the information from the sources that I posted in the article Cosoba. Why did you delete the information completely if you could just fix the design? did my edit contradict the rules? Ignat.Lolov (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

The redirect Malut has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27 § Malut until a consensus is reached. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:International organizations based in Romania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. AusLondonder (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just glancing at your userpage - quite some time back, you mentioned Elizabeth II. Do you want to update that to Charles III? DS (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Local politicians by nationality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed most references to Turk's books (monographs). Each monograph is referenced in the National bibliographic system (https://www.cobiss.si/en/): https://bib.cobiss.net/bibliographies/si/webBiblio/bib201_20241010_152908_a4726883.html. I don't understand what could be wrong with these references? You removed also the reference to Turk's ORCID page: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3253-2664 I have therefore reinstated the references to Turk's books.

Why does an entry of a book in a national bibliographic system not count as an independent source for the existance of that book? Francsolina (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

Thank you for your recent articles, including Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You can also use a friendly script for that. Which can be activated with one click after turning automatic script intallation in your Preferences->Gadgets (check the "Install scripts without having to manually edit JavaScript files" option and save page; then visit the script page and click install; then go to your new article and you'll find the new Rater menu).

You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at battles of Operation Veritable in 1945

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Speakers of the Landtag of Liechtenstein has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheBritinator (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Biruitorul,

thank you for the discussions and for voicing your opinions about articles I created and modified, and I gather from your posts you have strong opinions about me and those articles. I do respect your work in making wikipedia more complete and ensuring its quality. As I assume we may share many similar ideas about making wikipedia thorough and neutral in tone, I respectfully reach out directly, in the hope that we might even end up having a productive collaboration in the future on some Romanian topics.

In the deletion discussion of the article on my father Paul, you used some not-so-neutral language about the fact that I am the person who wrote these articles, even quite personal, without directly critiquing the contents and style of the articles I write. I hope we may be closer than you assume in motivation - though I do prefer to discuss article quality, not presumed motivation of the authors. As you notice, I write on Wikipedia under my real name, in order to ensure full transparency - I believe had I written under a pseudonym, you would perceive this differently, because I strongly feel the articles themselves do not lead to such critiques you are making.

You noticed I wrote articles about my ancestors - Demeter and Constantin Ritter von Tuschinski, and related topics. You said you had doubts about them in a public discussion, and did not follow up with details. As I presume you have the best intentions, and I hope you presume the same about me, I want to tell you about my motivation in a rather personal way - despite my belief that only the article quality counts, not the motivation. In post-WW2 Romania, my public family history was basically "buried", discussing Northern Bukovina and its society became a taboo. I have not yet even be able to find out the fate of Demeter post-1950, a time when many of his former colleagues were arrested just for being high-ranking functionaries in pre-1947 Romania. I found, with the exception of an article by Mircea Dutu, no post-WW2 articles discussing Demeter and his contributions. It was fascinating, and I started a PhD in history now about his biography.

A year ago, I started academic research on my great-grandfather, and by now discovered about 2000 pre-WW2 articles and publications mentioning him and his family, dozens are directly quoted and linked to in the wikipedia articles I wrote. In this research, I was amazed how much notable Bukovinian history has so far not been analysed and was "invisible" online, much of it "buried" in the 1947-1989 period. I immediatley felt it is important to expand public knowledge on those topics. As I am related, I put a strong focus on neutral wording and quoting from reputable sources, and never hide my connection, as you can also see on the respective "Talk" pages. As I am currently writing my PhD on Demeter, and I am quite aware of a neutral style and quoting style, which, so far, I'm happy to believe I have achieved in my wikipedia edits - you did not critique the content of the articles, but mostly fact that I wrote them.

About a year ago, it became my goal to make Wikipedia more complete, adding more articles about my ancestors and related topics that enhance public knowledge of Northern Bukowina, the Kingdom of Romania and subsequent years. Their notability is easily seen from the many sources, I located and digitized photos, and so on, which is a lot of work. The article about Constantin, for example, for the first time includes a complete bibliography of him that I researched with the help of librarians in Cluj for several months. In Socialist Romania, Constantin was careful to not ever publicly mention the books he had authored in Cernauti, and now, due to the Wikipedia article, finally a bibliography is available online. I work with a lot of idealism, and plan to write more articles about Northern Bukowina during that era, about notable friends and colleagues of my ancestors and institutions they were involved in - all in a suitable style for Wikipedia, quoting accurate sources, and where I feel it adheres to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I feel this motivation leads to very thoroughly researched and accurate articles. As you see, I also expanded and corrected several other related articles, too.

About my father Paul, whose academic career you critiqued in the deletion discussion of his article: I welcomed the discussion, as during it, I realized I might have misunderstood some notability criteria. Though, I was quite surprised by your emotional-sounding, negative critique. As you refered to him and his academic career in rather emotional terms, calling him my "papa" and saying he "never even managed to become a professor": In Socialist Romania, Paul Tuschinski faced challenges in his academic career merely because of his family background - while I understand and respect that the notability criteria were apparently not fulfilled in that article, I hope this makes you see the value I put to a neutral, respectful tone in discussion.

Re: the article dealing with me: I started completing and correcting it, again, being transparent about who I am, being particularly careful about the neutral wording and only quoting sources. Your critique has led to accurate information that is referenced online being deleted (birth date, alma mater, my full name), that I believe would normally not be deleted from articles. About my full last name "Ritter von Tuschinski" - from your message, I feel you assumed I had "given" myself that title on Wikipedia, so you had it deleted. But it is my actual full last name. The aristocratic title was used a lot in the Kingdom of Romania still until the 1940s. In Socialist Romania, it became a taboo. As I write in my foreword to Constantin's collected works (available at several libraries in Romania soon), he made sure to carefully hide and pass on documentation of the title in Socialist Romania, in order to restore it in some uncertain future. That restoration was successful. I added my full name including middle name and title to the page because I wanted to complete Wikipedia with accurate information about my full name (as would be no issue with an article about another person). With my current research, another, private, motivation (that actually shall play no role in gauging an edit's quality) is to finally again make public what had to be hidden in Socialist Romania. I understand your concern my full name might not have been quoted from good enough a source, and I would have hoped you reach out to me first so I can remedy it.

I hope this gives you an idea of my motivation - I want to help expanding wikipedia with accurate articles about notable topics interwined with my family history and Romanian history, which was basically made "invisible" 1947-1989. I aim to write in a neutral style as if I were not related, spending weeks researching and writing an article sometimes. This research, so far, has been quite lauded by historians I encountered, and I hope seeing my motivation, you can get a more accurate idea. If you like, it would be wonderful to maybe even collaborate in researching, for example about Demeter's post-1950 fate, which must be still hidden in archives in Brasov, where you might have easier access :) My next edits would be about Demeter von Tuschinski's WW1 career, which is based on research I am presently doing at Österreichisches Staatsarchiv Wien, and which yields some fascinating insights into Austrian-Hungarian military history in Czernowitz 1917/18 that has not yet been addressed or published anywhere.

Yours sincerely, Alexander ATuschinski (talk) 13:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat my earlier comments at my talk page, i.e. you should not have been directly editing articles about yourself, your relatives, your films, etc.

While it is interesting to hear your motivations, all of the relevant edits were contrary to Wikipedia's policy on Conflict of Interest, here WP:COI.

Also, Wikipedia is not a platform for original research WP:OR because Wikipedia seeks only to reflect what is contained in reliable and already published sources, as per WP:V and WP:RS.

Therefore edits about a family member based on original research in archives (non-published material) would breach at least three separate Wikipedia policies.

I would urge you to abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

Kind regards, Axad12 (talk) 16:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Following the deletion of Paul Tuschinski can I suggest that Demeter Ritter von Tuschinski and Constantin Ritter von Tuschinski also be referred to AfD?

I would do so myself but AfD isn't a process I'm familiar with.

Many thanks, Axad12 (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following recent communication from the article creator on my talk page, I would encourage you once again to refer the two articles above to AfD.

Regards, Axad12 (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following the excellent result at the AfD [2] earlier today, can I suggest that you follow up by nominating the related article Pagini Juridice, which is a blatant WP:COATRACK (i.e. an opportunity for Tuschinski to promote his non-notable relatives and his self-published book).

The article subject clearly doesn't meet WP:NJOURNAL in any case.

Also worth noting that Tuschinski has previously said that he intends at some point to create a further article about the justice system in the relevant region. Nominating the Pagini Juridice article for AfD would, I suspect, be a useful development to prevent similar activity. Several other articles about Tuschinski's films and associates have also been removed recently (e.g. [3], [4] and [5]).

I'm very grateful to you for have brought all of this non-policy compliant material to my attention. As I'm sure you know, I feel strongly about keeping the encyclopaedia free of COI and PROMO material.

Wishing you a very Merry Christmas, Axad12 (talk) 09:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A ref for the number of Romanian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union? The one in the text seems to be 404 and I can't get IA to work. I could use it for my new article (Prisoners of war in World War II). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]