good-
  bye,
                                             pork
                                               pie[1]

If I were doing it I would split the article about 1850. Pre-1850 belongs to early modern history and has little impact on modern history. After the Amur annexation Sino-Russian relations become tangled up with the Western impact on China, the rise of Japan and other stuff and all the parts are related. I wouldn't summarize the early part, but leave it there for anyone who wants to know about old stuff. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Begbrook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Begbrook is not a suburb of Bristol, it's clearly just a few streets in Broomhill

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trunky (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proffessor Phillips. Since you had some involvement with the Proffessor Phillips redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 10:48, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I've added the redirect Professor phillips to that discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]