Your assertion is false - not only have Arsenal been promoted to the top flight on merit - in 1903-04 - but in the same meeting as Arsenal's promotion in 1919 Chelsea were re-elected to the First Division despite being relegated in 1914-15. There was also Darwen when they were elected in 1890-91 and Sheffield Wednesday in 1891-92, despite other teams finishing higher in the Football Alliance. Qwghlm (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea have been relegated and promoted since 1919 thus earning their status by footballing merit. Darwen and Sheffield Wednesday are not currently top flight clubs. The statement is an undeniable fact. Arsenal are the only top flight club who haven't achieved their current position on footballing merit.(--BigTurnip (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, I am appalled at my spelling mistakes - thanks for picking them up! Regards Springnuts (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the edits back and calling it "speculation" - it is being broadcast live to about 30,000,000 people right now. That is why I put the current event tag on it. Turn on the BBC or Fox Soccer if you are in the US - they have special coverage on now. Please stop reverting my posts. I am trying to keep it updated via BBC and ITN reporting. The Moody Blue (Talk) 18:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware, but saying that he has been rushed to hospital or died, when he was clearly still in the stadium being resuscitated is pure speculation. (BigTurnip (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bigturnip. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]