The article Revenge of the Virgins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as only blog reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 11:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Revoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repository.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

OK. Fixed. --Bensin (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Now I Know What Made Otis Blue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now I Know What Made Otis Blue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Folf (talk) 23:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 00:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for creating the Forgejo article. I would recommend merging it into Gitea because it does not yet meet the WP:GNG, before you are getting dragged into a deletion discussion. PhotographyEdits (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Advice taken. Thanks! --Bensin (talk) 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saagar Enjeti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Another user already resolved this in this edit. --Bensin (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Stephen Lipson

added links pointing to Sting, Brian Kennedy, David Jordan, Poesy, Hotei and David Cook

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

OK! Now fixed by me and other users. --Bensin (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Yin and the Yang of Mr. Go is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yin and the Yang of Mr. Go until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Film Creator (talk) 20:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Distinguish between The Bloom Review, and Colin Bloom - which is this draft about? Lose unreliable sources, précis to include the bare minimum of (eg) the report - the section "Review response" is lazy writing anyway. Were it to be retained the references should be used to cite facts. But that is the report, not the man. Your job is to prove that Bloom the man passes WP:BIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Colin Bloom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Bensin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liane, Jungle Goddess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liane, Jungle Goddess until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

OK. Nomination was was withdrawn. --Bensin (talk) 23:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charade (1953 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charade (1953 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Film Creator (talk) 03:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

OK. Nomination was was withdrawn. --Bensin (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anti-Federalist Papers

added a link pointing to Anonymous

List of pen names

added a link pointing to John Neal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

OK. Now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

The article Satan's Harvest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. See Wikipedia:Notability_(films). Only independent source is about George Montgomery, not the film. I can't access it so I don't know whether it goes into the film in more detail, but I assume it doesn't. Google didn't turn up any more notable sources, just IMDB and stuff.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Publicly Visible (talk) 19:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@Publicly Visible I have declined the PROD and opened an AfD, for reasons stated in the procedural neutral nomination. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Satan's Harvest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan's Harvest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

OK. Nomination was was withdrawn. --Bensin (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eat Me (interactive fiction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eat Me (interactive fiction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Bensin, just for context, I hope the nomination isn't discouraging and I hope the deletion discussion yields support for more sourcing for the article, which seems to have almost enough, but not what I'd feel confident saying is self-evidently notable. It's a trend I appreciate does impact smaller independent games, like in interactive fiction spaces. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for notifying. --Bensin (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

OK. The outcome was to delete the article. My request to have it userfied was granted and it is now resting here awaiting one more source (assuming the last additions was not enough). --Bensin (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § X in fiction VIII on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)