Hi Aydın memmedov2000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! LouisAragon (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Iranian Azerbaijanis, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Azerbaijan old maps. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 16:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Azerbaijan old maps, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per one of your edit summaries, "Who deleted my article? And why did you delete it?" Bobherry Talk Edits 23:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Askar Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 20:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mir Mustafa Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 04:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aydın memmedov2000! Your additions to Azerbaijan Democratic Republic have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ru:Мир Мустафа-хан into Draft:Mir Mustafa Khan. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When translating a foreign-language Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've translated content, disclosing the translation and linking to the translated page, e.g., Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the page you placed the translation. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have translated material before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rizvan Garabagi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Battle of Sardrud, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 01:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I cited the source from the book of Turkish historian Faruk Sümer.

Sümer, Faruk, Kara Koyunlular (Başlangıçtan Cihan-Şah'a Kadar),TTK Yayınları,1967,Ankara. sf.74-78 Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new resource Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Azerbaijaniization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is full of unintelligible non-English sources, which contradicts the common WP:RS narrative (such as Azeri having a 'trans-regional influence' and being the lingua franca of Persia and the Caucasus), something the Soviet Union and Azerbaijan are very well known for, see Historical negationism#Azerbaijan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Aydın memmedov2000,

Your talk page is full of warnings and messages from other editors about problems with your editing. Please pay attention to them, especially when there are several messages highlighting the same problems. If you want to continue to be a productive editor here, you need to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources and talk to editors who are bringing up problems, instead of arguing with them. The goal for all editors is to have a rich encyclopedia, with articles that are reliably sourced and full of factual information. Focus on our common goal and try not to take criticism personally. Everyone here, whether editor or administrator, has room for improvement.

If you ever have questions about Wikipedia policies or practices, please feel free to bring them to the Teahouse where you will find advice and support from more experienced editors. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to be more careful, but I disagree with you on one thing. Not all editors here are unbiased and will not be highly rated. Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nacaf Şarifi İrevani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to delete this page. An Armenian requested the deletion. It is clear that this is ethnic nationalism. Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Per the ANI discussion, you are now subject to indefinite topic ban from the WP:AA2 topic area, broadly construed. The sanction has been logged at WP:EDRC. See WP:UNBAN for your appeal options. El_C 11:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce edit restrictions placed by the community, and for violations to Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions#Aydın_memmedov2000,

you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. 
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

---

Reminder to administrators: Edit restrictions placed by the community are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

El_C 15:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aydın memmedov2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Good evening, I wanted to talk to you about something.  It's about this guy (@Kevo327), this guy spamming my articles for no reason and quickly deleting my articles.  Although I objected that it should not be deleted, no one has responded to me so far and nothing has been done about it.  The deleted articles are not only my articles, this guy also deletes the articles of different Azerbaijani admins by doing a quick deletion and specifically targets the articles of Azerbaijani admins.  He is ethnically Armenian and it is clear that he does this from ethnic nationalism.  Was warned once by another admin (@Bbb23).  However, he is still doing the same thing and I expect a fair result from you on this issue. Because of this man, my 2 articles that I wrote without any justification were deleted.  I am sure that you will approach this matter with justice, thank you.

My articles deleted by @kevo327 : Nacaf Şarifi Irevani Huseyn Ali Khan (Khan of Quba)

If possible, my deleted articles should be brought back.  I put a lot of effort into writing those articles.

I was also unfairly spammed by him Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That is not something you are allowed to bring up anymore. See the Topic ban notice above for details on that. This is a ban that has been imposed by the community (WP:CBAN), so a normal unblock request does not apply (again, see WP:UNBAN for your appeal options). El_C 00:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aydın memmedov2000, just so it's perfectly clear: a topic ban from the WP:AA2 topic area means that you are not allowed to write about or comment on anything to do with Armenia and Azerbaijan (together or separately) anywhere on the project. The only exception to that would be within the confines of an appeal of the ban. El_C 00:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So what about my articles that are deleted for no reason? Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My deleted articles were not about Armenia. It was related to Azerbaijani poets and Quba khan Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 00:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop mis-using the unblock template. I would caution you against appealing so early on, but that is your right. If you like, write your appeal here and I will post it to WP:AN.

About the deleted articles falling under the topic ban, as mentioned above: you are not allowed to write about or comment on anything to do with Armenia and Azerbaijan (together or separately). About why the articles were deleted:

1. 11:41, 25 January 2022 Bbb23 talk contribs block deleted page Nacaf Şarifi İrevani (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject).
2. 11:55, 26 January 2022 Doug Weller talk contribs block deleted page Huseyn Ali Khan (Khan of Quba) (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Aydın memmedov2000) in violation of ban or block). El_C 00:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aydın memmedov2000, since your block expired you have again made edits that violate your topic ban. Azerbaijan Democratic Republic which you edited here is clearly about Azerbaijan, and your topic ban prohibits you from editing any Azerbaijan related pages. You posted the text from your unblock request at an admin's user talk page, even though User:El_C said very explicitly that it is not something you are allowed to bring up anymore. And in this edit summary you mention the Azerbaijani language. Please read the notices above, carefully. --bonadea contributions talk 23:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 00:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aydın memmedov2000. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 06:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Gavduşan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mammad Huseyn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Creativity section needs translation. Article prepared by blocked user. Can't AGF for non-translation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 08:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Askar Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mir Mustafa Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Battle of Sardrud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Askar Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rizvan Garabagi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aydın memmedov2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Gavduşan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miskin Abdal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miskin Abdal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]