Hey, Awsomaw. Sorry, I didn't intend to ignore your message. If you're still interested, I'd be happy to help you out. Regards,  Swarm  talk  23:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC) :Hey Swarm, thanks. I deleted my message because I really didn't know if I had time for a mentorship; not sure what it implies. If you can help me though, if you could look through some of my past edits that would be great, I have many questions regarding them. [reply]

1. I don't really know if what I'm doing is procedurally correct and stuff, maybe I should go on the talk pages of the articles before making big formatting and copyedit changes? I thought those articles were small so I didn't think many people would care, but again, I'm not sure if that's procedurally correct.

2. And after copyediting, I thought I've finished so I just popped the copyedit tag right off of the article, should I keep it there for other people to review it first? not entirely sure.

3. And lastly, I've been trying to read the deletion policy pages, but it's really complicated and difficult to read, even the Help: one... is there an easier way to explain it? Thanks very much if you answer this Awsomaw (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

I'm a big boy now! Awsomaw (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I love you ~ Andrew

Mcentag (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sovereign Grace Music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's fine. It was a template that I've never had the time to research. It does meet criteria if anyone cares to make the article though. Awsomaw (talk) 23:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mark Ibn Kunbar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Awsomaw (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Ibn Kunbar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mark Ibn Kunbar was excommunicated by two Coptic popes and one Monophysite patriarch in the 12th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Ibn Kunbar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Ibn Kunbar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a note on the nomination page, and then went to the nominator's talk page to leave a note there. I wonder why your note on his talk page has the header "DYK nomination"? Did you use the special script located just above the edit window:

{{subst:DYKproblem|Etienne Karita|header=yes|sig=yes}}

That will provide a subhead which includes the article name. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah, thanks for the corrections. I didn't know initially see that that template could be expanded for some reason until later, after this review. Must've missed it somehow. Also thanks for the correction on the other DYK altblurb. Thought it wasn't that big of a change, but now I know. Awsomaw (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't that big of a change, but now "Rwanda" is repeated twice in the hook. Please feel free to encourage nominators, especially new ones, to write really good hooks. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Awsomaw (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback on this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jon_Ignatius_Lumanog

There are at least 2 published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - 39 links in all - but additional links added from Anglican Relief and Development Fund, Anglican Church in North America, Cornell College and the Apostolic Communion of Anglican Churches. As well as citations in 2 books and The New York Times.

Thanks, Loose canon (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Loose canon[reply]

Hi, if all you do is add a source or do some copyediting to get an article ready for the main page, you can go ahead and approve the nomination. But if you add a lot of sources, or do serious rewriting, you should add your name to the DYK co-creation credits and call for a new reviewer. Does that make sense? Yoninah (talk) 21:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: It does. Just didn't know where the line is drawn, this explanation is clearer now. Thanks, Awsomaw (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Awsomaw: Thank you so much for your generous feedback and thank you for taking the time to review my article so diligently. I will edit this according your recommendations and will inform when it is ready to review again. Welsh Hamlet (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Awsomaw: Hi again. I just made some amendments to my article in response to your notes. Hopefully it is now in a good condition, but please let me know if I need to make any additional edits. Many thanks Welsh Hamlet (talk) 06:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Table tennis rubber, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that table tennis has a larger number of playing styles than other racket sports due to the large variety of table tennis rubbers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Table tennis rubber. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Table tennis rubber), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for working on that; I ended up getting busy IRL and haven't been around Wikipedia because of that. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Awsomaw,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Hi Awsomaw! I noticed you were an instrumental editor in the creation of TobyMac's The Elements album article. He's one of my favorite artists, and he recently came out with a new album, titled The Lost Demos. I'm not in a position to write this article myself, I've only written a couple an joined about a year ago. I found some sources:

• tobymac.com/the-lost-demos-ep-out-today/ News release on TobyMac's site
• www1.cbn.com/hollywoodinsight/tobymac-surprises-fans-lost-demos-EP CBN.com "TobyMac Surprises Fans with The Lost Demos EP
• twitter.com/tobymac/status/1258540536027213825?lang=en TobyMac's Twitter post about The Lost Demos

@Dswitz10734: I'd be happy to make this article, but it'd be during my Thanksgiving break, so in three weeks. If nobody gets to it by then, then I can do it. But currently I'm bogged down with schoolwork, and as you can tell from my contributions page, I haven't done any major edits in quite a few months. Awsomaw (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Awsomaw: Thank you for replying so soon! I'll see if I can find someone else to do it, and I can give you the link to the draft page in a few weeks. Thank you! Dswitz10734 (talk) 12:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI Awsomaw,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Awsomaw:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bern Disputation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RV (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bern Disputation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bern Disputation of 1528 led to the Swiss canton becoming the second Protestant canton in the Swiss Confederacy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bern Disputation. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bern Disputation), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the article of germ theory of history section it's given that

===Ancient India===

In the Sushruta Samhita, a Sanskrit medical treatise written around the sixth century BCE, the ancient Indian physician Sushruta wrote the Nidána Sthána chapter on pathology theorizing that "leprosy, fever, consumption, diseases of the eye, and other infectious diseases spread from one person to another by sexual union, physical contact, eating together, sleeping together, sitting together, and the use of same clothes, garlands, and pastes."^[1][2] whether the citation is relevant or not. David dclork li (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay? And what do you want me to do? The only time I edited that article was to remove vandalism. I'm not familiar with its contents. Awsomaw (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted you to check the reference of the statement whether it is mentioned or not. David dclork li (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't think I'm going to check that for you. You can check it yourself and make a decision about this with your own judgment :). I'm not really an active editor, and this is not an article that I specialize in.Awsomaw (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Awsomaw, I've been pulling my hair all morning trying to figure out how to go back and add my edit summary to my change. I was in the process of explaing the copy/edit over to another page, when I hit the Return key, which seemed to publish the change instead of giving me a new paragraph :) I also tried to restore the content in order to start over, but as a new editor, I wasn't sure if I would mess it up more. So thank you for the notice and restoration. I will go back now and explain why I moved the sentence and its citations over to cyanobacteria, and why I felt it didn't belong on the Aphanizomenon flos-aquae page. I will also paste this response over at your talk page. I'm not sure if I sure respond both here and the talk page, so I'll do both. Again, thank you for this help. I'm excited to become a good member of the Wiki Editors. Braintoniq (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Braintoniq No worries! Thanks for the clarification. Happy editing :) Awsomaw (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AwsomawI appreciate a watchful eye, and to have met my first editor. Cheers. Braintoniq (talk) 20:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Braintoniq Good to meet you too. And also, I also sometimes forget to add an edit summary as well, and you can't change an edit summary after the fact, but I usually will go back to the page and add a space somewhere, and then write my edit summary that I forgot to write. That way people can still see why you did it. Awsomaw (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great trick :) just add a space and comment on that! I will definite try that next time I mess up.

There are a number of incorrect, outdated or misleading citation links in the few pages that I have knowledge in. I suspect this is common across much of the sciences. As an editor, is the objective to edit these with as much gentleness as possible? I suppose there are occasional disagreements, and just explain as thoroughly as possible and cite, cite, cite. Braintoniq (talk) 01:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that, generally speaking, you should be bold when editing. This does not necessarily preclude being gentle, but most pages lay dormant for years, so if you don't do it, no one will. Unless you are editing really popular topics that gets daily edits, the best strategy is just to go ahead and change and fix what you think needs to be fixed. Just always make sure to leave a reliable source and an edit summary.

If you make a really large change to an article, sometimes it is good to leave a note on the talk page. Then your edit summary can be something like "moving this section to another article, see talk page for more details." Even when I do this to medium-trafficked articles, usually no one cares or responds for years, so long as it makes sense.

And if you think that a major or significant change needs to be made on a really high-trafficked article, it might be good to start the discussion on the talk page. I generally don't touch those articles though. Hope this helps. Awsomaw (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of this. Onward! Braintoniq (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]