The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for the Contribution for Article, Sheikh Aboobacker Ahmed. Irfan Arimbra (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox religious biography/Mufti has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:53, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you are factually correct, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. George Custer's Sabre 01:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes sir, improving...🥰 Kutyava (talk) 02:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Sunni Students' Federation. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not remove template without giving valid reasons as you did here. The article only has a single source. A lot of things are not sourced. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is under construction. Kutyava (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've added an "Under construction" template and removed redundant links. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, sir Kutyava (talk) 13:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Siraj Daily Header.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on P. K. Parakkadvau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kutyava, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mohammed Eeza, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims significance; A11 cannot be applied to people; text is not promotional. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 10:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	This is to encourage you to continue contributing to Wikipedia - especially your effort to create and edit Islam-related articles which I feel is a neglected area and needs much more editing work. I am a Pakistani-American and have been making this same effort myself for over 6 years now on Wikipedia. Best Regards and my Salaams Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:NPOL,

"The following are presumed to be notable:

Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or sub-national (e.g., province- or state-wide) office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels.[12] This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them. Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage"Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why the explanation put here? Kutyava (talk) 16:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Darul Huda Islamic Academy. ScholarM (talk) 14:32, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Darul Huda Islamic Academy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SQR Ilyas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kutyava,

Thank you for creating Samastha (AP faction).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It is unclear what the three factions are, what that means for the school. It is also unclear who the school serves, what ages and gender.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   17:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm one of the most experienced editors and administrators here working on university articles. I've reviewed the article on Darul Huda Islamic University. As you know, some of the articles here on universities are very much too expansive about details of concern only to current students; on the other hand, readers deserve sufficient verifiable information to know what the school is. Some of the material added by the other editor was indeed not appropriate, but some of it was . I added back what was customary, just the same way I do with all university articles I work on. I still need to check the references. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kutyava, I have reverted your edit once again, please familiarise yourself with Template:Infobox_criminal for the correct parameters to use with the criminal infobox. Mrbuskin (talk) 04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article: https://www.news18.com/amp/news/india/kerala-journalists-death-ias-officers-suspension-extended-2339689.html Kutyava (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Padavalamkuttanpilla. Your recent edit(s) to the page Shajan Skariah appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The page has been already reviewed , So please don't put unnecessary tag Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  06:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Samastha (AP faction). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Samastha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Samastha. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  15:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Samastha (EK faction). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Samastha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Samastha. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  15:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  16:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been already exist by another name Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  12:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Mufti of India you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Armanaziz -- Armanaziz (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grand Mufti of India you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Grand Mufti of India for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Armanaziz -- Armanaziz (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. K. Parakkadavu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. K. Parakkadavu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerala State Sunni Students' Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerala State Sunni Students' Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samastha (AP faction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samastha (AP faction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samastha (EK faction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samastha (EK faction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  00:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kutyava, please do not submit incorrect reports to Administrator intervention against vandalism, as you did here. Padavalamkuttanpilla has never been blocked, and their edits do not constitute vandalism. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 02:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K.M. Basheer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.M. Basheer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sriram Venkitaraman, you may be blocked from editing. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sriram Venkitaraman, you may be blocked from editing. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  12:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to T. G. Mohandas, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  12:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TG Mohandas. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  12:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at T. G. Mohandas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 12:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Padavalamkuttanpilla and Kutyava". Thank you. — Newslinger talk 13:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of journalists killed in India#KM Basheer. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious about your user page and the claim that you have been an editor on Wikipedia since September 2018. Your contribution record shows the earliest edit as August 2019. One of the purposes of a user page is to provide some useful background data for other users. One of the key criteria is that such information should be true. It may also be humorous or even flippant but is should never seek to dissemble. If an editor lies on his or her own user page, that bodes ill for any articles that they may edit. Perhaps you could comment on why this is wrong and whether other user boxes are also fictional, invented or just plain wrong. Thanks  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   05:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand what are you saying. My username has been changed recently. Authordom (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Velella, it looks like Authordom (formerly Kutyava) joined the English Wikipedia in July 2018, but made their first edit in August 2019. — Newslinger talk 05:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Newslinger. I have had some run-ins with editors claiming experience that was not theirs to claim. Maybe I am getting a little trigger happy in my jaundiced old age. Apologies Authordom if I appeared to be questioning your credentials, but a lag of over a year in making the first edit, is a bit unusual. Regards  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   07:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Velella and Newslinger, Thanks and Welcome always! Authordom (talk) 08:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I be allowed to make a suggestion? What you have reported is certainly not edit warring - yet. There must be a civil discussion of the article talk page about the content and try and find a satisfactory way forward, I doubt whether any admin is going to find in your favour when it is clearly, at present, a content dispute. Even without a discussion on the talk page it is customary to have warned the other editor about their conduct. Now I might well agree with your concerns but there must be due process and you may risk your own reputation by reporting others on so little evidence. Perhaps a chance to reflect ?  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   09:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Velella. Aside from clear-cut cases of vandalism or other blatant policy violations (which this is not), it is generally more productive to start a discussion on the article's talk page than to send a warning template to the other editor. — Newslinger talk 13:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karnataka State Sunni Students' Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnataka State Sunni Students' Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  08:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ma'bar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Authordom reported by User:Padavalamkuttanpilla (Result: ). Thank you. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  08:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have joined wikipedia few days ago. There are some important parameters missing from the bio infobox of the wikipedia article named as Shamsheer Vayalil.These parameters are nationality, title and degrees(MBBS and MD in alma mater column). I could have done this myself if the parameters were missing in the article paragraph but these are missing in bio infobox and I don't have enough knowledge in formatting bio infobox. Please! add these information. Thanks. 786 harsh life (talk) 09:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just expanded the information. Authordom (talk) 09:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Though world knows that all Indians are famous for their kind and humble nature but still I'm giving you this award as a formality. Many many thanks for your contribution to Shamsheer Vayalil article. I hope you'll maintain your kind and helping nature.

• I'm sorry, I'm a little emotional type Indian and generally thank 🙏💕 someone in this way only. Hope you'll not mind and we'll again work together in future. I'm extremely happy at least I found someone like me ( Indian🇮🇳) on wikipedia.

Thanks a lot...

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for Violation of our policy on biographies of living persons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Karnataka State Sunni Students' Federation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While fixing an unrelated bug, I saw an issue with cites at Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar that I wanted to mention since you were the contributor here. When using the cite tool to fill out a cite for The Times of India (at least), it mis-parses articles like Grant full membership to India: Kanthapuram to OIC as:

{{Cite web
|url         = https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kozhikode/grant-full-membership-to-india-kanthapuram-to-oic/articleshow/68227741.cms
|title       = Grant full membership to India: Kanthapuram to OIC {{!}} Kozhikode News - Times of India
|last        = Mar 2
|first       = TNN <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> Updated:
|last2       = 2019
|website     = The Times of India
|language    = en
|access-date = 2019-08-07
|last3       = Ist
|first3      = 8:44
}}

(spaces added for clarity). This has the following problems that need to be corrected manually:

1. |last=Mar 2 and |last2=2019 should be removed and |date=2 March 2019 added.
2. |first=TNN | Updated: should be removed and |agency=TNN added (at least I think it's saying that this is a regurgitation of a TNN staff/newswire piece and that's what this parm is for).
3. In |title=, remove the trailing " - Times of India"
4. Link |website=The Times of India if you like: |website=[[The Times of India]]
5. Remove |last3=Ist and |first3=8:44

In a non-newswire article, it behaves slightly differently:

{{cite web 
|last1       = Feb 5 
|first1      = Jaikrishnan Nair | TNN | 
|title       = Sexual abuse allegations: Three priests stripped of spiritual role {{!}} Kozhikode News - Times of India 
|url         = https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kozhikode/sexual-abuse-allegations-three-priests-stripped-of-spiritual-role/articleshow/73965104.cms 
|website     = The Times of India 
|language    = en
}}

1. |last1=Feb 5 contains the abbreviated month and day instead of |last=. The year is missing altogether (and must be obtained from the article manually).
2. |first1=Jaikrishnan Nair | TNN | Contains the first and last name of the author and | TNN |. I'm not sure if this means it is still a wire piece, but with a named author.

I've been seeing/fixing these for a while – I guess I'll figure out where to report it so maybe the tool can be fixed. Meanwhile, be aware that these cites need to be manually corrected. I know it has problems reading other (in fact, most) sites, too, e.g., it rarely gets the date. Cheers. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I respectfully check very carefully the accusations and blocking warnings you have recently been making against another editor ... I believe at least some of the specific accusations you have made to be unwarranted and I suggest you retract them and at least some apologies are in order. If you are concerned about specific content matters then that is another matter. I would urge you to think carefully on these matters. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Welfare Party of India, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sambhil32 (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. @Sambhil32: Why you removing the link from sources and sourced contents. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because the rediff is not a reliable news source. This link is a opinion piece by someone who has no author profile or details on the site. If you still think the source should be added you may add it back to the article. Thank you. --Sambhil32 (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Mufti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Senior Scholars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Karnataka Muslim Jamaat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have warned User:Padavalamkuttanpilla for not adding promotional materials in any article. I think he didn't take the warning seriously. Few days ago he removed the profile picture of Shamsheer Vayalil from the bio infobox and placed a new one. The previous bio infobox image belonged to common category whose information is given in External links section of the article.

• He also removed link of 'VPS Healthcare' from the known for parameter (in bio infobox).

I requested him(on his talk page) to revert his edits but he took no action.I think some rivalry is going on. Could you please give your valuable time for this?

Thanks. Pardaehnndsvver (talk) 12:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Authordom, I have replied to a part of this request on the article talk, you should move it there. and also enlist your name in the thread of being asked for help. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what i do? ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You filed two reports at WP:SPI, each with no evidence. In one I've asked you to provide evidence. I deleted the other. These filings are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear wikipedia user, I have noticed that you have your own interests in wikipedia, and you contribute well to the related articles. Congratulations. Sharing your knowledge in a particular field to the world is the very core thing every wikipedian should have. But the very basic principle is that nobody in the world is perfect. If you present something before a community (whether online or offline), you may be challenged, you may be questioned, somebody may request fact check, and somebody with the authority may take the action if you are wrong. You have to accept all those because you have the responsibility of the knowledge you share to others. I've noticed that you opened a sock puppet investgation on me and another unrelated user without valid evidence, just because you didn't like the edits these two random users made to your favorite topics. You couldn't revert those edits, you couldn't challenge those edits, because they were almost genuine, so you called for a sockpuppet investgation. This behaviour so disruptive and a good wikipedian shouldn't do this. So I'll watch all your future contributions to find any misbehaviour like this, and you'll be corrected or reported. Thank you. Sneha Raphael SnehaRaphael1996 (talk) 23:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your closure at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/As'ad_Madani was incorrect. As the nominator you must withdraw the nomination, you cannot close the nomination as you are an involved party. Please revert your edit and follow the correct proceedure for withdrawal, which is outlined here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). In future with any article you choose to nominate for deletion, please ensure you effectively undertake WP:BEFORE – in particular carrying out actions described in D1. Thank you.--Goldsztajn (talk) 09:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 08:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please read WP:Overtagging as in most cases the two most important tags are sufficient, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 00:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Grand Mufti, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Hammad (Talk!) 10:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad to see that you revert good edits and tag them as vandalism. It was proven from neutral sources like dawn and Pakistan’s Institute of Policy Studies that Mufti Muneeb Saheb Hafidhahullah is not the Grand Mufti anyway. You have recently vandalized the article again. If the Urdu resources you provided by Mufti Azam title are agreed upon including the Jhang one, then Mufti Rafi Usmani is also a Grand Mufti of Pakistan. See for example this report on Jang.com.pk . Here in this report, none of the two are referred to as Grand Muftis. The point being that since it's not an official title by the government, it's not used uniformly by neutral sources. If some sources mention it, they mention it with others as well as a mark of respect (and not to endorse it officially). Hope you understand and stop yourself from doing all this vandalism. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC) A BBC report also states that Mufti Rafi Usmani has the position of Grand Mufti. report may be seen. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC) In this issue], Mufti Taqi Usmani has been referred as Mufti-e-Azam - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) This Sama TV report] refers Mufti Rafi as Mufti Azam while the other Sama Tv report does not mention Muneeb Saheb as Grand Mufti - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC) This report of Jang also says Mufti Rafi as Mufti-e-Azam. All I wanted to say, that this is not a official position. It is a honorary title more used by followers and few people use it as a mark of respect. So, please avoid vandalizing the Grand Mufti and Muneeb-ur-Rehman pages. Love - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In many articles, Muneeb and Rafi have been used as the Mufti of Pakistan by the national news agencies. Rafi is not a government official, but Muneeb is the highest Islamic religious authority in Pakistan appointed by then Prime Minister Imran Khan. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sad to see that again from you. None of the two are officially State Muftis. Mufti e Azam is only honorary as proven from neutral sources. Agreed that Mufti Muneeb is in Ruet e Hilal Committee, and thus holds no other office than that. You may add Mufti e Azam has a honorary title not as a office as no such office exists in Pakistan. Moreover,mark of respect does not make one the top authority. PM Khan has recently used more high titles for Mufti Taqi when he was attacked. That doesn't make him officially the highest authority. Cheers - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 12:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 07:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 08:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom,

Thank you for creating Government Medical College, Idukki.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article needs to be expanded as it's too short. Also, reliable referenced needs to added. Please note not to copy-paste directly from source while re-writing the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Amkgp (talk) 14:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Medical colleges in Idukki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bareilly/mufti-asjad-raza-conferred-with-qadi-al-qudaat-title/articleshow/68677678.cms What u think about this article? --KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 05:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Allama Mufti Muhammad Asjad Raza Khan Qadri is the Qadi Al-Qudaat (Chief Islamic Justice) of India but the Grand Mufti of India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 17:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Markazu Sultaniyya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ICI has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ICI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ma'bar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Islamic Community of India. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Islamic Community of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Widefox; talk 15:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Islamic Community of India. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Widefox; talk 15:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Government Medical College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Birth and death dates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Birth and death dates/doc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Birth and death dates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Authordom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "doc".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arabi Malayalam-language literature has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arabi Malayalam-language songs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arabi Malayalam-language education has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Samastha has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Samastha (EK Faction) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]