I love that you edit the Dresden Files pages. So cool, always nice to find fellow fans.192.249.47.186 (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is! I was always more a fan of classic fantasy than urban fantasy, but the Dresden Files (and a couple others) have definitely made me appreciate it. Plus, it's always nice reading a series set in your home city. AtomsOrSystems (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed., a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

I've walked into the middle of a minefield with the hope of drawing a map on the way out, got it. ;) AtomsOrSystems (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really that bad, honestly. Just be considerate towards other editors, and it should be fine. --TS 23:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I figured. My snark doesn't have much chance to express itself on Wikipedia, I suppose I just let it off the leash for a moment. Thank for coming back to clarify, though! AtomsOrSystems (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely did ping me, I just don't edit in the evenings, and the page is locked to IP editors anyway.

I feel that "Some of the people using the hashtag have said that their goal" is a mouthful and doesn't sound professional. It should either be rephrased to "Those using the hashtage have defined their goal as" or "Supporters of the movement have defined their goal as". I'm not really sure how it can be controversial that the users of the hashtag support the movement -- that's what the hashtag is for, and that's generally how they discriminate between "actions in GG's name" and those without (well, that and whether the action is good PR or not). I'm also fairly confident that most of the RS acknowledge the claim that "Gamergate is actually about ethics in gaming journalism", though I can dredge them up if this is in dispute.

Not sure what you meant about my "forgetting to change to prominent" -- the article already uses "prominent", and I wanted to change that as it gives the false connotation that the list is merely naming the famous victims of Gamergate, rather than the main victims of Gamergate.192.249.47.186 (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I seem to have gotten turned around backwards with the primary/prominent change, I think it was late for me. I agree with you, and I've struck my comment in the talk.

I think your second paragraph may be addressed to Strongjam, although I agree with you on wordiness. My only other point, I believe, was the suggestion that we continue to list the primary targets as part of a larger group, such as primary targets of the attacks include rather than primary targets of the attacks were.

Since the talk page is currently locked to IP editors, and I believe I remember you saying you're not interested in creating an account, is there any input you would like me to add to the talk page on this discussion? (kind of a semi-protected edit of the talk-page.) AtomsOrSystems (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed "Some" to "Many" to match up with the section it's summarizing. My first reaction to changing just to a blanket statement is that its difficult to make any blanket statements about GG. However I'll take a look at the sources to see if we should re-word. — Strongjam (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with "includes". My only quibble is with using "prominent" instead of "primary", since it feels (to me, at least), like it is downplaying how much abuse these people recieved.

Thank you for the offer, but I've already had HJ give me the heads up that using an IP account could be considered close to giving the impression of impropriety, even if I haven't technically done anything wrong, so I definitely don't want to do anything that would get credulous people in a twist about "meatpuppeting". I'll just wait until the lock on the talk page expires -- there's very little of value that I have to add to the conversation, anyway, since there's already a plethora of intelligent, honest editors there anyway.192.249.47.186 (talk) 22:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Your caution is admirable. AtomsOrSystems (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Without asking you to make any specific edits or take any specific stances whatsoever, it would be comforting if you could take a look at the "Brandwatch elaboration" section.192.249.47.186 (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have indeed been keeping an eye on it (since well before this talk post). AtomsOrSystems (talk) 18:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for signing up at WikiProject Accessibility. However, your username appears to be the name of an organization, which is against the username policy; it might be a good idea to get it changed. Graham87 02:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's... it is? I certainly didn't choose it for that, and a cursory Google search doesn't show me anything. I chose it because I'm equal parts a science nerd (Atoms, Systems, etc.) and a book nerd (Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man). I've been using it as an internet handle for a while now, and I've never come across an organization. AtomsOrSystems (talk) 03:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw your request on your talk page for replies there, apologies. I will move my response there. AtomsOrSystems (talk) 03:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that ... I just assumed it was the name of an organization ... I guess I've encountered way too many usernames like that! Also, because I use a screen reader, I didn't notice (until now) that your username consisted of three words stuck together ("atoms or systems") ... it read the username way too fast for me to figure that out! I'm now having fun imagining a nuclear technology company with this name ... hopefully they'd work with both atoms and systems! Graham87 07:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I was assuming it was something like that. I was sincerely curious if you had found an organization using the name that I had somehow missed, over the several years I've been using this as an internet handle. I think that a nuclear company named this would be rather terrifying... although they would certainly keep with the "into ruin hurled" theme. :D Thanks again for the welcome! AtomsOrSystems (talk) 12:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For cooperation and collaborative editing on The Dresden Files. You've made it fun to once again edit some of my favorite article. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 13:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a mistake was made because editing that reversed was of another user. See here [1]. --190.146.94.64 (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, and I apologize. I must have mixed up IP addresses. I have removed the notice from your talk, and will move it to the other IP user's. Again, sorry, and thanks for pointing it out to me! -- ATOMSORSYSTEMS ^(TALK) 05:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AtomsOrSystems. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 08:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui ^雲_水 08:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AtomsOrSystems. You have new messages at Jim Carter's talk page.
Message added 10:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jim Carter 10:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AtomsOrSystems. You have new messages at Jim Carter's talk page.
Message added 05:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jim Carter 05:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And my first automated RfC is oddly on-point. -- ATOMSORSYSTEMS ^(TALK) 01:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Robert Kagan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Robot Chicken episodes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Multi-sport events. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Six Nations Championship. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Breda O'Brien. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Morisco. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Project for the New American Century. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Einstein Cross. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Landmark Worldwide. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Palestinian stone-throwing. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shaygan Kheradpir. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing this article Mathias 'Paddy' Bauler about a crooked Chicago alderman - want to help? There's been a lot written about him Victor Grigas (talk) 02:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Yuletide!

Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)

Rhoark (talk) 00:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MDMA. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State of Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Carter (film). Legobot (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 Stanley Cup Finals. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hilton Worldwide. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AtomsOrSystems! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phoenix and Ashes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Reserved for the Cat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:THSRPNTSSH2001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]